topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 9:32 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 ... 76next
726
http://www.anologue.com/

Sorry, I don't really know what else to say except there's a Killer Startup article which I didn't really understand.

http://www.killersta...w-way-to-communicate

It says something about Google Wave but it seems like just a chat room...
727
Living Room / Will Nokia hand their destiny to Google?
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 08, 2010, 05:30 AM »
Kevin as a long time user of Maemo I defiantly believe that it was successful for Nokia. Not in sales numbers but I don’t think they ever expected it to be. Where it was a success was in proving that Nokia can build and work in the Open Source world, it also allowed them recruit the Linux devs they need now.

I think Nokia have made the right decision to build their own system and at the same time completely open source it. This way they can use there considerable resources to be controllers of there own destiny while at the same time attracting other manufactures to Meego. From an OS point of view Maemo/Meego is already very strong. From a UI point of view time will tell but one thing you can’t say is that they are starting from scratch here.

Personally I'm not interested in the business side of cell phones but from a social perspective this looks interesting. (the comments, less so the article)

It's like a movie about a former champion and aging veteran. Can he/will he beat out the newer and younger generations of champions after a long lay-off?

Find out in the future which mobile operating system you will be using!



from Giga Om
728
Thanks IainB.

Those things look interesting.

Preferably:

-analysis of goals

and

-superannuation

Could you clarify those?
729
Living Room / The Fallacy of One Thing Leading to Another
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 07, 2010, 08:44 PM »
Its funny because there is so much hypocrisy.

In Japan the rape rates are so low, obviously the erotic things they produce must help them cope, but they are deemed as 'disgusting.'

And also ever since VHS and porn came out rape rates have dropped about 70%.

YES rape is totally wrong but it's a video game. If you choose do it outside, then you are a sick person.
Just like how if you play GTA you are NOT guaranteed to go and shoot hookers and carjack. Those options are made by people, not forced. Video games do not have a gun to their head, saying do this and do that. So why is a common sexual fantasy like rape looked at as obscene? Cause it's not the 'right' thing and people tend to think one thing always leads to another.

But shooting heads off and blowing up limbs? That's all day.

The world today is hurt so easily by pixels.. I'm sorry, just venting!

I had a longer comment underneath the topic but this one is much shorter and is much easier shareable although I have my doubts that it's much better at making the argument for the controversial side.




from Listverse.com
730
I paid for this game and like others cannot get past the coal mine. FIX IT IWIN! or give me my money back

Oh why oh why?!

Governor of poker 1 was IMO the best single player no limit hold-em poker I've played.

It had the hardest ai.

It was pick up and play.

Even when the ai cheats it punishes you for playing aggressively rather than winning hail mary flushes.

...and yet with one single bug and a hard to google for support forum, suddenly it's impossible to know whether a fix has been released or not...on a game that seemingly is unanimously heralded as adding more things while containing only graphic quirks:

I play the original all the time and I found this very disappointing in it's new character graphics while at the poker table. I miss the drop down menu on the top, the rooms seem too cluttered, the Fold/Skip feature is jagged and jerky, the interplay with the chips by the characters is awful compared to the original, and some characters are blurry and some costumes lack their crisp and clean appearance. I love the other features and the variety of play locations, just wish they'd have stuck with the original graphics format. However, I admit I'd buy it, if not for the premium price, in spite of its shortcomings. I never turn on the volume of my games, so I can't comment on that aspect.
-KathyEh

That said it seems to be fixed but instead of a forum, you're relying on a user review page:

uninstall the game and then reinstall it then activate it they have fixed the problem
-foxy1956

Not exactly buyer confidence boosting.



from: Who knows, these indie games can be confusing to narrow down which developer made what
731
Living Room / Re: Why does digital media cost so much?
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 07, 2010, 07:30 PM »
Edit: Sorry, it's kind of hard not going off-topic with this post because we're kind of going in the realms of what we think is needed for cheap digital media to succeed.

No, I was actually thinking of the reverse based on what I've seen many of those "submit your articles and get payed if more people click on your page" services like Hubpages end up as.

Some of these services generate high content relative to blogs but it also generates high amounts of low quality submissions that people generally don't profit as much compared to having a PPC ad on a blog when an author strikes upon a mega-article that has loads of people reading the link.

The model is slightly different but I think the model is a case where cheap and free are going to have similar trends of community failure.

These sites taper off from reaching critical mass because people started getting very little income from those site and the site themselves can't generate enough views that it either can't pay the rent and drops out or the site becomes a walled garden for generally free articles with lots of links on the articles themselves and the interest overall wanes down. (This while factoring the sites initially having a more comfortable interface than separate blogging services and the pay incentive increases commenting on articles)

This is what I meant about too many lightning needing to strike though.

There's a catch-22 between the service needing to already be a reputable service and the reverse, the service is better off not being a reputable service, gaining small amounts of loyal readers so that by the time it hits that payload of views, you already have tons of free marketers (in loyal readers) backing you up as a reputable service that it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy of credibility.

This especially holds true if each central repository design needs to be battle tested like the case with DRM. It's the small ones that got big that most people trust to already have gone through this battle and know more about the pros and flaws of the system itself. (which then reduces the worries of people submitting to the site)

Finally the central repository can only reach mass critical point if people are actually submitting "quality reviews" into those sites rather than posting them into social networks like GoodReads.

Reviews are more crucial than books in my opinion. Especially if the reviews themselves generate comments which helps in capturing suggested books and creating a sort of crowdsourced online best seller effect for non-book readers which in themselves become an alternative view from that of say published paid reviewers.

That is where I feel the content model for e-books often fails.

Repositories are trying to build...well e-commerce repositories rather than networks.

Yet it's the network themselves that are stealing the thunder of the central repositories because they are collecting reviews and thus collecting credibility excepting sites like Lulu.com which are pioneers and early bird implementors.

If you don't believe me, here are what social networks are building up to:

Fair enough, but that assumes the repository already is existing and has been proven to be a place where buyers are.  You won't get the content in the first place unless you reduce the worries/work/both of the writer(s).  And without that, you will never get the traffic that will allow you to ensure quality in the method you suggest.

My thoughts for this are that once you get a significant quantity of content that brings in enough people, the quality will rise (probably some sort of user ranking would be required).  As quality rises, the number of people will grow.  It becomes a spiral.  Once you hit critical mass, it no longer becomes an issue of driving traffic, it then becomes a quality issue.  Until then, it is a traffic issue (which admittedly does require quality in the first place, but traffic is a much more significant issue at first).

That said, I disagree that once you hit critical mass, it no longer becomes an issue of driving traffic.

Just ask Digg/Yahoo/MySpace that question.

This doesn't mean social networks are the next gen repositories but just as in martial arts "position before submission" - it's the ones who position themselves for the explosion of e-books while establishing their userbase that have the most leverage and the ones who only provide the "ease" to set up the "content"...well I'm a bit skeptical because self-publishing is not going to be similar to how Amazon succeeded in my opinion.

(Although I do believe there's a way to circumvent this, I think most cheap e-book lovers and e-book repositories and even on the fence users don't respect a type of system until it matures or gets implemented well enough that I think it's going to be a service not built on ease but built on networking and viral marketing that will conquer the e-book market and end up convincing both sides to sell and buy cheaper e-books.)
732
Developer's Corner / Re: Style guidelines for how to structure helpfiles?
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 07, 2010, 06:35 PM »
I think a screencast is the first resort for many people because it is a combination of introduction + help file.

There are some programs though that don't require full-on screencasts but rather an animated demonstration on your landing page.

I think Taskdaddy falls into those categories.

I'm not really sure why you see that as "not the best thing to do" as the only way I could see it being better is if the dialog itself was inside the search box to make it even more minimal. (I'm mostly referring to web services though)

I could see what you mean though if you're referring to this as being overwhelming for a help file: http://www.outlookco...edetail.aspx?id=1642

I wasn't able to actually open the .exe because I didn't have Outlook but from my personal viewpoint, it's not the structure that's the problem but how you have to read the help file itself that complicates things. (Most people initially using TaskDaddy probably wouldn't read the help file as much as head straight to the syntax, skim the right section for their needs and head back to the program immediately)

My specific suggestions would probably be to copy the lay-out of this page and rename the syntax label to "keyboard syntax" or something casual sounding like "symbols" (although "syntax" might make it more professional sounding depending on the user - I'm mostly thinking of the way some help files name keyboard shortcuts as "shortcuts")

http://www.remembert...m/services/smartadd/

Next...

Drop the interface label for an "advanced" folder and add the label "command-line" to describe how to install/enable the command-line interface.

Then add another label titled "syntax" and insert the explanation for the command-line syntax.

For the interface pictures, I would suggest adding those to the intro below the description.

Put "Tips" in a separate label under advanced.

This is just for how I would change it though but the best advice should come from users of the program itself.

Some other minor things I might change if I know how to code:
  • change text to "press F1 for help"
  • drop either the help icon or drop the definition
  • make a show help-file pop-up on inital open (with a checkbox for making it appear again or not) - so that you don't need to tell the user to type on the textbox
  • link the help icon or F1 to the syntax page instead of the intro if you haven't done so already
733
I don't understand hash checkers but just hypothetically speaking are portable apps safer than say a cellphone with some encrypted device?

Technically that's like remote PC usage correct or am I mistaken? (assuming it has security apps)
734
Developer's Corner / Re: Style guidelines for how to structure helpfiles?
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 07, 2010, 04:35 PM »
As a non-developer, I think generic help files are growing outdated.

There may be some things that specifically in need of a help file but generally you want a screencast or a demo page. (i.e. a notetaker that has introductory texts already exposed in the lay-out of the program when a user opens it)

I think your best bet though is to narrow down the purpose of your program and then do a search for similar programs that are popular in Delicious and then compare their help file lay-outs with your own.

Generally I would think the important part is to narrow down the search and the actual guide. Everything else is secondary even the structure although that is where having your program be able to support the help in it's structure rather than having a separate section helps.

If worse comes to worse, you could look at how DC is organized as a forum. This should apply even to offline help files.
735
Living Room / Re: Why does digital media cost so much?
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 07, 2010, 01:45 PM »
A better question is how can you create a business proposition that does transfer the extra risk to you, but does lower the WORK and WORRY on the writer while lowering costs for all involved?  That is what would be needed to be adopted, as once the content is there, the people will come.  As the saying goes, "Content is King".  Now, extrapolate that from books to all content - music, programs, whatever.

As the saying goes:

Content is king but... <insert marketing/copywriting/networking/etc.> is Queen.

I disagree that over the internet it works like that.

Actually it works like that everywhere but the realm changes further when it comes to self-publishing.

A central repository IMO should increase the Work and Worry of the writer.

At first, this seems counter to the desires of everyone but if the writer feels said repository is where everyone hangs out and the success of his book there is crucial to increasing the sales of their books long term, then they have more incentive to send their better books there than one that merely makes it easy. (and maybe even at a limited cheaper price like a Bits du Jour incentive style website)

In fact, the art of pricing and value still comes into play in such sites before it hits the sell button. A rotten apple can spoil a fresh one.

If a customer discovers that a book he payed for is well...not worth the price. His impression of the site changes even if he sticks around to buying something else.

Although I'm not saying the interface or business model should make it difficult for the writer to submit his work, if you make it too easy then the initial quality and majority of the content that's going to be in that site are most likely going to be low value. (relative to quality, not just price)

It's just the nature of the system. Even published books are more decentralized than a central repository of e-books. Even sites like Amazon has the benefit that when they started their site, online transactions were the ones in need of credibility - not the books themselves.
736
Living Room / Re: Why does digital media cost so much?
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 06, 2010, 06:34 PM »
Yeah, I was about to disagree with you there until I read the latter half of your post.

In the end it's still optimistic though because the people who are part of the problems are also often those who unseat and change the landscape and that brief hole of change is something to be optimistic about because it gives room for someone who really wants to offer something "an opportunity" rather than constantly having to battle through inertia.

737
Living Room / Re: Why does digital media cost so much?
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 06, 2010, 05:55 PM »
I specifically mentioned that this centralized platform would give higher royalties to the creator(s) due to leaving out (or rather, minimalizing) the middleman and all the dead-tree publishing costs. It costs less to produce, so you can still charge customers less while paying the author/artist/band more.

Oh sorry Deozaan. This reply wasn't so much saying you didn't provide an argument as much as replying to Innuendo saying "nope, not end of thread".

First of all, anybody who thinks that just because a book is published by a big publisher it has a quality guarantee is wrong. It's not hard to find spelling, grammar, or other typesetting errors in books. And that doesn't even go into details of whether the content is high quality, since that's more a matter of opinion. You can also look at other closed systems (like Apple's App/iTune's Store) to see that just because has to pass a "screening test" doesn't mean everybody is going to want it.

They may be wrong but that's what the majority feels like.

I'm not so much pointing out that there's a perfect quality guarantee as much as pointing out "it's no different from many people going gaga over Apple's products".

It's an emotional judgement call rather than a logical one.

But maybe now I'm participating in the digression here. My point of this thread is that the technology we have in this digital age is enough to reduce costs of production to negligible amounts. So why are the traditional rates being charged? I understand why it started that way, since that's what it costs to actually produce the goods and make a good profit. But why are authors and artists still selling themselves short to publishing houses or music labels who take most of the money for themselves while charging customers what is now an exorbitant amount (considering cost of production) for digital media?

That's the thing. They're not.

...but really the issue is best answered by those individual authors.

There are actually lots of e-books being sold over the internet.

Am I just asking too soon, and is it just a matter of time?

Yep. That's it in my opinion/

Too soon is relative though.

It's like asking why no one would make a Booster Gold movie or a Shazam movie or a Night Thrasher movie or a Maximum Carnage movie or a Question movie.

You can speed it up by actually making the movie yourself or you can get what you want but still not at the price you want like with lulu.com's e-books.

Or is there something else holding everything back? Why aren't the big-name NYT best-selling authors doing something like this? Especially since they already have the fame to successfully migrate to the new system, bringing their fans along with them.

Actually guys like Neil Gaiman have done such things. From wikipedia:

To celebrate the 7th anniversary of the blog, the novel American Gods was provided free of charge online for a month.

It's all about marketing and timing so as not to devalue their own books.

...but it's again a macro-issue with lots of tentacles holding such concepts like central repositories, cheap e-book reasons, lack of someone taking the opportunity to prove everyone wrong while getting richer...

@JavaJones

Kind of a depressing outlook I know. There's massive potential in technology, but our relationships to it, and to the content built on/in it, doesn't change at nearly the same rate. We as a culture, society as a whole, doesn't embrace what it enables you to do until long after the fact. Look back at the history of recorded music, TV, even the printing press (you mean monks who hand copy will be out of a job!? GASP!) and much more. It has happened this way time and again, I doubt this time will be much different, though the potential is there for wonderful revolution/evolution.

I wouldn't call that a depressing outlook. That's why I don't like words like inertia to describe these things.

It's like saying Apple was just waiting for inertia to release their products.

Part of that is true but part of that is the optimistic outlook of "acceptance".

It's what allows every generation to create their identity and it's what allows companies to seemingly rise over monopolistic-like entities who were not as good at delivering a quality product.

If every large company was always flexible to change, they could potentially maintain a much harder to penetrate through monopoly and with that monopoly comes the convenience to reduce the quality of their products. (although this is not saying Apple is completely grassroots but that slow process is what allows for openings in the market and opportunities for lesser companies to become more well known.)
738
Edit: ...or rather what's the best free screen recorder for uploading wink files to youtube?

Anyone has one for converting swf video to a flv video to upload for youtube?

I'm using wink but it only saves to swf and I'm not really using it for full blown screencasts, just screen capture with annotations. (I don't really need audio)

P.S. Not really looking for media converter as the forums showed some people having problems with converting wink's swf. (cut-off video)
739
Thanks nevf.

I don't have Surfulator (I've always tried to keep an eye on it but haven't taken the plunge) and I forgot the link but someone on DC said something about the files not syncing correctly. I'm not sure if this is the same issue of having to close Surfulator correctly.

740
Living Room / Re: Why does digital media cost so much?
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 05, 2010, 02:41 PM »
Btw here's a mashable link for those wondering what central repositories there are:

http://mashable.com/.../03/01/publish-book/

I would say aside from Lulu, CreateSpace is the only one I know of but I don't know how well off they are after the e-book price hike from Kindle books.
741
Living Room / Re: Why does digital media cost so much?
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 05, 2010, 02:30 PM »
I can't say for the general community but it could even be less than that.

People generally remember a free e-book connected to a blog more than they remember a cheap e-book connected to a central repository.

...but with that said, an e-book is even better if it's connected to a newsletter to me. (Feels more authentic)...than a download link.

Generally speaking it just comes off to me that selling and not just publishing is itself becoming a revolution.

If you're a self-publisher, you no longer want people to pay you after they acquired the item especially with digital items. Now the better marketing schemes are those where the author makes you want to pay prior to acquiring an e-book and so by the time you acquired the book, the donation link is merely a formality in case people acquired your e-book elsewhere but most of the payers are coming from direct "already thinking of paying" customers.

I forgot the term but it goes something like "nowadays it's not about attracting people but keeping their attention on what you're selling." I would think this goes especially for e-books where if you can get people to download a free e-book and donate, you can sell a 1$ e-book and then you can sell a 10$ e-book better than if you have a central repository where you always sell 1$ e-book in the hopes of being found. (although sites like lulu help too but that's where the trade-off of having a donation link comes - if they acquire it on your blog, I think it turns your readers away but if it's spread out over the internet, people are more tolerant and will click on the donate link)
742
Living Room / Re: Why does digital media cost so much?
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 05, 2010, 02:17 PM »
A 1$ price with e-books though is even lower.

People don't want to read long texts in blogs already, can you imagine a person thinking...oh 1$ dollar e-book it's just one dollar let's get a bunch of people to buy it.

Not really unless the blog itself was high quality and a high quality blog could already encourage users to donate. In this case as with the above posts, a 1$ dollar e-book requires too much to even consider paying for and it would be a whole lot better to provide a free e-book with a donation link as then someone might find value in what you already provided and not what you plan to provide.

P.S. - To also include Deozaan's reply, this doesn't improve the higher the cost of the e-book. A person is not going to buy a 5$ dollar e-book nor a 20$ e-book unless they themselves were partaking in buying e-books in general. Even for a central repository, you're basically trading "paper" book vs. self-published e-book with no guarantee of quality.
743
Living Room / Re: FARK creator doesn't believe in the wisdom of crowds
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 05, 2010, 01:08 PM »
I think it's not as complicated as that rxsantos.

See if this were to happen:

instead of how much it took to manufacture it and how useful is.

Then the issue becomes a similar problem of how do you define useful and what if the manufacturers added all kinds of ads to it which counts in how much it costs?

Thus

In capitalism the value of a product is based on how much people think is worth

Is one of the simpler philosophies to beat out such propaganda because the free market while imperfect is better at determining value than the slower more disconnected arms of the government or of those with the riches to manipulate such powers.

In the political context, this won't happen because:

From political ,we elect crooks every year based on propaganda

Propaganda can't keep third party issues from joining the debates because the people are more empowered to make sure their issues get in.

Only by keeping the fools from participating can the media and political propaganda machine be able to maintain a two party system because then they can pad up the "wise".

One may even argue that there are more wise people than foolish people.

For the fools often can know that they are fools but the wise are often not invested in assisting the fools.

Again, it goes back to what someone said from Quora about a hairpin bend:

    Libertarians, in my perception, are stuck in what I term a "hairpin bend". That is, the people who are less wise than them are frequently indistinguishable from the people who are more wise than them.

    There's a large class of people who disagree with libertarianism because they're clueless about economics, misunderstand the basic tenets and make stupid arguments. There's another, smaller group of people who understand perfectly well how libertarianism works and choose to reject it for intelligent, well thought out reasons. From the outside, both will have roughly the same range of political beliefs.

    So what happens is some people from the first group will have an epiphany, they will finally get libertarianism and they will become a loyal convert. For some fraction of the group who become libertarians, they will have a second epiphany, realize the various fundamental flaws that make it a fundamentally unworkable system and leave libertarianism for a more mainstream political philosophy.

    As you get a boiling off of the most enlightened members, the hairpin bend becomes a concentration of a certain type of person. This, in a large part, IMHO, explains the uniformity of personality of libertarians compared to many other social groups.

    Every time you have a hairpin bend, you tend to see this similar phenomena and it can often be used as a diagnosis for where hairpin bends exist.

    Note: There may well exist further hairpin bends further up the wisdom chain and it does seem some people have an epiphany back into libertarianism. This is mainly a critique of the "naive libertarianism" viewpoint.

http://www.quora.com...know-all-the-answers

I blogged about it but I just can't help sharing this word. It's just so good at pointing out issues like this in a simple metaphor.

Some fools try to swerve towards the other end but the wise try to keep those fools swerving (with the hopes of forming a loop) from reaching the other end because they just want to stay as it is and keep the status quo intact and the wise men are so much more plentier that when things do change, it is only because the wisest men became even wiser but nonetheless the hairpin bend is never fully formed into a loop where the wisest can have access to the most foolish. (Even the internet with it's ease of publishing has trolls and elitists who are secretly satisfied that everything is nearly the same and only complain when their needs are the ones being trampled.)

744
Living Room / Re: Why does digital media cost so much?
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 05, 2010, 12:53 PM »
The problem with greed is that often consumers are greedy too in that they want cheap but high quality books that would put less food on the author's plate than if they just asked for donations directly.  :P
745
Nice redesign nevf. Did you ever fix that issue were Surfulator files weren't syncing well with Dropbox?

I also read something about Free Reader mode. What's that? I haven't really been monitoring the site.
746
professional, extracurricular, personal:

http://calnewport.com/blog/?p=115
747
Living Room / Re: Why does digital media cost so much?
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 04, 2010, 09:01 PM »
I'm honestly trying to see how this is bad for anybody. The author gets paid more, the distributor gets paid enough to cover costs and make a profit (since digital costs are virtually nil once the product is finalized) and the customer gets their own copy of the book for a great price. Even the platform could keep some of the traditional publishing methods, like giving the author an advance and keeping 100% of the money from sold books until reaching a profit, at which point going to the 75%+ revenue to the author and whatever remaining to the platform company.

See that's the thing. It's not bad which is why sites like Lulu try but then it's not the logic of the thing that's keeping the whole thing risky. It's the recognition and the assurance if you will that something like this will work following the logical pattern.

With cost for example, you need someone who will sell books for 1$ and make it big. On the other hand, if it does sell big, most people will most likely flock towards the blog maker and not the repository.

Right now people feel like it's too many lightning hitting the same place to work.

Here's where services like Google and Facebook are born. Good ideas that no one seems willing to grab and run away with. Even Amazon fumbled the whole concept with their expertise.

The e-book reader idea is easier to answer.

For someone who regularly buys e-books already, it's almost an impulse to pay for cheap e-books even if you don't have a reader because the technology is already there.

...but that's like saying the Tablet PC has always been there prior to the IPad or the smartphone has existed prior to the Iphone.

The type of critical mass needed to explode an e-book market lies mostly in the acceptance for e-book readers because until then the e-book doesn't feel like a commodity to many people.

I mean it should from the technical sense but it's really not. There's a social aspect needed for it to be accepted.

That's where the revolution or revolutionary acceptance stage comes in. Forums have always existed but people needed mostly Photobucket + Forums to make social networks flourish. Blogs may be cheap or easy but it takes something like Twitter before most people take the plunge.

These seem like "dodging" the issue but only because there are such ideas that bottomline can only trickle to "if you're sure of it, build it and get rich from a good idea you were right about all along"

That said, maybe the satisfactory answer is one where it comes from the version of those who own sites like Lulu.com. In this case, it's more advantageous to get the answer from the horse's mouth on why their e-books cost that way or why an author/publisher/etc. etc. sells it a certain way at a certain price. (Not saying no one here will come to better educate the situation but you seem like you're really passionate about the whole thing and throwing a wider net may get you the more authoritative answers)

Forgot this:

But that's the point. Lots of "indie" authors are self-publishing digital books on obscure websites/blogs that practically nobody knows about. That's why a central platform is needed, IMO.

Well, that's also part of the problem. They are obscure.

You're not really sure of their quality in general. You don't even know if they will flock to your equally obscure service.

It comes down to marketing.

However as the authors become better at marketing, it becomes more profitable and logical to funnel readers back to their blogs for extra ad income and branding.

In order for a central platform to really capture these authors and still guarantee quality of the books they are selling, it's going to take a whole lot of luck, site marketing, customer encouragement, etc. etc.

...but then that means you're competing not only against Lulu but social network sites like GoodReads who have tons of authors and tons of networking opportunities for authors to funnel themselves back to their e-books.

A central repository then needs to be really really good and right now there's no assured model and therefore fewer and lesser known central repositories.
748
Living Room / Re: Why does digital media cost so much?
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 04, 2010, 07:54 PM »
As app showed, there are such sites.

My guess is that it's more of a case of high risk low rewards.

Individual authors marketing their own individual books can get by this but for the most part, a central repository with no publisher (industry) support will have difficulty gathering customers and taking off.

Even sites like Lulu as well known as they are, they're not as exposed as even some A-list blogs.

Then there's the illusion of value. Paper meets price is still worth it just for the simple case of "paper". Plus e-books meets low price at least from my own perspective has less value than pirated books for the simple reason that if you're going cheap, why not go free?

...and then there's two other intangible forces.

1. Easy publishing also means easy marketing of your own books equals you are better served self-marketing your book in the internet via a blog or a social network and repositories have less authority than your own blogs.

2. E-book readers aren't that cheap yet and they aren't as widespread.

These things tend to happen with revolutionary aspects. They kill if not maim the previous technology and it's often a paradigm shift rather than a media upgrade.
749
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Mini-Review of JungleDisk and ZumoDrive
« Last post by Paul Keith on July 04, 2010, 05:42 PM »
Thanks for the reviews wraith. If ever could you do one for Spider-Oak? That's the application I rarely heard reviews of although the ones I hear are good. (seems to share the same criticism as ZumoDrive as far as memory usage)
750
Oh ok. Thanks app.
Pages: prev1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 [30] 31 32 33 34 35 ... 76next