topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday December 25, 2025, 8:30 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 283 284 285 286 287 [288] 289 290 291 292 293 ... 364next
7176
General Software Discussion / Re: To Vista or not to Vista that is the ?
« Last post by f0dder on May 06, 2007, 07:15 AM »
Heh, that's insane :D
7177
General Software Discussion / Re: To Vista or not to Vista that is the ?
« Last post by f0dder on May 06, 2007, 03:43 AM »
Deleting files was broken even on XP :) - when I use shift+del to get rid of files instead of moving to recycle bin, every once in a while I would get 3-5 of the "are you sure?" messageboxes. Of course clicking *one* of them would delete the file, so saying yes to any of the others gives weird errors about the file not being there.

Fortunately just an explorer.exe bug, the underlying OS code is just fine, so no problems with xplorer^2. I assume the long-time-to-delete problem in vizzzduh is similar.
7178
General Software Discussion / Re: run the same program twice
« Last post by f0dder on May 05, 2007, 05:44 AM »
cmpm: consider msn messenger - you might want to use one account for work-related contacts and another for friends/whatever.
7179
Haha, nice lil' song tinny :)
7180
General Software Discussion / Re: run the same program twice
« Last post by f0dder on May 04, 2007, 06:17 PM »
hey, is there some code you can put in a shortcut of a program's target line that will do that? like the -w or -r NxN that might work, but I don't know of any, Ill have to go look.
-nite_monkey (May 04, 2007, 05:02 PM)

Not generally - it's up to each application whether it wants to allow multiple instances or not. For apps that don't, you'll need to patch them... which requires reverse engineering. In the case of MSN, there's mess.be and apatch which will do it for you.
7181
Living Room / Re: Today I was searching for interesting software...
« Last post by f0dder on May 04, 2007, 12:36 PM »
I wonder how much of the software on that site is spyware infested...
7182
It's a nice idea, but I'm afraid it won't happen - indexing, storing, searching takes a lot of server capacity, which I doubt anybody is going to donate just because it's a nice idea... at least google is (still) one of the lesser evils.
7183
If nobody else wants to do it, give me a few days to gather some strength and dive into COM hell :)
7184
General Software Discussion / Re: To Vista or not to Vista that is the ?
« Last post by f0dder on May 03, 2007, 08:05 AM »
There's always vLite, but I have never touched it.
...Which is NuHi's, the author of nLite, new program to tweak vista :)
7185
General Software Discussion / Re: To Vista or not to Vista that is the ?
« Last post by f0dder on May 03, 2007, 07:05 AM »
I've used nLite for XP for quite a while, works like a charm. His Vista program is still in beta though... but that might be the thing that makes that operating system actually bearable.
7186
I'd prefer somebody else to write the code - I hate COM with a passion, and the various constants and such necessary for this require a lot of digging around to find.
7187
The stuff in the "Summary" pane is stored as a NTFS alternate file stream... I wonder if the format is public, and/or easy to reverse engineer. There might be some APIs or COM interface for manipulating this information as well.
* f0dder goes tinkering.

* f0dder is done tinkering:
C:\q>streams Eula.txt

Streams v1.56 - Enumerate alternate NTFS data streams
Copyright (C) 1999-2007 Mark Russinovich
Sysinternals - www.sysinternals.com

C:\q\Eula.txt:
   :♣SummaryInformation:$DATA   144
   :{4c8cc155-6c1e-11d1-8e41-00c04fb9386d}:$DATA        0

And look and behold, this CodeProject article might just be of help.
7188
General Software Discussion / Re: To Vista or not to Vista that is the ?
« Last post by f0dder on May 03, 2007, 04:20 AM »
Considering that OEM copies have been available for retail sale for maaaaany years now, I guess Microsoft either don't care, or have some pretty frigging big loopholes in their cryptic license agreement. I haven't heard of anybody being sued for selling or buying OEM copies.
7189
General Software Discussion / Re: To Vista or not to Vista that is the ?
« Last post by f0dder on May 03, 2007, 03:40 AM »
The 3rd scenario is what MS calls "Supreme OEMs" (or something like that). In order to avoid processing... whatever, 5 million activation requests they allow the very large OEMs (Dell, HP, Sony, Toshiba, etc.) to install Vista without activating.
-Hirudin
Those are pretty interesting, actually.

It's a mix of storing some key material in the BIOS (iirc in the ACPI tables?), along with installing a matching crypto certificate in vista. This was exploited, first by modifying and re-flashing the BIOS (which could go wrong), then a "softmod bios" that used some pre-boot code, and then a pretty clean driver-only approach... result: easily activated vista on any computer. Except x64 versions, as those won't run unsigned drivers :)

It's funny to see just how much Microsoft has shot themselves in the foot with this activation method, considering how "secure" the OS is. Expect to see similarly efficient workarounds for all the other security in the OS, malware wise.
7190
Living Room / Re: Best Buy Geek Squad Confession (long and interesting)
« Last post by f0dder on May 02, 2007, 06:14 PM »
Hm, not going to read the article, but the summary leaves one word: BASTARDS.
7191
Living Room / Re: Map of online communities (xkcd)
« Last post by f0dder on May 02, 2007, 04:16 PM »
xkcd is :-*,

but I often forget to read it for a while because I can never recall the correct sequence of letters >_<
7192
General Software Discussion / Re: To Vista or not to Vista that is the ?
« Last post by f0dder on May 02, 2007, 04:11 PM »
I called Microsoft Support and asked about licensing when I upgrade my CPU chip later this year, and was told I'd need to buy another copy of Vista if I did.
-zridling
Just the CPU? That single little item, and not the whole box? New Vista license for that? Christ.
7193
Oki doki. I wonder if that "static file" handles fragmented files gracefully...

It's a nice enough idea anyway, for testing it sure beats (slow and limited) live-cds, (slow and limited, especially graphics wise) vmware, and the mess of either repartitioning, or swapping harddrives around.
7194
General Software Discussion / Re: To Vista or not to Vista that is the ?
« Last post by f0dder on May 02, 2007, 09:01 AM »
Far more stable than XP? Weird. The only time I've had stability problems with XP have been bad hardware or bad drivers (including the ones I've tinkered with myself :) ) - and that's on 15+ widely different machines.

Also I don't think disk management was bad in XP or even 2k, at least not when you don't need to resize partitions.

I really wouldn't mind having I/O priorities and more aggressive caching in XP, along with a few other of the kernel enhancements in Vista. But at the same time I don't dig the DRM and the über-bloat (and yes, I've played around a bit with Vista on real hardware).
7195
Well, cthorpe, how is the access to the ubuntu image on the NTFS partition handled? - that's my question. The typical "inside windows, take note of the sectors it's stored in" (which can get really funny if you defragment your partition), or is there always some degree of NTFS-write enabled in the kernel? And is NTFS-write stable by now?
7196
Everything is just like it would be with a standard install.  Straight away, you will have read access to all of your data on your NTFS partitions, and the Wubi Guide gives instructions for enabling write access.
Humm, how well does it work, then, when your boot partition is NTFS (as it should be)? Will no changes persist by default until you enabled NTFS write?
7197
General Software Discussion / Re: To Vista or not to Vista that is the ?
« Last post by f0dder on May 01, 2007, 07:05 PM »
What impressed me the most was it was able to install and work with a range of nVidia Video and nForce LAN drivers without me lifting a finger. On Windows XP on the same hardware I need to manually install these drivers from the CD that comes with the Motherboard.
Only because Vista is more recent than XP, so those drivers have been added to the default install - for other hardware, you'll still need to load drivers during setup (though those can, finally!, be loaded from USB drives and whatnot, not limited to floppies). With 2k and XP you can fortunately make a slipstreamed and driver-integrated install CD, so you don't need to use floppies. And with something like www.nliteos.com , this isn't just limited to über-geeks, but also in the realm of the power users that would usually do an install themselves.

Vista has a very attractive new User Interface called Aero which I think looks great.
And it's the first thing a lot of us are going to turn off as the first thing after installing... there goes one sales argument :)

however from what I now know after doing the work to updating our software products for Vista, is that there are some quite fundamental areas which must be addressed for software to work correctly on Vista.
Many of the "new requirements" for vista compatible software is actually just about writing clean and well-behaving applications; a lot of the "omfg vista breaks this!" would already be broken on NT4 if run from a non-administrator account...

The question is, really, "why bother". There's some interesting kernel changes, but they're swamped down by the rest of the system (okay, turn off Aero, tweak the install, substitute blackbox and xplorer^2 and it should be bearable), and there's the added DRM and driver paranoia.

The two big selling points would be DX10 and suppot for hybrid flash drives, both which I can't see any real technical reasons for not being supported on XP. We'll probably even begin to see applications that are artificially limited to run on Vista, even though they'd run fine on XP (like one of the Age Of Whatever games that had no problems running on Win2k, after reversers patched out the XP checks).
7198
Developer's Corner / Re: The Best Introductory Language
« Last post by f0dder on May 01, 2007, 06:56 PM »
Good question - I haven't found any single source that I liked, I've picked up from bits and pieces here and there. For x86, the resource has been the processor manuals from intel (PDFs as well as paperback prints freely available), but those are pretty dry and heavy.

Randall Hyde's "The art of assembly" is supposedly good, but I haven't read it - the old part is about 16bit which I've happily forgotten more about than most people of today will ever look at :), and the 32bit part is in his HLA syntax that I'm not too fond of (it's interesting because it's different, though). I've never taken a formal course in this stuff, so I don't have any references, sorry. Or well, I bought "Silberschatz/Galvin/Gagne: operating system concepts" which seems to be decent, but that's only part of it - more OS than machine architecture.
7199
CoolPDF also "cheats" by compressing the executable with UPX - unpacked it's 1.7 megabytes, which is still smaller than the 1.9 megabytes of Sumatra (which is also packed with UPX). I don't like how CoolPDF has a funky non-default color schemes, I hate draggable toolbars, and I don't like the "pdf2exe pro" advertisement, and it is indeed extremely slow at rendering... so another :down: from here :)
7200
General Software Discussion / Re: Ubuntu Linux vs. Windows Vista
« Last post by f0dder on April 29, 2007, 03:20 AM »
Linux isn't ready for prime time - and that's just the way it is.

And it's a real bloody shame. While the NT kernel is clearly superior to both BSD and Linux, I'm sick and tired of the way Microsoft are running things. I still have a thin hope that Vista will nail the coffin, but people are lemmings.

The only real alternative to Windows as of now is Apple OS X, but that's really a matter of plague versus cholera - Apple is, if possible, even more hooked on the idea of DRM and whatnot than Microsoft is.

Closed source software under linux is a real mess. It's fscking messy to do because it's not a coherent and standardized platform, and you have to re-invent the wheel over and over and over again if you cannot use GPL code (which, duh, you generally can't for closed-source software). Like it or not, but opensource isn't what innovates the world and delivers the paycheck.

GPL is an atrocity. LGPL is bearable. BSD license is nice. Something like the LZMA license is imho how it really should be done:
SPECIAL EXCEPTION: Igor Pavlov, as the author of this code, expressly permits you to statically or dynamically link your code (or bind by name) to the files from LZMA SDK without subjecting your linked code to the terms of the CPL or GNU LGPL. Any modifications or additions to files from LZMA SDK, however, are subject to the GNU LGPL or CPL terms.
- keep the original code free, but don't be viral.

When was the last time that anyone ran World of Warcraft or Grand Theft Auto on Ubuntu?
-Renegade
Both should run pretty well with the (commercial :)) Cedega, although I wouldn't risk The Warden getting me banned from WOW (fascist blizzard fscks).

If people don't like linux getting compared to windows, perhaps people should try and stop selling linux as a viable alternative. It's not.
Pages: prev1 ... 283 284 285 286 287 [288] 289 290 291 292 293 ... 364next