topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday December 20, 2025, 2:27 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 274 275 276 277 278 [279] 280 281 282 283 284 ... 404next
6951
General Software Discussion / Re: Directory Opus 10 ... Light!
« Last post by wraith808 on September 23, 2012, 10:56 AM »
What is flat view and sync?  (I know I don't use half of what dopus is capable of...)
6952
General Software Discussion / Directory Opus 10 ... Light!
« Last post by wraith808 on September 23, 2012, 10:12 AM »
Has anyone else heard about Directory Opus 10 Light?  I'm still on 9 because there was no compelling reason to upgrade to 10 and it costs so much for the number of computers (all my own) that I use it on.  Looking at Light vs. Pro, I see that I'm still stuck with 9.  The inability to get the FTP plugin and replace explorer knocks that option out of the water for me. 

But someone else might benefit from it.
6953
Developer's Corner / Re: WiX Installer - not really a review
« Last post by wraith808 on September 23, 2012, 10:02 AM »
I formerly used Inno Setup years ago, and it was quite good.  I was just incredibly impressed by the integration of WiX into VS, and how transparent and straightforward it was.  Again, the need to put the files in manually is incredibly mind numbing and I'm surprised there's not a VS extension to take that pain away.  Then again... I didn't look.  Hmm...
6954
Developer's Corner / Re: WiX Installer - not really a review
« Last post by wraith808 on September 23, 2012, 12:37 AM »
What I look for in an installer is (a) control, and (b) ease of use.

I don't like the VS Setup projects because of a lack of control.  It makes a lot of assumptions for you, and wants you to install the windows way.  Inno setup is pretty easy to use- but I don't like it because of the use of yet another tool.  That's why I liked WiX- it was easy to use, and I had control.  Basically, all I wanted to do was show a license, get a path, and do an xcopy.  The only thing that would have hit it out the park for me is if you could point it to a directory structure and it grab all of the files.  But copying and pasting one line for each file was trivial, if mind-numbing.  And it's in the same solution as the rest of my solution, and I can just build it from VS after I build my solution.  If I had more requirements for an installer, it might be a different story.  But not having advanced requirements, it was just enough for me.

Inno Setup is good.  NSIS was also.  And I'd recommend either (as NSIS is still useful as of now... but I'd go with Inno because of the fact that it's in development).  There are a few that have free options for commercial installers- but I haven't actually used any of them.  With them being at heart commercial, I figured I'd stay away, not wanting to be in the midst of using it when they decided to no longer support the free version.
6955
Developer's Corner / WiX Installer - not really a review
« Last post by wraith808 on September 22, 2012, 11:50 PM »
So, in a former life, my title at a company was 'Configuration Engineer'.  What that meant at that particular company was that I did the work that developers didn't want to do, i.e burning CDs/DVDs, Maintaining version control systems, and writing installers.  Since writing installers at the time was painful, once I paid my dues in that position, I didn't want to write installers anymore.  All of my software has been zip it up, and let the user unzip it.  If I needed something done, I did it on first run.

I decided that for my latest effort, I wanted to get back into writing installers.  I still have my old unzip it mentality and have a distribution just in a zip file, but I also wrote an installer.  I looked at a few of the ones I remembered: NSIS (development stalled), Wise (discontinued), InstallAware (way too expensive), InstallShield (ditto)... I was about to go with Inno Setup, but then I saw WiX - Windows Installer XML.  I was somewhat skeptical of an XML based installer system, but decided to try it.

After downloading and installing, I used a tutorial.  I didn't walk through using their sample, but instead tried my own software.  It was a pain putting in entries for all of the files that I used manually.  But, I have to admit, it was pretty straightforward.  Within an hour, I had an installer- but no UI.  Then I found out that adding the UI was pretty painless.  The came the realization that it had installed into Visual studio- and I could create a project for it from the IDE.  I was glad to have learned everything behind the compiler and linker- but that made it a lot easier.

I'd give WiX a thumbs up to anyone looking to make an installer- and a thumbs way up for anyone using Visual studio and needing to make an installer.  It was straightforward, and just works!
6956
Living Room / Re: Ubuntu will now have Amazon ads pre-installed
« Last post by wraith808 on September 22, 2012, 11:36 PM »
^ That's cool.  That's what I try to do whenever I use affiliate links.
6957
General Software Discussion / Re: Google says goobye to Internet Explorer 8
« Last post by wraith808 on September 22, 2012, 10:48 PM »
Would the official end of support for XP be a big enough event to force those kinds of agencies to make the necessary changes? As long as it's "merely corporate bickering with the users" vs versions, life trundles along. But I'd ... uh ... hope that the security-conscious agencies might see a wee little problem with producing data that requires, by a couple steps of logical reasoning, to use an OS that officially has no more security updates as of X date.

I'm sure they'll change by that time.  But as of right now, XP hasn't reached end of life.  Neither has IE 7 nor 8.  So because of a quick turnaround on versions- quicker than IE was updating when they made that policy- they are discontinuing support for a viable browser.  This isn't so much serving as self-serving.  They are very much aware of this.  So that means that anyone on XP will have to switch.  Not saying anything one way or another about the browsers.  It just smacks of the same thing we saw with the whole go dark for ie thing.  Elitism.
6958
Living Room / Re: Ubuntu will now have Amazon ads pre-installed
« Last post by wraith808 on September 22, 2012, 10:45 PM »
I'm going to hedge my wording here in case I am blundering, but I think at least some links aren't just sending affiliate info, they're sending identifiable user info of various kinds along with it.

(Peeks out from under tinfoil hat, wating for the time to verify it with facts and so remove the hat.)

Affiliate links send the affiliate info of the linker.  Sort of like those links that people send with Dropbox.

I should clarify my response also- if someone is forthcoming that the link has affiliate info, then if it's useful and I buy something as a direct result of the link, then I won't remove.  If someone is less than forthcoming, or I buy something that is not a direct result of the link... bye bye affiliate link!
6959
General Software Discussion / Re: Google says goobye to Internet Explorer 8
« Last post by wraith808 on September 22, 2012, 12:27 PM »
There are other examples, but I think that gets the point across.
You've listed one specific issue where there's - supposedly - some IE requirements going on (I haven't had the misfortune of dealing with SharePoint, I pity you :)). Lots of stuff doesn't require IE because of crappy ActiveX controls, but because of jscript vs. javascript or DOM differences (or, in the old days, MS-Java specifics) - the kind of stuff there's really no excuse for.
Not supposedly - Sharepoint just won't work under anything but IE.
I guess that depends on the level of sharepoint support you want - the (horrible!) office integration crap might require IE, but basic site functionality works fine (as "fine" as you can manage to get with sharepoint  ::) ::) ::)) with other browsers - at least the school intranet system some years back did. Of course the site as a whole was a catastrophe of sharepoint dimensions, so was eventually scrapped again in favor of something simpler, that actually worked.
We don't have office integration... just using basics like document storage and documentation page (we have over a decade, and most likely more of documentation in sharepoint, so it's definitely not going away anytime soon).  It just doesn't work in anything other than IE.  I don't know the specifics why...but believe me, I've tried.

Or the need to have an embedded browser- it's easier to just embed IE- and they're using IE specific stuff.
And I'm kinda glad when that bites people in the behind, since embedded browsers is almost always a horrible end-user experience. There's a (very!) few pieces of software where this makes sense, but mostly it's just a very very bad idea. (I remember a certain antivirus package that decided using embedded IE for it's user interface was a good idea... yeah.)

In our case, it's a necessity.  We have documents from the SEC and other filings type documents that don't display correctly in anything but IE.  And since the application has to do with extracting data exactly as it appears in the documents, then mapping it to standard data in the database, and seeing where those numbers match up with the calculations, and then being able to go from our site (which doesn't require IE anymore thank goodness) back to the documents.  We're trapped in a world we never made.  And we can't dictate to those firms how to report, and since the SEC and doesn't standardize EDGAR documents, there's nothing we can do other than try to deal with what's there.
6960
General Software Discussion / Re: Google says goobye to Internet Explorer 8
« Last post by wraith808 on September 22, 2012, 10:45 AM »
There are other examples, but I think that gets the point across.
You've listed one specific issue where there's - supposedly - some IE requirements going on (I haven't had the misfortune of dealing with SharePoint, I pity you :)). Lots of stuff doesn't require IE because of crappy ActiveX controls, but because of jscript vs. javascript or DOM differences (or, in the old days, MS-Java specifics) - the kind of stuff there's really no excuse for.

Not supposedly - Sharepoint just won't work under anything but IE.  And there's a *lot* of sharepoint out there- I know a few people who made their living as a Sharepoint developer (ick).  If you code open platforms for a specific browser, that's one thing.  But I know quite a few things that are limited specifically because of ActiveX controls.  Or the need to have an embedded browser- it's easier to just embed IE- and they're using IE specific stuff.  And this doesn't just go away.  It would be different if newer versions of the browser supported older operating systems, but they don't.  So the 2 generations is pretty disingenuous when people can't upgrade for other reasons, and have to use IE.  Basically it's 'stuck on XP and have to use IE?  You're part of the 47%!'
6961
Living Room / Re: Ubuntu will now have Amazon ads pre-installed
« Last post by wraith808 on September 22, 2012, 09:52 AM »
On a somewhat related topic: am I the only one that purposefully removes affiliate links from URLs before purchasing things, unless I deliberately want to support a particular person?

Nope.
6962
General Software Discussion / Re: Google says goobye to Internet Explorer 8
« Last post by wraith808 on September 22, 2012, 09:50 AM »
because of retarded internal apps coded by slopmonkeys
Why blame the coders for the requirements of management?  That seems somewhat ... wrong.
Because the coders wrote stuff that breaks in all other browsers, instead of Doing Things Right, with some abstraction layer for IE support?

Nope.  Doesn't hold water.  We had a requirement to use Sharepoint for internal applications for tracking and document management and other things.  We railed against it because Sharepoint sucks- but we had to get paid.  Eventually, we were able to get them to move to a google platform and to TFS for source control and scrum... but that was eventually.  We still have many years worth of baggage in sharepoint, and the ROI for changing it isn't enough.

There are other examples, but I think that gets the point across.
6963
General Software Discussion / Re: Google says goobye to Internet Explorer 8
« Last post by wraith808 on September 22, 2012, 09:29 AM »
because of retarded internal apps coded by slopmonkeys

Why blame the coders for the requirements of management?  That seems somewhat ... wrong.
6964
DC Website Help and Extras / Re: DonationCoder.com on an iPad is Kinda Weird
« Last post by wraith808 on September 21, 2012, 11:34 PM »
I was seeing this since Firefox 12. Also occurs in all browsers on the iPad.

Not all browsers.  I don't see it on my iPad 3 using Chrome, iCabMobile, or Safari.
6965
DC Gamer Club / Re: Request for Help from Skyrim Players
« Last post by wraith808 on September 21, 2012, 11:09 PM »
If anyone is interested in the pre-release, PM me.  Only DC supporting members for now.

Images and help file for the latest version is available at http://www.wraith808...rimcharactermanager/ if anyone is interested. (no ribbon now- well, almost no ribbon now)
6966
General Software Discussion / Re: sublime text: some innovative text editor!
« Last post by wraith808 on September 21, 2012, 06:26 PM »
^ Agreed.  Perhaps he didn't have it up before they attempted to purchase, assuming that anyone interested would know such.
6967
General Software Discussion / Re: sublime text: some innovative text editor!
« Last post by wraith808 on September 21, 2012, 04:05 PM »
That's an interesting (if unfortunate) story... 

I was surprised to see the rewardli deal, since Sublime Text's developer seemed to historically have little interest in discounting the software. Turns out that that still seems to be the case.

It's also stated clearly on the pricing faq (the part about the volume licensing).  Not sure if after the debacle or before.  But I can respect it.  Not discounting the product lets people know that it will always be the same price.  It's a valid tactic, especially if the software is worth it, which I think it is.  I'd prefer to have a discount, but it's worth it no matter what, especially with his licensing terms.
6968
General Software Discussion / Re: sublime text: some innovative text editor!
« Last post by wraith808 on September 21, 2012, 02:20 PM »
Sublime Text 2 can be purchased for a discounted price here: http://www.rewardli....text-editor-discount

Not a valid link - at least not anymore.
6969
Living Room / Re: Kids E-Book Ideas?
« Last post by wraith808 on September 21, 2012, 12:30 PM »
Oh ... I forget how old things are :) 

Infocomw used to be an interactive fiction maker that made purely text adventure games for computers.  They have some classics with some truly great writing and great puzzles mixed into an insanely frustrating but incredibly entertaining and rewarding experience.

Their works include Enchanter, Sorcerer, Spellbreaker, Wishbringer and of course the series that started everything Zork I, Zork II, and Zork III.  There are several others... my favorites are Wishbringer, Starfall, and Planetfall.
6970
Living Room / Re: Kids E-Book Ideas?
« Last post by wraith808 on September 21, 2012, 10:29 AM »
Another good option for the interactive books is Frotz, a z-machine interpreter, like used in the Infocom games.
6971
General Software Discussion / Re: sublime text: some innovative text editor!
« Last post by wraith808 on September 21, 2012, 10:25 AM »
It's still a random nag screen when saving, and no other limitations that I am aware of. I must admit I have postponed buying a license because, well, it's expensive, and I was hoping for a larger DC discount :-[

Same here.  But I'm about to give in.  It's great!  And it's replaced e for me since e looks like its never going to be updated.  And it's cross platform!
6972
Living Room / Re: Cascading grammar trolls
« Last post by wraith808 on September 21, 2012, 10:23 AM »
^ That's hilarious!  I love it!
6973
Seems pretty clear to me looking at it.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B007HCCNJU

Screen Cap:
No Offers
kindlenooffers.png

Offers
kindleoffers.png

Not sure if the UK one is different, but it's right next to the price.  If the buyer is going to pimp themselves for $20, I don't have much sympathy for them after the fact.
6974
Think of what an ad on the screen saver implies: it implies that when I am not using my device, and it is perhaps on the coffee table or my desk at work, it is broadcasting ads. And because up to now screensavers have always been personal choices, it is communicating to people around that I endorse this brand.

There is implicit endorsement assigned to something shown on a personal screen. That's why advertisers should jump on this for the short time it will work, and that's why people should run away from it in horror. But then people "like" a brand on facebook just for a chance to win a freebie, even though it will push an ad (with endorsement!) on all their friends feeds, so perhaps I am the only one horrified by being hijacked to promote brands I might object to.

If I am not, there will be a lawsuit "kindle showed ads I object to on religious grounds" or "kindle on my desk showed ad that could have got me fired"... it will happen



The thing is, you agree to it when you agree to buy a subsidized device.  The same as people object to and have sued over termination fees for cellular service, but are in the same boat.  You get a discount- you pay for it in another way.  TANSTAAFL.
6975
Living Room / Re: Kids E-Book Ideas?
« Last post by wraith808 on September 21, 2012, 07:58 AM »
After Borders closed, showing that all brick bookstores will die eventually, buying a Nook from the other big brick-and-mortar bookstore seemed like a sure dead end, and Amazon seemed like it would be the last bookstore standing. At least the partnership with Microsoft seems to change that, so in that sense it is an improvement.

Borders closing doesn't imply that all brick bookstores will die eventually, IMO.  Borders was badly managed from a high level (as shown by the really stupid bid to buy B&N), was too late to the web and e-books and didn't make the transition well (B&N did both early enough and well enough, though they still have strides to make), opened too many stores that tried to be too trendy in places with very high rent, over invested in music and movies and then over-priced them, created an irresponsible level of debt, and created an unworkable inventory management system that locked indie choices out of their stores.

Being in the book industry for a while, I still follow the trends and have seen several successes and failures, and a lot of the reasons behind them.  Being a brick and mortar store has never been the wrong step to take, even now.  It's just the failure to pay attention to trends and adapt to them.  It's pretty much the same for all retailers- and many of them are taking the wrong steps currently.  This has nothing at all to do with having a physical presence, and a lot to do with not knowing your competitors and your customers, and not offering people a reason to buy from you.  Borders was always busy, but the people were looking, not buying.

Update: Added a few reference links

http://moneyland.tim...will-take-its-place/
http://www.businessi...orders-went-bye-bye/
Pages: prev1 ... 274 275 276 277 278 [279] 280 281 282 283 284 ... 404next