Recent Posts
But nature isn't all evil~!
...
That's impossible not to love~!-Renegade (April 20, 2011, 08:06 PM)
But if you re-read their post [OP] you will see that this is an assumption as well:-at which stage you took off - in the style of the OP (or worse)Now, as you seem to be an established DC member, would you please tell us the reason why you don't post with your real DC account but use a dummy account for that? Is it, because you are a jealous competitor or is it, because you know that your posting is not true and you don't want to harm your real account's reputation?-BartelsMedia (April 20, 2011, 03:58 AM)-tomos (April 20, 2011, 06:10 AM)
At least you have a sense of humor
Of course, I thought it would be the other way. Some folks look so grumpy here at DC.
Boys, we have been severely accused and offended by this troll and you expect us to ignore that? Sorry, but this is quite difficult, especially as it was so easy to pull the plug out of his pointless arguments.-BartelsMedia (April 20, 2011, 09:21 AM)
Now, as you seem to be an established DC member, would you please tell us the reason why you don't post with your real DC account but use a dummy account for that? Is it, because you are a jealous competitor or is it, because you know that your posting is not true and you don't want to harm your real account's reputation?-BartelsMedia (April 20, 2011, 03:58 AM)
We regret to tell you that we also detected an unauthorized access to one of our server systems. We assume that the attackers were able to purloin data of customers. Sensitive data such as billing information etc. is not affected by this, because Ashampoo does not store this data.
We summarized all pieces of information concerning this incident for you and would like you to read the following website: http://www.ashampoo.com/datatheft
On their developer blog, Amazon responded the following day, stating simply that the policy in question was from a dated text file, and that a PDF elsewhere on the site contained the correct terms.
The response seems fishy. The IGDA's letter states that they reached out to Amazon several times and that Amazon were unwilling to change terms. If it were simply a matter of referencing the wrong terms, surely they would have pointed that out. Secondly, Amazon's response doesn't actually address the concerns stated in the IGDA letter. Even taking Amazon's 'correction' into account, many of the IGDA's concerns still seem valid.-Deozaan (April 19, 2011, 07:30 PM)
I notice I'm not able to remove older backedup revisions of a file - so I had to remove the database file completely from the SpiderOak backup
(which deleted 3GB space!)-tomos (April 19, 2011, 12:26 PM)
I'm curious... How do you plan to solve this uploading/backup issue (same as mine, basically) ?-Armando (April 19, 2011, 12:58 PM)
My current solution will be to stick with dropbox until this is fixed -- I don't have this problem with dropbox, as I said. They must use a different delta backup algorithm.That, or DropBox uses special handling for certain files, including access databases?-Armando (April 18, 2011, 12:49 PM)-f0dder (April 18, 2011, 01:02 PM)
As you probably read, I wonder why my DB is re-uploaded each time it's backed up (i.e. : I periodically send the DB to a folder monitored by spideroak -- the DB is RC4 encrypted). I understand the UI doesn't mirror everything happening behind the scene. But I can definitely see the amount of uploaded data each time.-Armando (April 17, 2011, 11:33 PM)
Do you know a soft to scan a folder and subfolders and output all in shorcut's mode to a destination folder organized cronologically.
That's :
source folder : By example Y:\datos
to destination folder : by example Y:\Crono
with the subfolders 2011 to make reference to year
containing the subfolder 06.2011 to make reference to month
and finally containing the subfolder 12.06.2011 to make reference to the date.
Able to control years, months, and days of the creation file.
Able to exclude from the source folder some extensions of file.-Contro (April 10, 2011, 08:38 AM)
I would like :
Source folder : a folder of my election containing files and subfolders.
Each file has a creation date. We can exclude system files and other extensions not proper to control.
The basic idea would be : reorganize documents, audios, videos, images, and usual files by crono.
Destination folder : The coding snack give the possibility to generate or use a previosly created.
The destination folder is a crono folder :
First level of subfolders control the year : 2010 , 2011, 2012 .
Second level of subfolders control the month : 01.2010, 02.2010, 03.2010, 04.2010 , etc
Third level of subfolders control the day : 12.01.2010 , 13.01.2010, 14.01.2010 , etc. (for me is usually enough control the month)
This may be configurable....
Mechanic to get : when the scan found a file in the source folder analyze the creation date and copy a shortcut to the year, month , and day specified in the creation date of that file.
In other words. Is an utility organization copy creating in the destination folder the shorcuts of the original files.-Contro (April 08, 2011, 09:45 AM)
forgive me if my legs are too short, but your comment went over my head.
"BMs"?-Curt (April 17, 2011, 04:48 AM)
[/edit]Prime reason all kinds of drugs isn't legalized is not public health issues, it's the cash flow. The corrupt politicians want their bribes, and the police/military/etc wouldn't want their funding cut or lose the ability to play with a lot of fancy toys. The general population would be better off, though, we'd see crime rates drop quite a lot, and organized crime would lose a helluva lot of their cash flow. But it just ain't gonna happen.reminds me of:-f0dder (April 15, 2011, 06:41 PM)
Too bad, remember what happened once the alcohol prohibition ended?eh, no?-f0dder (April 15, 2011, 06:41 PM)
^ I had the same problem with Jungle Disk & S3 (account created summer 2008) - unreadable in Cloudberry. Which discovery, combined with a failure of JD -with no warnings- prompted me to start using SFFS to backup directly to S3.
Also I was wary of what the future might be bringing... [edit] (for Jungle Disk/S3) [/edit]-tomos (April 13, 2011, 04:47 PM)
What is SFFS?-wraith808 (April 15, 2011, 10:33 AM)
ONE has since been forced to remind confused civilians that it is an advocacy organisation and not a grant-making organisation. This became necessary after the New York Post revealed that in 2008, the most recent year for which tax records are available, ONE took $14,993,873 in donations from philanthropists, of which a thrifty $184,732 was distributed to charity. More than $8m was spent on executive and employee salaries.
you might find something interesting-mouser (April 14, 2011, 04:28 PM)
Didn't you promise not to fudge this?-cranioscopical (April 14, 2011, 04:53 PM)
And of course every marijuana user is a hippie, very good. I couldn't agree less.-housetier (April 14, 2011, 09:17 AM)
Food for thought... No privacy on Amazon's cloud drive.
Less so than other cloud storage?-Cloq (April 12, 2011, 08:04 PM)
The thing I don't like about SpiderOak (the software) is that if you try to restore from a backup (after a format, for example), it will copy everything back to the original directory locations and doesn't give you an option to download the content to a different location.-Deozaan (April 07, 2011, 05:17 PM)
I went and restored a whole bunch of settings etc. and it did ask me whether I wanted them in the original location or a folder of my chosing.-iphigenie (April 09, 2011, 12:03 PM)
