6876
Living Room / Re: DOTCOM saga - updates
« Last post by wraith808 on October 11, 2012, 02:39 PM »You suggest that "...but this was most likely a civil seizure..." but if that is the case, then I do not understand why the police/FBI/SS etc . were so heavily involved with the police and SS (GCSB) in NZ.
As far as I was aware, in any civil actions in NZ, the police would not normally get involved - only if a crime had been committed.-IainB (October 11, 2012, 12:58 PM)
The civil seizure is not predicated by a criminal procedure. However, the two are related, i.e. they seized him based upon criminal proceedings. During the criminal seizure of his person, they also seized his assets based on civil forfeiture rules, so that this part would not be based on the criminal proceedings. This is usually used in the case of drug lords and such, as they deal in cash and other assets with ready liquidity and as such if immediate seizure and forfeiture is not enacted, there might be nothing to enact it against.

Recent Posts


