...this is a move towards a hybrid OS rather than a move to close the total OS... -wraith808
Yes. A hybrid steppingstone on the way to becoming a totally closed ecosystem.
... it was the inception for a lot of people placing intentions on the company that might just not be there.
Um...I don't know how much direct experience dealing with Microsoft you've had. But from my direct experience with them, it's obvious that their intention is, and has always been, to see the total dominance of Windows, and to have it running on everything in the world that has a CPU in it.
There was a time back in the late 80s and early 90s when they word "monopoly" was freely bandied about in Microsoft. It wasn't until later that Bill & Co. learned that corporations should never say the "M-word." Even in private.
-40hz
I've had a lot of direct experience in dealing with Microsoft, even to the point of being in partner projects with them to get C# and .NET in shops; my training came directly from them on that regard as redmond engineers were in the same consulting gig that I was on, and we were flown to Redmond for training at MS's expense.
I think that they are definitely ... aggressive, to put it lightly, especially in regards to increasing and holding on to the Windows market share. However, I think that this may be a different animal, especially in the implementation of it. But that's just my reading of the signs from my experience as from the developer end and how their treatment of developers has gone (and the fact that this would be a definite screwing of the developers at the most basic level), as yours are yours. Only time will tell, and I suppose that's my point- to place intentions based on signs are to place opinions as fact.