A browser, sorter, tagger is like a file explorer taking in details of all the files, allowing you to browse them and add tags, ratings etc.
that's a good description of Exif Pro then
(but I'm not sure of it's RAW capabilities)
-tomos
Exif Pro is only just moving on to working with some RAW files. I've never used it myself. And it doesn't have the reputation for workflow speed that PM has. But then it doesn't have the price either.
-Dormouse
I love the idea of exifPro, and bought a license. However, as I've noted elsewhere, it generates HUGE index files (almost 2GB) and two deal breakers for me:
1. If, while indexing, it encounters an error, it sits and waits for user input to keep going SO you can't leave it running for an hour or two and come back to find all of your photos catalogued.
2. There is no way to add new photos to a catalog - you have to create a new catalog. Cumbersome.
EDIT: just to note, the 2GB catalog created covered 37.4 GB of photos! So, perhaps not so bad... Having said that, when I was able to use and compare exifPro, Zoner, Ashampoo, and PhotoCollector back to back, exifPro's catalogues were the biggest of the bunch by a fair margin. Granted this was two years ago.