topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 1:02 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 ... 89next
626
Living Room / Re: Britannica - would you buy it on (say) Kindle or Nook?
« Last post by Innuendo on March 15, 2012, 10:32 AM »
Edit: Meanwhile, I wouldn't want it on the e-readers at all - I'd want it on my high end desktop that can crunch the info and do stuff to it.

Yes...give me a Britannica wherein I can get 3D-accelerated models of whatever the article is explaining (the solar system, the human anatomy, storm/wind patterns/currents, ....dinosaurs!) that harness my gee-whiz CPU & video card!

And in the spirit of 40hz's post, give me the ability to lay the volumes out on a virtual table-top so I can look at articles side by side, have numerous volumes open at once, and give me the ability to use virtual post-it notes.

That'd be an awesome program....till they clogged it up with DRM. :(
627
Living Room / Re: New Time management system from Mark Forster
« Last post by Innuendo on March 15, 2012, 10:24 AM »
My opinion on the system itself - I was kind of meh. All that build up for some top-secret method of organization that has been refined over 10 years? I just expected more. I don't know exactly what I expected, but I expected there to be more of whatever it turned out to be. :)

My opinion on the distribution system - It didn't strike me as anything underhanded or insidious. It just seemed like the Old Dude wanted to know who was reading his words. Judging from his picture on his web site, he's an older gentleman & probably has old-fashioned ideas about how he wants to get his ideas out rather than that new-fangled 'throw it up on a web site, fly, and be free" approach. Regardless, he did plainly state that he wasn't going to share or sell anyone's email addresses so I'm sure monetary gain isn't the motivational factor.

Bottom line - I hope there's more to the system & an occasional email isn't going to upset me. I've got worse coming into my mailbox from time to time & to be honest, I'd eventually forget to keep visiting his web site anyway.
628
I've hear records played on very expensive record players with crazy expensive needles, and if I'm being honest, they actually DO sound better.  I'm specifically thinking of Stevie Wonder's Songs in the Key of Life.  Now, it wasn't the greatest experiment in the world...I didn't do a double-blind test or anything, but what I heard actually confirmed that belief.  The record sounded more organic and full of life.  But again...it's not something I'm very convinced of.

There's no doubt in my mind that you heard a difference in sound, but when you talk of the "very expensive record player" with the "crazy expensive needle" the first question in my mind is how expensive were the speakers these expensive things hooked up to? It's been my experience that the quickest way to improve the sound of music you are listening to is to up the quality of the speakers it is coming out of.

If the speakers were "crazy expensive" as well they may have played a large part in the increase in music quality.
629
Living Room / Re: URGENT Board Mod Request: Sobriety Mod
« Last post by Innuendo on March 11, 2012, 11:03 AM »
40hz, great idea...but I was picturing more the emoticon where the little guy is running around in a circle waving his arms around....but Renegade's version would have a beer mugs in the hands he was waving. ;)
630
I use DrTag. I had tried Mp3Tag a few years back, found it wanting and so discarded it, but after what you wrote I am trialling it again. It looks like it may have been considerably improved.

mp3Tag will fool you with its deceptively simple out-of-the-box appearance, Iain. It's the tagging equivalent of either foobar2000, Total Commander or Directory Opus. Right after installation they all look like very simple, basic, no-frills programs, but once you start exploring scripts, plugins, etc. the possibilities start to really open up.

Dig around mp3Tag's support forum. You'll find lots of scripts that will make it easily the equal of Dr. Tag.
631
Living Room / Re: Why I Pirate - An Open Letter to Content Creators
« Last post by Innuendo on March 11, 2012, 10:49 AM »
Lots of great stuff snipped

What a sobering post, tranglos. What is truly worthy of thought are not the examples you gave, but the hundreds (thousands?) of decisions like that corporations have made that have been carefully kept out of the public eye.
632
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: WordPress bundle: $59 instead of $609!
« Last post by Innuendo on March 10, 2012, 12:37 PM »
I think the real take-away from this bundled deal is that a lot of the value is attached to free multi-month subscriptions to certain products. One could look at that as saving money now so one can spend more money later.

It's a great way for a company to hook new users on the subscription model.
633
General Software Discussion / Re: Program Files or Program Files (x86)?
« Last post by Innuendo on March 10, 2012, 12:35 PM »
Agreed. It is funny, but years ago I thought x32 would be dead in no time. Here we are, years later, with it still being the defacto standard in most cases because CPU utilization is not usually the bottleneck, and x32 code is nearly as fast as x64 code since x64 code comes with extra memory overhead.

I think at one point we all thought x86 was going to be dead in no time. 16-bit died because there was huge benefit in moving to a 32-bit architecture. There's just not that much of an advantage to moving exclusively to 64-bit. It does have its advantages, however, so it should be used wherever practical.

I just usually recommend people be very careful when it comes to programs that rely heavily on plugins or you run into the problem Curt did.
634
Living Room / Re: URGENT Board Mod Request: Sobriety Mod
« Last post by Innuendo on March 10, 2012, 12:16 PM »
http://www.breathaly...-Kit-p/al9000usb.htm

It includes "pc connectivity software", so I wonder if it  can be set up like an automobile ignition breathalyzer interlock  :)

Ha! Good find...I was just about to make a recommendation we just put a breathalyzer on the OP's PC. :)
635
Living Room / Re: Notable Spam...
« Last post by Innuendo on March 10, 2012, 12:14 PM »
Oh dear, that bad am I? Even so, I don't think I can stand for that.
-cranioscopical (March 04, 2012, 04:43 PM)

If you find that after four hours you still cannot stand, please contact a doctor immediately. :)
636
Living Room / Re: Why I Pirate - An Open Letter to Content Creators
« Last post by Innuendo on March 10, 2012, 12:12 PM »
So let's not get too bogged down in finger pointing or arguing 'tit for tat' and "You're another!" This is too important an issue to allow ourselves go off on tangents.

I don't think it's a tangent at all. It's been put forth in the thread that piracy should never be considered an option as this is where malware comes from. J-Mac was merely making the counter-point that even if one were to never pirate anything, one might become a victim of malware through the actions of a 'respectable' corporation.
637
Living Room / Re: Why I Pirate - An Open Letter to Content Creators
« Last post by Innuendo on March 10, 2012, 12:10 PM »
db90h, you talk as if software pirates invented the rootkit! Please try to remember exactly WHO first introduced most of the public to the "joys" of rootkits!

(Hint: Not to mention Sony BMG by name... -Oops! - but could it have been an overbearing corporation claiming to protect their copyrighted material?? So much for blaming pirates, db90h!)

Thank you, J-Mac! I was just getting ready to make that point!

db90h, under the traditional definition, perhaps piracy and warez could be construed as being the leading attack vector for malware.

However, what if we broaden the definition? Malware is by definition software that performs unintended, usually harmful, unwanted actions to a user's PC. It's a brave, new world. By that definition, a lot of forms of DRM can fall into the definition of malware!

The installation of games that cause performance slowdowns or optical drives to (no lie!) disappear! The mandate that a user's PC must be connected to the internet in order to be used! And what of J-Mac's Rhapsody story above? His own ripped CDs were commandeered and rendered unusable by actions by a piece of software that could only fall under the description of a virus or trojan.

None of this could ever be construed as being wanted behavior by a PC owner. Therefore, I would make the bold claim that DRM is merely a sub-species of malware.

Piracy as the leading vector of malware? I think it may lose to Steam.
638
Living Room / Re: Why I Pirate - An Open Letter to Content Creators
« Last post by Innuendo on March 09, 2012, 10:37 AM »
Do you realize how much malware gets bundled with pirated software? It is where most of it comes from, arguably. This isn't a theory, this is a fact. I've analyzed a considerable amount of it myself in prior jobs. The software appears to be fine, installs fine, but you get a little extra, totally hidden, present along with it. THAT is what piracy is today.

No. This is what the software publishers would have you believe. Oh, that's right. You are a software publisher, aren't you, db90h? I'm sure you're a nice guy, but you have a dog in this fight so anything you say will be (unintentionally) biased.

Sure, if a person goes to those shady web sites that have catalogs of cracks or if they use most of the peer-to-peer file-sharing programs, sure...they are probably going to be infected, but the educated, savvy pirates know where to go to get software that runs buttery smooth with no performance-robbing DRM and is malware-free.

Every release group (those that bring the pirated software to the masses) does so to build up their rep and street cred among the other release groups, always competing to bring the latest, greatest software the quickest & before their rivals. Sticking a piece of malware in their release would wreck their precious reputations. Sure, an unscrupulous third party could later get ahold of that release and inject some malware, but like I said before....the educated, savvy pirates know where to go to avoid that. The dangerous thing for software publishers is a focused Google search is the only thing keeping people from becoming savvy & educated. Fortunately, what works in the software publishers' favor is laziness. People usually want the quickest, easiest, cheapest methods....so they'll be doomed to virus-filled Kazaa downloads.

I agree otherwise, but BEWARE. Also, don't think your security software can protect you from malware. That crap is regenerated DAILY and the scanners can't keep up. NO, that does not mean you should install multiple security suites, then you just get a really, really slow PC with lots of problems and more false positives than anything.

While I agree that new malware is written every single day & there's no way the security suites can protect against it all immediately, there's almost no chance of 0-day malware infecting any illegal software downloads just because of the way that culture works. The 0-day malware writers want to target the largest pool of victims possible. That's not peer-to-peer users. Sure, that malware may make it into the world of piracy eventually, but it'll be long after even McAfee will be able to detect it & neutralize it.

Sure, there are probably non-malware sources of pirated software - but the laymen user doesn't know. So, I wouldn't EVER condone this practice. Not because it is illegal, but because it is unsafe and spreads malware.

The laymen do spread malware, but fortunately it's the equivalents to Sasser & Blaster. These days I'm far more worried about the malware that comes through PDF exploits & advertising banners on web sites than anything that little Bobby or Suzie download from that cool new peer-to-peer program all the hip kids are using at school.
639
Living Room / Re: Sansa Clip+ and Rockbox
« Last post by Innuendo on March 09, 2012, 10:05 AM »
There are ways to convert audible files but they are not straightforward and tedious (software) or very laborious - burn the books to CD and then rip them back to MP3 - trouble is each book can be between 6 and 10 CDs.
-Carol Haynes (March 07, 2012, 01:46 PM)

A quick Google reveals that there are a couple different methods that allow you to skip the burning step and go straight from Audible format to either wav or mp3. It seems most (but not all) methods involve using a codec called audibleMediaFilter.exe which allows you to load the audio book into other players and editors. I don't own any Audible products, however, so I cannot test.
640
one think I am picking up from this is that I probably should re-encode all my CDs - that it is likely that the ogg encoder I used in 2000 could have been of lower quality than the one I could use now (although it was not the one in ffmpeg). And I have much better processing power now so it should be less painful.

Your logic is sound. LAME is a much better encoder than it was just 3 or 4 years ago. I'm sure other encoders have had similar strides in quality.

Who am I kidding, this would take months - there's between 300 and 500 CDs in that basement, if not more :S

That's why a lot of people initially rip their collection to something lossless (like FLAC). Then when they want to do another lossy encode (maybe going from MP3 to OGG or advances in lossy encoding) they can just fire up a program that will automate the task overnight for them. You save a lot of time with this method, but of course the trade-off is maintaining two sets of your music & the huge amount of space the lossless set will consume.
641
General Software Discussion / Re: Program Files or Program Files (x86)?
« Last post by Innuendo on March 09, 2012, 09:17 AM »
Curt, Program Files is where 64-bit programs are installed by default. Program Files (x86) are where 32-bit programs are installed by default. This is just cosmetic for organizational purposes (Windows x64 likes to separate the 32-bit 'stuff' from the 64-bit 'stuff'), but vlastimil has your answer.

64-bit programs cannot use 32-bit plugins. This is one of the main reasons Microsoft recommends people install the 32-bit version of Office rather than the 64-bit one else people wouldn't be able to use the wealth of Office plugins that are available. This is also a reason why the 64-bit version of Total Commander is having a hard time gaining traction. People would have to leave the bajillion useful 32-bit plugins behind.

I don't think there's any real reason yet to use a 64-bit browser...and this is coming from someone who routinely has 100+ tabs open every day. :)
642
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: DrawPlusX5 50% on BDJ
« Last post by Innuendo on March 09, 2012, 08:53 AM »
Not a bad thing these days. Better to err on the side of caution when in doubt. Wish more of my clients did. :Thmbsup:

But then you'd probably have fewer clients.  ;D
643
I haven't checked this program out in years. I never had a problem with it other than the devs seem to be very slow to update it.
644
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: TuneUp $15 lifetime key
« Last post by Innuendo on March 07, 2012, 10:40 AM »
That software looks like the perfect recipe to turn a working operating system into a non-working one similar to the problems you had with your non-booting Vista install, Curt.

Software like that needs to be used very carefully, double- and triple-checking any change it wants to make to one's system.
645
The zilla name come s from the excellent FTP Filezilla program.
Use by a totally unrelated company is tacky.
-Steven Avery (March 06, 2012, 05:45 PM)

I thought the original usage of -zilla was Mozilla. But my memory could be faulty.
646
Nudone you do not count, your sensory perception exceeds that of humans.

Depends on the source material. You can easily tell the difference between 256 bit-rate and 320 bit-rate on certain songs. Crashes of cymbals during certain musical stretches are often the most telling.
647
Nowadays I usually listen to all my music via headphones on my laptop, from mp3's at 128kHz. I had always been skeptical of the need for using 192kHz and considered it to be inefficient in space terms and with no perceptible benefit in my case.

Not only is hearing a factor, but what genres of music you listen to as well. The lossy compression of MP3s is more well suited to some types of music than others.

(All this talk reminds me of a few months ago when I had to replace my dead Klipsch ProMedia Ultra 5.1 speakers for my PC. What a trip down the rabbit hole that was....with the time invested in researching what to buy...yeesh!)
648
Living Room / Re: Sansa Clip+ and Rockbox
« Last post by Innuendo on March 07, 2012, 09:42 AM »
That's the great thing about Rockbox. If things go pear-shaped, you can always retreat back to the factory firmware to regroup & figure out what went wrong.

Been a long time since I ran a PMP with Rockbox, but what always amazed my friends was my ability to play GameBoy games on my mp3 player. ;)
649
General Software Discussion / Re: How to remove Windows.old?
« Last post by Innuendo on March 05, 2012, 04:49 PM »
Yep, the branded OEM discs look for the proper SLIC in the OEM BIOS and will automatically activate if found. If not, they just gracefully revert back to the standard retail activation method & will act like a retail version of Windows thereafter.
650
Living Room / Re: Obtaining Windows OS ISO's
« Last post by Innuendo on March 05, 2012, 04:42 PM »
Yeah that's the plan...Linux on those without COA's and Winblows windows on those with them.
-Stephen66515 (March 05, 2012, 04:36 PM)

Silly question, but how many machines? And what are they being used for?
Pages: prev1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 ... 89next