topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday November 11, 2025, 6:23 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 ... 46next
626
I don't use adblocking but your blog would tempt me to do.

Vibrant media ads are a pain and freeze the mouse while vibrant thinks about it (and the words it chooses are so general as to be useless - an "Act database migration tool" popping up on the word "software" is unlikely to get a click)

I am also unlikely to ever click on the stuff adsense chose to show - how the heck did it come up with

Heat Pressed Clothing
Add Your Logo, No Set-Up Fee For Text Embroidery, Order Online Now!

to go with that article?

If you are going to put ads like google or vibrant to monetise your blog, a bit more optimisation of their setting could allow you to make a lot more with less ads ;)
627
Although I make my living in web development, I still mostly use desktop apps.

I buy online, I research online, but I tend to do things on the desktop

Most of the web apps are just not as responsive - I especially notice when doing things like search or edit. I have just been looking for a bookmark manager and having tried the online ones it was just sooo slow to manage bookmarks, move them around or edit their properties to add tags.

So I only use online tools where I want to store online for backup or sharing, or where it is just for fun. Eg: librarything, bookmooch, smugmug, diigo (&spurl for the "i saw at work and want to check later at home" things). I think these are the only ones I use atm, and I have accounts with tons and tons of places since I have a professional interest

There's also the issue of trust, which I don't have to many of these providers - they could disappear overnight (the way the economy is going, quite a few will go bust this year), their security could be not as good etc. etc.

But it is the "no way I am ever organising my --whatever-- online if it takes so long to do one!" feeling

One thing I might do online is write -so i can start in one place and continue from elsewhere etc. - but when I try to really write I do not do it in a word processor (the formatting gets in the way) I tend to do it in an outliner/notetaker text tool - and although there are snippets/note takers online, they are not aimed at someone capturing bits for writing - they dont expect your notes to all be related in that way- so moving, merging etc are just too slow. That "edit" slowness I mentioned earlier

Back to the desktop for that.
628
General Software Discussion / Re: The lazy user's guilt
« Last post by iphigenie on March 13, 2008, 02:02 AM »
That's sooo true -  :Thmbsup:

many independent shareware authors don't seem to have the time to both code and create helpful documentation or clips (many of the great tools I have have sub adequate help or documentation). That's quite normal, but maybe they should harness some of their users, ask their registered users to tell of their favorite features or tasks, or give a rebate to people who write an entry or make a video about a feature or add on etc. (with certain quality requirements)
629
I'm not sure why I would search microsoft or amazon through google instead of going to the site and using the site's own search - which usually has structured search adapted to that site's content and is going to be better.

But then I dont believe in google's pagerank when searching for specific professional/technical/specialised information - what's popular is often not what i want.
630
General Software Discussion / Re: The lazy user's guilt
« Last post by iphigenie on March 12, 2008, 02:09 PM »
PS: might be an idea to split out my vague intro about the launcher somewhere else if it is of interest
631
General Software Discussion / Re: The lazy user's guilt
« Last post by iphigenie on March 12, 2008, 01:58 PM »
I still feel guilty a bit when I have good things (or software) and dont use them properly at all. It seems a shame, and it seems unfair to whoever made the things...

But then I am also a person who will buy something (games, books, software etc.) just because it deserves to be supported, even if I dont really need it at this time - so feeling bad for something i dont use enough is just an extension of that

Interestingly enough I dont feel anywhere near as bad for say a web app I might have signed up and not used. Maybe cause there are so many I signed up for and never used... Although I have paid/registered on sites sometimes before I knew whether I would really use them or not, just because the concept needed support (here is an example, i donated before I had actually used any of the software... caught up since!)
632
maybe they are all wrong and mcafee is the lone ranger, and you are the most cunning virus writer ever, creating a whole persona over several years to fool the entire world into trusting your software  :eusa_naughty:

(couldnt resist)
633
General Software Discussion / Re: The lazy user's guilt
« Last post by iphigenie on March 11, 2008, 07:33 PM »
This statement about WireKeys made me think of all the times I have felt certain that I knew which program offered which feature, only later to realize I was wrong and it was some other program, and I often concluded that the false memory must have been caused by how seldom I use most of my programs. I say this because there is no such WireKeys open/save-dialog plugin, that I know of.

It's actually a pretty nice variation on the theme... from the website:

For example after installing WireKeys you will get great shell enhancement plugin that gives you quick jump to your favorite folders in Common Open/Save dialogs (including dialogs of the Microsoft Office applications like Word, Excel, Outlook),in Windows Explorer and Total Commander.

I actually use more than wirekeys than I think I do, especially on the tray/bar management as well as some of the windows management, but far less than I ought to.

The tool really needs someone to look at the configuration options and make them a bit clearer/easier to find. The plugin in question is called "shell extender" and you have to open not the main configuration but the plug in configuration. Even when I know its there it takes me a while to find it (it just did take me 10 minutes!)
634
General Software Discussion / Re: The lazy user's guilt
« Last post by iphigenie on March 11, 2008, 06:59 PM »
This made me try to puzzle why there's software with all the cool features, and then there's software that you *like* better. It might on paper have less features, it might be more expensive, or more quirky, or or or. And yet when you try it you like it better, it just fits you better, or something...


635
General Software Discussion / Re: The lazy user's guilt
« Last post by iphigenie on March 11, 2008, 06:52 PM »
The problem I face is info-overload and forcing myself to let go.
There's just too much to do and too few hours to do it in - I've had to unsubscribe from several interesting blog feeds, for instance - there just isn't enough time to go through everything. I have even forced myself to stop upgrading software that I'm happy with. I don't know how to describe the feeling, it's just a slow-kill kind of frustration, there's a constant conflict between the perfectionist within who wants to do everything to the last detail and the pragmatist

Yes, I think that is very similar for me - I dont want every activity to be a learning curve, to save time and not be spread too thin. On the other hand I also want to do everything properly and make good use of what i already have, because just buying something when you already have something adequate or could whipe something up feels wasteful.

Strangely enough in some other areas I tend to go for the "no waste, use what you have even if it means reading up, trial and error etc." but when it comes to IT I have gone the other way to the total opposite (pay someone to do my email service when I used to run mail servers! buy new software when i already have some that could probably do the job but that i havent used much). More and more when it comes to the computer, time and ease win.

But still, being around here I am humbled how many of you manage to accomplish stuff in their spare time. I used to be like this, loads of projects etc. then years of startup work-around-the-clock madness made me lose all the hobbies, from creative stuff to sports to writing code for fun and learning. Plan to recover some this year, now that I have a cushy job but must not fall into the trap of everything becoming a project :Thmbsup:
636
General Software Discussion / Re: The lazy user's guilt
« Last post by iphigenie on March 11, 2008, 06:34 PM »
. I have gone out and found a launcher tool which suits lazy people like me, because it builds its menu by watching what i run, from all sources. Finally a menu that doesnt need work.

So what is your lazy launcher?
All dormice dislike unnecessary activity.  :)

Actually I did a tiny bit of work, to create 2 categories and move some software in it when the list became too big - by default you can set a max length and it creates a "more" overflow menu for items over that length, but i created some categories. It was as hard as going through the config list of detected software and picking a category for some.

I found this lazy launcher on my quest for a comfortable bookmark manager - it's called task commander (http://www.resortlab...er/taskcommander.php)
There's nothing all that special about it, there are much more feature rich launchers out there, and many of the "non launcher" additional features it has overlap with some of my other tools - and in a way it's just like the "frequently used programs" bit on the start menu - except it is able to capture programs you start in other ways than the start menu. And somehow unlike many other launchers out there i find I do end up using it more than others. I reckon it is because it is so simple about its business so a lazy person like me can immediately use it.

Anyway it has the following features
* puts a little dot on your bar (can also be in explorer and ie if you want it)
* the color of the dot is a cheap cpu activity indicator
* hover over or left click on the dot and up pops a list of programs
* that list of programs can be manually edited, but it is automagically populated
* unlike the start menu one, it will also detect programs started say from a file manager (total commander), run box, command line, Farr etc. although some software that never opens a window can get missed
* once a program is in the list you can move it into a category, tell the software not to show it (effectively ignore it)
non launcher features
* you can also make any program minimize to tray, or show a tray icon instead of a task bar
* on top of this it has a task list where you can close things, do the same tray magic or stay on top
* it also has an alt-tab switcher thing, which i am not sure i like. thats mostly because by default it has a mouse gestures and mouse gestures and me dont mix (i wobble the mouse around when i think and trigger all and any mouse gestures at random as a result. no good!)

There are a lot of launcher discussions in this forum, and a lot of good programs highlighted, and most seem more clever and more powerful than this one. Yet I found I never bother to set up any of them, or used them much, not the way I use this.

I keep farr for the uncommon stuff (especially now that i have identified what made it slow and told it to ignore the lwa directory), and I think I will keep this for the regular stuff, knowing that whatever I call once in farr will then be visible in task commander. It's a shame they dont offer a co-buy rebate as that would have snatched the deal for the link commander bookmark manager tool ;)

I whipped up some screenies using the awesome Screenshot Captor which is just another tool which works really well for a lazy user like me :)
1) the menu thingie
2) the task switcher thingie
3) one of the config screens
4) the visual alt tab thingie
637
General Software Discussion / The lazy user's guilt
« Last post by iphigenie on March 11, 2008, 03:11 PM »
I have been more and more conscious lately that I am a lazy software user.

By that I mean that I often use only a small fraction of a tool's capabilities, and that, very often, if those capabilities need a lot of configuration, or scripting, or even a lot of reading... then I often don't do the necessary legwork. I might even end up looking for a tool to do something that a program I already own would be able to do with some configuration or scripting.

Now I am sure I am not alone in this, but the strange thing is I ought to be perfectly capable of learning these and doing it (after all I made a good living as a developer before I started making a good living creating and running development teams), but in truth I don't.

Some examples:

Total Commander is my file manager of choice, and it has quite a powerful set of scripting and extension possibilities. I have seen what can be done with it. Yet in 10 years I have never tried to understand it, I had even never (until December 2006) bothered to create a custom menu in it, and never gone beyond installing a few of the plugins... I finally looked a tiny bit in December after someone posted some screenshots in here that showed some capabilities - but even then it was a few hours and then I parked it.

I have the wirekeys tool, which has a lot of features. Again, it can also be scripted. And yet, in the 3 or more years I have owned it I have never started to use more than a tiny fraction of the features, never written anything in it, and never done much more than trawling the help file for a few tweaks (like the file open/save dialog improvement plug in). There are zillions of shortcuts that I ought to try to remember because they would save me a lot of time and hassle, yet I dont. I know I ought to create a "cheat sheet" and learn a few ones every week... but I haven't.

Opera is highly customisable yet I only bothered once to download alternate menus/toolbars - at the moment the most customisation I do is changing the search.

I had ahk installed for about 2 months and did exactly nothing with it, so I removed it. I didn't even install some of the great ahk scripts available here, although I downloaded about 20  :o

When I was looking at time tracking software I had to settle on one that would spy and record on my active windows, and then I would tag them, because no way I was going to set up all the kind of clients, categories etc. that the normal time trackers seemed to expect. I tested quite a few before realising that!

I own the stardock object desktop, and have had for years, but I have only once or twice tried to customise DesktopX or objectbar to create an environment that would suit my work and tasks. I know if I did it could be very cool and useful, but it is just a lot of work, so I haven't (actually i did an objectbar once and kept it for 2 months until I had to reinstall windows and realised I had never backed this bar config up).

...

You get the picture, it's just quite pathetic!

I guess I am at one extreme of the developer scale - the one who doesnt want his/her personal computer time to feel even remotely like work and likes simple tools that dont require too much configuration etc. The other extreme of the scale is the developer who likes to customise or write everything he/she uses.

I want my tool to be immediately useful out of the box, with a few simple adjustments. In all these cases and many others the tool is either good enough in its "immediate" form I will just stop using it, it will not give me the kick to learn it... If it is good enough out of the box I am more likely to never scratch the surface of what it could do with tweaking...

Launchers are a similar case. I have farr, and use it more as a search tool. I think I even installed and downloaded some of the plugins but never use them. And just like total commander and wirekeys, if I bothered to get used to using some of the features I am sure I would benefit. But I don't  :o Similarly I could set up a menu in Total Commander, but I dont (I started once, but too many programs). Or I could set them up in wirekeys (or stardock's keyboard launchpad and right click commander, i own that too) to make them into launch keys and right click menu. Or I could do an objectbar or desktopX instance. Or reinstall ahk. But instead I have gone out and found a launcher tool which suits lazy people like me, because it builds its menu by watching what i run, from all sources. Finally a menu that doesnt need work.

I do feel a bit ashamed that I am that lazy, but I guess I have so many other projects that I dont want tools that turn in projects. That's my excuse  :Thmbsup:
638
I did try linkstash because I expect to buy clipcache one of these days, it is still the clipboard manager that works best with me. although most of the time i do all right with simpler tools. But i prefer the other 2 products I will go with one of them

Linkman: I really like the small toolbar that linkman leaves at the bottom of the screen, I can see that having this I might just use it and never use my browser's bookmarks. When I had it on I would actually click on that to add a bookmark instead of my browser's add and I loved how it warned me of duplicates. It was also as-you-type search always visible but without using much space.
I also kind of like the idea that you can have your browser's bookmarks open in the second pane, so you can control the synchronisation, but in practice I just don't seem to get around to using it, anduse that bit less than in a tool with preview or properties.
It is quite fast and powerful, the search worked really well, has all the tools I could think of needing. I only miss an internal quick view browser, somehow it helps me when checking bookmarks as it reminds me what the site was. There are a lot more features which I am not at all sure what they mean or how useful they are, but that's just typical of me 

Link Commander: I find link commander quite intuitive to use for management, in a way more so than linkman. Somehow I just *like* it better. It integrates very well with opera, i can even look up the history or list of all open tabs, live, and allow me to bookmark them in bulk. It was very easy to clean, move, manage the bookmarks, but unlike linkman I didnt find myself using it to add the bookmarks while browsing. On the other hand the build in browser comes in handy for me, and it keeps a screenie if i want it, and I found I did spend a bit more time getting keywords and meta information than I ever did with linkman - in summary I used it only for managing/cleaning the bookmarks, but I used it more as it made that bit feel easier.

So I used linkman more when in conjunction with my browser, and link commander more for the move-tag-check of links. Ugh, need more cash to spend!

So is anyone in DC using either Outertech's linkman and Resort Labs' link commander who could tell me how they fare in long term use?

PS: sorry for continuing the hijack of mouser's thread, should have put my question in another thread but this was the most recent mentioning bookmark managers
639
I could look in wikipedia but... what is pink noise?
640
I tried archivarius but it couldnt index my Outlook files - although this might be because my mail is all on the exchange server, but there is still a local cache

I will try your trick, it might work
641
I tried really hard to like website watcher but it's just not made for me - on paper I should just love it but it's too much setup work and then it still managed to puzzle me. Mostly I have tons of bookmarks I check once in a blue moon and just want for reference so I can find them again, and a tiny number of sites i check regularly. It was just too much work to set them all up so it wouldnt show me whenever things i am not interested in are changed...

In a way I am far too lazy - I want the tool to feel logical and smooth, and I also want it to be an improvement over the browser bookmark thing out of the box.

642
I am looking at the bookmark managing/synch'ing area again and have tried a few online options but the management of things is just too slow online, no matter what they try.

I tried again pretty much everything mentioned in this thread and at the moment my 2 favorites are Outertech's linkman and resort labs' link commander

Linkman: I really like the small toolbar that linkman leaves at the bottom of the screen, I can see that having this I might just use it and never use my browser's bookmarks. When I had it on I would actually click on that to add a bookmark instead of my browser's add and I loved how it warned me of duplicates. It was also as-you-type search always visible but without using much space.
I also kind of like the idea that you can have your browser's bookmarks open in the second pane, so you can control the synchronisation, but in practice I just don't seem to get around to using it, anduse that bit less than in a tool with preview or properties.
It is quite fast and powerful, the search worked really well, has all the tools I could think of needing. I only miss an internal quick view browser, somehow it helps me when checking bookmarks as it reminds me what the site was. There are a lot more features which I am not at all sure what they mean or how useful they are, but that's just typical of me :\
I had a weird issue with the trial locking up after less than a week and contacted the developer, and got a quick response, plus a follow up email when there was a new version released. Which is very nice and professional.
I almost registered this one years ago so maybe this time around I should :)

Link Commander: I find link commander quite intuitive to use for management, in a way more so than linkman. Somehow I just *like* it better. It integrates very well with opera, i can even look up the history or list of all open tabs, live, and allow me to bookmark them in bulk. It was very easy to clean, move, manage the bookmarks, but unlike linkman I didnt find myself using it to add the bookmarks while browsing. On the other hand the build in browser comes in handy for me, and it keeps a screenie if i want it, and I found I did spend a bit more time getting keywords and meta information than I ever did with linkman - in summary I used it only for managing/cleaning the bookmarks, but I used it more as it made that bit feel easier.

So I used linkman more when in conjunction with my browser, and link commander more for the move-tag-check of links. Ugh, need more cash to spend!


Between the two I am torn  :huh: must try a bit longer

643
Do you know how they got access to the pages in the first place?

When I had the problem 1.5 years ago they gained access to the tinyportal/smf uploads directory (cant remember which) and from this created some folders to put a warez server on. They didnt manage to change the pages, and couldnt do very much (thank goodness for BSD!) but still the bandwidth bill for 36 hours was.... about a year's hosting!

Do i need to worry and go check my site or can I just stay here and post some of the things I wanted to post last weekend?
644
Official Announcements / Re: The site is now back online (March 6th, 2008)
« Last post by iphigenie on March 07, 2008, 01:21 AM »
It happened to me once about a year and a half ago (also on a site running smf, and the vulnerabilty back then for me was in smf :( ) - I know your pain!

Now just sit back and relax and sleep it out - then tell me if I have to worry about my smf site again!
645
Developer's Corner / Re: How Do You Like to Approach Database Design?
« Last post by iphigenie on March 01, 2008, 10:42 AM »
3rd normal form??

It is about the steps you take to "clean" your database ideas - the 5 housekeeping checks to get a "clean" database. They're more mathematical than that.

IIRC the 1st normal form is about not having repeating columns and having an unique key (single or composite) in each table

the second normal form is about splitting off things that belong together into separate related tables (i.e. taking the product information outside of the shopping cart or separating address from personal details), making sure all your information is directly related to the key. This is about breaking down your content and index into meanigful data sub-chunks

The 3rd normal form is that the data in my table that actually exists "outside" this table's context should be outside it, this is where it really gets relational. Here you hunt down columns that dont belong in one table but should be separated...

Theres a few more steps after that that get more and more mathematical

Once you reach your clean database you often have to start "breaking" the cleanness for performance reason, using views or cache tables etc.  :-\

I'm sure people taking courses at the moment have it clearer in their head.
646
Developer's Corner / Re: How Do You Like to Approach Database Design?
« Last post by iphigenie on March 01, 2008, 10:34 AM »
I agree with you that many things are better offloaded to the database.

I am often apalled in web development how little is offloaded to the database. I think it is the fault of the way people learned, often learning database abstraction layers and learning on databases like mysql which until recently did not have foreign keys, subqueries or other basic tools of the DBA trade.

My favorite databases has been Postgres in recent years, it's a beauty to develop for/with - although I hate the absence of easy, simple replication
647
General Software Discussion / Re: books/blogs on database design?
« Last post by iphigenie on March 01, 2008, 08:13 AM »
It really depends on your level and your aim - there are very different aims in an academic textbook and a learning book for the pragmatic practitioner

The best is to indeed take the time to learn the theory, then learn the ins and outs and quirks of real world practice - which imply to throw out the window half the theory because real databases dont work that way, there are performance concerns and simply if you want to write something that is easy to write and maintain

I still recommend "SQL for Smarties" or "Database in Depth" which is by the same C Date as the textbook above but oriented at practitioners rather than at a 2 semester course for undergraduates
648
I havent had the freeze for a while now so disabling extensions has done the trick

I disabled

* the stardock extensions for a few tools that seemed to still be on, keyboard launchpad, right click, and windows blinds
* extensions from qt tab bar (mostly cause i added it about when the problems started and reading the history there are many right click related bugs, none like mine but still)
* extensions linked to farstone virtual drive/gamedrive
* securom context menu
* fuji camera extensions
* sony phone extensions
* skype add on extensions
* zoner extensions (reenabled since)
* Copernic search handler
* stuff i dont think i use like microsoft office infopath, intel graphics context menu, search for people, hyperterminal, ms web folders

I am going to start reenabling some of them bit by bit to see if i can figure out which it was. one of the top 2 I still think!
649
DC Gamer Club / Re: Voice chat: good or bad?
« Last post by iphigenie on March 01, 2008, 03:29 AM »
I can get a teamspeak server organised if desired
Pages: prev1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 ... 46next