topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday November 11, 2025, 4:00 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 ... 175next
626
To as great an extent as possible, the business requirements for the application should drive the approach to the selection of programming tools/languages. It should not be a "technical" IT decision per se, nor driven by vendors peddling a favoured or proprietary approach.

Iain, I think our two comments pair together.

I went after the idea you have these two languages, so in my "advantages" and "disadvantages" suggested comparison, that includes the intersection of business and technical requirements.

Dilbert is all about when "pointy head business types" want stuff, over the wailing howls of the techs. Techs are occasionally known to drift into something that loses track of what's actually making value for the company. To me the intersection is where a business manager says "I want X because I think X adds value. Tech, you pick which language best produces X without too many time sinks that drag the project into a moldy swamp." The business manager should always be "first" to look for value ... then *very quickly* go consult with tech to make sure to avoid pointy-head blunders.

The main time tech goes first is when the company does a "10% time is yours" type project, which is what pure research does to science. When they're not busy making tires for airplanes, someone drops a beaker on the floor and comes up with silly putty which is useless for the hoped-for airplane tire, but makes a fortune with four year olds (and mothers buying special shampoo to get it out of their child's hair!!)
:Thmbsup:

627
Living Room / Flawless Autobot Win and near final rundown
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on April 01, 2015, 02:53 AM »
Got it!

A flawless victory! Fatality!

I've been mildly irritated that my recent wins always had "artistic flaws" where a bunch of enemies would breach home base way the end. This time I found one of the "perfect" formulas that left no room in doubt, so I am ready to do a big writeup.

1. Overview notes
Autobot Stronghold is a tower defense type game with waves of enemy armies. I have remarked that for a tie-in to a commercial ad, it really is well put together and balanced. Now that I figured out a crucial aspect, I no longer believe I even have seen any bugs!

Without looking at spoilers like this or others on the net, it's a game that you have to play at least "seven times" to win, because it pulls some tricks you just don't see coming on your initial pass through. There are more tactical details involved, but here are the crucial points I now understand.

2. Crucial strategies
a. Levels 1-25
For months I thought you didn't earn the right to deploy Optimus Prime until level 25. That's because at a "certain pace" ... it just tends to be there when you get the right pre-reqs. But the correct answer is 100,000 points plus 50 sparks. So on the early levels when you are tempted to just "play relaxing" and you end up with whole minutes waiting for the army to die, while you make coffee and stuff, is a mistake! In fact, you can actually "send next wave" whenever you like -- and you get bonus points doing so! So this means that you can get an extra 15,000 ish points over levels 5-22, and if you don't overspend and make sure you have enough sparks banked up, starting around level 23-24, you can get Optimus one crucial frame early *before* the "breakpoint level" 25.

b. Once you unlock the rights to deploy Optimus, unless you are "hardcore playing for score", there is no further reason to rush, so then it makes most strategy to stretch existing resources to the very max and not go for "squash crushes" of the armies - you will need a bank of sparks on hand for emergencies! Both deploying and upgrading Optimus are in batches of 50 sparks each, and once you have him unlocked, it no longer makes any sense to buy lower level units.

c. Soldiers, Rats, Copters, and Dreadnoughts
One reason it takes "7 plays to win" is you have to see the spread of armies over all 50 levels ... because there are lots of "close but no cigars" at the end! You do indeed get a lot of "slack" where letting through two dumb rats and a helicopter won't end your game ... the problem is that once you miscalculate and get overloaded, it all just caves in! So while in theory you can ignore the big slow moving dreadnoughts, by themselves they won't kill you - but what they do is siphon off your defense fire in distraction while 15 other things get through!

Chances are the Soldiers, while durable, aren't your main problem. The bigger problems are that the copters come straight at the middle of the board, and the rats run really fast around them. So you need a really solid spread to handle them in pairs, and a good chunk of strategy to avoid getting "magpied" by the dreadnoughts that basically refuse to die.

3. Top row!
The game DOES "play fair" by sending a couple "sacrrficial scouts" at the top to let you know that's a legal entry point, because chances are the first time you play you have no idea that's even legal! So even at worst if those two get by, the point is, it's warning you that you better put up some *powerhouse* defense up there because your 20 guys down on the bottom don't help with 23 guys storming in at the top in the high 40's levels!

.. And that REALLY is a problem! So while having one good upgraded Optimus over on the side does help, you really need to load up on the top left because a quad of Optimus protects the entire top left of the board.

4. "Closers"
A big "close but no cigar" problem to avoid is that enemies with 1 hp left still damage your base! So it's bad news to "almost kill them" and let them all get too close. So at different levels you can put a few "closers" like at the top right and down right by home base just to "seal the deal" with the random few guys that slip through from "micro timing" through your main strategic defense.

Here is my diagram. The diagram box on the bottom right is resources that *are not there in the final scenes*, but indicate how they were there for "earlier needs" in levels 2-30 before getting sold off at the end to get more Optimus bots.

5. "Trap buys"
Not all bots are created equally useful. In approx order my eval of value is:
Levels 1-20:
1-3 gold Ratchets, 1-3 gold Bumblebees, and a whole lot of sky-aiming (copters!!) silver Ironhides. I never had a use for the Jazz bot. It just seems like too little of anything to be useful except as an esoteric "hard way" experiment.
Levels 21-25:
Start to really hang on tight because a good couple send-next waves tips you over the 100,000 point mark to get Optimus, and make sure you have the sparks on hand. So it's okay to play it really tight where you even allow 2 guys through because a couple of these levels have that incredible balancing where something like 2 rats and/or 2 copters get through just from micro placement. You don't need to waste 40 sparks desperately trying to stop them - because then you just tricked yourself out of an Optimus!
Level 26-30:
Optimus! *Upgrade him!* What I completely missed until I had to look online was that while the other guys in early levels "just get kinda strong", Optimus can shoot *multi rays*! So notice there are only so many really correct strategic placements because single deploys elsewhere just end up failing at the last second. Instead, upgrade the strategic ones to level 2-3.



Good luck!

Tao Autobot Flawlesss Win with Early Strategy Diagram on right.png

---------------------
Edit:
Here's one with a few less purchase-then-sales on the side traded for a more aesthetic bot on the bottom to add that extra solidity to the lower half of the board.

Tao Autobot Flawlesss Win Aesthetic1.png
628
Living Room / Re: The conflict of interest that is Google
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on April 01, 2015, 01:48 AM »
With Apologies to Murphy.

If something can be abused, it will.

Google new motto should be in the lines of
"Do not GET CAUGHT while doing evil."

It's getting worse!

"Something will be abused. There is no whether, because anything can be abused with sufficient malice. If you have failed to abuse something, apply more malice."

"Actual worry about getting caught doesn't even always apply. The corps have moved on to playing "talk to the hand" to the government. IF they take sanctions, ignore them. That's because they are under the silly impression that laws matter!"

Now excuse me while I go abuse something else!
:'(
629
The advantage people learning now would have is that OOP is not this new foreign way of thinking about coding.

Miles, you are absolutely right. Not is OOP old hat, but it is the preferred, 'modern' way of doing things now. Maybe I'm the odd one out, but when people say C++ is difficult to learn and master, I have to say I found it to be quite easy, but I've got a 'big picture' way of thinking. I can look at a whole and easily break it down into modular components.

To be fair, I'm discovering not everyone thinks in that fashion. As I tackle learning IT project management, I'm finding a lot of people can't 'zoom out' their vision far enough to see how everything is intertwined & I suppose C++ is like that as well.

I guess the takeaway from this post is to choose a programming language that matches how you process thoughts. Everyone processes thoughts differently, no one way more correct than the other.

This is going to be a bit of a "leading the witness" type post, but I think it would be useful for the thread since it's targetted at beginners.

First, a slight language nuance change: Something can't quite be "old hat" if it's also the "preferred modern way". Because like in the humor thread, "old hat" is a soft insult. So something described like above becomes something like "the venerable OOP that superseded older styles except in specific cases."

Then as for the "difficult to master", I'll use my outsider's view to suggest the following:

Top level:
Core C-Type concepts that evolved out of original C on down.

"Offspring variants"
A. C++
B. C#

So granted, each of those kept most/some of the core. But then they split for different specialties, that the beginner has to think about for a while as a forest before chopping down trees to build an application out of Lincoln logs.

1. What did each language "decide to evolve to have" (aka the creators did), as specific advantages to address a nuisance that wasn't suitable in original C?
2. What sacrificial tradeoffs did each give up as a lesser of two evils to get there and what were the judgement calls made about why they were less damaging than the advantages gained?
(Basics of old style rational economics.)

Even my uncle who used to do some corp coding back his day rolled his eyes at a few of the mistakes possible in old C!

I saw a useful humorous phrasing about how things evolve / get invented to address needs / markets:

"If you start swearing and using the shift-top of your keyboard, there is a need/market! So go do something, and then maybe it's still raw, but the next stage refines the finesses".


630
Funny joke. But how come the Irish guy has a name but the Polish guy doesn't?

Assuming you're not "playing Straight Man" to the joke, the "hero" of the joke always gets a name, and the mark target is always a nameless mook.

It's a cousin effect to that stuff we were saying over on the TV thread. It makes for some of the lowest forms of humor, and they thought puns were bad!
:(

631
Living Room / Re: Interesting "stuff"
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on March 31, 2015, 04:07 PM »
Precision, depth, and flexibility - the ultimate difference between PC software and apps

I'm gonna single out this one to echo because to me it's far beyond "just interesting stuff" and smack in the middle of the desktop-mobile wars.

Not the least being that we're on DC, we're either software creators or software appreciators.

In contrast, strange "new culture" themes keep emerging in the "app-world" that disturb me. Besides the lockin platform stuff, just the actual software design, tons of apps seem to have "good pixel placement", someone set a bar high for that, but the actual feature sets seem to be often really sloppy.

632

I'll raise it to new meta heights when an April Fools joke from 2013 ... becomes the actual marketing for Windows 10 ... and revisit the article on April Fools 2015! (Just after that new build which I bet you they rushed by a couple days to avoid the newbie marketing blunder!)

http://www.infoworld...s-to-windows-10.html

"Deeming Windows 9 'too good to release,' Microsoft execs shelve follow-up to Windows 8 and proceed to Windows 10"

633
Living Room / Re: Why are car stereos so flimsy?
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on March 31, 2015, 12:24 PM »

I think there's like 3 separate mini culture-effects going on here.

1. Flimsy knobs - Renegade's funny semi-paranoia version aside, I'll say it's because the Upper Mgt comes from the older "rule by committee" culture where someone decides to shave off "$3 per unit" so "let's take it out of the knobs!"

2. Different design specs. "A car stereo with one button?! (Apple) Who wants that?!" -- Imagined consumer reaction, per the minds of the engineering management committee.

3. "But ... it's in a car!" Carmaker says "But it's not ours. Dealer just stuck it in there." Instead of looking at either Apple or Google's Android phones, try instead like pharmacy brand imitation ipods.

634
I can see it.  Kind of like The Tonight Show standard bit where people supposedly send in newspaper clippings of ads with funny typos.  The thing with tracking I really find annoying is it seems as soon as I buy something online I get an email that I could have purchased the same item at 75% of the cost.  Like, now you tell me!  :)

Edit:  What I need is a predictive heuristic.  Like, I get an email "we know you are going to buy a 256 GB Lexar USB 3.0 for $150.  Stop!  We'll give it to you for $100 shipping included!"  :)

Sort of like a reverse auction.
(Homer voice)
"Mmm. Gray Morality."
What you can do is buy it, with a big show of having your laptop with you, vanish "to a restaurant", then come back like 1 hour later saying "hey, it's not broken but my laptop doesn't have the driver for it and I can't get the cd to work, and no I don't want to spend three hours with your tech guy."

635
Contextual advertising win? Or fail?

Where did that image come from?

Was it "natural", or was it photo-manipped on there?

How many people would look up such a term?  There must also be a Latin term for the fear of hit counter remaining at zero in perpetuity.

That's why I was asking about photo-manips. Only "the curious" would normally look up that term. But it's a square graphic, which could have just been pasted on there quite easily. At least some care was taken to keep (most?) of the sentences intact.

A few companies are learning that "clever" ads like that could score well in the "viral culture". But a lot of times, especially in technology, ad placement algorithms scan for keywords and smash an ad onto the article. Hilarity ensues. Slashdot has experienced bunches of this because their content is fairly focused on the same twelve-ish categories of news. I tend not to see the ads because of adblocks, but usually when it happens someone posts a tinypic or something where a story is something like "Users concerned about security of the cloud in wake of Amazon cloud outage", and then the ad alg smashes "Amazon cloud services!!" onto it.



636
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 10 Announced
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on March 31, 2015, 05:37 AM »

Lazy blurb taken from Slashdot:

"Today Microsoft released a new Technical Preview build for Windows 10. Its most notable addition is Microsoft's new browser: Project Spartan."

Anyone want to chime in on Spartan?

637
Living Room / Re: TV shows thread
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on March 31, 2015, 05:26 AM »

"Character role of race in media" is one of those awful "super entrenched meta issues" that for ex could take another 100 years to begin fixing!

To me it's a bit like how Microsoft used a bunch of dirty tricks to become the eternal "metagame" in the desktop OS world.

638
Living Room / Re: Programming/Coder humor
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on March 31, 2015, 05:17 AM »
A possibly better example than solving 8+5 might be how would you solve 97*3 in your head?  I think that many people would juggle the numbers so that it's 100*3 - 3*3, which is easy to work out in your head (or mine at least) as 300-9 = 291.  I know that how I'd do it, and it's a similar transformation to 8+5 being the same as 8+2 + 3 = 10 + 3 = 13. It's just that the 8+5 problem is pretty simple by itself, so there's probably less need for the transformation 'trick'.

This is exactly what I was saying earlier.

I think there's a "goldilocks" theme here.

"Everyone" knows that 8+5=13. And then in a later class they teach you "estimating" so that if you're quickly glancing at (97*3)-3 and it's not "sorta around 290" then you have a problem.

And then everything else gets handled with combinations of calculators and software so most people don't need to pull the final answer to (97*3)-3 by hand unless they're in a special situation. Even if I think I could get that one, I'd just do it on a calculator because it's not worth the risk of getting it right 9/10 times and then the last time you're just wiped and botch it and the error travels along with your data and really wrecks something. You get zero credit for doing the other nine "the cool kid way" if your last one then causes $1000 in implicit damages like the value of people's time, then plus reputation dishonor damage when for example you're signing a contract and your change order has a math blunder in it!
:tellme:

639
Living Room / Re: Programming/Coder humor
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on March 31, 2015, 04:28 AM »
It would be funny if a whole class of those kinds of kids showed up in high school Algebra 1 and confidently parrots back versions of that speech. Teacher would do a double facepalm!

There was a study where small groups solved problems to come up with the wrong answer. 1 person in the group wasn't "in" on the fix, but usually went along with it. I forget where I read that though. I guess you could get a class to "fix" the answers they give the teacher to mess with them. :)

Nah, kids prank teachers all the time. It's not the same. It will get a funny reaction first, but then it all goes "back to normal".

The horror comes from when the kids *really* believe it because the kool-aid-knockoff went on so long and wasn't just "1 stupid class they took". Then the teacher is trying to figure out how to teach solving for a variable when the teacher can't trust the kids to finish *any* step!

"So, you subtract 8x from both sides." (Trying to be rhetorical) "See? 8x - 8x is what?"
Kid: "Two x?"
((Teacher sinks into double facepalm again.))

640
Living Room / Re: Programming/Coder humor
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on March 31, 2015, 03:23 AM »
Oh, you mean how 3x4=11?

The Common Core way is just silly. Here's one mom showing 8+5.

I put these into two separate categories.

At least the 8+5 example comes out right. In another category, there's the "fast math" tricks seen on TED talks that suddenly look "impressive" because it's stuff like 24x26=624 which is out of most people's "multi tables". So I call that one a "draw".

Now the really funny part is if someone in the audience at that 3x4 epic speech was REALLY fast on the draw and mimicked her at that 110 words per min pacing "Yeah, in base 11."
:D
Extra credit for the guy having this in his "notes":
Chart of other base systems multi tables:
http://www.dozenal.o...rticles/DSA-Mult.pdf
(Extra Extra credit! In "Literature for 500 Alex", lots of the 800+ page Battlefield Earth novel relies on a plot point that the alien Psychlos built their entire technology base, besides on self destructing circuits when opened, but also on purpose in Base 11 to screw over reverse engineering attempts. I mean you guys are good, but if you only had one whack at looking at a schematic under an hour, would you pick that up?)

In high school and college teachers/profs have been doing partial credit for decades. You know, 9 step problems, you're tired/other and botch something way at the top, they just take off 3 out of 8 total points. No biggie.

It's the epic simplicity of the 3x4 example that is the shocking part. How many times can students actually produce those kinds of answers before they're held back grades though? That's the unspoken item here.

It would be funny if a whole class of those kinds of kids showed up in high school Algebra 1 and confidently parrots back versions of that speech. Teacher would do a double facepalm!

(Dramatization of teacher who thought he/she was going to teach algebra and gets kids who gloriously produce things like 3x4=11 and "explain the work". )
https://www.youtube..../watch?v=BNsrK6P9QvI



641
Living Room / Re: TV shows thread
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on March 31, 2015, 02:36 AM »
Speaking of Forever, there's some weird stuff going on (lately?) with IMDB. It's (beginning?) to have colossal gaps in who plays what role. But besides the X Files that I surveyed last week, I'm suddenly discovering blatant holes in new shows too, like Forever.

I hadn't looked at this show in a while, until reminded by it in this thread. I'd forgotten about it for no real reason, just life marching on and such.

But I'd vaguely remembered that Adrian Pasdar of Heroes was the "anonymous caller" aka "Adam" (and some con-cover character roles etc.)

But watch this!

Adrian Pasdar's IMDB (as it stands now)
http://www.imdb.com/...499/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1
No mention of Forever

Forever Pilot on IMDB:
http://www.imdb.com/...76146/?ref_=ttep_ep1
No mention of the caller, A. P. or otherwise.

But look! It's on Wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia....g/wiki/Adrian_Pasdar

"Forever" Wiki
http://forever.wikia.com/wiki/Forever

Misc io9 Article about this, with him on it:
http://io9.com/for-i...ever-mana-1649247743

So what's with this? Are some actors able to contact IMDB and get themselves taken off of listings there?!

It's *possible* this was a mistake that traveled along the web, but you'd think a famous actor's agency would go after this all and fix it.

I thought IMDB used to be pretty good, but I'm starting to have serious doubts about it now! : (


642
I apologise for this up front :-[

Researchers for the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority found over 200 dead crows near greater Boston recently, and there was concern that they may have died from Avian Flu.
...
 
The Ornithological Behaviorist very quickly concluded the cause: when crows eat road kill, they always have a look-out crow in a nearby tree to warn of impending danger. They discovered that while all the lookout crows could shout "Cah", not a single one could shout "Truck"

They missed getting in the word "TurnPaahk"!
:D

But ya know, on a medium "straight man" level, "shaggy dog" jokes seem to have dramatically declined in the net age.

The last time I saw jokes with this kind of really big set up was in a British joke book for kids, I think from Harrod's, from the 1980's.

The net seems to like its jokes with "faster punchlines", whether it's Nyancat, or webcomics, or Youtube videos, or your choice of thirteen other things.

643
That "thread aggregator" is one of the most powerful features of the opening forum page for me! First thing I do is *scroll down* to see what the threads are! Then I right-click a few of them to get ready for some reading.
You might also enjoy the list of recent topics and recent posts, both linked from the top of the forum pages.

I've looked at those, but with a slight tinge of today's obsession with TV tropes, the aggregator has a huge "innovative value" (Implementation trademarked by Mouser, most rights reserved!)

What it does is make sure that *ten threads* are merged, and it can never be less than 10. (Except maybe one day if there's a setting per member. What about more?)

So the stunning innovation vs the "older tech" recent posts is that, that view produces the following:
(Some humor below!)

---------------------------------------------

Why Mouser Rules
Hooray for the Fundraiser
How to improve DC - What about a CMS?
Sharing Buttons - where, how big, and what do they do?
Linguistic analysis of emotional markers of Stephen's last five posts over 400 words long
Honesty is what you are thinking, Balanced tone is what you should be thinking
Why Mouser Rules
Hooray for the Fundraiser
How to improve DC - What about a CMS?
Sharing Buttons - where, how big, and what do they do?
Why Mouser Rules
Hooray for the Fundraiser
How to improve DC - What about a CMS?
Sharing Buttons - where, how big, and what do they do?
Why Mouser Rules
Hooray for the Fundraiser
How to improve DC - What about a CMS?
Sharing Buttons - where, how big, and what do they do?
Why Mouser Rules
Hooray for the Fundraiser
How to improve DC - What about a CMS?
Sharing Buttons - where, how big, and what do they do?
Why Mouser Rules
Hooray for the Fundraiser
How to improve DC - What about a CMS?
Sharing Buttons - where, how big, and what do they do?
Why Mouser Rules
Hooray for the Fundraiser
How to improve DC - What about a CMS?
Sharing Buttons - where, how big, and what do they do?
Why Mouser Rules
Hooray for the Fundraiser
How to improve DC - What about a CMS?
Sharing Buttons - where, how big, and what do they do?
Why Mouser Rules
Hooray for the Fundraiser
How to improve DC - What about a CMS?
Sharing Buttons - where, how big, and what do they do?
--------------------------------------------------------

Whew! Oh look! That's only six threads!

There's more that weren't talked about for three whole days!

: )

So, how hard is it to get a modular x setting per member to expand that section?



644
And since there is currently no room on most of those pages, without a slight redesign, and if there is plans on moving the main site to a CMS adding them now would be a waste of work, that was why I said to wait.

I'll add something to this small snippet, from a slightly different perspective.

Apparently some "purist" developers make the same judgement choice that has in another domain, caused me to lose several chess games: "Why bother to make that first small move with a pawn or a piece, when you're just going to move it again? It's a waste of ___". Chess tempi, work, etc.

But the right answer can be more often than we think, "because the double-step accomplishes something small and definite *right now* like developing a certain piece, or actually locking in concrete improvements to the site, rather than waiting on the unclear future for imagined savings of time or tempi in the future, which may not ever happen at all!"

So I'll try a really bold approach:
Leave the bottom buttons there. Because to me there are *two sets* of content on DC forum pages!

That "thread aggregator" is one of the most powerful features of the opening forum page for me! First thing I do is *scroll down* to see what the threads are! Then I right-click a few of them to get ready for some reading.

And *then* I scroll to the top, to check PM messages and the fundraiser and prepare to open a chat tab. So just do App's idea and put a *second set of buttons* at the top! I'll leave it for y'all later to fine tune which function buttons go where.

Meanwhile, jump over the hurdle of "potential super efficiency later" and ... just put in App's suggestion ... right now! Because we've amiably pondered site redesigns for years! So ... the move to a CMS is not going to happen "soon enough"! So ... just put in the sharing code. Right now. Develop that knight to d7 ... right now. Birds in hand vs more in the bush etc. The really fancy metaphor is the biz/finance one of the present value vs discounted future value. Put in our *own* tracker of what we gain from the sharing buttons! One new member *right now* is more important than the "future value of labor saved ... whenever"!

As for if "people ever get to the bottom of a page", that's back to that other edgy argument of our userbase ... I trust our core market ... is smart enough ... wait for it ... to scroll *all the way to the bottom of a page without getting exhausted and distracted by

oh look! a new episode of Castle! Bye!

8)   :P
645
General Software Discussion / Re: Windows 10 Announced
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on March 29, 2015, 07:36 PM »
The Anti-Climax Known as Windows 10  John C. Dvorak  PCMag.com

I've been waiting for years for someone to write The Anti-Climax Known as John C. Dvorak.

Well, not quite, John D "is his own climax". I just checked a couple of those articles, and basically if you put it in enough vitriolic biased language, you can make anything sound unbuyable! Let's try it!

"Well hell. Look at this $hit called ca$h. I mean it's F$cking paper that becomes almost unusable the minute it rains and you drop your wallet! Boom! Hundred buck$ down the drain. Almost literally. Well, it will sit there swirling until the dept of public works comes and bitches at your for making them spend an hour of billable time to clean it out of the drain holes. But tell ya what. I know a guy who knows a guy, so I'll take your ca$h right off you at a nice durable quarter on the $hitty dollar and give you either quarters, or on your debit card for a fee."

:D

646

Also, this site is not inhabited by morons who don't know how to copy/paste an URL, so I don't really see what value they add.

This bit starts to get trickier the more we look at it!
647

I'm okay with them.

648

Def check out the settings - I set it to "do not confirm" and a couple other things.

If I'm gonna go to that much effort to nuke something, I don't want the confirm box!
649
Living Room / Re: The Dreams thread...
« Last post by TaoPhoenix on March 26, 2015, 02:42 PM »

Got one!

The structure was a little strange - I was not quite "in control" like a full lucid one, but I could def tell portions of it unfolding.

Near as I can tell, it was like being a nobody-cast-extra in something on TV. By the lack of "dominating title characters", it felt like a TV movie.

It was something like a "soft crime" mystery taking place at something like a college where the Star Trek club got the funding for a "Day with Diana Muldaur (Dr. Pulaski from ST TNG)." Typical of those second string college activities where they can only afford one of the "B list" stars.

So we were all riding around in a car going places, and there was something about packages. Suppose Ms. Muldaur had either engineer or prop manager friends and maybe had brought custom Trekkian gifts for the club to mail home.

But because of a recent unrelated mail bomb scare, we were all talking about asking for police assistance while we mailed them to demonstrate the authenticity of the gifts.

It all went off without any "plot developments" - the tone was much more "slice of life". It gets a little fuzzy but I presume the Trek club and friends just wandered around campus and maybe the d-list local tourist attractions of a small college town and probably had lunch in there somewhere.

Fun little dream!

650
This is just batshit crazy...

These people are worried about being "triggered" by clapping. Really.


Anxiety inducing clapping:

https://www.youtube..../watch?v=PNXElmEUIJo

:D

(I know there are new entries, but this is the most anxiety inducing!) 

Pages: prev1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 ... 175next