topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Wednesday November 12, 2025, 5:52 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 ... 309next
626
General Software Discussion / Re: Directory Opus 11 Released!
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 06, 2016, 05:13 PM »
I meant that the bad quality of the Lazarus fC is not caused by Lazarus.

I understand.  That is when it happened because to move to 64 bit the developer had(due to monetary concerns) to change to Lazarus.  Since he had to write a new application he made it a bit differently.  Only to be expected.  But I had used freeCommander for so many years I like it the way it was.  I was hoping for a 64 bit implementation with no learning curve.

Afaik the x64 version is still only in beta and given out as a "thank you" to donors.  Who knows if it will ever be ready for prime time.  :)
627
General Software Discussion / Re: Directory Opus 11 Released!
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 06, 2016, 01:51 PM »
That's not Lazarus's fault, though. Delphi doesn't really make a difference.

The difference would have been a 64 bit version that looked exactly the same as the 32 bit.  What provoked the change to Lazarus was anticipation of the need to compile x64 without spending a lot of $$$
628
General Software Discussion / Re: Directory Opus 11 Released!
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 06, 2016, 01:46 PM »
Lazarus doesn't change functionality. However, I made the experience that freeware file managers - except FAR, of course - are notably worse than their commercial pendants, usability-wise.

The freeCommander author made it a bit different when he released the XE version.  Also it came out with many functions unimplemented and filled in piecemeal.  One of the last was the multi-renamer which was one of my favorite freeCommander functions.  I still haven't seen the 64 bit release.

The trouble with a file manager is a tendency to use that as the cockpit.  If you decide you made a bad choice you likely invested lots of time that has to be jettisoned unless the replacement has a similar command set and layout.

But I don't do a zillion file operations a day.  So it is not really the basis of how I use the PC.  A guy I worked with did everything out of X-Tree Gold.  He pretty much talked me into buying it.  It worked well so I didn't feel ripped off.  But I got nowhere near the use from it that he did.

629
General Software Discussion / Re: Directory Opus 11 Released!
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 06, 2016, 11:15 AM »
I am tempted to delve into Multi Commander

It has a built in scripting thingie that looks very powerful.  Also it is totally free.  What makes me hesitate is I think it is a one developer deal.  Or is that just an excuse not to learn the scripting syntax?  The big drawback with all the file managers that are not Explorer is that they don't sit in memory all the time.  Perhaps I could try running it out of a ramdisk.  I liked FreeCommander very much.  But the transition to Lazarus really made it seem not the same to me.

Multi Commander has the advantage it already comes in native 32 and 64 bit versions.  Just for grins I may try running the portable 64 bit version out of my ramdisk to see if it fits.  At this point I haven't done anything with it.  So uninstalling loses me not much to go portable.

630
Living Room / Re: When you make your 100'th Post
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 05, 2016, 06:24 PM »
...My feeling is that I have an innate desire to put in my $.02.  Either I haven't depleted my two penny sets or my post count is augmented by multiple edits to eliminate typos.  Do edits count?  I am not sure.  As for the non important person I can understand your incarceration if you professed this status without a license.  Likewise I am in danger of apprehension since I believe that the requirement of an Associate's Degree in Sub-Tropical Urban Survival Techniques is immanent.

It is obvious many homeless in Miami lack the education to do it right.  I just hope I can get a Pell Grant to see me through.  FAU has free tuition if you can prove Florida residence but ironically there is no place to live up there in West Boca.  So I cannot take advantage of it.
________________________
Methinks that you may underestimate yourseslf.
Is that "lack" a lack of formal education (qualifications on paper)?
Sir James Goldsmith (deceased) is an example  - and there are many more - of someone who was monumentally "unqualified" (in that sense) for what he did, but that never seemed to hold him back.
During their lives, such people have the propensity to change the world we live in, and sometimes they quietly do just that.
I know of not a few degree-holders who are apparently intelligent idiots.
(I blame a politicised educational system for this.)

Let me preface my remarks by saying I have worked with very bright people both with degrees and without.  An engineer I worked with developed a "Nickel Plating Process" that produced a sheet that felt like cellophane but was actually a nickel screen.  You had to look through a magnifier to see the screen it was so fine.  One major application was in oscilloscope production.  He only had a G.E.D.

Another fellow I worked with had a degree in music and one in business.  So of course he was an engineer.  :)  An extremely bright fellow.  Also I worked in some research companies(as a mechanical tech) with PHDs.  I am just laying the ground work so people can see I don't have a chip on my shoulder when it concerns those with degrees.

In my case with only a G.E.D. I became a Software Analyst.  I was fortunate in that several of my article submissions to computer programming journals were published.  The first consulting company that hired me had a software developer who had a couple of the issues with my articles in his collection.  So they had some rationale for assuming I had the ability to do the job they were filling.

Unfortunately I got in on the gravy train as a consultant just as the railroad(figuratively speaking) was being disassembled.  More precisely, outsourced.  Since I was new I had the fewest contacts and limited experience.  I had a reputation of knowing what I was doing.  I just wish I got in on the game years earlier.  But since generally the computer is kept in a non hostile environment and the work usually involves typing on the keyboard rather than lifting object high in mass, I stubbornly hang on hoping I will get the gig that at least allows me to obtain decent living quarters and the usual stuff most of us took for granted if one had a full time job, such as car, a few toys etc..

But when it comes to office politics the singleton tends to get knocked out early in the game.  Unless he or she has done something semi-famous like inventing a computer language people know about or whatnot.

It does make me kind of sad that the programmer journals of yesteryear are gone and for the new generation just unknown.  Even wonderful writers like Jeff Duntemann have to include the titles of his programming journals on his page so that we can even remember what the magazines were named(I used to subscribe to all his stuff.  He brilliantly mixed humor with the technical knowledge.  I enjoyed his work very much.  He was The Guy when it came to Borland Turbo and Delphi stuff.)

But there seems to be a ready made mold for anyone without a permanent address in this country.  Anything you say is automatically discounted.  I don't even tell people what I used to make an hour because I figure they will just tell me I am a liar.  And of course I must be a drunk/crack head/nutcase or something or why would I be out here?  I feel bad for all these young kids who think they will really get this hot job in a field that is pretty much non-existent these days.  About all they can point to is game development.  I don't think the economy can thrive by all of us just selling each other video games.

But I get too serious.  My comment about the Associate's Degree to be homeless was semi-tongue-in-cheek.  I try to see the humorous side.  Otherwise it would just be too sad.
631
Living Room / Re: When you make your 100'th Post
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 04, 2016, 06:48 PM »
Miles, when I got out of prison for impersonating a NIP (Non-Important Person) in 2008, I joined DCF, and  you joined in 2009 (according to our stats at any rate).
So how is it that I am now just over 6,000 posts and yet you are currently way ahead with about 7,100 posts and have the effrontery to congratulate me at getting to 6,000?
What? In my youthfull exuberance, was I not expected to be able to last the distance?

Enquiring minds need to know.     :tellme:

My feeling is that I have an innate desire to put in my $.02.  Either I haven't depleted my two penny sets or my post count is augmented by multiple edits to eliminate typos.  Do edits count?  I am not sure.  As for the non important person I can understand your incarceration if you professed this status without a license.  Likewise I am in danger of apprehension since I believe that the requirement of an Associate's Degree in Sub-Tropical Urban Survival Techniques is immanent.

It is obvious many homeless in Miami lack the education to do it right.  I just hope I can get a Pell Grant to see me through.  FAU has free tuition if you can prove Florida residence but ironically there is no place to live up there in West Boca.  So I cannot take advantage of it.  :)

heh heh heh
632
Living Room / Re: When you make your 100'th Post
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 03, 2016, 08:09 PM »
I checked I saw that I had got past the 6,000 mark today:


Congrats!!  Nice going.


633
^oh yes, of course

So I was saying the right thing, but barking up the wrong tree.  :-[


When Microsoft wants to jump from one "bitness" to another, like calling a 32 bit routine from 64 bit code, they use a "thunk."  My theory is that the programmer who thought up that idea conjugated the verb "to think" as "think" "thank" "thunk."   :)  At least that's what I thunk when I read it the first time.  :)



Interestingly, thunk is listed as the informal term for "thud", as in, that joke landed like a ... :P

I appreciate your comment.  Thunk you very much.  :)
634
^oh yes, of course

So I was saying the right thing, but barking up the wrong tree.  :-[


When Microsoft wants to jump from one "bitness" to another, like calling a 32 bit routine from 64 bit code, they use a "thunk."  My theory is that the programmer who thought up that idea conjugated the verb "to think" as "think" "thank" "thunk."   :)  At least that's what I thunk when I read it the first time.  :)
635
How does one tell which type (32 or 64-bit) one has? It's not mentioned in the "About" section.
Check the install location. If it's in "Program Files" then it's 64-bit. If it's in "Program Files (x86)" then it's 32-bit.

- eh, no! On a 32-bits system the %1% is "Program Files", because there is no other system.


In which case if you try to run a 64 bit exe you'll get an error anyway.
636
General Software Discussion / Re: BingThing 1.5.8.0 guilty pleasure
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 02, 2016, 09:59 AM »
BingThing 1.5.8.0  One small tweak.  After some operations I set the focus back to the Input Line.  This makes it a bit easier to filter the History List by hitting the Enter key.

Link is in the first post as usual.
637
How does one tell which type (32 or 64-bit) one has? It's not mentioned in the "About" section.

Check the install location. If it's in "Program Files" then it's 64-bit. If it's in "Program Files (x86)" then it's 32-bit.

If you downloaded the portable the self-extracting exe has either x86 or x64 in the filename.
638
How does one tell which type (32 or 64-bit) one has? It's not mentioned in the "About" section.

Considering you have to dig through a layer of warnings against using the x64 version, to download the x64 version ...(if you don't remember the ruckus)... I'd be inclined to just assume it's x86.

Once running you can always look in Task Manager.  If it is 32 bit it will say so next to the program name.
639
32-bit.

I have a slow HD.  Only Sata II.  So I followed IainB's lead and put the cache in a ramdisk.  I only allocated 256 MB to the ramdisk and set the limit in SlimJet to 200 MB cache.  It seems to speed it up a bit.  I added the ramdisk cache folder to CCleaner and periodically empty the cache conveniently that way.

Edit:  It doesn't download any faster than Firefox.  If you leave your browser up and running all the time you may not see much benefit.  But if you only run it when you actually want to browse something, SlimJet jumps onto the desktop.  Whereas now Firefox takes about 45 seconds to load on my Laptop.  I have a bunch of folders on my bookmarks bar.  There seems to be a 20 second delay for the folder icons to appear after the folder names are shown.  Firefox never used to have that lag.  It is hard for me to believe none of the developers notice any of this stuff.  They should get a slow PC for testing some of these builds.  It's ridiculous to wait a minute after double clicking to type something into the address bar.
640
General Software Discussion / Re: The Outlook is disappointing
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2016, 02:29 PM »
I was curious so I did a search and it turns out that MS still hasn't migrated all accounts to the new interface, so one can have different experiences (and URLs) with different Hotmail/Outlook/Microsoft accounts:

That may be the reason why Opera goes straight to the inbox.  I have never logged in to either of my hotmail accounts from the Outlook page using Opera.  It seems like once they suck you in they won't let you off.  Like the cat has hold of the mouse.  Game over.  :)

641
It doesn't seem that much faster to me, unfortunately.  I'm still trying it, but underwhelmed.

Are you trying the 32 bit or 64 bit version?
642
General Software Discussion / Re: The Outlook is disappointing
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2016, 02:22 PM »
I updated Opera x64 to v. 12.18.  So far the main drawback I have found to using it is non acceptance of some sites when going to https yadda yadda such as when logging in.  On the humorous side Opera keeps popping up a notification that I really do not need to have Turbo Mode enabled since I am on a fast network and TM only helps with slow networks such as dial-up.  The WiFi here has download bandwidth anywhere from 12 to 35 Mbs and I still notice the difference with TM on.  So I am leaving it on.  heh heh heh
643
General Software Discussion / Re: The Outlook is disappointing
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2016, 09:22 AM »
Hmm, perhaps it is a case that the older browser has become "Lite" by today's standards?  I remember sticking with Netscape 6.x because 7.x was so "bloated."  Then years later I tried Netscape 7 I had hanging around and it totally snapped onto the desktop on launch.

I set Opera to open with the Speed Dial.  When I run my hotkey to open Opera in hotmail it snaps open and both the SpeedDial and Inbox are loaded in tabs.  These other browsers, with all the delays and lags, still do not load the tab until you activate it.  What's up with that?

Maybe you guys who don't leave the browsers open all the time would want to give Opera x64 12.14 a shot?  Turn on Turbo Mode and watch your head spin!  :)


Heh!  Get this!  The setup exe for the 64 bit version is only 10 MB!   :)
644
General Software Discussion / Re: The Outlook is disappointing
« Last post by MilesAhead on September 01, 2016, 09:03 AM »
@dr_andus the url in the address bar is after redirection.  I never opted for the Outlook interface.  I kept it to hotmail.com as long as possible.  I had to go through a link to restore my password and that was what got me.  The link went through the outlook page.  I had no choice.

For some reason Opera 12.14 can go to hotmail.com and be redirected.  This is the url I end up with in Opera:  outlook.live.com/owa/#wa=wsignin1.0

Except is has the https prefix.  Anyway, Opera goes there and I am in my inbox.  No splash.  No delay.
645
General Software Discussion / Re: The Outlook is disappointing
« Last post by MilesAhead on August 31, 2016, 05:34 PM »
I guess what I'm saying is that if it does not happen on all platforms, I doubt it's intentional, but there's something behind it.  I just tried on Firefox, and no splash screen.

* wraith808 shrugs

What happens is once you log in using the outlook page rather than hotmail, from then on you end up in the new interface no matter where you come from.  But it surprises me that Opera doesn't go there.  Maybe it relies on some feature or capability that did not exist when Opera 12 was coded.  I'm just guessing.  MS definitely wants you to go through the new portal.  Otherwise there would be an Opt Out mechanism in the mailbox display settings.  It probably has to do with hitting you with targeted advertising.



I log in from the outlook page.  I don't get it.  I've never seen that page that you screenshot other than in your screenshot.  I even tried an account that I'd not accessed in a long time that had never used the new UI.  I ended up in the new UI, but never got that loading screen.  If it is targeted advertising, it's a pretty bad job of it.


Quite curious indeed.  :)  I have a hotkey that opens Opera to my outlook mail.  It turns out with Turbo Mode enabled, even if SlimJet is already open, it is faster to hit the hotkey and let Opera open on top and enter my inbox than to open another SlimJet tab to Outlook.  It snaps right open.  I am not really that fond of using Opera.  But since it seems to leap onto the screen I may have to use it more often for some things.  It certainly is fast.
646
General Software Discussion / Re: The Outlook is disappointing
« Last post by MilesAhead on August 31, 2016, 04:19 PM »
I guess what I'm saying is that if it does not happen on all platforms, I doubt it's intentional, but there's something behind it.  I just tried on Firefox, and no splash screen.

* wraith808 shrugs

What happens is once you log in using the outlook page rather than hotmail, from then on you end up in the new interface no matter where you come from.  But it surprises me that Opera doesn't go there.  Maybe it relies on some feature or capability that did not exist when Opera 12 was coded.  I'm just guessing.  MS definitely wants you to go through the new portal.  Otherwise there would be an Opt Out mechanism in the mailbox display settings.  It probably has to do with hitting you with targeted advertising.

647
@Curt: You're a bit late, but welcome to the party. Go to http://www.slimjet.com/
Holy shit, that thing is fast!!

In case anyone is curious I have been using the 32 bit portable since some point in the 9x builds.  For grins I tried the x64 portable about a week ago.  I did not notice any difference until I did something that used extensions.  Then the 32 bit seemed way faster.  In this case it was a YouTube download extension.  The 32 bit SlimJet downloaded the same file 3 or 4 times faster.  Just my anecdotal experience.  But who ya' gonna' believe?  Me or your own eyes?  :D


648
General Software Discussion / Re: The Outlook is disappointing
« Last post by MilesAhead on August 31, 2016, 11:08 AM »
I don't get that.  Could it be because you have so much spam?  It does process the messages, and when I'd not been using my account for a while, it did that when I first logged in again.  Currently, however, mine goes to a login portal, then directly into my inbox in less than a couple of seconds.

Opera never goes to the splash screen.  SlimJet, Firefox and k-meleon do.  The amount of mail is not the issue.  If it gets real bad I'll have to bring up Opera but I would rather just use a tab in the browser that is already open.  No big deal.  But it seems like MS has programmers sitting around devising things to waste your time.  Maybe it is one of those marketing things like never having clocks on the wall in supermarkets or department stores.
649
DC Website Help and Extras / Re: Links in Posts
« Last post by MilesAhead on August 31, 2016, 09:27 AM »
That isn't a new threat is it? It's just another thing spammers have always done.  It just requires a little more thought to figure out if they are a spammer, but the punishment is the same: delete and ban :)

I just so happen to have a few links apropos...    :)
650
General Software Discussion / Re: The Outlook is disappointing
« Last post by MilesAhead on August 31, 2016, 08:51 AM »
I can't figure it out.  If I use Opera 12.14 x64 then put hotmail.com and log in, it goes right to the inbox.  If I do the same thing in firefox or slimjet, I get the splash screen.  Really weird.

There is obviously no need for the screen except to make you wait.
Pages: prev1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 ... 309next