topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Sunday December 21, 2025, 11:18 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 243 244 245 246 247 [248] 249 250 251 252 253 ... 470next
6176
General Software Discussion / Re: Cthulhu Saves the World Pricing Blog Post
« Last post by 40hz on February 09, 2012, 04:14 PM »
So, I find out it is only on Steam... So much for that.

abort_small-250x250.gif

+1. Showstopper for me too. Too bad...
6177
Living Room / Re: When you make your 100'th Post
« Last post by 40hz on February 09, 2012, 03:31 PM »
Don't know what I did today, but my post-count is a bit messed up:
 (see attachment in previous post)

Um...booted up Photoshop maybe?  :P ;D

6178
Living Room / Re: Would you buy me a $0.99 track on Amazon?
« Last post by 40hz on February 09, 2012, 02:30 PM »
BUT, in their eyes, it is criminal.

In their eyes humming a tune in the park is criminal.

Pretty much. They've gone after cover bands playing local bar venues. And I'm not talking full out tribute bands either. Just people covering a general mix songs.

Someone with big concern about this is the jazz performance world where improvisation is the name of the game.

When improvising, it's a common and accepted practice to quote bits and pieces of other people's songs and solos when you're preforming your own. Nothing new here. This is how jazz has been played since day one. A jazz player is expected to master a vocabulary of themes, riffs, and 'standard' songs as part of their learning the idiom - and to be able to know how and when to use them. But now, there's a very real worry that everything jazz used to be about may be coming to a close with the ridiculous extremes that copyright rules are getting pushed to.

First it started with record companies sometimes putting restrictions on who a player was allowed to "sit in" with - which is another thing jazz is about since, at its core, it's a live-performance artform that thrives on the cross-fertilization playing with other musicians provides.

Now, some record labels are beginning to feel the need to put the music they hold (under contract) in silos as well...

Talk about bad acid!  :(

6179
Living Room / Re: Interactive Web Patented? <insert more insanity here />
« Last post by 40hz on February 09, 2012, 10:35 AM »
Bloody trolls strike again.
6180
Living Room / Re: New weapons in the file sharing war.
« Last post by 40hz on February 09, 2012, 10:07 AM »
I think at 39.9hz ;p. Just kidding, I'm in my mid-thirties. Dunno if that makes me a child of the 70s, as I was too young really :o

Perhaps only "too young" in years. You have a capacity for insight into 'power politics' that Noam Chomsky would find admirable.

 ;D


Well, thanks, I think :). ... though maybe a bit scary that I've become so cynical so fast ;p.

To my way of thinking, a cynic is someone who sees how bad things truly are and can see no alternative to it. A realist is someone who sees how bad things truly are and can see an alternative to it.

It's a subtle distinction.

I think we're both realists.  :)
6181
Living Room / Re: New weapons in the file sharing war.
« Last post by 40hz on February 09, 2012, 09:56 AM »
@nosh- I'll...uh...take that under advisement. Thanks for suggesting it! :P
6182
Living Room / Re: New weapons in the file sharing war.
« Last post by 40hz on February 09, 2012, 09:47 AM »
@nosh-FWIW, my GF's recollection is much the same. Every time we watch that flick her eyes are glued on Snake Pliskin. Anytime he's offscreen she goes back to reading her book.

Usually sometime before the picture's over she says something like "Remember when you were playing bass in that band and used to wear skinny jeans and look like that?

I have no idea what she means. I've always been clean shaven. And I never once wore an eyepatch.  ;D

6183
Living Room / Re: New weapons in the file sharing war.
« Last post by 40hz on February 09, 2012, 09:38 AM »
I think at 39.9hz ;p. Just kidding, I'm in my mid-thirties. Dunno if that makes me a child of the 70s, as I was too young really :o

Perhaps only "too young" in years. You have a capacity for insight into 'power politics' that Noam Chomsky would find admirable.

 ;D
6184
Living Room / Re: New weapons in the file sharing war.
« Last post by 40hz on February 09, 2012, 09:33 AM »
Eventually we will get back to sharing via snail mail. Someone has the download you want? he will burn a copy and mail it to you  ;) or better yet a whole new USB key 'protocol'   :P

Or via old-style BBS technology using SSH/SFTP. And which is already happening BTW.  ;)
6185
Living Room / Re: New weapons in the file sharing war.
« Last post by 40hz on February 09, 2012, 09:23 AM »
Ah! I see db90h is already thinking like I'm thinking! 8) :Thmbsup:

Wonder if our backgrounds are similar?  :)

@db90h - Child of the 60/70s by any chance? ;)
6186
Living Room / Re: New weapons in the file sharing war.
« Last post by 40hz on February 09, 2012, 09:20 AM »
@Ren- see my caveat that I was still typing in on my wonderful iPhone when you replied. (Must have hit the post button instead of preview at one point by mistake.) ;D
6187
Living Room / New weapons in the file sharing war.
« Last post by 40hz on February 09, 2012, 08:51 AM »
Well...maybe not technically "new." But 'new' to most people.

May I present for your edification (courtesy of TorrentFreak )- Tribler.  :tellme:


Tribler Makes BitTorrent Impossible to Shut Down
Ernesto February 8, 2012

While the file-sharing ecosystem is currently filled with uncertainty and doubt, researchers at Delft University of Technology continue to work on their decentralized BitTorrent network. Their Tribler client doesn’t require torrent sites to find or download content, as it is based on pure peer-to-peer communication. “The only way to take it down is to take the Internet down,” the lead researcher says.

Of course there's nothing to stop governments from shutting down the Internet and replacing it with something like the old AOL except on steroids. It would be inefficient. And not very cost effective. But it would give them a large amount of control back. All the major (i.e. ACTA signatories) could link up using it; and maybe provide a tightly controlled and monitored gateway out to the old Internet in order to keep up appearances. Which could work since the government is really only interested in protecting its own economic and social interests online. Once Google, Youtube, Twitter, Facebook, commerce sites, and banking moves over to the NeoNet most of the general public will too. Especially if it becomes the only thing they're legally allowed to get access to.

That would be what I call the Escape from New York (after the movie) scenario.

In that movie, the government gave up on dealing with crime or terror. They just established a reservation for all the troublemakers, blew up the access roads into it, then tossed the inmates in it to do whatever they wanted and survive as best they could.

In the movie, they sacrificed Manhattan island to be the super-prison.

In the digital age they might do that with the Internet. Which in turn would lose a lot of its power without huge corporate and government financed backbones to run on. Not that it would be more than a big administrative headache for the network admins. The routers and other hardware are already virtualized up to the hilt. They'd just need to be reprogrammed. And maybe reflashed to handle a new protocol or two. All very doable.  

Hmm...maybe there might eventually come a time when the 'powers that be' could decide the only way to fix the Internet is to replace it?
 8)
6188
Living Room / Re: silly humor - post 'em here! [warning some NSFW and adult content]
« Last post by 40hz on February 08, 2012, 06:27 PM »
Ok. Time for some geek chuckles.



The client who sent me the link said half the office was in hysterics over how much this guy's reaction and demeanor reminded them of me. Especially his question "Do they have like a professional version instead of all this bullshit?"

And while it may be true I spend way too much time in server and hub rooms - or with my nose in a tech book - I do in fact recognize what the Windows 8 beta looks like. So I'm not quite as far gone as this dude is. But that doesn't mean I'm not I'm 100% in agreement of his assessment that "this is bullshit."

So ok...laugh it up guys, I sez to my client. :P

Lucky for you I'm a mostly just a crabby SA and not a true BOFH.
 ;)

6189
Living Room / Re: silly humor - post 'em here! [warning some NSFW and adult content]
« Last post by 40hz on February 08, 2012, 06:14 PM »
Ok, here's one for 40hz - I think you'll like this one! (Though I'm certain quite a few people here will also like it!)
 (see attachment in previous post)
I think we've discussed the topic in a few places in one form or another. :)

@Ren - Yeah, but they're working on it!  :Thmbsup: ;D ;D ;D

6190
The real problem with unpaid content "appropriation" is that it drives professionals off the playing field. After which things such as music, motion pictures, art, news reporting, and literature once again become the exclusive domain of amateurs. Much like it was prior to the 20th century.

Before that, most creative expression was the province of the idle rich. With the result that virtually all art reflected the attitudes and preferences of a very small and disengaged part of the populace. Which in turn shaped social attitude and institutions. Often with disastrous results.

Modern art marketplaces allowed people from all walks a life to participate in creative expression once there was no longer a need for personal financial independence before people could pursue it. The possibility of making a living off creative works opened the doors and tore down the walls economic necessity put up. And removed the need to secure patronage - which allowed for a far greater freedom of expression and subject matter than had existed before.

And with that came new ideas and art forms, new institutions, and new understandings. And all because creative expression no longer relied upon the wealthy to provide or support it.

We're now in danger of losing that because people want to consume but not give back.

Eventually it will lead to fewer choices and lower quality as creative production only remains affordable to large businesses that can give a lot away in order to get the opportunity to make money in a tangental rather than direct fashion.

If genre-mill fiction books, YouTube, and shows like Dancing with the Stars and America's Got Talent strike you as being the epitome of artistic expression, then bootleg books, movies, and music off the torrents as you will.

But if people want and expect better than that, they're going to need to give something back to the creatives before they have to quit - and leave nothing behind but commercial hacks and amateurs to fill the void.

ACTA/SOPA/PIPA isn't the answer to this problem. But neither is the "Why should I have to pay at all?" mindset many people now have.

I'd suggest we start by dumping outmoded and unnecessary parts of the distribution system, since it's the distributors and their trade practices that are the biggest part of the problem right now. Digital downloads have pretty much rendered most of the old industry models obsolete or inapplicable anyway. Much like how telco regulations are designed to protect the quality of analog voice signals even though we're now fully digital - and voice communications only make up about 15-20% of the data packets the telcos are currently sending down their lines. And that percentage is steadily dropping with each passing year.

Once the crud gets cleaned out of the distribution pipes we have a better chance of putting artists directly in touch with their friends and fans. And maybe out of that will come a new awareness of why it's necessary to actively and financially support the arts people are most interested in. And hopefully the people will act on their awareness without the need for givernment (not a typo!) to continue to propose crazy and unworkable laws and other regulatory nonsense.

At least it's worth a try. Because what people and governments are currently doing isn't working. And never will.



6191
Can't speak for the UK, but when it comes to the US, I'm glad more people don't vote regulary.

Broad voter indifference is about the only thing preventing mob rule right now. Not to mention constraining our tendency to think that maybe some form of fascism is what we really need to "save" our nation.

I think it was Ambrose Bierce who described American Democracy as being a political system based on the belief that rule by 400 craven idiots was preferable to being ruled by one mad king.

Imagine what would happen if 400 idiots became 200 million...

 8)

 

6192
N.A.N.Y. 2012 / Re: NANY 2012 Mugs, etc. -- All participants please read in
« Last post by 40hz on February 08, 2012, 05:35 AM »
Just out of curiosity - is there a central gallery of all the NANY mugs and 'official' DC artwork posted anywhere up here? It'd be a good sticky topic.
 8)
6193
Living Room / Re: Chilling Effects - BTjunkie Closes
« Last post by 40hz on February 08, 2012, 05:15 AM »
I feel sure there must be a lot more behind the charges against Mr Dotcom and possibly others, for the police to have acted in the way they did.

Such is the power of belief.  :)

That pic is hilarious!  ;D

Indeed. That would be the famous Pinched with Four Aces by Cassius Marcellus Coolidge. It's one in a series unofficially called "Dogs Playing Poker" if you're not familiar with them. Was a time not so long ago when you couldn't go into a local tavern, or the back of a gas station, and not see a print of at least one of these pictures hanging on a wall somewhere.

My personal favorite is Poker Sympathy

poker_sympathy.jpg

Says everything that needs to be said about most people's attitude towards those who attempt great things and fail. ;D

Note: Coolidge also was known for inventing the Comic Foreground - those silly illustrated scenes with cutouts for your head that you can be photographed standing behind. Forerunner of today's digital compositing and 'green screen' techniques. (In 1874, he was also awarded a patent for it: Patent 149,724 - Processes of Taking Photographic Pictures. It's only two pages long. Ah, those were the days!)
6194
Living Room / Re: Chilling Effects - BTjunkie Closes
« Last post by 40hz on February 07, 2012, 10:54 PM »
The video that follows has the police chief in charge. His comments are pretty guarded.

He also never really explains how he can reconcile his belief that the police acted in a manner that could best protect the lives of everyone inside and outside the house with having 30 or so heavily armed and adrenalin-juiced paramilitary police running around in all that darkness, noise, and confusion.

Nor how he could argue that the police were acting on the best intelligence available despite the fact it took them a full half hour before they even located, let alone entered, the mansion's 'safe room' - and all that despite the fact that the room was clearly shown on the existing plans for the house that were already on file with whatever NZ's equivalent of the local zoning and building permits office is.

It's amazing nobody was accidentally hurt or killed that night.

onyou.jpg

If that interview was an attempt by the police to put some positive spin on an excessively heavy-handed but almost comically botched raid, he needed to be much better prepped. Maybe next time they can hire some professional handlers to coach him on how to tone down what comes across as a contemptuous and rather smirky demeanor while they're at it.

Sorry. But the man sounded like an ill-informed apparatchik working off a hastily prepared set of talking points. And that was before he started stonewalling most of the pointed questions being asked (and re-asked) of him.

6195
What you are saying is true but the defeatism won't improve anything either. By saying and thinking what you posted they have really won, our apathy (or similar sentiment) is and has become their greatest weapon. And also, we can not keep on living thinking that all of us can be bought and there is no chance of "true democracy".

There's a big difference between not kidding yourself you won and being a defeatist.

And the single biggest tactical mistake you can make in a battle like this one is to lull yourself into a false sense of victory before you've conclusively attained it. And that is going to take a lot more work than has been done so far.

What we've recently had is a minor skirmish with both sides feeling each other out and gauging the degree and nature of the support both sides can expect to get on this issue. It's little more than queen's pawn to queen's pawn 3 so far. An opening move. The real battle hasn't even begun yet. And the gloves won't come off until some time after that.

So beware of irrational exuberance when it comes to largely symbolic gains in the early rounds of conflict. I've seen more than a few worthy movements defeated by that.

Assumptions are deadly. Which is why it's so necessary to maintain vigilance.

As it stands right now, those arguing for a free net are down a point. We gained a temporary stay of execution by getting PIPA and SOPA put on hold. But that's all we got.

Or did we?

The media lobby got ACTA signed into law while we were sitting around congratulating ourselves on how well "we showed 'em."

Now SOPA and PIPA are looking more and more like a diversionary tactic. The classic red herring. The disposable infantry units that got sent out to draw fire and distract attention away from what the real game was - getting ACTA signed as quickly, and in as many countries, as possible.

My point in my earlier post wasn't to concede defeat. It was to acknowledge the very real chance that we just might have been had. And big time too!

And if that upsets some people, or rains on their parade badly enough that their confidence is shattered - and now they're worried they might lose faith in the cause ,well... maybe we should let them. Because those of us who are in it for the long haul don't need them. And considering what's to come, we'd probably be better off without them. Because it's going to get a lot harder before we even see the slightest glimmer of real hope this nonsense is going to be put to rest.

And we can up our chances for success by not letting ourselves feel good until we actually have something to feel good about.

susan.jpg

There's a great moment in the Terry Pratchett story Hogfather where a governess is speaking to two young children who are crying because they are afraid of the monster they know is hiding in the basement of their house just waiting for them to fall asleep. The governess asks the children to repeat back to her what she told them they should do whenever they felt afraid. The children dutifully respond "Don't get afraid - get angry!"

Not a bad piece of advice.  :)

Why it's good to feel bad about some things!
If you study NLP, there's a technique used to forment change. In NLP's scheme of things, change itself isn't hard. Change occurs in the psychological equivalent of a quantum shift. It takes place in an instant. A new circuit is forged and switched on. Bang! Done!

What takes time, and is very hard, is getting up the resolve to make that change.

And one way to get up that resolve is to begin by not trying to smooth over pain and adapt to it. On the contrary, you're taught to wallow in it until you can't stand it. And then use that like rocket fuel to attain escape velocity.

Here's a proven 3-step technique for bringing about change ala NLP:

Step-1:  Feel your pain. Deeply. Horribly. Let it become unbearable. Do not attempt to rationalize it away.

Step-2: Allow yourself get to the point of where you want to scream: This is intolerable! I cannot live even one more second like this!!! This has absolutely got to change!!!!!

Step-3: Now remind yourself the only way anything is ever going to change is if you yourself change it.


Anybody who has ever gone through this "dark night of the soul" process will tell you it's astonishingly effective. Maybe not very enjoyable. But effective nevertheless.
 8) 8)


6196
General Software Discussion / Re: Is WinZip still worth updating?
« Last post by 40hz on February 07, 2012, 06:20 PM »
People still use Winzip?
People still use WinRAR?

Ehtyar.

I know a few people that still swear by it for reasons they're never quite able to explain in ways I can understand. But they're all VCIW types anyway. If it ain't obscure, abandoned, or a hopelessly lost cause, they're not happy with it. ;D
6197
General Software Discussion / Re: Is WinZip still worth updating?
« Last post by 40hz on February 07, 2012, 02:52 PM »
You'd better be aware jZip installs (or tries to install) add-ons, set your browser homepage and add a search-toolbar. :-\
Read here the how-to for reset/remove/uninstall

Supposedly there's a corporate version of the installer that does not include those add-ons if you go to the download page.

The installer for the corporate version weighs in at 3063 Kb versus 6768 Kb for the regular installer. Looks like something's been left out. :)
6198
On a related note - exactly what didn't the game industry learn from the RIAA and MPAA?

The RIAA and MPAA have seen ACTA passed in several places. And although there is a hue and cry breaking out about it, ACTA has yet to be formally overturned by any of its signatory nations.

So while there's still a lot of Sturm und Drang going on over it, it's still not a sure thing that all that screaming is going to change anything. Or defeat ACTA.

Even SOPA and PIPA aren't gone indefinitely. Once the next US election is over, they'll be back. The only difference is they'll be attached under different names as 'riders' to some huge and absolutely essential bill. And they'll be ten times harder to spot as a result when they come up for a vote.

Then there's what happened with Megauploads...

Right now, I think the gaming industry has been emboldened by the recent successes of the RIAA and MPAA - who are slowly but steadily getting everything they're demanding from our world's governments.




6199
Living Room / Re: Anonymous on FBI Phone Call
« Last post by 40hz on February 07, 2012, 02:17 PM »
The problem with these kids is that there's too much posturing and coup counting going on for their own good.

Part of it might be because many of them are approaching the real world with a 'gaming' mindset.

Messing with secure government communications is definitely not a game. If you're crazy and committed enough to do something like that, you should hopefully be smart and cagey enough to realize you can never claim credit for it - if you don't get caught while doing it. "Loose lips..." as the saying goes.

Because the minute you so much as hint of anything to anybody (and it doesn't matter who), your very own personal 'doomsday clock' starts ticking.

And the law has time on its side.

6200
I think what most consumers don’t realize is that every time they buy a used game, there is ZERO money making it back to the Game Developers.  All of those profits are going directly to the re-seller and making it more and more difficult for us to continue making higher quality products.

The Question is, what can we do about it?

Game Developers have recently been trying to figure out ways to address this on our own over the last few years and have come up with some ideas that I’m actually beginning to like!

(Link to full article here. )

head1.gif

Talk about hubris. Further from Jameson Durall's blog :

There’s another big rumor about the next Xbox console that could really start to shake things up…it won’t play used games at all!  Personally I think this would be a fantastic change for our business and even though the consumers would be up in arms about it at first…they will grow to understand why and that it won’t kill them.

(Link to full article here. )


The 40hz NSFW analysis of J.Durall's sage words

From the Gospel according to 40hz (Ch:7 V:17):

The phrase "FUCK YOU!" takes many forms.

Jameson Durall's paragraph above is yet another way of saying it.


 8)


Pages: prev1 ... 243 244 245 246 247 [248] 249 250 251 252 253 ... 470next