6101
Living Room / Re: Amazon Signs Up Authors, Writing Publishers Out of Deal
« Last post by IainB on October 18, 2011, 11:18 AM »@wraith808:
No, my point was that:
@Carol Haynes: + 1 re what you write - I and my 10-year old daughter had been discussing those same points today.
It will be interesting to see what the upshot of this disruptive technology will be. The limited pricing differential that you describe certainly seems to be all wrong anyway, at present - too greedy. The new technology would probably not intrinsically justify that limited pricing differential. If they keep that pricing, then market preference (demand) could well be divided roughly equally between the two technologies. In that case, for the new technology to "win" and oust the old, some extrinsic market factors might need to be brought to bear on the situation. This is what seemed to happen to a greater or lesser extent in most of the above examples.
Warp was not necessarily the best option. And this comes from someone who used it quite a bit.Yes, I quite agree. I had to use WARP quite a bit too and have some knowledge of it, but I did not intend for the reader to infer from what I wrote that WARP was a "best" option - that wasn't my point at all. Sorry if I was misleading.-wraith808 (October 18, 2011, 10:03 AM)
No, my point was that:
...the market winner will not necessarily be the "best" technology or the "best" form of the productIn the table of examples, I highlighted the "winner", but I have no idea what were the "best" options/forms in each case. The criteria for deciding the "winner" seemed to have less to do with whether the winner was intrinsically "best" in any way and rather more to do with extrinsic market factors.
@Carol Haynes: + 1 re what you write - I and my 10-year old daughter had been discussing those same points today.
It will be interesting to see what the upshot of this disruptive technology will be. The limited pricing differential that you describe certainly seems to be all wrong anyway, at present - too greedy. The new technology would probably not intrinsically justify that limited pricing differential. If they keep that pricing, then market preference (demand) could well be divided roughly equally between the two technologies. In that case, for the new technology to "win" and oust the old, some extrinsic market factors might need to be brought to bear on the situation. This is what seemed to happen to a greater or lesser extent in most of the above examples.

Recent Posts
