I started reading this thread about 10 minutes, so please forgive my dated replies.
I'm afraid I can't subscribe to this IE/FF metaphor gentlemen. As a sysadmin, I'm bound to windows as a part of my job.
I am, however, free to choose my browser. Why? Because my browser is not nearly as central to the use of my machine as my operating system is. Nor does it create nearly the level of compatibility problems using Linux in a Windows workplace would (fortunately most webmasters have had the foresight to steer clear of ActiveX in-browser).
Nor can I concur with the comparison to QWERTY/DVORAK. If you have a problem with Linux, you search for a solution and you fix it. If you don't know how to do something in Linux, you search for instructions and you follow them.
If you move to DVORAK, you're completely on your own. Not only that, but if you've been typing 50 WPM in QWERTY, how do you then function typing 20 WPM in DVORAK?
On a more personal note, there's a gentleman where I work that uses DVORAK on his work laptop. Since I've been there (almost 3 months now) I've had to reset his password 4 times. That does not include any occasion when my boss has done it. I've not yet had to reset the password of any other member of staff more than once.
Ehtyar.
P.S. Yay 40hz and Edvard
