Recent Posts
And that was based on the true story of an Iranian man that lived in the Charles de Gaulle Airport in Paris, for 17 years.-app103 (June 27, 2013, 11:44 AM)
So... The US is expecting to get favors from people...(directly)...after getting caught red-handed shitting in their hats.
Dear god, how stupid are these people?!?-Stoic Joker (June 27, 2013, 11:20 AM)
Cool, grabbed a copy as I've been pondering the possibility of attempting a Metro app.
..So is this a standalone IDE, or an add-on for MSVS, or both?-Stoic Joker (June 27, 2013, 11:38 AM)
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say today's Supreme Court rulings tangentially bear on all this. If we play with Venn diagrams, some fragment of the overlap is about "opression". So if the topic of Marriage just became "medium less" oppressive, despite people specifically calling for the Good ol' Boys club, then that's a small step towards transparency in all those other agency areas.-TaoPhoenix (June 26, 2013, 05:52 PM)
That's not fearing the people...that's viewing them with contempt.-Stoic Joker (June 26, 2013, 01:34 PM)
Smith wanted Beech killed before he could do anything- but Schiano, who had compiled the Spartacus File, wanted to see how far Beech could get, and what, if anything, he'd do about the apparent conflict in his programming between pro-Americanism and the need to overthrow the government.
Schiano was beginning to suspect it wasn't that much of a conflict, actually. After all, sending assassins after him hardly reflected the highest ideals of American society, or any great respect for Constitutional rights.
Not that he'd never say anything like that to Smith. If Smith had any ideals, Schiano doubted they resembled anything in the Constitution. The entire Covert Operations Group didn't much resemble anything in the Constitution.
These are not issues that powerful elites in the area of our defense and security apparatus should have more than a peripheral opinion about. I don't buy that the President's hand was forced in these cases (particularly the ones where the promises were broken *immediately*).-CWuestefeld (June 26, 2013, 01:08 PM)
I find it interesting how so many are willing to concede our government's right to spin stories, send off flames, bully pulpit and dead-cat its opponents, and lie at will to the public - yet very quickly label any nose tweaking or blunt editorial characterizations in return as being "partisan politics."
Our enthroned leadership has made an art form out of using so-called "partisan" political strategies and debating techniques. That's one of the reasons they have been - and continue to be - so successful.
FWIW, I think we can have "intelligent" and "measured" and "respectful" dialog about this whole problem until the cows come home. The only way any real change will come about (or even become possible) is if the general public feels sufficient anger and disgust about what is going on to force changes. Because it isn't ever the "bright promise for the future" that stirs our public out of its chronic political llethargy. It's the hard realization that "enough is enough" and that "I am no longer willing to tolerate this behavior - starting now" that brings about social change. Something that our politicians understand and have learned to take advantage of all too well. Because they're often the first to remind you "you're better than that"; and that "you shouldn't talk that way"; and suggest you try to "exercise proper restraint and some consideration with your comments" - because they certainly aren't going to do the same with theirs.-40hz (June 26, 2013, 10:40 AM)
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.
Friedrich Nietzsche
Two mind-numbing articles by Paul Craig Roberts:-40hz (June 26, 2013, 08:49 AM)
I'm afraid you're crossing the line into partisan politics.
I agree with the overall conclusion you're presenting here. But, bad as the situation that they describe is, these articles do contain untruths and exaggerations (I won't enumerate them, because I don't want to dig deeper into the political quagmire). Presenting things in this manner undermines the effort in the long run: it gives the bad guys the opportunity to rebut trivial details while ignoring the big picture, and it robs us of (some of) the moral high ground.-CWuestefeld (June 26, 2013, 09:50 AM)
Ok...it's 17:15 EDT on 25-Jun-2013.
Mssr. Putin has just confirmed Mr. Snowden is currently standing in the 'international area' in Moscow's airport.
The US is insisting Russia has the legal authority to expel him immediately, and is insisting they do so.-40hz (June 25, 2013, 04:16 PM)
On a side note: Your level of detailed insight on this stuff is truly frightening at time.-Stoic Joker (June 25, 2013, 05:05 PM)
Think of me as Shepherd Book character in Firefly...
***
Capt. Malcolm Reynolds: It's of interest to me how much you seem to know about that world.
Shepherd Book: I wasn't born a shepherd, Mal.
Capt. Malcolm Reynolds: You have to tell me about that sometime.
Shepherd Book: [pause] No, I don't.
-40hz (June 25, 2013, 05:18 PM)
Well, it's pretty much always come down to settling rather than choosing in every election I was ever old enough to vote in.-40hz (June 25, 2013, 04:12 PM)
)Of course, without a public trial, it's not really a help... but still...-wraith808 (June 25, 2013, 11:48 AM)
This lad will never come to trial if those in a position to try him have anything to say about it.-40hz (June 25, 2013, 02:34 PM)
I'm guessing "somebody" got cautioned. And in no uncertain terms.-40hz (June 25, 2013, 02:26 PM)
Meanwhile having watched a few James Bond movies, if this Ed Snowden critter basically did one of the "top five worst acts of treason" ever, why is it this hard to take him down? What am I not getting that a nice infiltrator team with a $25 million budget including some payoffs can't get done in a week? Or does *that* create the "Game Changer" martyr they're desperately trying to avoid? Why all this prancing around with the spin campaign?!-TaoPhoenix (June 25, 2013, 02:49 PM)
Had this happened back in the 70s, there would be no question whatsoever about impeachment, resignations, and criminal prosecution of government officials and officers over any of this.-40hz (June 25, 2013, 06:22 AM)
If Snowden is caught and brought to trial, here's what I think the next move ought to be:
Snowden should claim that everything he said previously was a lie. And there's no law against telling lies to our enemies, right?
To make its case, the government would need to prove that the stuff Snowden said really was true, thus forcing the government to admit, at the very least, the truth of Snowden's claims.-CWuestefeld (June 25, 2013, 11:33 AM)
