topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday November 11, 2025, 6:21 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 231 232 233 234 235 [236] 237 238 239 240 241 ... 261next
5876
General Software Discussion / Re: Must-have apps in the System tray?
« Last post by Darwin on April 17, 2007, 11:38 PM »
I don't know how much these RAM program things are, but it would seem that their primary function is to free memory, so other programs can use it... RAM is so cheap these days, I'd say if the program is $30, it would be logical to spend $45 (or maybe more) to get more actual RAM...

I think their primary function is actually to free MONEY from your wallet ;) Seriously, though, they run from oodles of free and opensource offerings through a range of shareware products that seem to run between $10 and $30 (but I'm sure you can pay much more).
5877
Living Room / Re: 14 Surefire Ways to Annoy Users
« Last post by Darwin on April 17, 2007, 03:04 PM »
Make changes to our file associations in the registry that don't revert when we un-install.

Good one Edvard, this should definitely be added to the list.
5878
Living Room / Re: 14 Surefire Ways to Annoy Users
« Last post by Darwin on April 17, 2007, 11:41 AM »
Amen.
5879
Hi Zaine - I honestly forget how I wound up choosing Scansoft PDF Pro (well... I know how I wound up with version 4 - I upgraded to it!). I spent a lot of time reading reviews of Acrobat alternatives in the fall of 2005 and basically got confused... When I realised that Scansoft offered a 90 day money back guarantee I bought it because it was *sort of* leading the pack on feature set and user opinion (the other contenders were PDF Factory Pro and another, the name of which escapes me, now). I stayed with it. Version 4 is a quantum leap over 3 in stability and the "play nice with other software" factor, and it is very powerful. If you want to launch the editor it takes about a minute and change on my computer (probably a tad slower than PaintShop Pro XI). So not impressive at all, though YMMV given that my notebook should be taken out back and put out of its misery. Most of the time I just print to its virtual printer (has a nice range of options - very configureable) from Word and Powerpoint and it's very quick and produces small, searchable pdfs when used like this (but then, there are so many free pdf printer drivers out there...).

So, I guess in answer to your question "how good is PDF Pro 4" my answer is a qualified "very good", but if you're turned off by Adobe's load times, this is not the app for you (I think it's SLOWER, though I haven't had Adobe installed in a long time).
5880
General Software Discussion / Re: RANT: High Software Prices!
« Last post by Darwin on April 17, 2007, 10:32 AM »
Yup, agree with pro3carp3 and Curt but I *think* that we're straying into the philosophical realm here in that I don't think that people who use cracks, hacks and serialz are necessarily career criminals but rather people who... ah fuck it. They're thieves and there is no justification for it.

When I can't afford (or won't pay) a vendor's high prices, I look for alternatives (Open Source, shareware, Freeware, Donationware), rather than running a pirated version of something. This is, for want of a better word, a moral decision on my part, because I don't want to be a thief!

My gut tells me that there is a distinction lurking here to be defined but, on balance, I know lots of people who run pirated software and most of them can more than afford (from my perspective - what do I really know about anyone else's finances) to buy the software that they steal - all of them are better off than me (I'm essentially unemployed and a student dealing with mortgage payments and two kids - I'm not doing it alone though... :)) and yet I've been asked on a couple of occasions to provide my legitimately purchased registration details so that they can use some software that I use and they like for free. Nice. The really odd thing is that usually they're lookng for the serial for a $30-$80 program, not PaintShop Pro, not Xara Xtreme Pro, not PowerGrep - you get the picture (they run hacks and cracks of PhotoShop, Office, and CorelDraw - i.e. the packages that require activation). For some reason, I can't convince many of them that they are stealing. Why steal Office, for example? OpenOffice is more powerful than most people's requirements - I know PhD candidates using it to collect and analyse genetic and morphological data and to write it all up.

Unfortuantely, software occupies twin spaces right now - it's SEXY and people buy into marketing hype (want to edit your three year old's birthday party snaps? Nothing other than PhotoShop will do) and it's become part of the range of things that people use for self-validation (I have and use PhotoShop, woo hoo. You use PhotoFiltre, sniff). So that it's becoming something that people fewel they need to have in order to keep up with the Jones'...

app - you're right, too. What is a reasonable price? It's like the housing market. Five years ago, I could have bought both halves of a nice, brand new duplex for under $200,000 Cdn. but didn't want to live in a duplex (or be a resident landlord, either). Three years ago, I thought that $179,900 was too much for a nice, solid 1950's post and beam home on a hill overlooking the harbour and the mountains in the background and waited for prices to drop. Last year I paid $211,000 (priced $10,000 below assessed value - owner was military and being posted) for half of an 8 year old duplex! New duplexes run $240,000 and up (for half of the dupex!) and that house I looked at and and passed on in 2004 is back on the market with fresh paint and a new deck for $550,000! Now when I'm looking at real estate in the paper I think "Oh, wow, a single family home for $350,000. What a bargain! Can I come up with the financing?" (the answer to that question is NO - my parents gave my wife and I the mortgage on our place...). My point is that over a five year period my perceptions of what is reasonable to pay for a home have changed DRASTICALLY. Software is the same. There was a time when I dithered about paying $20 for downloadable shareware. Today, anything under $50 seems fair and anything between $50 and $150 can seem reasonable, depending on the software's function...

app - I share your aversion to money. Actually, my real aversion is to the increasing, and alarming, utilization of credit to be able to "have it all and have it now" instead of building toward goals. Part of the problem with this is that I know so many people that have, literally, 20+ credit cards (and growing) and just keep bouncing credit from one card to the other to avoid paying for things. I don't want to live in a duplex but I do for now. I'm barely employed and my wife is a contractor for the school district. We live where we do because if we both lost our jobs tomorrow, we could still make our mortgage and car payments if I went back to my first real job - flipping burgers at McDonalds. We also bought something big enough to accomodate our family and that is comfortable, so if we can't "move up" we're fine right where we are. Don't even get me started about my brother-in-law...

Sorry, folks, long rambling post...

PS LOVE the movie Network. Coincidentally, it was on cable this weekend!
5881
General Software Discussion / Re: Don't call it "the tray"!
« Last post by Darwin on April 17, 2007, 12:12 AM »
When I was a little boy, my sister was a "slut". "Slut" originally meant "little girl" and had no sexual connotations. The word changed.

! How old are you, Renegade? On the west coast of Canada at no point in the last 50 years (that I am aware of) has calling a guy's little sister a slut been anything other than derogatory, inflammatory, and loaded with sexual connotations!
5882
You're certainly right about it not feeling bloated. I've just spent some time playing around with Acrobat Reader as a Reader (and not as something to be compared with anything else, if that makes sense) and neither its footprint nor the time it takes to open files, render graphics, yada, yada, yada are significant in terms of my real-world usage. I really like the look of it and the feature set is fantastic. I'd forgotten how convenient the navigation panels are (they're absent in Foxit Reader) and what a difference that the font smoothing makes. Compare these two screenshots (Foxit first, then Acrobat):

Foxit.png

Acrobat.png

Even at 7 seconds to open it, it's at least ten times quicker than Scansoft PDF Professional... Given the fact that viewing fonts is much easier on the eyes coupled with better tools for copying text and images and the convenience of the navigation panels when viewing large files, this could win me over.

PS Honesty compels me to admit that I was indexing 19000 images with exifPro while installing Acrobat Reader, so my complaints about the 10 minute installation are unfair as no doubt this would have gone significantly more quickly with less going on in the background!

PS A 67.2MB pdf with some very complex graphics opens in 5 seconds flat in Foxit Reader when double clicking on it from within DOpus. I can't access the context menu and am too lazy to reboot (trying to access it from DOpus, XYPlorer, Windows Explorer and Frigate 3 results in an access violation error!) so can't "open with" Adobe Reader. What I have done, though, is use both Foxit and Adobe to open the same file using the open dialogue - both accomplish this in under 2 seconds (granted Foxit already did the heavy lifting on it in the first place...).
5883
General Software Discussion / Re: Don't call it "the tray"!
« Last post by Darwin on April 16, 2007, 10:09 PM »
Some folks get quite anal about some stuff.
Now who don't know what your refering to when you say "system tray"?

As if there ain't enough speech police around. :-\

Rather reminds me of the hand wringing and tut-tutting that goes on about applying the term "donationware" to mouser's software...

So, I'll yell it from the rooftops - mountaintops if I have to - I LOVE RUNNING DONATIONCODER DONATIONWARE IN MY SYSTEM TRAY  :-*
5884
General Software Discussion / Re: Must-have apps in the System tray?
« Last post by Darwin on April 16, 2007, 10:06 PM »
This is a slippery slope - regardless of whether or not RAM optimizers are beneficial, *I* found that all they do is make me fixate on how much RAM I have free. I actually own licences for three shareware RAM optimizers (comments about fools and their money will be, politely, chuckled at) and have at least two other apps that feature RAM optimizer components, but I don't use any of them anymore. I *think*, but cannot prove, that these apps have little effect on the functioning of my system and just serve to make me obsess about the difference between 512MB free RAM and 100MB free RAM. I haven't actually observed much difference in performance no matter how much RAM I have free. Now, that said, I can imagine that if I didn't have a lot of RAM, a RAM optimizer might actually be very useful (certainly when I was running Win98SE with 128MB RAM I *thought* it made a big difference). With a gig of RAM there doesn't seem to me to be any benefit (my daily computer usage sees me running Xara Xtreme Pro, PhotoShop Pro, Office Professional 2003 - the only thing I don't run often is Publisher, Maxthon, ESRI ArcGis, etc.)...
5885
Yuck. 20.8MB download and ten minutes to install (compare this to the Sumatra sub-MB download and no install and Foxit Reader's 1MB and change download and 15 second installation). Even with the speedloader running, Adobe Reader took 8 seconds to start and consumed up to 90% of my CPU until it settled down. VM (Private Bytes) runs at about 50,000K, while RAM usage crept slowly and inexorably up over 70,000K before falling to 26,000K.

I also downloaded and installed AR Speedup. It shaved a full second off the startup time, which isn't really very impressive! Back when I was using Acrobat 5 and 6, it had a much more noticeable and significant impact.

I've disabled the BHO, the speedloader and the synchroniztion tool (the latter two are set to load at system start by default. No thanks) and will leave it on my system for a while. It is visually stunning and as always I am struck by how much nicer looking fonts are in Reader. Having said that, Foxit Reader is more than adequate for my needs and I don't think that I'll be switching to the Adobe product anytime soon. In its favour, it didn't even ask to set itself as my pdf viewer, so it's easy to have it installed next to Foxit, which I've left as the default handler.
5886
Oh all right... (sigh, rolling eyes) I'll step up to the plate and give Acrobat Reader 8 a go. I'm just crazy enough to do it!
5887
General Software Discussion / Re: Directory Opus 9
« Last post by Darwin on April 16, 2007, 07:59 AM »
Right, I've gotta get out of the house to go buy the new NIИ album that came out today (tomorrow in the USA) for £12. Despite buying his last five albums and turning a few dozen people on to his music, I don't get a free copy .

Cheeky monkey  ;D
5888
General Software Discussion / Re: I found a jewel of a program: XMplay
« Last post by Darwin on April 15, 2007, 11:35 PM »
Killer - thanks urlwolf. I never did get around looking into this and am not sure that I would have found that on my own (unless is documented somewhere? It probably is...).
5889
General Software Discussion / Re: Mac Software Clones for Windows
« Last post by Darwin on April 15, 2007, 11:33 PM »
LOL lanux128 - that's the first thing I looked for, too ;)

Quicksilver's author recommends launchy, as I recall...
5890
General Software Discussion / Re: Mac Software Clones for Windows
« Last post by Darwin on April 15, 2007, 08:44 PM »
Thanks Ken - nice find.
5891
General Software Discussion / Re: I found a jewel of a program: XMplay
« Last post by Darwin on April 15, 2007, 08:27 AM »
Good question... One for which I don't have an immediate answer!
5892
General Software Discussion / Re: Directory Opus 9
« Last post by Darwin on April 15, 2007, 08:25 AM »
Just to clarify - "VM" in my post above is Virtual Memory as read in Task Manager and, as far as I've ever been able to determine, corresponds to Process Explorer's "Private Bytes". Anytime I've ever compared what the two are reporting, TM's VM and PE's PB have been the same.
5893
General Software Discussion / Re: Directory Opus 9
« Last post by Darwin on April 15, 2007, 12:17 AM »
Quote from: Darwin
it is not as svelte and quick as XYplorer
What sort of stuff do you find slow in Opus? I would think most operations are bounded by how fast the filesystem can supply directory listings. You can slow things down by turning on certain options, though, so maybe that's what you're seeing? Or maybe there's something none of us have noticed that could do with fixing/improving. Let me or GPSoft know and I'll pass it on.
 :'(

DOpus is 12.4MB on disk while XYplorer is 2.37MB. Running both side by side with each open to the same folder, DOpus oscillates between 0 and 24% of my CPU, uses 7,592K RAM and 29,940K VM while XYPlorer is stable at 0% CPU, 22,344K RAM and 14,348K VM... So, all I can do is eat crow. My gut reaction to your question, Leo, before running the quick and dirty test just described, was "What was I thinking about when I wrote that DOpus isn't as quick as XYPlorer?" All I could think of, again prior to testing this, was that I must have been referring to size - XYPlorer is a lot smaller (but it does a lot less, too). Going and comparing the two, though reveals that, given its power, DOpus is tiny and that it's very economical with my system resources as well. XYPlorer IS smaller than DOpus and uses significantly less VM, but so what? I have a gig of RAM and a 120 GB harddrive. Further, the thumbdrive that I am quite anxious to install DOpus on is 2GB in size and I'm only using about 300MB of it currently... I'm not trying to disparage XYPlorer here. I bought it expressly to run from my thumbdrive so that I don't have to tolerate trying to work on other peoples' computers while shackled by Windows Explorer. When I did this, there was no reliable way to run DOpus from a thumbdrive (though there are several threads on their forum that describe how to do this, and which include some helpful comments from the developers). I have no regrets about doing this but I AM looking forward to running DOpus from a thumbdrive as I have found myself missing the absence of dual-pane viewing in XYplorer. As stated above, I will continue to follow XYploer's development and will keep it loaded.

Somewhat tangetially, the only thing I find slow in DOpus 8 is displaying my favorites menu on one of my three computers. I've no idea why this is so, and it persists even after paring the list down to two and disabling smart favorites. It works fine on my very old P-IIIE notebook and on my wife's notebook (which is a couple of years newer than the affected computer).

I'd like some brown sauce with my crow, please, and a pint. This is what I get for shooting from the hip. Sorry, I shouldn't talk with my mouth full  :-[
5894
General Software Discussion / Re: Directory Opus 9
« Last post by Darwin on April 14, 2007, 06:59 PM »
I don't really care about the money - it's "the banker" and her reaction to me spending the money that I'm worried about!

That aside, I'm starting to feel embarrassed about my role in extending this thread. $45 Cdn. -that's all an upgrade to DOpus 9 is going to cost me (if I don't spring for the USB licence). Another way I can look at this is that this works out to "about" $22.50 Cdn. per year (I say about because I purchased DOpus 8 on Oct.4, 2004 and the last update to it was October 20-ish, 2006). I have other subscription based software that costs me more than that per year and doesn't necessarily get updated that often (i.e. no major releases from one year to the next). Additionally, I would say that the only software I have loaded on my computer that I use more is the OS!

I hit "Post" and went shopping for a barbeque, probably three hours ago now. Got back to find that the above hadn't been posted because Ken had posted while I was typing. Tried to post again and got a note that SEVEN new replies have been posted. This is a popular topic! Right - off to read the 8 new posts...
5895
General Software Discussion / Re: opera 9.2 is out
« Last post by Darwin on April 14, 2007, 11:47 AM »
If it won't work with RoboForm yet, they need to start on 9.3.

 :Thmbsup:
5896
sri - glad that you're using the beta. I *thought* that the developers had restricted access to it to paid customers, which is why I asked!
5897
I would love to have the ability to set process tamer rules based on the full startup command line, not just the exe (or at least the exe and all flags that follow it).  This would allow rules for specific instances of programs (e.g. svchost.exe). 

That's an excellent idea. svchost.exe drives me mental, though since Carol pointed out that downgrading from Microsoft Update to Windows Update will cure many svchost.exe woes, things have improved immeasurablely (sadly my mental health has, for good or bad, been consistent throughout...).
5898
General Software Discussion / Re: Directory Opus 9
« Last post by Darwin on April 13, 2007, 04:47 PM »
What qualifies as a minor update?  There were multiple minor updates since 8.0.  The amount of updates and fixes from 8.1.0.8 alone takes 35 pages to list.  And don't forget that the move up to 8.2 was a significant update.

I assumed from reading Zaine's comment that he meant point releases (8.0 -> 8.1 -> 8.2). You're right, though, there have been a number of minor updates and they've averaged one big update a year since release. I'm still smarting about the price BUT note that I gladly paid the same amount to go from 6 to 8 after about a year with 6. Also, no one REALLY gets too hot under the collar about the price of an upgrade from say Office 2000 to 2007, so who am I to criticise? The comparatively nominal cost of going from DOpus 8 to 9 will probably benefit me far more than the upgrade, costing far more, from Office 2003 to 2007.

The only thing left for me to do now is to wait for DOpus 9 to be released. Impatiently.
5899
General Software Discussion / Re: Directory Opus 9
« Last post by Darwin on April 13, 2007, 04:31 PM »
My impression is that DOpus is at most a two man show and maybe even, from a development perspective, a one man show (though I could be wrong about that). It certainly is a quantum leap over XYplorer in terms of feature set and I am very much in love with it! That said, there is a price to be paid for its feature set and that is that it is not as svelte and quick as XYplorer. In its favour, though, its feature set means that one can dump a lot of other apps and not lose too much functionality (ftp, archiver, multiple rename, customizing folder colours and icons, at a basic level, music, video and image file organization, etc.). So, I will say that bitch and whine though I might, it's very likely that I'll be upgrading very quickly after (if not on) April 27.

I also have a license for XYplorer and like it very much. I'll be watching its development with great interest.
5900
sri - do you have a license for Evernote? If so, are you trying the beta for version 2? The wow factor really takes off when you start playing with it!
Pages: prev1 ... 231 232 233 234 235 [236] 237 238 239 240 241 ... 261next