topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday November 10, 2025, 11:09 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 ... 46next
576
General Software Discussion / Re: Is Firefox 3.0 the "Fat Elvis?"
« Last post by iphigenie on April 15, 2008, 01:50 AM »
To be honest there was the same kind of talk when FF2 was in beta, then most people just moved to it anyway. People say the same thing every time there is a new version of a tool like this "oh no bloat!" "oh no, design over substance".

What is there for FF since all the functionality is in the plugins? FF has become a web-rendering widget engine, but that makes the core product weak, and they are working on strengthening it. Makes sense to me. Don't rely on the add-on makers for basics anymore.

It helped early on to be tiny and lean and leave it all to the add on writers. That serves a geeky crowd well. Once you go for more market share (they didnt dream of that back then) this approach starts to backfire. Normal people installing FF just wonder what the fuss is all about, it is a "bah" product out of the box with no plugins.

Also a lot of functionality which was earlier done in things like add-ons, we now know how to do on the web, in a cross-browser way. So again, people wont install an add-on they will use a web app, and FF is again under pressure, since the advantage some of these add-ons gave is going away. And it has had as many security holes as anything else recently, so that advantage is gone.

I left FF after 1.5 - FF2 just rubbed me the wrong way, it was more instable and of course the existing plugins didnt work so I had to use plain FF again, and that is when you notice that FF is actually pretty lame without the plugins. I didnt want to use it plain, neither did I want to spend hours hunting plugins.

Also by then the FF community was starting to become really annoying and arrogant, so I bailed out. I dont like fanatism about anything, and it certainly is totally out of place on mundane things like software. Whatever it is you feel "evangelic" about, it's probably not that great or that important that you really ought to go around telling people to repent from their own software and use yours. ugh. I dont like FF only sites (eg: "Sorry, but we do not support the Opera web browser. However, Stumbleupon works well with Mozilla-based browsers, free open-source ones based upon Netscape Navigator. Our Toolbar doesn't work with Opera because it relies on browser features which Opera does not have. Mozilla and Firefox are ad-free, fast & stable, with banner/popup-ad blocking and tabbed browsing features. Install one now before joining the Stumbleupon community" Yeah, right.)

Most enthusiastic FF users do have a really good browser that works exactly like they want it to, but they spent 200 house over the last 3 years getting it that way. And they forget that.

I used slimbrowser, used kmeleon, and now opera. I am a lazy user and I spend a maximum of 1 hour over 3-4 sessions tweaking a piece of software. That's it. And I dont particularly like the plugin lottery.
577
General Software Discussion / Re: User friendly . . .
« Last post by iphigenie on April 12, 2008, 02:05 PM »
Makes sense - and that is why i listed flickr as the "best for sharing" not for pros (although they have a pro version) and not for pretty display or fancy galleries

Smugmug is a bit pricey for the family snaps, especially if you consider you technically need multiple accounts - and i guess that is why there are 2 new services, 72photos and 23, which aim to offer clean and pretty galleries free or at lower price points

Although if you look at the 3 inks I posted smugmug almost looks the best to me, and to say I am really tempted ... is an understatement. But when I have my own dedicated server etc. it seems silly to pay for hosting photos, no matter how slick, when the community of commenting is not that active (to me that would be the benefit of such a service over private site hosting)
578
General Software Discussion / Re: User friendly . . .
« Last post by iphigenie on April 12, 2008, 09:18 AM »
Aww, you made me check smugmug again, it's improved!!! My wallet might curse you. I will resist... I will resist!

Anyway here's a smugmug gallery http://curiousmind.s...6VeW#278273704_F6VeW
most of the same pictures in a zenfolio gallery http://iphigenie.zen...=h208FEE4E#732680789 and my simple 72photos gallery http://72photos.com/...end/iphigenie/images (works better to browse via "all images" or tags than galleries at the moment)

This is not as clear cut as it seems

Smugmug
+ wide range of administration options
+ most common, integrates with a lot of stuff
+ communities & forums
+ most customisable
+ great support
- galleries a bit slow
- price

Zenfolio
+ fastest on the user browsing front
+ tends to add features before smugmug
+ fast uploads
+ supports collections as well as galleries
+ slightly slicker typography and design
- no comments and community side
- price

72photos
+ good editing tools
+ clean looking
+ works from opera
+ slick workflow
+ free/cheap
- is quite a bit behind feature wise
- how to see large size photos is too hidden so nobody does
- front end galleries a bit weak, missing information and customisation
- getting slow
- work in progress (could be good or stay stuck)
not sure about support

579
General Software Discussion / Re: User friendly . . .
« Last post by iphigenie on April 12, 2008, 03:04 AM »
I am amazed, I never heard of the private settings in flickr not working, although I know with caching and stuff if you dont make your photo private from the start it gets tricky. That is pretty lax of them since they themselves have a special faq on protecting children (make them private, or if not then dont use real names or geocoding and dont publish to groups)
I like the flickr admin, its actually quite steamlined, but I dont like the amount of noise on the site. I only started using it recently when trying to use a bit more all my yahoo toys, uploaded 3 pics.
Flickr does make it easy to integrate images in your blog, because everyone integrates with flickr.
I like that it supports the creative commons license, I think it did a lot to promote that approach. I dont like that peole completely ignore that and take anything they want from flickr.
It is probably the best choice if you want to use photos to extend your footprint, if you want your images to by found by natural search, and if you want to build popularity and bring links to your site.

I really liked smugmug  :-*, it has a very vibrant forum community, the support is top notch, everyone cares. But I am trying to be thrifty and trying something simpler. I am still very tempted, as much for the community as for the slightly better look and for the satisfaction of using a grown up tool. But I have learned to catch myself and try to find cheaper/simpler alternatives first. I'm also still very tempted also because it is so easy to integrate from acdsee (which is good since upload wont work from opera) and there are more tools and widgets available (i really want to show some pics on my website!) and you never know someone *might* just buy an images one day and wouldnt i feel chuffed!

Smugmug, pbase and zenfolio are the 3 serious choices if you want to password protect, and have some proper pro tools. Although there is a flickr pro aiming at the same market so it must work there too.
photo.net and pbase are the ones if you want serious discussion and critique of your photos, or smugmug's forum dgrin. Everything else is just "pat on the back" comments (even in smugmug) or knee jerk reactions (flickr)

But for now I will stick it out with the 72photos stuff, try to get them to foster commenting and a forum, try to get a non animated widget to put on my site (via pipes if needed or write something), I'm their most prolific user this week so maybe I'll be heard.

Must go check if someone reacted to my blip at blipfoto... this is addictive! If anyone here gets lured by the 1-photo-a-day challenge (although you can miss days) then let me know :D
580
I found out at my own expense that editing tags from the library is really bad. Had 2000 files ending in .mp3.mp3 grr!

Nice little player, apart from that
581
Living Room / Re: Most useless
« Last post by iphigenie on April 11, 2008, 09:38 PM »
2) Aww, tough one. there's a tradition in my lazier half's family to give absurd pointless gifts for christmas. I think it started as "the kids are grown up now lets stop offering gifts... oh but its fun, if you dont have to find something really good for all 20 members of the family but go to the salvation army and buy everything that is ludicrous." I recall a book on chinchilla genetics and a duck shaped 80s phone.
On the other hand my mother always feels she has to bring something back from her travels, and since my partner is a bit musical she often brings us back the cheap-tourist version of real instruments. Which we never even want to display.

3) Easy. There are 2
3a - my first hard drive. I was young and had my dad's castout old corean PC clone, and reading up I figured it would all be easier with these new pricey things. So i scrounged up my money and saved $200 to buy a 20Mb drive. Which I never managed to make my PC recognise.
3b - In a fit of nostalgia I once bought a used Sun Sparc 20. Realised after I bought it that although it came with the CD of the OS, it had no CD reader. I checked the price of scsi readers and gave up. tried network booting but it was secured against that. No used it as a paperweight in the basement until i got the heart to get it recycled.
hmm, maybe a 3rd
3c) - bought everything to make a fancy mini-itx pc, with the idea of making a weird and wacky case to hide a silent media pc in. Never could decide what.
582
General Software Discussion / Re: User friendly . . .
« Last post by iphigenie on April 11, 2008, 09:21 PM »
I mean it when I say blipfoto is one of the cleanest crispest photo showing design - i wish some of the pro sites offered a look like that

583
General Software Discussion / Re: User friendly . . .
« Last post by iphigenie on April 11, 2008, 09:15 PM »
I have been looking around and testing lately and I tried both Smugmug and their main competitor (in the slick and pretty category) Zenfolio and pbase (in the pro/sell category)

I did a trial in both of them and I think Zenfolio gallerieslooks better but smugmug has a small edge in certain features (more integration) and a more vibrant community, and pbase has the best commenting culture and best search and optimisation.

Neither zenfolio nor smugmug seems to offer even a basic upload in opera  >:(

There's a few others and here's my totally subjective assessment - and I am curious about what others who have tried some think of them.

Maybe this will be useful for the next person wondering how to put their different sets of images

Best for pro/semi pro client facing galleries
Smugmug http://www.smugmug.com
Zenfolio http://www.zenfolio.com
pbase http://www.pbase.com


and to go on tangents:

best for commenting/discussing
photo.net http://www.photo.net - one of the oldest communities still active in near enough its original form. The photos there are of a very high level I wouldnt dare post mine but I have been hanging out there forever  :-[
flickr - although theres a lot of noise in there, theres also a high chance to get seen
my.opera.com - galleries actually look quite nice and clean, and the community will look and comment :)
webaperture http://www.webaperture.com - active commenting of the encouraging kind but the design has aged. a lot.
pbase

for sharing with friends and family
72 photos http://www.72photos.com/
23 http://www.23hq.com/
flickr

for linking to and integrating in blogs/sites
smugmug
flickr

photoblog (1 a day)
blipfoto http://www.blipfoto.com
aminus3 http://www.aminus3.com

to upload something for use on forums, etc
photobucket.com
imageshack.us
webshots.com

for mixed media
deviantart.com
showthatportfolio.com


I looked at a few more I cant even remember, and I would be interested in any really good ones I havent tried, in any of those categories :)

At the moment I have a few images in flickr, and most of my images in my.opera and 72folders - I just couldnt justify paying for the yearly fee a the prices the big guys, no matter how pretty and feature rich they are.  Maybe in a fewmonths this might change, but for now i'll see how 72folders matures.

72folders is still beta at the moment, but the upload tool works in opera 9.25 and 9.27 and to about 90% of features in the beta. The design could use some polish and the slideshow and feed/site widgets need developing, and there is not much of a commenting or discussing culture, but the basics are sound and the workflow to add/tag/assign images is quite slick (it even has some online editing which i havent tried so i cant say if that works in opera). I am at http://iphigenie.72p...tos.com/view/profile

I actually like the community at my.opera and the design is clean, but uploading image by image is a pain and will limit my use of it. I'm at, predictably... http://my.opera.com/iphigenie/albums/ - mostly the same pics as now on 72 folders, but less of them and sometimes an earlier version. I will probably evolve this into something different from what is on 72folders

I also got lured into blipfoto.com, the image-a-day concept. Started 5 days ago so we'll see, but I must say the design is minimalistic and beautiful. Maybe someone else at DC wants to play :)  I'm @ http://www.blipfoto.com/iphigenie

I also have a whole bunch of family/travel pics of no artistic value but which i want to share with the people on the pics, and for that I am not sure yet, but I might use a differnt 72folders account. Or flickr. Or webshots since I have a credit of 100000 images there, habing registered in 2000 and forgotten about it.
584
It seems the beta only works for 30 days unless you own version 1 OR get an invitation code from an owner of version 1.

Anyone here has figured out how to get these issued, cause I'd love for it to stop nagging me every time I start something.

 :Thmbsup:

EDIT: thanks a lot, you know who you are  :-*
585
General Software Discussion / Re: 1 Tera Byte CD..
« Last post by iphigenie on April 09, 2008, 02:09 PM »
Now I have simple needs but ultraiso is always able to do anything I can think of, even when i think "thats probably not possible but ill check"
586
Living Room / Re: Do you collect anything?
« Last post by iphigenie on April 09, 2008, 10:21 AM »
I actually don't speed read. I spend my commute reading, a bit on the lunch hour and an hour or more in the evening. That's an average paperback in 2 days, easy, although now I waste more time on the net and less reading. Then there is going back to leeds for the weekend and that is easily 3 books!

I have been a reader from a very young age. When I was about 10 I had to be a member of 3 libraries, the school one, the local town one and the one in the larger town next door (because there were limits to how many you could take out and I could not go more than once a week or even less to some of them, and 3 books a week was just not enough!). Got special dispensation to go pick books in the adult library by 12 (age limit is 15) because I had outgrown the books.

And I wasnt a geeky kid, I'd still spend my saturdays in something like the girl scouts crafting, building rope bridges, putting plays together etc. I didnt spend all my time reading. I had friends.

What I never really had was a strong sport or music hobby - I skied and hiked but these arent "2 nights a week" activities. This is where many children spend their time growing up. I put that time reading books (and on the 'puter after i got my zx spectrum). So if you dont have an instrument or a sport to rehearse, that is a lot of time for reading or doing creative hobbies, which I did.

Still read loads through uni although it was cramming textbooks

I only lost it when i launched a startup and lost my life in it

Still, I have too many books now, and I am becoming more ruthless with disposing of them after a read (bookmooch!!)
587
Living Room / Re: Do you collect anything?
« Last post by iphigenie on April 09, 2008, 10:19 AM »
Having had to start working hundred of miles from home (leeds>london) it was quite obvious to me how my life would be easier and more mobile if I owned less stuff.

When you consider what to do next and some tempting ideas just feel like "too much hassle" you know you are too entangled in stuff.

But then I have a nomadic streak, I like moving to something new every few years.
588
General Software Discussion / Re: Power Desk 7
« Last post by iphigenie on April 09, 2008, 08:49 AM »
I gave in the other day cause one machine was having a problem after a power cut so I upgraded for 14.95 to version 8.

Didnt see that much in it thats new that i would use, although I noticed the startup manager looked rather well done. Havent put it through its paces though.

It was missing the one thing I upgraded for, naively. Disk fixing tools on the boot cd.

I just wish *someone* would still do a bootable CD that does the disk check, Norton stopped with NU 2002 or 2003 (and I stopped buying!), and the last version of the fix it system suite doesnt seem to offer it either anymore. It's back to boot-to-recovery-console and run chkdsk, but unless chkdsk has hugely improved sometimes it might not be enough.
589
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Ashampoo Burning Studio 6 released for free
« Last post by iphigenie on April 09, 2008, 08:42 AM »
I really like the ashampoo burning software, had it since v4, bought several copies over time.

It does everything i need (all right my needs are simple, burn files, burn isos, make an iso, burn the same thing 5 times etc.), is clean, and the "easy" mode really makes it easy for people who arent too confident.

Get a license if only to give it to your parents  ;)

There's a similar deal out there for their photocommander (last version), I'll see if I can find the link. Although if you register on the site then find the newsletters tab you can find all the deals from the past few months, and many stay active way after the official date.
590
Living Room / Re: Do you collect anything?
« Last post by iphigenie on April 09, 2008, 08:30 AM »
I don't think I collect anything - by the normal definitions of collecting.

If I collected anything it would probably old science instruments and books, I find these fascinating, but I dont think one old physics book counts as a collection. I could also imagine collecting writing tools - pens etc - as I love a nice pen. But I only own what I use. Or vintage cameras, I own two, but use them for photo effect. But I could imagine collecting.

I do, though, like most people in the west, own too much stuff.  I dont mean I am a packrat - I'm atually quite good at getting rid of stuff. I dont mean I am anything like those people on TV, house looks nice and tidy, not cluttered. But I still have a lot more stuff than I need. So much stuff it weighs me down, so I have started clearing down. Even on books - 150 given away in a year. I'm mostly making sure I use up my stuff before I buy any more.

I do have one thing catalogued, but I dont think of it as collecting. I *did* read a book a day for a while and ooved to a place without a convenient livrary - as a result a few years down the road I own 1500 books (counting cookbooks and comics and stuff). That is not a collection to me because I do not seek any kind of coverage or completeness or topic or anything.

I cannot resist a clever board game, even when, like now, I have noone in the region to play them with. Banned myself from the ebay board game forum and from bgg
591
My GX10 works natively in Adobe's RAW format I think (dng?), so I should have it easy

I'm just wading my way through hundreds of scans trying to improve them, get rid of scratches too, and I am sure the right tool could speed it up. Of course the other right tool could help me get even better final pictures... and i already own too many tools, although apart from acdsee they are aimed at image composition and manipulation. So theres this itch to scratch, this empty hook in the toolbelt...

592
Thanks for that, it is very useful. I guess I should compare the RAW converters - i was just using what came with my camera out of lazyness until i started thinking about it. If the RAW workflow in ACDSEE is as clunky as you say, then I just wont have the patience for it... I hadnt tried it yet.

ACDSee is nowhere near as slick as other tools for combining fixes and effects and undoing/adjusting later. Unless it is all in their RAW tool. I like what i saw in lightroom and lightzone (lightzone offers it for jpegs too and i have a lot of those)

I have been looking at tutorials on lightroom and the beta, and I must admit it looks pretty nice. Very slick. If you know what you are doing - I dont think I understand enough (or more precisely want to take the time!) how to use all the sliders and curves. And I am sure I dont want to pay 220 pounds (although give me time, you never know. 199 dollars i might pay)

I just dont have the 100 hours and 1000 pounds to spend on being an expert (well i have them but dont want to use them for that). I wouldnt know a color profile if it bit me... it's not that I cant understand, it is just that I am not sure I want to spend the time to read, learn, then pay for all the costs. I also am not sure whether it isnt a bit of an illusion - like people with top of the range ski gear who barely can ski, maybe one converter or tool is not as good but I wouldnt do any better with the top of the range one due to lack of patience.

I'm old school when it comes to photos, taught in the time of film (still have film cameras and use them). I try to get them right the first time and forget about them if they arent. Still getting the head around the fact that some of my "bah" picture could be made stunning.

Give me time

PS: As for acdsee at the time i compared it with a few of the other tools and it had the best workflow to acquire, file, name, tag files from scanning negatives, as it would stay in acquisition mode for strip after strip until i told it to stop. Other tools would take the 4 scanned, then go back to the main interface and you had to go through the menus and "ok" "ok" "ok" etc. So I used the demo to scan half of them in. Only bought it later when they did a deal. The price and the scanning workflow is what won acdsee the sale, that and allowing me to change certain iptc tags like camera etc. which many tools just do not let you do, but which you want to do when scanning.
593
Living Room / Re: How many people work from home?
« Last post by iphigenie on April 05, 2008, 05:32 PM »
I don't work from home at the moment, work for an employer.

I worked from home for over a year around 2002-2003 but not alone - me and 7 people worked from my home for a year when we were setting up our web business.

Then I worked from home again for about 8 months in 2006-2007 (around then is when i found DC looking for "thrifty" software since i had less income), after I got manoeuvered out of the business created above. A dark time for me and yet probably good for my sanity.

One thing I found out is that I dont work well in a vacuum, need people to bounce off. So I would need a home large enough that others can use it for their office too, like a freelance commune, or a good virtual community to keep myself on track...
594
I wasnt holding the crashes against the app - just makes it hard to figure out for a lazy user like me - ads to the confusion

I dont have the benefit of photoshop to inform how the tools in lightroom work - I have tended to use other photo editing tools in the past, and my last photoshop course was v6... so I feel lost. I know from reading reviews that people used to photoshop are often lost in front of some other tool, because the sliders arent the same and dont have the same effect etc. Well i have this the other way at the moment.

I am trying to like it, since all the tutorials and books anywhere only ever mention lightroom, if i can get myself to be able to use it and justify its cost, then I will have an easier time improving (same goes for photoshop but heck if I am going to spend the price of a good lens on a piece of software)

Slowly figuring it out - but I think it is overkill for me to have a tool like this especially if i dont have photoshop to integrate with - i dont understand the different tools enough
595
to not sound like a grump:

lightroom seems very well thought out and slick. I like the workflow. I cant do anything in the develop phase worth anything - random fumbling about produces nothing. And there doesnt seem to be a way to say "i didnt like what i did DO NOT save it"  :tellme:

I now figured out where the history is hiding, after having toyed with it several hours (took me 4 seconds to find it in lightzone). But it doesnt seem to make sense to me. I cant figure out how to, for example, sharpen an image I have!

There's a sharpen option in the tool bar. It seems that every time I move a slider in a tool it adds it to the history. I dont want to apply sharpening 22 times, i want to find the right setting. And through all of this the image does not sharpen one bit.

lightzone is clearly inspired, interface wise, from lightroom - although I have figure out how to change the exposure (in quite subtle ways at times), apply something only to part of the image, sharpen etc. in 10 minutes. I am still confused doing this in lightroom...

Both lightroom and lightzone have clone/repair tools I cant figure out either - ah well, too clever for me
596
Lightroom seems fine, very slick and all - but i dont really see that many advantages over acdsee.
I mean yes, there are a few more tools available straight from the viewing/managing screen, but i didnt notice anything that i didnt already have in acdsee pro. As a matter of fact some of the things hailed as new make me go "you mean it didnt have that?"

Although with the beta I had lots of errors and crashes so I will wait and see. Not using photoshop or any adobe tool (I was on the macromedia side of that divide) I probably dont get the full benefit of the integration

I can see the workflow might be a little bit smoother if all the changes you do fit within the tools it sets, it feels a bit faster than in acdsee. Although I cannot make heads or tails of the impact of some of the controls without lots of trial and error - i must be wired wrong for adobe.

There's still a couple tools I want to try in the "non destructive" department - photostudio darkroom, rawtherapee, and the very slick (after 10 minutes) lightzone (some cool ideas in that one,although it is a bit more of an editor and a bit less of a workflow/admin tool)
597
Living Room / Re: Your happiness right now
« Last post by iphigenie on April 05, 2008, 12:33 PM »
I have this niggly feeling that my nicely paid bossy job is really a waste of me
-iphigenie
Good managers are hard to find. Perhaps you undervalue your contribution in that area.
-cranioscopical (April 04, 2008, 11:11 AM)

you're quite right, and I am good at it -managing talented people, develop talent, and deal with the rest of the business- it is certainly worth it to the company in question - saved their bacon when I joined, no question! But is it the best thing I can do for me, and the best I can contribute to "the world" ?

Lately I kind of feel guilty about it, and trying to figure out what idea of myself i want to develop - it might be keep this job and redevelop my hobbies more, or do another startup again, or it might be figure out how to get a job at Unesco or someplace like that - dont we all want to save the world?- or buy a farmhouse with good internet access and write, paint, take  pictures and pick up pottery... women have their midlife crisis early, I hear...

Of course 75% happy is fine, and it'd be more if my mother wasnt ill
598
General Software Discussion / Re: Linspire Inc. (Rant) [Explicit Language]
« Last post by iphigenie on April 05, 2008, 12:26 PM »
it might be a good idea next time you receive an email to look through the full headers to check if they are sending it to the address you think they are.
599
General Software Discussion / Re: Linspire Inc. (Rant) [Explicit Language]
« Last post by iphigenie on April 05, 2008, 12:25 PM »
You waited 3 years???????????????

 :hanged:
600
General Software Discussion / Re: Linspire Inc. (Rant) [Explicit Language]
« Last post by iphigenie on April 05, 2008, 03:04 AM »
Larry Kettler, CEO
http://forum.freespi...howthread.php?t=9626
http://www.linkedin.com/in/larrykettler

Michael Robertson, owner (pa/agent is camille wood)
http://www.michaelro...son.com/ventures.php

of course if like many executives they do regular vanity search they might find this on their own
Pages: prev1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 ... 46next