topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Friday June 20, 2025, 12:20 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 ... 43next
576
I knew about the ads in 3.x, but then again I had known about them for some time. I believe that when FeedDemon was abandoned as a paid software and made freely available, it was widely mentioned that the biggest change would be the addition of ads to the free versions.

Well, having slept on it, my opinion stands. If there are any differences among us, I hope they don't fall along the lines of who knew about it beforehand and who did not, because this is only a side issue. If I added adverts to one of my apps, and only announced it here on dc, would that be sufficient? Not to anyone who just went to my site and downloaded the software.

We've all been through years of debating adware and other *-wares on all possible forums, and if there is one thing that those debates have produced, it is that users expect to be told beforehand, and that software vendors have by and large come to accept that.

I do want to say that Nick has indeed always treated his customers with respect and while I don't know him personally, I have never felt that he was one to sell out his customers/users for a buck.

The more I was taken aback to see the ads in FeedDemon.

I reinstalled the program specifically to see if the license mentioned the ads, and it didn't. Then I went looking for a privacy policy, but there is none that's relevant to FeedDemon, and the one that does exist on NewsGator site does not disclose anything about the ads.

This is a breach of trust, and especially so, coming from a vendor I respect.

577
Can anyone else confirm the Google Reader issue? Is it really slowing down?

I didn't notice anything to complain about in this respect. If you normally use Google Reader, you have to be used to a bit of lag anyway. And you can still use FeedDemon as a standalone reader, without Google Reader integration, in which case it should be as snappy as it was before.

(I originally wrote "standalone newsreader", then realized a newsreader is something entirely different of course. Does that make me an old-timer?)
578
1) The ad support, surely we registered users could at least get a short window in which to evaluate without ads, then either pay an update fee or see the ads.

I think so. Not a free no-ads trial even, but just an upfront choice during installation: enter your reg key now or see ads. This way you could upgrade and never have to see the ads at all. The price is really fair.

2) The entire program seems to be running through treacle. The interface seems unresponsive. Perhaps this is a reflection of the synchronisation

Well, almost every action must now go to Google and back, so that's to be expected. The delays didn't seem bothersome to me. Maybe the requests going out of FeedDemon could be buffered and sent in batches every so often, but then you would run the risk of losing synchronization if something went wrong.

579
You post this exact same complaint in my blog, and then you post it here before even giving me a chance to respond?  

There is nothing wrong with posting the complaint here, nor with you responding here, or me relating your response if you did not. As for the blog, it is yours, you can erase my post if you wish.

"There was absolutely no attempt on our part to hide the fact that FeedDemon 3.0 has ads, as a quick search of this blog will prove. It has been mentioned here - and several other places - many times before, and it seemed pointless to bring it up again since my only goal with this post was to introduce the new features.

Nick, I wrote as much above. I know (I saw later) that this is mentioned in the support forum postings. Please understand that this means exactly zero, because you cannot expact everyone to first read / search your blog or the forum, and only then download and install the software. This may be true for some existing users who follow your blog, but most people first install, and then maybe visit the blog or the support forum if they are interested or need assistance. Myself, I had version 2.7 installed, but never used it much, since most of my reading was through Google, and maintaining two sets of subscriptions wasn't convenient.

An advertising-supported program absolutely must disclose this in the installer. Some vendors place that information only in the license. That is an intentionally underhanded approach, because a lot of users don't read EULAs, or wouldn't understand them if they read it, since English is not their native language. But at least the vendor can claim they do disclose the fact before users commit to installing the software.

Yet FeedDemon does not even do that much. If you go to the website, read the overview and what's new sections, download and proceed to install, at no time during this process are you told you are going to see ads in the program. FeedDemon does not carry any privacy statement, either, while the Privacy Policy at NewsGator is not very clear, as I describe in my post above.

In fact, NewsGator's privacy policy does state that subscriptions and "actions" taken with regard to posts are collected. If that information pertains only to users' online activities through the NewsGator site, then the policy needs to be amended, since it is not relevant to FeedDemon.

FeedDemon doesn't automatically subscribe you to those feeds unless you tell it to, and you explicitly have to click "Yes" for those feeds to be added (the default is "No"). I can only guess that those subscriptions were somehow left over from the previous version, or that you misread the step in the startup wizard which asked whether to subscribe you to anything.

You are right that the default is no, but I am not lying to you, either. I do not think those were leftover subscriptions, because (a) as I have already said, I chose the option to clear the cache and subscription data when uninstalling version 2.7, then went and manually removed any traces of the program left on disk. (I did that to ensure that any old subscriptions would not get merged with my current Google Reader feeds); and (b) though you have to take my word for it, there is nothing in the world more boring to me than sports, and I would never and have never subscribed to any sports feeds. Or, indeed, a Gossip section.

I may be wrong about the bug in the installer, though. I suppose it is possible that (a) the uninstaller for v2.7 did not clear the cache even after I clicked Yes twice, and that subsequently I did not manage to find *all* the remaining traces of those old subscriptions. (I did not check the registry, for example.) In that case the bug may be in the 2.7 uninstaller, rather than the current version.

Again, I repeated the procedure twice with the same effect.

FeedDemon doesn't share your subscriptions, nor does it share your Google login. Your login is stored locally, encrypted in the registry. It's only sent to Google itself, and then only using secure HTTP."

Thank you for the direct reply. My request would be to include that information on the NewsGator's FeedDemon page, as well as on the installer screens. Also, please describe the nature of the advertisements. It is becoming standard practice today to serve contextual ads, in which case the program would have to provide at least some subscription information to the advertisers. Whether or not this is the case for FeedDemon, there should be a statement to that effect in the license or a privacy policy distributed with the program.

Please understand that, while I am not a fan of adware, and would not have installed FeedDemon had I known about the ads, I accept that this practice exists. I am not out to rid the world of advertisers (a nice thought, though). My sole issue is with the lack of clear, accessible, prominent disclosure, because FeedDemon did not give me a fair chance to back off. That's all I'm asking for.
580
FeedDemon is now at 3.0, and instead of continuing with the NewsGator subscription service, it now offers syunchronization with Google Reader. I thought it was great, downloaded and installed v3.

Then I saw FeedDemon now displays ads.

I went back to the website looking for some disclosure, but there's nothing (at least nthing I can readily see). I revisited Nick Bradbury's post, Introducing FeedDemon 3.0, thinking that such a change would merit a mention in What's New, but no.

I uninstalled, cleaned every last trace of FeedDemon from under "Documents and Settings", then reinstalled FD 3, expecting to find some big red warning on the license page that I had somehow missed. Turns out I didn't miss anything - the license does not mention the ads, or if it does, it must be in some inscrutable language.

It seems to me that by not disclosing the advertising prior to installation, NewsGator runs afoul of the law in some countries. It used to be the typical evil practice in the early days of adware, but today we expect to be told before we install. This is particularly important because of the following:

When you first launch FeedDemon, before you see the main program window with the ads in the corner, FD asks you if you want to synchronize with Google Reader. This means entering your Google account username and password in the program. I was naive enough to trust Nick Bradbury, and did so. Only then did I see the ads first.

This leads to a number of questions:

Since FeedDemon does not disclose the fact that it has become adware, what else does it not disclose? Are the ads context-sensitive? Does FeedDemon share my subscriptions and the articles I read with NewsGator or with third parties? The license does not say it doesn't, so my assumption is that it may.

Secondly, does FeedDemon share my Google Reader username and password with NewsGator or any third party? Again, the license doesn't say.

NewsGator privacy policy does admit they "collect" (a) subscriptions and (b) "Data from actions you take on posts (for example marking read, saving, forwarding via email, etc)". It is not clear though whether this relates only to the online activities (the NewsGator paid aggregation service, if it still exists), or if it also affects desktop sofware like FeedDemon. FeedDemon itself bears no privacy-related information.

Now, it is entirely possible that I am the last person in the world to find out FeedDemon is now adware. Sure, there are mentions on the support forums. However, users cannot be expected to see the forums before they install the software. This does not count as proper disclosure before the fact.

As if that were not enough, FeedDemon manages to add add insult to injury. After the installation, and after it synchronizes with Google Reader, FeedDemon asks if you want to add its suggested subscriptions. I selected "No, don't subscribe me to anything else right now" and proceeded.

Result: FeedDemon displays my Google Reader subscriptions, as well as a bunch of new junk subscriptions I specifically told it to exclude. What's worse, it pushed those additional subscriptions to the Google Reader account, thereby polluting it with lots of stuff I now have to remove manually. This may be a bug, but you'd think something like that would have been easily caught in beta, so who knows if it really is a bug. (Just to be sure, I repeated the entire uninstal / scrub / reinstall process twice, thiking maybe I did not check the right option the first time. The effect was the same both times.)

You can pay (under $10) for a key to remove the ads, and that's okay, since I first registered FeedDemon in 2004 and would not mind paying for an upgrade. But I cannot with clear conscience support NewsGator's policies. And first I would like to know how much of my Google account data has already been leaked to NewsGator or their advertisers without my permission. Come to think of it, it's quite sickening. A very annoying experience.
581
General Software Discussion / Re: Installers: "This may take several minutes."
« Last post by tranglos on September 30, 2009, 08:36 PM »
Fake Progress Bar

This reminds me of...

sign01.jpg

sign02.jpg

#2 is almost certainly a fake, but I really hope #1 is a real sign somewhere!
582
General Software Discussion / Re: Installers: "This may take several minutes."
« Last post by tranglos on September 30, 2009, 08:31 PM »
Of course, there's always the option of capitalizing on how long the general population thinks such things will take...

Okay, I don't have a link for this, it was a looong time ago. But. I read once about a shareware developer who was selling a program to crack passwords in Excel and Word files (or was it WordPerfect? I really have to find that piece!). Encryption in those days was so weak, the results were delivered practically instantly.

Users didn't like it! They thought there was cheating involved, since they expected password cracking to take some serious computing. If it was so easy, why were they paying for it in the first place? So the developer put in an artificial delay loop, to make it appear as if the program was doing a lot of important, wizardry work. Users were happy, and sales went up.

I swear I did not make it up.
583
General Software Discussion / Re: Installers: "This may take several minutes."
« Last post by tranglos on September 30, 2009, 06:33 PM »
It's a holdover from who knows how long ago - Windows 3.0 days at least. And you're right, it never takes that long. My guess is the message comes as default with the installer builder(*), and few people bother to change it, since packaging an installer is generally tedious and painful, and you want to minimize the damage. Or maybe it's even hard-coded?

Also, a professional setup builder comes with localized resources for many languages. So you'll be unlikely to go and change the default messages. If you did, you'd have to have them localized from scratch, so why bother.

But you know what - more and more installers now are stubs that download components from their home websites. Then the message is relevant and true again. We've come a full circle.

(* InstallShield? are they still in action? I mostly see InnoSetup-based installers these days.)
584
Living Room / Re: How much Soda/Energy-Drinks you drink / week?
« Last post by tranglos on September 30, 2009, 05:44 PM »
But how much do YOU waste sugarified-water with vitamins / week?

For me, zero. I like the taste of Coke, and I used to really love the taste of Lilt (pineapple and grapefruit, only sold in the UK, same maker. The only soft drink I know that actually tastes refreshing and will quench thirst for more than 10 minutes). But once you realize how much sugar this stuff contains (and any sugar substitutes are likely much worse), you really want to stop.

I drink tea all day round (with or without milk, no sugar) instead. When the choice is limited to soft drinks, I go for water.

And on a related note, I haven't seen the inside of a McDonald's in 15 years or so :) OK, that's a lie: when traveling in the US, I sometimes stopped to use their lavatories, when there was nothnig else for miles along our Nevada trail. I would order tea so as not to feel guilty about ripping them off. But at McDonald's, tea is as far as I will go.

My guilty pleasure instead is a cold lager before bedtime. (Probably not too good an idea, either, I know!)

Oh, and energy drinks - they taste like battery acid! I do drink Red Bull, reluctantly, to keep me alert when driving, especially at night, but I hate it. The inside of the car stinks of the drink for a few hours afterwards.
585
General Software Discussion / Re: Win7: Anyone else getting excited?
« Last post by tranglos on September 30, 2009, 11:36 AM »
I don't know what kind of job you have, Innuendo, but you should be working in the sales department :-) 

What Curt said. That was a really inspired write-up, informative too. Thanks a bunch, Innuendo!
586
General Software Discussion / Re: MOGware's FileHamster (Complaint)
« Last post by tranglos on September 30, 2009, 10:52 AM »
I'm not sure what sound you are talking about...FileHamster doesn't play any sounds with the bubbles; although, allowing the user to specify a sounds when a bubble pops up or disappears might be a fun little 'optional' feature.   :Thmbsup:
-Mogware Support (September 30, 2009, 10:24 AM)

Thanks, Mogware!

Babouras: in that case you may have sounds configured in Windows to play at certain "events", such as a program popping up a notification message. Do check the Control Panel, you may well find the answer there.
587
General Software Discussion / Re: MOGware's FileHamster (Complaint)
« Last post by tranglos on September 30, 2009, 08:54 AM »
Could someone please inform me how to get rid the constant sound of a boxing glove that is part of a Filehamster's buuble ad? I can accept its appearance once, but the moment Filehamster initiates and keeps a copy, this annoying sound repeats itself until I close Filehamster. I will have to uninstall the program if there's no solution.

Is this a FileHamster sound, or could it be one of Windows built-in souds? (I don't like it when Windows plays an error sound at 3am, so I always disable all these sound effects in Control Panel, and don't really know what sounds come bundled with Windows).

Anyway, if this is a FileHamster sound, there is probably a .wav or an .mp3 file installed with the program. Check under the folder where FH is installed. If you find any sound files there, delete them (or rename them), so that FH cannot find them.  It should not cause any visible errors in the program. If it does, it's a bug that you can report to FH.

If there are no sound files under FH folder, then perhaps this is a Windows sound. Try Control Panel -> Sounds, and checkk the sound schemes. Applications can add their own sounds there for various events, and you can disable individual sounds or all of them.

(I don't have FH installed at the moment, so I cannot check this for you, but is there no option in Preferences to disable sounds? Though I guess you'd have tried that already :) )
588
I thought the explanation was sufficient, in how it shows sometimes a useful feature will be dropped because it may do more harm than good, or be too confusing. (Or at least, how MS reaches decisions on such features.)

I had not considered the issue with backup software before, and it looks like it would be a problem. I suppose the alternate file streams is another example of the same.

But most of all I wanted to plug Raymond Chen's blog. It's a window into how and why things are done a certain way at Microsoft. (And sometimes you can find out how to use a certain API properly).
589
Interesting (and realistic) explanation why hard links are not directly available on Windows, even though NTFS supports them. By Raymond Chen, a Microsoft API guru.

His is a fascinating blog about why certain things in Windows are the way they are. Some of the content is programmer-only, but much, like this entry, is accessible to all who care.

590
General Software Discussion / Re: For those who write articles on CMS, a question.
« Last post by tranglos on September 29, 2009, 03:39 PM »
Would you say that the nest/outline view capability is the only big ui difference between optimizing for mutli-page static pages in Joomla?

I think so now, but while I've spent a lot of time trying out various CMS-es, I can't claim any significant experience with any of them yet. So my impressions may be somewhat superficial.

Note that the approach WordPress takes makes sense, since it is primarily a blogging platform. If you post often, pretty soon you will have hundreds, eventually thousands of posts, and no menu can handle that and stay usable. So the idea of having an automatic menu that lists only categories, then simply browsing through a timeline of posts, is rational. It just doesn't work too well when you have mostly static content, rather than blog posts that grow every day.

I ask this because I have seen people praise things like Tumblr's archive (example) but criticize it because the rest of the ui doesn't quite match. (Like that page has no search engine)

It's the first time I've seen it, and I don't think I like it much. The intro text is too short to make sense of or get an idea what the article is about. And I wouldn't want to scroll through several screenfuls of such little blocks. But it certainly is a novel idea :)

On the other hand, if the intro text was a little longer, this layout could work for incremental search. In FireFox I can start typing, and the browser jumps to the nearest match. The Tumblr layout does make it easy to find text in this manner - but only in the first few words of each post, which isn't all that practical.

Others have praised popurls' and Alltop's way of simplifying the Netvibes engine lay-out.

And these are not bad at all!

Still there are some uis which I feel have the potential of being a better way of negating discovery of old blog posts without forcing it to use a model of pick 1 random article like OurSignal's way of showing aggregated news.

Ouch! :) I can tell which articles I am *supposed* to look at in this design, but all the less-prominent articles are like noise. I suppose you could use that for images, but with text it's pretty self-defeating. Maybe not if you have very young eyes.

Still kind of confusing but I guess to understand my question, you would have to consider people like me who don't feel comfortable with any kinds of list so when thinking of a multi-post static page ui for us, my question stems from asking whether the difference is just Joomla's ability to create outline style categories and top menus (I know I've already said that before) or you are just showing one of the more obvious ways that Joomla differs from Wordpress? (That is if I focused on Joomla, I should have a more tech-newbie friendlier way of going wild with menus so that I can design/experiment with a multi-post static page that is on par with being an advanced website designer/developer and is tailored made for people like me who prefer other ways of navigating besides outline lists.)

My aim was to show the differences - particularly in the light of how I praised WordPress, yet ultimately did not find it suitable for my software site.

Beyond that, I think a lot depends on the nature of your content and audience. People over 40 may not be happy with Tumblr's or OurSignal's way of presenting information; younger people may be OK with that. Also, how important is it that your visitors actually read or scan the whole listing? Are they supposed to do that, or do they just arrive and click a specific link they're interested in?

You could google for articles on website usability; there's a lot of good advice. I learned a lot from Joel Spolsky's User Interface Design for Programmers (his book is on Amazon, and he published online  a large part of it). The rules for the web will often be similar.

In my experience radical new designs may be visually captivating, but they often volate even basic rules of usability (such as, don't show too much dense text at once; don't use too many colors because they distract; don't spread the text across the whole width of the page, etc.) You may be able to find some middle ground. Check out the BBC News site: they use lists arranged into blocks of different but coherent styles, so that they don't look too much like lists, and the content is sectioned in a very clear way. It's easy to scan through the whole page, and it's equally easy to go directly to just the special link you want. (I seem to recall BBC website won some usability awards, but don't quote me on that.)
591
General Software Discussion / Re: For those who write articles on CMS, a question.
« Last post by tranglos on September 29, 2009, 02:01 PM »
@trianglos:
 
Joomla, by comparison, got the menu right (but little else).
Your post made me curious. Could you post a screenshot on why a menu in Joomla is more optimized for 50 or more pages?

Well, there are two major differences:

1. In WordPress, you can have a menu that shows all categories or all pages. (Categories are used to organize blog posts, while the page menu links to static pages. Both categories and pages can be nested). You can have either of the two menus on top, and both on the sidebar. The menus are generated automatically, however, so no matter what theme you use, you don't really have much control over the structure of the menu. You can only hide certain categories or certain pages. Also, the menus you choose will always be displayed the same way, on all pages. (There may be plugins that give more control over WordPress menus, I don't know yet.)

In Joomla, by contrast, you create menus manually, which takes some work. But this means you can have any number of different menus and show different menus on different pages. (There is a little hitch to that, but in general that's what you get.) You can have two or more items, in different menus, that link to the same page, for example. You can create menu items that link to individual pages, or items that link to blog-like listings of articles, or items that link to "table of content" layouts with links to more stuff. And certain plugins add their own menu types - e.g. there's a photo gallery plugin that adds a menu item type that automatically creates a gallery page. Maintaining the menu(-s) does take some work, and if you change the menu item that links to an article, the URL of the article will change too, which is bad. But overall, Joomla's structure is much more flexible, especially if your site is not all a blog.

2. The second difference is in the way the menus work. Here's a menu of static pages for my blog site (in Polish), using a free WordPress theme called Fusion:
wordpress-sidebar-menu.png

It's quite long already, and imagine what's going to happen when there are three or four times as many pages. It's not easy to find stuff in it, and it's not easy to navigate. The selected page is not highlighted, and the nesting, while indicated, isn't all that clear (nested items should be indented). And it's still the best effect I can get - all other themes I've tried were worse in this regard. To improve, the menu should be collapsible, indented, and should only show the expanded portion.

This is the same WordPress menu, displayed on top:
wordpress-top-menu.png

This is better, because the menu is collapsible, so the lists are not as long. But (a) this menu can only be shown on top and is only navigable with the mouse, and (b) if there are many levels of nesting, it will not be very usable, either - much like the Start menu in Windows. And since you can only have one menu on top (the "better" one), you have to choose whether to use it for pages or for categories. The other menu has to live in the sidebar.

I do not have the same menu composed in Joomla, so the effect of comparison will not be as persuasive, perhaps, but this is a typical Joomla menu on the sidebar (using a commercial theme):
joomla-sidebar-menu.png

It's pretty small, but you can see that only the "path" to the current page is expanded: New products -> eStopWatch -> Download. Graphical indicators make it easy to see where you are in the overall menu structure. If I now clicked the "Activehotkeys" item, the currently expanded part of the menu would fold, and the clicked item would open up. Perhaps such a menu is also possible in WordPress, but I haven't seen one like that.

Now, here is the same Joomla menu displayed as a top menu:
joomla-top-menu.png

This one works pretty much like the top menu in WordPress, only here it's prettier. It's the sidebar menus that really differ in functionality.
592
General Software Discussion / Re: For those who write articles on CMS, a question.
« Last post by tranglos on September 29, 2009, 07:14 AM »
Wordpress, Joomla, MediaWiki, raw XHTML/CSS, Drupal, postNuke, Typo3 (learning how to use this is equivalent to doing a PhD)...I have tried them all.

WordPress is the best. Whether you want a one page site or multi-page static site or of course a blog, nothing can beat WordPress.

I have to agree. For the last two weeks I've been wrestling with Joomla, then set up a (separate) blog site in Wordpress. It was such a relief. Everything "just works" in Wordpress. The ajaxy adminstrative UI is awesome, functional and clean. All the settings I wish to change are right where I expect to find them, and they make sense. The documentation is exhaustive and written with a dash of humor, which is always welcome. And though I had previously only read php code, never written a script, I wrote a simple widget for WordPress, from scratch, within a couple of hours yesterday.

And WordPress has smarts! I was editing a page in html view, and pasted a few paragraphs of text but forgot to wrap them in p tags. Switched to the page view, and the display was correct! My text was properly divided into paragraphs. WordPress did what I meant, not what I told it to do. It was "smart" and did the right thing.

That said... and I'm beginning to hate this phrase, but that said, I don't (yet) think I can use WordPress for my main site. All the templates I've seen display the menu of pages as static and fully expanded. That works for 10-20 pages, but not for 50 or more, with levels of nesting. It's just not convenient trying to find your way around a fuly expanded, long menu of dozens, maybe hundreds of pages eventually. Joomla, by comparison, got the menu right (but little else).

And WordPress seems strangely slow to load on the front-end. Slower than Joomla, even for simple pages with no images. There's the SuperCache plugin; I read the docs and didn't quite like the caveats.
593
General Software Discussion / Re: Win7: Anyone else getting excited?
« Last post by tranglos on September 28, 2009, 09:10 PM »
As for upgrading from Windows XP,  that was a fine OS in its day and may feel like it has some life left in it, but the time is approaching that one must face the fact that XP is a seven year old operating system. That's a lifetime in the realm of computers. Many innovations have happened across all operating system platforms & it's just not as secure as a modern operating system can and should be.

Hi Innuendo! What innovations are there in Windows 7 that make people's lives easier? Not challenging, just asking, because I've seen plenty of screenshots, but haven't read much about any feature or usability improvements.

Win2K was a plus because it was very stable. XP was better, because it made networking nearly painless, particularly setting up a home (W)LAN.

In Vista I couldn't find a similar redeeming feature. Security doesn't count really, first of all because I think UAC is a terrible idea (and I've already debated this with some who think otherwise :) ), but also because I don't consider security a feature - it's partly a prerequisite (any issues should be fixed through the update mechanism, not in a separate new version), and partly a process in which user behavior plays the biggest part. My XP boxen have always been pretty secure, regardless of how I connected. (I've only ever contracted an actual hostile virus once, in DOS/Windows 3.1 days, through a friend's infected diskette.)

One of the ideas MS floated around for Vista was the database-backed filesystem. That would have been an innovation, and a fantastic one at that, especially if they published a nice API to use in third-party applications. We know what happened to that. Aero is kind of innovative, but it's just for the looks.

So what about 7?

The new task bar unfortunately makes True Launch Bar near inoperable. Gone are the days of being able to imbed all of TLB's nifty features into the Windows Task Bar.

Yow, that's really bad. It's reminiscent of the Office 2007 ribbon, which pretty much removed users' ability to customize it. What does the new taskbar have to make up for the loss, then? (In the screenshots I can see there are no captions on the buttons. That's bad too - I use the captions.) I couldn't live without TrueLaunchBar!


594
A new (to me) application of this kind is being offered at Bits du Jour today:
http://www.bitsdujou.../software/detalizer/

Comments under the listing imply it doesn't install on Vista or Windows 7 - maybe the authors will respond there.

595
Developer's Corner / Re: RAD Studio 2010 Released Today (Delphi/C++ Builder)
« Last post by tranglos on September 28, 2009, 05:55 AM »
So... it's a 2010 release, and full unicode support is a new feature? No 64bit support? And not even unsigned 64bit integers? This is a joke, isn't it? :)

Well, they've apparently fixed bugs in generics, too :)

One worthwhile feature in 2010 is the significantly expanded RTTI. It's supposed to be on par with .net reflection now. But yeah, what's called RAD Stuidio 2010 should really have been a hotfix for 2009.
596
Developer's Corner / Re: RAD Studio 2010 Released Today (Delphi/C++ Builder)
« Last post by tranglos on September 27, 2009, 05:48 PM »
Hmm ... will the data type  long long  then at least be supported there?

Delphi defaults to a 32-bit signed int, but it has had support for signed 64-bit integers - if I understand you correctly - since at least version 6. There is no unsigned 64-bit int, though, at least not up to D2009.

(No idea if C++ Builder is any different in this regard, though.)
597
Developer's Corner / Re: RAD Studio 2010 Released Today (Delphi/C++ Builder)
« Last post by tranglos on September 27, 2009, 04:37 PM »
Is this C++ now 64 Bit aware, or will we have to wait for another release?

Not yet. A few new features are highlighted here, and this should be the full account.
598
General Software Discussion / Re: Total Commander: Tips, Tricks, and Tweaks
« Last post by tranglos on September 27, 2009, 11:18 AM »
to the totalcmd gurus, is there a shortcut key to open folder under cursor in a new tab on the opposite panel? something like the current Ctrl-Left/Right hotkeys but i want it to create a new tab first.

Not that I know of (but maybe I shouldn't speak out, not exactly being a guru ;) ). I think the feature you're asking for would require macros, to be able to invoke a series of commands. Unfortunately TC doesn't do macros. One button or one keypress can only execute a single command.

An autohotkey script that sends the correct key sequence should work, though: send Tab, Ctrl+T (for new tab), Tab again, then Ctrl+Right arrow.

Apparently (I didn't know that until 30 seconds ago) TC can also be controlled by sending messages to it - that might be more reliable than sending keypresses, since the script will not be dependent on the customized keyboard shortcuts in TC. There is a quick description of sending commands here, and of course autohotkey will do that for you as well.

599
Living Room / Re: The Pricelessware Scam (Alt.Comp.Freeware)
« Last post by tranglos on September 26, 2009, 06:02 PM »
or this thread will quickly end up closed.

The sooner the better. Bloss's latest response to 40Hz just about seals it.

Bloss, for your information: I may not be an old-timer compared to some, but I've been on DC for three years now. And I have never before seen your kind of language and your kind of attitude here. What constructive input do aim to provide?

Please, read a few other threads on DC, and you will notice that your posts are quite out of ordinary here, in both tone and content.
600
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Free License Give-away for USB Safely Remove v4.1
« Last post by tranglos on September 26, 2009, 03:46 PM »
(And by the way, Josh, I swear I've just tried to swat your avatar off the screen. I work with windows wide open at night, there are trees outside, so all kinds of critters, winged and not, end up touching down on my monitor. Your avatar didn't look any different - though of course I had seen it many times before. Good job! :) )
Pages: prev1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 29 ... 43next