5651
General Software Discussion / Re: The DonationCoder "Superior Antivirus" Award/Certification
« Last post by Stoic Joker on December 20, 2009, 11:33 AM »The award could only go to a company that does not try to sell "security". They should be honest about what their product really does: attempt to lessen the likelihood of catching a worm, virus, or whatever. When they "guarantee 100% security" they are making fools of their customers.110% agreed ... The various AV companies seem to pit their marketing & legal departments against each other ... Granted they never really flat-out say 100% effective. But, most seem to use the cleverest forms of word play to get as close to the razor edge as po$$ible without causing anybody in legal to have a seizure.
But if they do educate their customers and try to raise their awareness about those "dangers" without resorting to panicking them, I think that should have a positive impact on the uhm awardiness(?).-housetier (December 20, 2009, 12:06 AM)
Truth-in-Advertising should most definitely be considered, and weigh heavily on any award(s) given.

Recent Posts


...But that's what error checking is for... b135 handles the legacy stuff much better (properly...). 