I read through the review, and I feel that they do have some valid points, but a lot of their negative comments seem excessive and repetitive.-cthorpe
As far as the repetition goes, that may be the down side of having six people each writing an independent review. But I've also often found
value in the repetition. If just one person complains about something, I might dismiss his complaint as idiosyncratic, but if four people have the same complaint, I'm likely to take it more seriously.
For example, they harp on the fact that PE autostarts with Windows constantly throughout the review. In addition, they have inserted responses from the developer throughout their review, but did not take his responses into account and edit their review in any way.
Well, as someone who tries to have as few programs in my startup menu as possible and hates it when a program puts itself there without at least asking me if I want it there, I'm very sympathetic when other people have this complaint.
I've read the NNT software reviews for a number of years and have bought some programs thanks to their recommendations. I applaud NNT's practice of giving the software company the opportunity to comment on the review and having the company's comments included with the review.
Other complaints seem downright silly ("One needs also be aware that while it is only a 3.7MB download, it requires 8.3MB of space on the hard drive").
I agree with you.
The conclusion reached by most of the members of the NNT panel is that they will not continue using the program as they do not have a use for it. It left me wondering why they would spend so much time and energy reviewing a program and being so "nitpicky" if they aren't the target audience in the first place.
When I read reviews on the NNT website or in various computer magazines, I assume that the reviewers write reviews of programs that other people might want to know about, not necessarily the programs the reviewers themselves need or want. In the case of the NNT review of Phrase Express, three of the six reviewers simply flat-out said no, they wouldn't continue to use it. And several of the NNT reviewers said they wouldn't continue to use it because they had a program that they thought was better. That's quite different from saying they had no use for PE.