topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday December 22, 2025, 10:58 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 214 215 216 217 218 [219] 220 221 222 223 224 ... 470next
5451
Living Room / Re: Piano gigging pc: help me build
« Last post by 40hz on August 21, 2012, 01:34 PM »
A lot would depend on exactly what software you intend to run. Once that's settled, it should be fairly clear what HW specs are required.

For road use you'll want at least two identical rigs if the system is going to be an essential part of your act. If it isn't (i.e. you can do what you need to do on a standalone keyboard if necessary) you can chance going out on the road with only a single rig.

In general. something either very rugged (i.e. a "field-ready" laptop or "industrial PC") or something easy to find, small and straightforward, relatively cheap, and fairly reliable (i.e. a MacMini) is probably a good way to start thinking about it.

I don't like 'real' PCs for most live venues because I tend not to trust CPUs unless they're built into a keyboard or dedicated musical device. I'm also generally not too keen on packing a lot of high-end technology for a gig unless it's part of a show big enough to hire a tech roadie or two. And it's not because I can't handle the technology myself. It's more a matter of me wanting to stay focused on what my real job should be: playing good music and spending some one-on-one time with audience members during breaks.

IMHO too much time spent having to worry about the' tools of the trade' (because they will break at the worst times) distracts  from a musician staying focused on the music and the performance. It's ok to do that in the studio if you want to. That's what studio and woodshed time is for. But when it comes to playing for an audience (especially a paying audience) there's no margin for error or stage delays. So simplify, simplify, simplify. Unless you can afford complexity.

But I'm a just bass player who can't even walk and chew gum at the same time - so what do I know. ;D
5452
Living Room / Please (oh please!) let this be a joke...
« Last post by 40hz on August 21, 2012, 12:46 PM »
From The Verge:

The "Who's Your Daddy" RV is looking to make DNA paternity tests a bit more of an impulse purchase. The colorfully-wrapped vehicle attracts fathers who aren't certain that the child in their hands is their own, and after a $299 to $575 purchase, a quick cheek swab, and a three-day waiting period, they can get the answer.

big_dog_little_dog.jpg

Link to article here.

And the New York Post, Rupert Murdoch's bastion of superb US news reporting,  :P has a related article here.

5453
Living Room / Re: Wikileaks - Julian Assange Granted Asylum by Ecuador
« Last post by 40hz on August 21, 2012, 12:09 PM »
I wasn't talking about assassination. Last thing you want to do is create a martyr for the history books. I was thinking more along the lines of Noreiga. Nice little "fair trial" followed by 60 years in an 8x10 super-max cell - and with no visitors allowed because what he knows is a "threat to national security."

After a few years of that, most people just go quietly out of their minds. No need to kill the body. Just destroy the person.

Now that's what those in power might call "sending a message."  :-\
5454
Living Room / Re: Wikileaks - Julian Assange Granted Asylum by Ecuador
« Last post by 40hz on August 21, 2012, 11:26 AM »
If anyone doesn't believe getting Assange extradited to Sweden isn't the first step in his ultimate extradition to the US...well...I have a bridge in NYC I'd like to sell you.

Unfortunately, not being Russia or China, Ecuador will only be a temporary asylum at best. The US claims jurisdiction anyplace and everyplace on planet earth. So this is far from over for Assange and Wikileaks. Ecuador isn't important or valuable enough to the US that I'd rule out it sending in some mil-ninja types to "extract" him if the usual bullying diplomatic negotiations and bribes trade concessions don't sway the Ecuadorian government should Assange ever find himself on their soil.
5455
Living Room / Re: I want a Sony Xperia SX, but I think it's stupid to buy one.
« Last post by 40hz on August 21, 2012, 11:03 AM »
I sometimes suspect Sony deliberately keeps some of their real plum tech out of the US markets for no reason other than the pleasure of saying: "You like it? Well...sorry, but this is not for you."  ;)
5456
^FWIW Google Wave never made very much sense to me no matter how hard I tried to use it for anything non-trivial. Since I was far from alone (and that included people I respect who were big advocates for "all the possibilities" Wave would someday open up) I still think when it came to Wave, the clothes had no emperor.
5457
^Agree 100%. Which is why I've tried several at various times and still very much want to like these tools, despite (to date) being unable to do so. I guess it's more a function of the project - and the group of participants - than anything else. Maybe we've also become too set in our ways, having found a system that works extremely well (for our requirements) and have since become leery of doing anything that may screw that up.

Oh well! Hope springs eternal.  :)
5458
Living Room / Re: I want a Sony Xperia SX, but I think it's stupid to buy one.
« Last post by 40hz on August 20, 2012, 10:33 AM »
Just ask yourself 1 question... How well does it do porn? :P

Bigger screen better images?  ;D
Well, it can't compete with my dual 24" monitor setup at home.  At times, it's better than the real thing.

Perfect size for a flight simulator. And way safer than flying the real thing. ;D ;)

FWIW, I've adopted the comedian Dennis Miller's "soul mate" perspective to technology purchases:

If the New Agers are correct, right this very minute, there's the perfect woman waiting for me out there somewhere. Problem is, with my luck, she's probably sitting in front of a yak shit fire on a hilltop in outer Mongolia eating a bowl of horse meat stew as we speak. Yeah...so she's absolutely perfect. And like we're sooooooo ever gonna find each other. Thanks guys!
 ;)
5459
One side effect I've noticed with "real time" is that it has brought about far less considered comments and writing.

There was a time when you'd very carefully choose your words and marshal your arguments on a given topic. Now, with the "need for speed" to either be first out the door - or (more commonly) being pressured to respond to something more quickly than desired - you see more and more pointless exchanges.

What I see is a gradual but very widespread and noticeable shift away from dialog. Instead of dialog there's now the trend of making a statement - and then digging in to defend it against all comers. Small wonder petty bickering and squabbling has replaced mature debate and discussion in most places.

To paraphrase an old joke: You want my answer, and you want it right now? Well... did you want it "right" - or did you just want it "now." ;)
5460
you can use the tool to visualize how a contributor's contribution and writing style developed over time - it can display the entire writing session.

Just curious (being somewhat dense) ...beyond the "that's interesting" and scholarly aspect, what exactly does all that bring to the table? Most of what I've seen touted as the benefits of "collaborative" software is more the "just getting it done" and brainstorming aspects rather than the granular tracking of where we've been and who did what.

In some respects, tracking that sort of thing seems (to me) to be to be counterproductive for the general free exchange of ideas and contributions since everything now becomes "for the record."

Since most of this grew out of version control and software authoring environments (where it is absolutely necessary to have a full backtrack capability in order to aid in debugging and maneuver out of 'bad turns') I can see why it's been incorporated into other products. But I wonder how good (or even necessary) such a feature really is for the stated aim of collaboration. I'm sure some management types love it since it provides a certain Big Brother capability to the mix. But again, from the participants end, is this really of any value beyond possibly settling "he said/she said" arguments or counting coup for who thought of something first?

FWIW I've personally found most of what's marketed as 'collaboration' tools to be relatively limited in usefulness. Probably because most of what I need to interact with others in order to accomplish doesn't lend itself to the "free for all" approach due to budget and time constraints. Focused, carefully considered, and intense discussions are more how my world currently operates.

I've generally found a web accessible storage point used in conjunction with a modified Delphi method approach (plus a previously negotiated "tight" schedule) seems to work best for my groupthink projects. Email takes care of the rest.

But, as always, different tools for differing work environments - so YMMV. :)
5461
General Software Discussion / Re: Help me understand Virtual Machine [VMWare]
« Last post by 40hz on August 19, 2012, 12:32 PM »
@CD - if you get a chance (and can spare about an hour) do try to watch some of Eli the Computer Guy's Introduction to Virtualization video I mentioned earlier. It's a very gentle, but not dumbed-down, introduction to virtualization technology. And one of the better instructional vids I've ever seen. :) :up:
5462
Living Room / Re: Go dark for IE - October 26, 2012
« Last post by 40hz on August 19, 2012, 08:16 AM »
People generally use whatever works for them. Punishing them is not an effective way to encourage  them to change. If websites just stop jumping through all those hoops they allegedly do to support older browsers, people will eventually migrate over to what works. That's how it's always worked in the past. Those people who are unwilling (or can't for technical reasons) upgrade will become a new market and income opportunity for those sites that do continue to support their browser versions.

Web developers and hosts need to get over themselves a little. This isn't the 90s any more. The web's era of the child-king webmaster and the techno-elite is largely over. The Internet has already become a commodity. And it will soon become just another public utility - no different than electricity, water, and sewage treatment. Time to get with the new reality folks!

Openness and 'come as you are' has always been the rule of the web. How is this "go dark" initiative any different from the thinking of certain governments when they propose to establish an official web access client? And are these people who propose the web "go dark" the same people protesting closed ecosystems whenever Apple and Microsoft attempt to play that game? Or who rebel against any attempt to dictate to them how they operate their websites?

If so, it's a sad state of affairs.

I can see a time in the not too distant future when I put an old school Fido BBS system on a Raspberry Pi and walk away from all this browser nonsense once and for all. And after talking to a few other folks, I now know I'm not the only one thinking about doing it.
 :-\


5463
Living Room / Re: 1,000,000,000,000 Frames/Second Photography
« Last post by 40hz on August 18, 2012, 04:27 PM »
This is awesome! You can now photograph the movement of photons in real time...

But, Is having everything available in "real time" where we really want to go?


Would you believe I was waiting for that?  ;D

Unfortunately, there will be no prize for your being the first. :P

Besides, isn't 'photographing' and 'having' two completely different things?  ;)

5464
Living Room / 1,000,000,000,000 Frames/Second Photography
« Last post by 40hz on August 18, 2012, 03:51 PM »
This is awesome! You can now photograph the movement of photons in real time...



They've also open sourced the data and software to encourage further research.  8) :Thmbsup:
5465
Living Room / Re: CodyOS
« Last post by 40hz on August 18, 2012, 03:37 PM »
Wanna be part of a new OS movement 40hz?

Nope. Been there. Done that. Had my heart broken already.  ;D

Going forward, I think I'm gonna focus on the Raspberry Pi if they ever ship me the one I ordered ages ago. The Pi brings back the feeling I used to get about technology when I was in college the same time Bill Gates was.

There's a post over at the Raspberry Pi site about a 7 year old who wrote his first game. Like they said - this is what the Pi is all about.

Philip, age 7, his game and his review of the Raspberry Pi
Posted on August 15, 2012 by liz   

A little reminder of what it’s all about. Philip, who is seven years old, reviews the Raspberry Pi and shows off the first game he’s ever written in Scratch. Dad Spencer says proudly that Philip had very little help with this. We’re really impressed and very proud too; well done, Philip, and thanks, Dad!

Here's the YouTube video:



Kids like Philip give me hope. Best thing I've seen all week. :Thmbsup:
5466
Living Room / Re: CodyOS
« Last post by 40hz on August 18, 2012, 11:38 AM »
And if you ever decide to do it for real, just customize a copy of Debian, slap some weird "optimized for tablet/touchscreen" manager over it, add in a custom theme or two with your own icon set, and never never ever mention Linux on your website - or in any of your press releases.

Hey! It worked for Ubuntu. It can work for you too! :P :Thmbsup:

Haha, that might just work...shame I know absolutely ZERO about coding a linux system rofl

Neither did Mark Shuttleworth. Just assemble a team. Promise them little (or nothing) other than "glory" and the opportunity "to make a difference." There's enough of us naive fools who still believe in the GNU-F/OSS philosophy that you shouldn't have too much trouble gathering talent which you'll need do nothing other than ride herd on.
 ;D

---------------------------
Addendum: You will need to come up with a really cool name and logo for it. But you can always job that task out too if you have to. ;)
5467
Smashing Magazine recently posted an article with some good tips on how to keep up to date without spending more time than necessary to do so. Some good ideas if you haven't given your online reading habits too much thought.

The Art Of Staying Up To Date
By Vasilis van Gemert
August 9th, 2012
    
An important part of our job is staying up to date. Technologies don’t really change that fast — HTML5 and CSS3 take a long time to be specified and implemented. But the ideas surrounding these technologies and the things we can do with them are constantly evolving, and hundreds of blog posts and articles are published every day. There’s no way you can read all of those but you’ll still have to keep up to date. Here are some tips on doing that while still having some time left to work.
.
.
.

Full article here.

Note: If you've been doing the "web thing" for a while you're probably already familiar with some, or all of Vasilis' suggestions. But it might still be worth a glance as either a refresher or for something you missed.
5468
I already have the 50Gb account without syncing feature. I just grabbed one of these 25Gb accounts and all works as advertised. Nice deal. :Thmbsup:
5469
Living Room / Re: CodyOS
« Last post by 40hz on August 18, 2012, 11:13 AM »
And if you ever decide to do it for real, just customize a copy of Debian, slap some weird "optimized for tablet/touchscreen" manager over it, add in a custom theme or two with your own icon set, and never never ever mention Linux on your website - or in any of your press releases.

Hey! It worked for Ubuntu. It can work for you too! :P :Thmbsup:
5470
Everything at a proper pace[/i]? Certainly more correct. But somehow, it loses something...
You fast-walking devil!
-cranioscopical (August 17, 2012, 01:50 PM)

You cannot claim to have "arrived" at DoCo until a post of yours gets a Chris christening! ;D

Hey Chris! Nice to see you're still around. It's been too much quiet lately. :Thmbsup:
5471
General Software Discussion / Re: Help me understand Virtual Machine [VMWare]
« Last post by 40hz on August 17, 2012, 01:36 PM »
If you can spare about 25 mins and would like to watch a really good hands-on for VirtualBox, take a look at Eli the Computer Guy's video on YouTube:



You may find the (usually) free VirtualBox software all you want or need. :) :Thmbsup:

Note: He also has a good intro to both virtualization and cloud computing. I often drop copies of these off with people (i.e. non-clients and tire-kickers) who want to know more about these technologies - but who haven't invited me out to discuss them over pizza.

Actually, all of Eli's videos are pretty good. You can find the complete collection here.

His reality check presentation on How to Become an IT Professional (see below) should be required viewing for anyone who is considering pursuing one of those "highly paid professional careers" the late night cable TV ads for private technical 'institutes' boast so much about. Seriously, if you're at all thinking about going into IT (as opposed to just "getting into computers") take the time to watch it. It can save you tens of thousands of dollars, and a few years of your life!


 :Thmbsup:
5472
General Software Discussion / Re: Help me understand Virtual Machine [VMWare]
« Last post by 40hz on August 17, 2012, 12:48 PM »
I'm generally bullish on F/OSS projects. DOSBox and VirtualBox are both workable for casual to semi-serious use. But VMWare Workstation is a far better product if you have more complex requirements or do a lot of software testing.

I tried DOSBox and VirtualBox. I bought VMWare Workstation.

YMMV. 8)
5473
@40hz: Sorry, though I noticed it, I forgot to mention this before:
I think the correct link you referred to in the OP should be Everything in its Right Pace.

That's "pace", not "place". The speaker was on about the pace of using technology/things, not location.

I have always liked the Radiohead song "Everything in its Right Place" and was about to link to it in my first comment, until I realised I had misread the actual title on the linked web page.

???? :huh:

Corrected. :-[

Thank you. :)

------------------------------------

Addendum: Is it just me, or shouldn't it also more correctly be 'at' rather than "in" its right pace? ;D

Hmm..I think I might substitute 'proper' for "right" while I was at it. And remove that faux possessive.

Let's see...Everything at a proper pace? Certainly more correct. But somehow, it loses something... ;D
5474
Living Room / Re: Wikileaks - Julian Assange Granted Asylum by Ecuador
« Last post by 40hz on August 17, 2012, 10:34 AM »
And thinking about it more, I wonder if the break down in diplomatic actions and language are just a mirror of the breakdown in communication in every other area in current times.  I think in the days of the Cold War, there was an unspoken etiquette between all sides in addition to a lack of a forum for such things, so the idea that a country would have even had to threaten to storm an embassy would never have even occurred because things would never have even gotten this far- a media outlet wouldn't have touched anything like this, and there was no open internet.

+100 - There seems to be an overall breakdown in respect for ones fellow man. People just walk around being nice in a medically induced politically correct fog ... but no one really seems to respect anything, anyone, or even themselves. It's all just scepter banging and posturing now.

Amazing what the absence of the Cold War (and the threat of nuclear annihilation) can do for the levels of aggression many governments are now willing to indulge in.
 ;)
5475
Living Room / Re: Wikileaks - Julian Assange Granted Asylum by Ecuador
« Last post by 40hz on August 17, 2012, 10:24 AM »

And thinking about it more, I wonder if the break down in diplomatic actions and language are just a mirror of the breakdown in communication in every other area in current times.  I think in the days of the Cold War, there was an unspoken etiquette between all sides

I think that neatly summarizes what's been going on. The United States (along with some other powerful nations that should know better) seem to be abandoning their democratic ideals and respect for the law by taking ever more arbitrary and intrusive unilateral actions whenever they feel their political interests are being threatened. What was once the "intervention" methodology of the old (and often reviled) Soviet Bloc has now spread to the West, largely thanks to the Bush2/Cheney administration and 9/11.

Washington Post's Barton Gellman summarized the Dick Cheney approach to diplomacy in an analysis for PBS/Frontline:

Dick Cheney always advocated a very strong, edge-of-the-envelope view on executive power...

... Cheney believes that he's a realist and that he is more realistic about the world than most of his adversaries and critics. He believes the world is an immensely dangerous place, that most people underestimate the risks to the security and well being of the United States, and that if you want to face those risks, there's no namby-pamby, legalistic, rule-bound approach that's going to work. If you want to fight the bad guys, you have to take the gloves off.

Apparently Dick Cheney's remark that "the gloves have come off" has been taken to heart and adopted as our new foreign policy.

... in addition to a lack of a forum for such things, so the idea that a country would have even had to threaten to storm an embassy would never have even occurred because things would never have even gotten this far- a media outlet wouldn't have touched anything like this, and there was no open internet.

I politely disagree.  :)

Back in the day, nobody (including the US) would have dared storm any embassy for fear of what precedent might be set by doing so. Iran was condemned internationally when "students" stormed the US embassy in Tehran in 1979 and took the staff there hostage for 444 days. Even the Iranian government didn't dare claim official responsibility for that move. Which is why the UK is at such pains to find some "legal" way of removing the status of "embassy" from Ecuador's holding before taking any direct action. Because in a nutshell, storming an embassy - any embassy for any reason - is simply not done. That's why there's still the need for posturing and legal wrangling to somehow find a way to make Ecuador's embassy not an embassy.  (Apparently the UK learned a lesson in "power semantics" from the US: When is a POW not a POW? When they're called "enemy combatants." When is torture not 'torture'? When it's called "enhanced interrogation techniques.")

Regarding the press and media outlets: Back in the late 60s and early 70s, the US press was openly confrontational about many actions taken by the US government, as well as being unsparing in its criticism of power grabs and abuses of the legal system by the government. (Please remember that President Nixon was brought down by the press. Something the the Republican Party and a host of paid neo-con pundits have never forgotten - or forgiven.) The same went for the federal courts who viewed a major part of their duty as keeping the government honest and law abiding. All of which was duly watched, reported, and commented on by the press.

Such were the joys of operating in an environment where "freedom of the press" was given more than the lip service it gets today.

Because we've certainly gotten away from all of that nonsense. Amazing what a politically providential terrorist attack and some carefully orchestrated public disinformation and fear-mongering can do to change basic attitudes and understandings.

I think a good part of why the web is becoming increasingly important vector for news gathering is because the corporate-controlled government-friendly media outlets wouldn't normally touch this sort of story. The only thing that seems to be keeping big media honest (at least to a token degree) is that the web provides too many ways to do an end run around the likes of CNN or NBC. (Note: I think the current trend of governments firewalling or otherwise attempting to regulate non-commercial web activity is a good indication of just how real a threat such an open forum poses to The Powers that Be and their Official Version of the story.)

The unfortunate side effect is that this has increased the amount of "noise" in the news signal. However, if it is true that you can't really trust anything you see or read on  the web, the same is becoming increasingly true of the so-called ""free" press. Especially in an era when more and more "representative" governments see "threats to national security" - and the public exposure of news which is often nothing more than politically embarrassing to the government - as one and the same thing.

I don't particular care for Julian Assange's style, or some of  the irresponsible behaviors of Wikileaks. But it's important to remember that things like Wikileaks and "unofficial" news reporting is a symptom of a larger problem rather than the cause of a smaller one.

If you can't trust your governments to tell you the truth - and you can't trust the "free press" to keep you informed - then your only alternative becomes taking matters into your own hands. Wkikileaks is one manifestation of that. And once Assange and Wikileaks gets removed from the stage by hook (or more likely crook) another will take their place.

"So it goes."
Pages: prev1 ... 214 215 216 217 218 [219] 220 221 222 223 224 ... 470next