5401
Living Room / Re: Programming/Coder humor
« Last post by wraith808 on October 13, 2013, 11:43 AM »"Who thought it was a good idea to assign DebtCeiling as a global variable? Can we deprecate?" 




Studio C's Shoulder Angel (and a Shoulder Devil):-Deozaan (October 12, 2013, 01:52 AM)
Users are opted in to Google's new scheme by default. In the past, Google gave itself permission to use users’ +1s alongside advertisements unless the user specifically opted out. The new “shared endorsements” are an extension of that setting, wherein Google gives itself permission to take even more of a user’s content and place it alongside ads.
I might have to get back on the alternate PDF bandwagon at some point. My problem is that my job now uses a plug-in to do some functionality, so I have to keep it available for testing/development. 

Many font designers handle this in a very clever way. If you go to their sites for a freebie, you often discover you need to register first to download. All their no-charge fonts go in their shopping cart just like everything else they offer does. An invoice gets generated with a total of $0 which gets emailed to the 'buyer' along with the download link plus a copy of the license. Brilliant!-40hz (October 08, 2013, 03:10 PM)
I would only ask how much difference there is between the NSA/government and parents when it comes to actually caring. I somehow doubt that the former really cares about people, whereas the latter do care about their children.-Renegade (October 08, 2013, 03:32 PM)
I'd say none. These things always start with a desire to care for/protect X. But than as circumstances extenuate more stringent measures are needed. So before anybody realizes what's happening an NSA class invasion is born.
Baby steps and good intentions...that, is precisely how anything goes to shit.-Stoic Joker (October 08, 2013, 03:57 PM)
In light of that, I'll recuse myself from this discussion going forward.-40hz (October 08, 2013, 01:28 PM)
Conversation ended more surely than the invocation of Godwin's Law.
please keep politics out of this thread.-mouser (October 08, 2013, 11:00 AM)
Free software may refer to one of the following.
- Freely redistributable software
- Free software, defined by the Free Software Foundation, is software which may be used, copied, studied, modified and redistributed ("free as in free speech"), but is not necessarily available for no charge
- Open-source software, similar to free software
- Free and open-source software, software that can be classified as both free software and open-source software
- Freeware, software available for zero price, but not necessarily with the rights to modify and redistribute it
- Free Software Magazine
- Free Software Magazine (China)
Correct, but it's possible to do the in-between step of Vista. It'll feel like hell, taking ages for 2 consecutive upgrades, but if an upgrade is required to keep some unique application installed, it's a solution.-Ath (October 08, 2013, 01:39 AM)
Surveillance technologies beg to be abused. And if the Snowden revelations have shown anything about this technology, they've shown us that the temptation to 'abuse and extend' is apparently too great to resist. Especially when it comes to the people most entrusted not to abuse these capabilities.
Surveillance technology is a drug. And addiction, in the guise of "mission creep" (that clever euphemism for abuse and violation of trust) inevitably follows.-40hz (October 08, 2013, 08:39 AM)
But seriously, after all I've told you about how I handle things, after all that y0himba told you about how he handles things, after valuing the ability of the parent to make a decision for good or bad and do what they are supposed to do...-wraith808 (October 07, 2013, 03:06 PM)
Hay man, it's all good if it's working for you, but there are 2 sides to everything. I can think of half a dozen or more names of kids that I died while I was growing up as they finally got out of a repressive monitoring oriented culture that encouraged strict child control. Because when they (the children) finally realized that for the first time...there really was nobody "watching" ... They handled it badly.
So you have my sincerest wish that this does indeed work as well as you have it planned. But please understand that I have seen first hand just how badly it can go.-Stoic Joker (October 07, 2013, 05:28 PM)
^I think you're taking what I said personally.
I have no problem with you or any of the others here. But thats a small percentage of the how many million parents out there?
But even with that, I think bugging a kid's or personal acquaintance's phone is a big mistake and sends the entirely wrong message.-40hz (October 07, 2013, 03:45 PM)


Electronic monitoring is a tool. As is the taking away of "any expectation of personal privacy." While it may make some people feel "safer" or "more responsible" in their duty to society and family, it is also instilling a potentially hazardous meme in the mind of someone who is too young to question it before it becomes a part of their accepted "reality.".-40hz (October 07, 2013, 12:17 PM)