5376
Living Room / Re: Confessions of a drone warrior
« Last post by wraith808 on October 28, 2013, 07:23 PM »While I will agree that the introduction of mortality and the visceral nature of being there is different, that still doesn't excuse IMO the denigration of any that serve in any capacity. I'll just never get that. There are also those that are in the conflict that are there for different reasons- they aren't all heroes, no matter what acts they perform. Then there are those that are heroes, but are in the capacity of execution of the wrong thing.
There's also the fact that some of these people who are being denigrated for their part are preventing very real casualties on the ground. For instance, if there wasn't the jamming screw up in the example in the article and they'd been able to tell the soldiers, "hey, there's an IED on the ground there", that would have saved real casualties. And I'm sure that has happened in other cases. Is that contribution to be denigrated? And once you start making these sorts of distinctions... where do you draw the line? What about sailors on a battleship giving offshore support? What about pilots of a bomber? Soldiers manning missile stations?
There's also the fact that some of these people who are being denigrated for their part are preventing very real casualties on the ground. For instance, if there wasn't the jamming screw up in the example in the article and they'd been able to tell the soldiers, "hey, there's an IED on the ground there", that would have saved real casualties. And I'm sure that has happened in other cases. Is that contribution to be denigrated? And once you start making these sorts of distinctions... where do you draw the line? What about sailors on a battleship giving offshore support? What about pilots of a bomber? Soldiers manning missile stations?

Recent Posts

