topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday September 19, 2026, 3:12 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 198 199 200 201 202 [203] 204 205 206 207 208 ... 404next
5051
Living Room / Re: Knight to queen's bishop 3 - Snowden charged with espionage.
« Last post by wraith808 on January 30, 2014, 10:22 AM »
There's no post... only the video that you've embedded when I go to that first link.
5052
LaunchBar Commander / Re: Width, spacing and padding (Oh my!)
« Last post by wraith808 on January 30, 2014, 10:21 AM »
Is it appropriate to say how scared I am now?  :'( :P ;D
5054
LaunchBar Commander / Re: Width, spacing and padding (Oh my!)
« Last post by wraith808 on January 29, 2014, 02:41 PM »
Notice how I also use a left handed mouse pointer. That's another visibility issue. I like a big mouse pointer but the bigger it is, the more it gets in your way. Click on a text box and by default the pointer is directly over where you're typing.

That's actually a really elegant solution to that problem.
5055
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by wraith808 on January 29, 2014, 02:26 PM »
Truthfully, I can see why- for the same reason I don't use direct deposit in many cases.  Leaves a money trail that can be reversed.  Tracing is fine... it's the reversal that alarms me.
5056
Maybe that's the reason it's free  :-\
5057
Actually, a lot of the features that he's talking about from Word 2013 were in Word 2010.  I tried it for a while, then after trying it, tried to fix the fact that I didn't want the huge monolithic document and give back my corkboard which I missed by utilizing writing outliner (excellent tool, BTW if you're going with this).  But in the end, I'm back to Scrivener.
5058
Looks kind of interesting.  Have you much experience with it?

I tried it briefly, but it didn't work in the context that I wanted to use it

FWIW I was running a screen scraper into excel so I wanted to group excel, the source app, and the bot in one window, but, for whatever reason, when I dragged the apps onto the task space the bot could no longer see the target app...

That said, I didn't really give it much time (I didn't really have it to spare) but I had intended to come back to it as there were a few combinations I could try...

Probably because it parents the window to the taskspace window, and the bot is looking for that window as a top-level window.  But still a pretty cool app- thanks for the info for my needs :)
5059
General Software Discussion / Re: SkyDrive no more, it's now OneDrive!
« Last post by wraith808 on January 28, 2014, 01:02 PM »
Either.  ;D
5060
DC Gamer Club / GOG Running DRM-Free Time Machine Sale
« Last post by wraith808 on January 28, 2014, 11:07 AM »
DRM Free Time Machine Sale

Starting at 1983, GoG is going through the years with one highlight of that year (well, since some are in bundles, they're wonky... seemed to be based on an average).

To add to the fun of the sale, each game has a +1/-1 sec and you can vote whether to make the time it's available longer or shorter.  You also vote with your money; each buy increases the time it's available on sale by 3 seconds.

GoG's been having some decent DRM-free discount goodness lately with fun little gimmicks on top of them.
5061
Paid- I purchased the lifetime gold version.  Not sure if things have changed since the review, but it asked me before it did any of what the reviewer describes.  It doesn't ask me on subsequent startups as it refreshes what is available and what is not.  But on install, it did ask, and even asked for what paths I wanted to include.
5062
As an alternative to music bee there is mediamonkey.  I've been making use of it with no problems for a while.
5063
N.A.N.Y. 2014 / Re: NANY 2014 Release - epCheck
« Last post by wraith808 on January 26, 2014, 11:11 AM »
probably.  basically you're using it for a plain-text database if you strip it down... so a separate file from the configurations would seem to be the right way to go imo.
5064
Living Room / Re: NSA restraints? Yes we can! (not)
« Last post by wraith808 on January 26, 2014, 01:27 AM »
Yes, I think there is the implied assumption that nothing is being done...when perhaps something is, but it just isn't evident on this board.
5065
General Software Discussion / Re: Google Chrome: Time for a Second Chance?
« Last post by wraith808 on January 25, 2014, 01:02 AM »
Posted here quite a bit ago, but there wasn't much uproar over it on DC.
5066
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by wraith808 on January 24, 2014, 03:39 PM »
Ah... I get it.  But from a philosophical standpoint, if it's worth it, is it waste?  ;D  But yes, I get your meaning.  There is waste in the process, and cutting that would be better, as it would be the waste in burning fossil fuels in automotives and such, with the greenhouse emissions and reduction of those.

And to be sure... I'm not one of the real bitcoin advocates.  I just enjoy a good debate, especially about abstract ideas, especially when they intersect with technology, and was just enjoying myself as there's not been one of those around here in a while.  And I do see the benefit from that level, especially in terms of fiat and who holds it.
5067
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by wraith808 on January 24, 2014, 08:22 AM »
You're deliberately missing the point. I claim that gold has a value regardless of the assumption of it being a medium of exchange. Bitcoin hashes do not have that VALUE REGARDLESS OF THE ASSUMPTION OF THEM BEING A MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE. See the phrase "in and of itself".

Anyway, this is slowly evolving into a flame war, and I don't want to be a jerk (I feel I will be in my next post, if I'm not already). So I won't reply anymore.

I wasn't deliberately missing the point- I was debating the merits of your argument.  Gold does have productive value, as I conceded.  But it's *worth* isn't directly proportional to that value, nor based on it.  It's based on, as you put it, the value of it being shiny, more than that productive value, which skews the argument towards it being more like bitcoin than not.  10% goes towards production- is that correlative to the amount of energy put into mining it?  Not at 10%.  If correlated, there would be a lesser demand, and a lesser investment of industry towards mining it.  I also didn't intend any flame war- it wasn't devolving into such on my side.  I do apologize if you viewed it that way, and if I said anything that you construed as being towards you instead of your argument (it doesn't seem that I did... but then that is, I guess subjective).

Thanks for the conversation.

when I replied there I didnt realise that was still your main focus. It is unfortunate that there is this waste involved. It would have been great it it could have been doing something useful. But that's not the case - and cannot be changed in retrospect. And I dont think it's going to stop the forward march of bitcoin.

But is that waste?  It's providing a very real service, i.e. taking fiat out of the hands of the rich, and putting it into the hands of all of us.  That's not a waste to me. 

85 people have as much money as half the world

I strongly recommend that no matter where you stand on the issue, you actually read Adam Smith (The Wealth of Nations). He knew and said that the top oligarchs were not "job creators" but rather would concentrate on "rent-seeking" which is not Capitalism. Supply Side "economics was a betrayal of Smith that ignored human nature and was never ever right. Jobs are created by small business and by high tech. Both of which across 6000 years were always crushed by owner-oligarchy.

Capitalism of the true, creative and open variety is one of the top VICTIMS of oligarchy. Read… Adam… Smith...

... but that's getting out of the technological aspects of Bitcoin, so I'm going to stop right there.
5068
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by wraith808 on January 24, 2014, 07:13 AM »
Well, I'd also raise the same argument against the dollar, or peso, or lira, or euro, whatever, if it did needlessly contribute to global warming. Sure they do (dead trees), but not at the scale applicable to bitcoin mining I reckon.

But they do.  Maybe not as directly... but they do.  It's *all* digital these days, truth be told.  The paper money that we hold is just a representation of digital systems in place, especially in this day and age of fractional reserve banking, quantitative easing, and creative accounting.

So why should bitcoin be held to a different standard?  It's value is in the same thing as all of our other digital banking and such- in the reliability of the transactional data and the ability to conduct those transactions with a measure of security.

You keep harping on how gold has intrinsic value based on the shine, i.e. from your last post:

I wouldn't discount the shine as a source of value. Value is defined as the likelihood to get something else in return. I could imagine shiny rocks buying services to some caveman in a cave bordello. In other words you could use it in barter, even before the invention of money. I can't imagine that for random strings of numbers.

But now you've gotten yourself in a logical hole.  Just because you can't imagine cryptographic strings being worth much- apparently many others can.  And as such, by your definition, doesn't that give it 'intrinsic value'?  After all, people want it, right?
5069
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by wraith808 on January 24, 2014, 12:46 AM »
Just because someone is attracted to something doesn't define an intrinsic value.  I think intrinsic value is pretty much universally taken to be characterized in terms of the value that something has “in itself,” or “for its own sake,” or “as such,” or “in its own right.”  Gold has no value in and of itself, other than as you say as a shiny bauble.  Therefore, gold has no intrinsic value.

The concept of the intrinsic value of gold is more related to the belief that gold is a safe investment vehicle is based on the presumption that a rare shiny yellow metal has intangible value because it has been used as a store of value and a commodity currency in the past. While this holds today, that does not mean that in the future, gold will be regarded as a "precious metal."

With that in mind, the fundamental intrinsic value of gold, in my opinion, is equivalent to the demand for gold in productive applications.  Not as jewelry, but in production- the same yardstick that you are using in bitcoin vs. the electricity used.  While it is true, as you say, that gold can and is used in electronics, that is not the store placed on its value.  Indeed, if that was the only thing that gold was useful for, it would be as valuable as other metal materials used for the same purpose at the same rarity, especially as the reserve would be larger as jewelry applications would not compete with the use in productive applications.

As such, if you take away the perceived value because of shiny baubles, there is not much in the way of intrinsic value in gold.  It's value is what people see it as.
5070
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by wraith808 on January 23, 2014, 10:18 PM »
But it doesn't.

The other things we used to generate money, for instance mining gold, had an actual use other than just generating money. Actually, the original function of gold (making shiny things women like, using in alloys to make rust resistant weapons etc.) predated the use as legal tender.

This one doesn't have another function. You just burn electricity, and assure yourself that you'll be paid for it. No intrinsic purpose whatsoever.

Gold has no intrinsic value.  The only value is what people place on it.  When people mine gold, they use power for all sorts of things, under the assurance that they will be paid for it, out of the fact that people want it.
5071
Living Room / Re: Does anyone here use Bitcoins?
« Last post by wraith808 on January 23, 2014, 09:23 PM »
Anything we do that generates revenue in some way has a cost.  Why should this be any different?  What makes this the thing that makes power the consideration?
5072
^ Ok... thats funny.  Especially in context.  And it's cool that I get it now  ;D
5073
Living Room / Re: NSA restraints? Yes we can! (not)
« Last post by wraith808 on January 23, 2014, 01:58 PM »
Perhaps so. But I'd rather die on my feet, than live on my knees. Because my generation wasn't taught to just give up and bend over on cue.

This. :Thmbsup:

Double this  :Thmbsup:
5074
Living Room / Re: BitCloud: BitCoin concepts applied to... everything else.
« Last post by wraith808 on January 22, 2014, 08:20 PM »
Cynically, I think that one of the reasons it worked before was that they weren't prepared.  Now?  It would be like trying the same sucker punch on the same person.

But... what about bitcloud?  ;D
5075
Living Room / Re: BitCloud: BitCoin concepts applied to... everything else.
« Last post by wraith808 on January 22, 2014, 12:21 PM »
No...it's a nice idea. But as long as you're running on somebody else's physical backbone and closed hardware it'll never be your own private internet. This is a rearguard or short-term strategy at best.

Well, as I understand it, it works on a similar principle to the other BC uses that leverage the privacy of BC and the tenets, i.e. you know that communication has taken place, but not what communication, nor for what.  And yes, the bandwidth favors those that have high speed.  But doesn't BC in general favor those that have a lot of processing power?  This isn't a socialist view of the internet... just a more private one.
Pages: prev1 ... 198 199 200 201 202 [203] 204 205 206 207 208 ... 404next