topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 6, 2025, 7:08 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev • 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 ... 46 • next
501
Post New Requests Here / Re: Hotkey Toggle Screen Resolution
« Last post by AbteriX on September 17, 2006, 03:05 PM »
Hello dandersahn,
welcome to the community!


If you already use AHK you could add this piece of code into your AutoHotkey.ini
or use this as stand alone script:

qres.ahk
^!1:: Run qres.exe /x:640 ; Ctrl+Shift+1 Changes resolution to 640 x 480.
^Numpad2:: Run qres.exe /x 1280 /y 1024 ;Ctrl+NumPad2 Changes resolution to 1280 x 1024.

The qres.exe must be in the same folder as the AHK script (or change the path in the script).


502
Living Room / Re: Just HOW do you tie a *censor* tie?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 17, 2006, 01:08 PM »
greedings to your girlfriend
503
Living Room / Re: Just HOW do you tie a *censor* tie?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 17, 2006, 11:41 AM »
Mr. Jasmund have also an video about 'knoting' the shoes:
http://www.mjasmund..../technik-knoten.html

If anyone fells need  :D
504
Living Room / Re: Just HOW do you tie a *censor* tie?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 17, 2006, 11:38 AM »
I found it! I found it again.
Here is the pic i had used... see the images are  from the 'right' side:
505
Living Room / Re: Just HOW do you tie a *censor* tie?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 17, 2006, 11:32 AM »
i admit it takes a while to get it right - once you are happy with the result don't untie it - just loosen it enough to slip over your head, then you won't have to do it every again.
-nudone (September 17, 2006, 11:29 AM)
From where did you get MY trick  :o
506
Living Room / Re: Just HOW do you tie a *censor* tie?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 17, 2006, 11:32 AM »
.
 ;D i had have an pic like this to aid me:
.
http://www.stump.info/images/nuetz/versch/krawatte.gif
.
but i never think about to search for a VIDEO!. Great idee  :Thmbsup:
507
Living Room / Re: [Video] 4 year old drummer
« Last post by AbteriX on September 17, 2006, 08:57 AM »
4 years? Impressing!
This videos bring a lot of joy, i wish i had the band witdh (and the time) to see them all.
508
Screenshot Captor / Improve SINGLE-Object-Capturing
« Last post by AbteriX on September 17, 2006, 04:48 AM »
I don't know if this is possible with your engine
or how many work this is...

... but for documention work we need to capture single obects at easy.

Please see the following pic,... i think SC can "only"  capture the 'good' marked ones?

ScreenshotCaptor_impr_ObjectCapture.png


But i need smt to capture single objects as they i mark with 'better'
Is it possible to improve the single object capturing for you?


Thanks
509
Living Room / [Fun Video] Do you remember THIS guy?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 16, 2006, 07:02 PM »
Do you remember THIS guy?
Here he comes back in his new movie (stil the old story, but great)
http://video.google....-2139555376132383479




And here is a video showing the game in original (if you ddn't know it already):
Super Mario Bros speed run part 1 without using warps
http://www.youtube.c...=related&search=
I see there levels i never have reach  when i play this  :P

Or watch the
Super Mario Bros Race
http://www.youtube.c...=related&search=

If you're once there, you'll find an another video and an another...
I am back in the '80s?

-

Here i found the SMB sound as wav file...for my reminder proggys:
http://www.themushro...ingdom.net/wav.shtml

-

Here is this game to play (non tested..., the other game/side i had in mind is unreachable)
http://www.gamershel...download_10171.shtml
510
fSekrit / Re: Beta: fSekrit 1.2 needs bashing!
« Last post by AbteriX on September 13, 2006, 09:33 AM »
Thank you for your work, Mr. f0dder! I will find some time to test.
511
General Software Discussion / Re: [DISCUSSION] How to extract embedded zip/rar files recursively in one step?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 13, 2006, 09:31 AM »
Allways the same structure?

Maybe with an batch.cmd:
C:\>UNPACK *.zip  INTO STEP1
CD STEP1
C:\STEP1>UNPACK *.zip INTO STEP2
CD STEP2
C:\STEP1\STEP2>UNRAR *.rar INTO STEP3
CD STEP3
C:\STEP1\STEP2\STEP3>EXTRAXT *.exe INTO STEP4
... to be continue
512
Screenshot Captor / Re: Preview of mask to come
« Last post by AbteriX on September 13, 2006, 06:07 AM »
Can i please have a step-by-step HowTo creacte such ragged edge frames/masks?
How can i make the x.pgn with what feature and attributes?
How make the x.pgn.mask?

Thanks.

(BTW: while playing around with wrong created ragged masks , i still got the access violation )
513
Screenshot Captor / Comments on ScreenshotCaptor - Beta Version - 2.12.01 to 2.24.01
« Last post by AbteriX on September 11, 2006, 01:05 AM »
.
I love SC!, so here i am again, sorry  :(

you can zoom in the preview window with mouse wheel and left+right click, as long as you turn off the auto fit checkbox.

there are advantages to the mini window:
1) its faster to display because its simpler and doesnt user thumbnail explorer browser.
-mouser (September 10, 2006, 09:31 PM)
Thumbnails never was an problem, even with manys of them.  :D
The time problem was every the time needed to save the shot, till i can work with him. (~1GHz,500MB and ~700Hz,750MB)

2) nice and small (if you resize it small)
If i resize it small, the capture preview is also small and useless :D

so it dont disturb your other work.
Every extra click... :D
3) you can just hit quick keys for keep, discard, print.
In SC main window too  :D
4) doesnt autosave.. i might still add this to main sc.
If you find time... thanks. :D
514
Screenshot Captor / Comments on ScreenshotCaptor - Beta Version - 2.12.01 to 2.24.01
« Last post by AbteriX on September 10, 2006, 04:50 PM »
damn i thought abterix was going to love this feature  :'(
-mouser (September 10, 2006, 03:52 PM)
;D i do love the preview and the discard button!
But i didn't see the benefit of see this new window then SCwindow itself!
I only see an another step if i choose to work farther on with this current capture.
And if i want to drop this shot i can do this in SCwindow directly.

The only good (for me) is the part that you not immediately save the capture to disk.
But the preview i (i !) like to have in the SCwindow, where i can crop or zoom it
and see than if i wanna keep it.


let me make clear this is a totally optional dialog.  in the OnCapture options tab (and
now also from manu) you can tell it what to do when a new screenshot is taken (restore
main window, dont restore main window, and now this quick popup dialog).
yes, i have seen this option.

So allow me again my older question
"why you didn't use SC to preview the capture bevor the user choose to save it?"

My old request is still an option "[X]Auto save Capture" in [On capture - General]
which i would let disabled most of the time.
Sorry i have to went offline soon (23:45):D

But it seams most of the other user like this new dialog, so it's fine too (for the moment:)
515
Screenshot Captor / Comments on ScreenshotCaptor - Beta Version - 2.12.01 to 2.24.01
« Last post by AbteriX on September 10, 2006, 11:11 AM »
Sorry, what is this? An preview without saving?
That's what i want a long time ago.
But i want have this in SC himself, not in an extra window.

Where do you 'store' this preview pic? TEMP? RAM?
Why can this not be done with SC window self?

And this buttons in the new preview window
are also in the SC window, till the "Discard"-Button.
So what is the benefit????

Hmm, also i like such an preview and this discard feature,
but an extra window is (for me) senseless.
It's an extra step with an extra click. For documentation i do often
a many shots and this extra window would disturb me.
But saving every shot automaticly to disc disturbs me also, 'cos it cost so much time.

$00,02
516
Screenshot Captor / Re: Links to Reviews and Comments - Add yours!
« Last post by AbteriX on September 10, 2006, 10:50 AM »
Hier ist ein Link zu einer Vorstellung dieses Screenshot-Tools in deutsch:
http://www.essential...viewtopic.php?t=9226
517
General Software Discussion / Re: is life without clicking possible?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 08, 2006, 12:43 AM »
Dupe.
This was posted on the forum before.
-Gothi[c] (September 07, 2006, 10:06 AM)
Anyway, i didn't saw that last post.

LOL "is life without clicking possible?" LOL
Just think "You know that you are a fanatic computer fan
 if you move rapidly your forefinger down
at the breakfast table to open the jam jar." LOL
518
fSekrit / Re: Brute Force hacking possible?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 08, 2006, 12:37 AM »
If people use weak passwords, they shouldn't really be dealing with cryptography anyway.
-f0dder (September 07, 2006, 04:54 PM)
That's wrong. People are people. They do use 'weak' PWs because they are easy to remember.
And it's better people use weak PWs then they do nothing to care there own infos.
It's challenge of the coder to help people in any way to protect them and there data, not to
say 'you are a looser if you can't remember "x$4kHa8"' (BTW, i don't wanna push you to do what you don't
want, we just talking about, right?) I know the PWs of a many user and they are "holliday" "2006"
"daughter's name" "pet's name"...

Peace  :-*
519
fSekrit / Re: Read only password support?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 07, 2006, 02:14 PM »
>No, I don't plan on such a version.
How bad (or "It is a pity." ? sorry, don't know the right term)


------------
>But if your friends aren't going to respect a read-only copy,
>perhaps you shouldn't give them a copy in the first place   
Nothing to do with respect (i will be respected, hmm, i must ask tommorow!)
but people are people, the wanna do there own things.
Giving out an r/o exe would give use more consistence in this things
 
----------------
> perhaps it only need check if the file itself is readonly,
> and if so set the readonly flag of the memo to match that of the file

"readonly flag"-thing doesn't helps me of course.
520
fSekrit / Re: Brute Force hacking possible?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 07, 2006, 02:05 PM »
It can take 4 years.... but also 4 min. by chance.

> or you might use a weak password from a dictionary
As most people do, that's why i ask to prevent a hole in fSekrit.

521
fSekrit / Re: Read only password support?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 07, 2006, 07:32 AM »
But what is to stop somebody from copy/paste to a new note,
then overwrite the original exe file with that?
-f0dder (September 07, 2006, 07:11 AM)
Hmm  :huh:  :o  :-[
Yes, that's right. If they have access to an original fSekrit exe ...
Hmm BTW: will there be a fSekrit version without About-box and fSekrit in the title?  :D
If no one knows where this secret little exe comes from....
522
fSekrit / Re: Brute Force hacking possible?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 07, 2006, 07:24 AM »
All right, THX  :)
523
fSekrit / Re: Read only password support?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 07, 2006, 07:07 AM »
I'm still considering it :)
-f0dder (September 07, 2006, 06:52 AM)
Aha, thanks.  :)
Thing is, a user could still copy the text and paste it into a new document.
Yes, that's OK. But than i can still reffer to the original exe and say "Use this!"
If the can modify the original exe, no one can say what is the correct one after a short time.

Unless you want to disable clipboard functionality?
Than the make a quick screen shot with screenshot captor. :-)  :D  ;D


A read-only mode *could* be useful though, I guess, for stopping accidental saves and such. I'm still considering it.
 I don't think it'll make it in v1.2, though - I'm trying not to add *to* much new stuff with each relase, but keeping the program stable. I hope :)
Thank you.
524
fSekrit / Brute Force hacking possible?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 07, 2006, 06:12 AM »
Hi f0dder,

1. If i enter a wrong password into fSekrit 1.1
2. i get an messagebox telling me that this password is incorrect.
3. Then i can try another one.
4. if this is wrong also i get an messagebox telling me that this password is incorrect.
5. GoTo 1.

I think someone can wrote an AutoIt script to use an text file to try common passwords, as many ppl use this.

For secure reason maybe you want add an timeout, like after 10 wrong pw's wait 30 minutes?

What think you?
525
fSekrit / Read only password support?
« Last post by AbteriX on September 07, 2006, 06:06 AM »
Hi f0dder,

have you think about to implement the option of having an r/o password too?

e.g.
i want to share a "CommonInfos.exe"
with passwords and telephone numbers not all should see
but some people who have the password for fSekrit.

If i now didn't want that the modify the content of my "CommonInfos.exe"
for not having different versions of that info circle around...
... it would be nice to give only an r/o password out to that people.

Maybe you came along a trick to do that... so please think about this feature than again.
Pages: prev • 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 [21] 22 23 24 25 26 ... 46 • next