Recent Posts

4826

General Software Discussion / Re: Help back the Registry of this particular GOTD.

« Last post by 4wd on January 21, 2010, 05:09 PM »

You didn't get this from me, but start up the installer on giveaway day [today]
After the key wrapper dissapears and the installation starts, run

-scancode (January 21, 2010, 11:02 AM)

Hah!  I usually just watch the %temp% and copy it out, now why didn't I think of making a DOpus button to do this  

I tried looking in the Regisrtry but could couldn't find a trace, checked it in the Windows/Currentversion/Uninstall :although here the Program seems to be Registered and using this doesn't seem to activate the Product.

-hulkbuster (January 21, 2010, 08:28 AM)

RegShot is your friend

It can also monitor for changed/new/deleted files on the system partition.

Addendum: Updated unicode version here.

4827

General Software Discussion / Re: Just discovered a HUGE annoyance in Windows 7

« Last post by 4wd on January 20, 2010, 07:00 PM »

Backup the settings and give that method a try and let us know if it makes any difference.

-Carol Haynes (January 20, 2010, 02:26 AM)

It's now down to around 15-25 seconds but added the need to enter a username/password to connect, (even for an Everyone share) - so it got removed, (the last thing I want on LAN night is to be bombarded with: "I can't access that directory!" or "What's the user/password?", when I'm busy trying to get that last enemy in OFDR or CoD-MW2.

It's also not just on initial share listing, if I go into a shared folder and then return to the parent, (\\computername), it'll take the same amount of time to list all the shares again - I thought it would have cached them?

EDIT: Just as a matter of interest, could someone using DOpus on Win7 tell me if the "Share with" context menu works?
Here it works under Explorer but not DOpus but as yet I haven't looked into possible causes.

4828

General Software Discussion / Re: Just discovered a HUGE annoyance in Windows 7

« Last post by 4wd on January 20, 2010, 01:31 AM »

That would only apply to Domains though, wouldn't it?

Not Workgroups which is how my network is set up.

Just as a matter of interest, for the IsDomainMaster regkey:
2 XP machines = FALSE
W7 machine = key not present

MaintainServerList = AUTO on all machines

4829

General Software Discussion / Re: Just discovered a HUGE annoyance in Windows 7

« Last post by 4wd on January 19, 2010, 05:24 PM »

Ditto for me, WRT folder sharing with XP. It was one checkbox but it only worked about 30% of the time, and this was when networking three XP machines. Drove me nuts. Haven't had a problem with 7 and Vista.

-Darwin (January 19, 2010, 09:09 AM)

Guess it's one of those YMMV things, I never had a problem with Simple File Sharing under XP either at home or on LAN night.

"Slow to access on non-Win7 machines" - in which way?

-f0dder (January 19, 2010, 08:50 AM)

The initial connection, here XP to W7 takes approx. 30-40 seconds to list available shares,  XP to XP takes around 5.

Connection from W7 to XP is fast, no problems there.

EDIT: I should add, logged in as same admin user on both machines.

4830

General Software Discussion / Re: Just discovered a HUGE annoyance in Windows 7

« Last post by 4wd on January 19, 2010, 08:29 AM »

eg. sharing folders for access by anyone is a lot easier under XP.

-4wd (January 18, 2010, 10:07 PM)

??? Really ??? Is it so hard to type Everyone and click three boxes ???

-Carol Haynes (January 19, 2010, 02:53 AM)

Compared to one checkbox and clicking OK, yes.  Plus it just worked all the time here and it's so bl**dy slow to access the shares under Win7 from other computers not running Win7, (obviously a subtle prod by MS to get you to upgrade all your computers).

If you have multiple computers with Windows 7 use Homegroup which makes it very easy.

And if you don't, it's a PITA.

4831

General Software Discussion / Re: Just discovered a HUGE annoyance in Windows 7

« Last post by 4wd on January 18, 2010, 10:07 PM »

... whereas cmpm and tranglos upgraded from XP, no?

-Darwin (January 18, 2010, 09:10 AM)

Moving from XP to Win7 is always a clean install, there is no upgrade, (what happens after that comes under YMMV as Lashiec said ).

I've done the same thing, XP Pro -> Win7HP, generally positive result but a few annoyances regarding things that were just so much easier to do under XP.

eg. sharing folders for access by anyone is a lot easier under XP.

4832

General Software Discussion / Re: Just discovered a HUGE annoyance in Windows 7

« Last post by 4wd on January 17, 2010, 08:27 PM »

Well, running the same hardware and Outpost Security Suite on both XP and Win7 - XP was faster to connect here.

4833

General Software Discussion / Re: Just discovered a HUGE annoyance in Windows 7

« Last post by 4wd on January 17, 2010, 07:20 PM »

4wd - not my experience. Restarting and network connections seem to be fast on my system than XP or Vista

-Carol Haynes (January 17, 2010, 07:13 PM)

Maybe your controller ignores the order to spin down the HDDs and you're running Win7's firewall?

4834

General Software Discussion / Re: Just discovered a HUGE annoyance in Windows 7

« Last post by 4wd on January 17, 2010, 07:07 PM »

You can now "pin" applications to the taskbar - this is supposed to replace the Quick Launch bar, whatever. Obviously no-one at MS has ever seen True Launch Bar, or they would know how to do it right.

-tranglos (January 17, 2010, 05:53 PM)

That lasted about 90 minutes before all the crappy pinned stuff was removed, (just long enough to do a Google to fix it and install some basic apps to replace them), and the Quick Launch was reinstated.

Some more annoyances with Win7 I've found:
It is the slowest of all Windows versions to do a simple Restart.
Why?  Because it insists in turning off the HDDs before doing it, so upon rebooting the HDDs spin up one by one as the controller addresses/identifies them.  It takes about 2 to 3 times longer to do a Restart than an initial system boot.
Can't Microsoft tell the difference between a Restart and a Shutdown?

And this might be subjective but Win7 seems to be slower at connecting to a network at boot than XP ever was.  Win7 actually defaults to an APIPA IP before finally getting a DHCP assigned IP, something XP never did at boot.

4835

Living Room / Re: Need NAS Enclosure recommendation

« Last post by 4wd on January 16, 2010, 01:43 AM »

I've had great luck with it in the past even with the old origional 10-14Mb units.

-Stoic Joker (January 15, 2010, 10:32 PM)

What kind of throughput did you get?

I'm thinking of replacing the only WiFi linked computer with a pair of HomePlug units.

4836

Living Room / Re: Need NAS Enclosure recommendation

« Last post by 4wd on January 15, 2010, 06:52 PM »

If you have a few WiFi based devices/computers it would probably be better to upgrade the router, (the Netgear WNR3500L I mention above or similar), that way you'll get an all-round higher throughput, assuming of course that you upgrade the WiFi devices to 802.11n also, plus by plugging in the USB HDD, an easy NAS solution.

The difference in price between the Addonics NAS Adapter V2 and the Netgear WNR3500L is ~EU$70, (EU$41 vs EU$110 ex. any shipping and ripoff).  Then your limiting factor will be the 802.11b/g in the rest of the WLAN.

If you only have one WiFi device then perhaps a pair of HomePlug units, (at least the 85Mbps versions), might be suitable to increase throughput between it and the router, (assuming suitable electrical house wiring of course), the price of them has been progressively dropping and the 85Mbps units will be cheaper than the HomePlug AV 200Mbps versions.
Even if the routers USB port is v1.1 you should be able to get at least 1MBps throughput via the HomePlug units.

Of course, for the cost of these adapters, (and a bit of exercise), you could also buy a fair amount of CAT5 cable and get some real speed

4837

Living Room / Re: Need NAS Enclosure recommendation

« Last post by 4wd on January 14, 2010, 07:19 PM »

Just as a matter of interest, (and to better understand what you're trying to achieve), what's the WLAN based devices used for?

ie. Do you want to stream data from the USB HDD to a media player, use it for data backup for your computers, both, etc, etc.

4838

Living Room / Re: Need NAS Enclosure recommendation

« Last post by 4wd on January 14, 2010, 06:21 AM »

G+, (if you can get a reliable connection), should be about the same as 100Mb LAN.

But I've found that even with an apparently rock solid 54Mbps link, (at a distance of 700mm), I rarely get more than about 500kBps.

AFAIAC, WLAN speeds are in the same category as statistics - 80% BS 

4839

Living Room / Re: Need NAS Enclosure recommendation

« Last post by 4wd on January 14, 2010, 06:05 AM »

If you want to upgrade your whole router and get access to the USB HDD also, check out the new NetGear WNR3500L.

Open Source firmware, Gigabit wired, 802.11n WLAN and USB port to plug in external storage.

Just had a quick search, they're ~AU$173 - mmmmm, tempting.

With my current USB port (on the router), I reach about 300 KB/s.  
(Via WLAN.)

-Tuxman (January 14, 2010, 05:55 AM)

Naturally, you'll still only get 300kBps transferring by WLAN - it'd be quicker to transfer by flash drive  

4840

Living Room / Re: Need NAS Enclosure recommendation

« Last post by 4wd on January 14, 2010, 05:52 AM »

Now these NAS adapters need to be attached to my router anyway... so we're back on USB 1.1 then, right?

-Tuxman (January 14, 2010, 05:32 AM)

The adapter plugs into the 100Mbps network and your USB2.0 HDD plugs into it - so let's be generous and say you'll get around 8MB/s read/write to the drive.

USB1.1 is 12Mbps, so you'll get approx. 7 times USB1.1 data rate, (after overheads).

4841

Living Room / Re: Need NAS Enclosure recommendation

« Last post by 4wd on January 14, 2010, 05:23 AM »

What would be the cheapest way to bring the HD with USB 2.0 into my network? Is there some "USB hard disk to WLAN adapter", or should I upgrade my router?

-Tuxman (January 14, 2010, 04:55 AM)

How about US$50?

Addonics NAS adapter.


Or, if you want Gb then Addonics NAS Adapter V2 for US$60.


Or, a Linksys NSLU2.


With the NSLU2 there are alternative firmwares available, see References section in Wikipedia^w.

There's also the Hitachi SimpleNET adapter for US$68 on Amazon, (which looks like the Addonics NAS Adapter V2).

4842

Living Room / Re: Something on computer is fubar

« Last post by 4wd on January 13, 2010, 06:46 PM »

Just wondering, possibly a interrupt clash?

Or the slot it's plugged into is sharing interrupts with another card?

Maybe try another slot if you want to keep it otherwise just dump it since, as f0dder has said, onboard audio has come a long way and unless you have really good hearing, (or need the features), you probably wouldn't know the difference.

Good to find the problem though.

4843

Living Room / Re: Something on computer is fubar

« Last post by 4wd on January 10, 2010, 08:29 PM »

AFAIK there hasn't been such a thing as "low-level format" after MFM drives were phased out... tools claiming to do "low-level format" usually just overwrite every sector with zeroes.

-f0dder (January 10, 2010, 08:12 PM)

Actually, I thought current HDDs, (as in after MFM like you said), just ignored the command completely - didn't know about the sector zeroing but if it works I'm all for it

4844

General Software Discussion / Re: JumpTo v1.1

« Last post by 4wd on January 10, 2010, 08:21 PM »

Hey!  Your site name is suspiciously similar to my own Apathyware license, (created way back in my Amiga days, circa 1992/3).  

I'm gonna sue for copyright infringement.



Then again, do I care?  

4845

Living Room / Re: Netbooks, Portable Applications, and USB/SDHC Flash Drives.

« Last post by 4wd on January 10, 2010, 05:37 PM »

The main reason for all of this is that I want to avoid the scenario of having my documents lost/stolen with the netbook as well as the ability to easily ship it off for repair if need be.

-tinjaw (January 10, 2010, 04:19 PM)

If you concerned about them being on your netbook when it goes missing, the same should apply for a flash drive or SDHC card, (which are even easier to misplace).

Keep the online storage option but change the removable to something like the IronKey Flash drive.   Or possibly Truecrypt the entire flash drive for something a fair bit cheaper.

4846

Living Room / Re: Something on computer is fubar

« Last post by 4wd on January 10, 2010, 04:10 AM »

However if you're out of guarantee and want to remap or discard the broken sectors, would you mind telling how the drive behaves afterwards?

-Shades (January 09, 2010, 11:14 PM)

I decided to go with the Low Level Format tool at HDDGuru first rather than diving straight in with MHDD.

At the moment the results seem positive, transferring files to it at about 70-90MB/s.

Interesting to note that S.M.A.R.T. doesn't show any indication of sectors being remapped.  So at the moment I'll let it run with volatile data to see how it goes.

As I said, the drive is only around 3 months old so I'm making a guess that possibly the Conficker virus I caught might have glitched it since the two events were coincident.

EDIT: Over 500GB copied to it and it's still working OK.

@nite_monkey: This may help, (or not), determine if the problem is a specific drive.  Open up the Resource Monitor and switch to the Disk tab, in the Disk Activity pane on the left is a column called Response Time.
With that open, start copying files on both drives but only to the same physical drive. eg. If the whole of one drive is C: and the other is E:, then start copy files from C: -> C: and E: -> E:

I found that the response time for one drive would blow out to 3+ seconds when the system would apparently "freeze", (obviously it was hitting bad sectors at this point), whereas other drives would still have significantly lower response times, (unless the transaction also involved the faulty drive).

It helps if you can minimise OS writes during the test period, eg. disable Pagefile if you have enough memory, stop the indexing service, etc, etc.

4847

Living Room / Re: Something on computer is fubar

« Last post by 4wd on January 09, 2010, 08:50 PM »

Well, I have to say that as far as I can remember this is actually the first HDD I've had go faulty on any machine I've had, including my old Amigas - guess my luck had to run out sometime.  Usually I've upgraded the HDD before the old one has reached its 'your screwed' date.

I plugged it into a PCIe SI-3132 card and while it didn't cause the computer to freeze, the transfer rate dropped to <100kB/s during copying - so it's hitting bad blocks somewhere.

I'm just intrigued they aren't being mapped out.  Wish WDs utility had a low level format option.

EDIT: S.M.A.R.T.s Remapped Sectors Count doesn't indicate anything wrong - maybe I'll have a play with MHDD on it.

4848

Living Room / Re: Something on computer is fubar

« Last post by 4wd on January 09, 2010, 11:01 AM »

Well, after error checking the the two WDs using their own tool they both reported as being OK, (a few hours later).

So, both HDDs then got full formatted, (not quick formatted), and Win7HP installed on the WD 640 no problems until..............I plugged the WD 1TB, (newly mindwiped), back in and started copying things to it.

The freezes returned, so out came the 1TB and the system began behaving normally.

So, even after a few formats, error checking, etc, etc which all reported OK, the drive has some bad blocks somewhere, possibly the firmware has gone buggy or it just may be a firmware incompatibility with the new motherboard.

Bit annoying, now to dig out a receipt and see who I got it from since it's only about 3 months old.

4849

General Software Discussion / Re: Very scary! I just completely lost a bunch of files [FALSE ALARM!]

« Last post by 4wd on January 07, 2010, 06:53 PM »

Ah, then you could have entered ch: and seen all changes in the last hour, (providing you're using a later alpha version of course).

4850

General Software Discussion / Re: 'Everything' is one FAST file search engine

« Last post by 4wd on January 07, 2010, 06:05 PM »

Alpha version Everything 1.2.1.451a released

Changes:

• improved searching for folders by up to 20 times faster.
• fixed unrecognized included volumes in the options window.
• fixed an issue with the volume monitors not releasing handles when safely remove device requested to unmount a volume.
• fixed a display issue with new recently change dates/times.
• fixed a crash when sorting by size then second sorting by recent changes.

Hopefully I won't have to kill it occasionally when unplugging SATA drives now.