topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday December 22, 2025, 4:08 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 [193] 194 195 196 197 198 ... 470next
4801
Before you read another word of this review, I need you to do something very important. Take all of your preconceived notions about what Windows is today and what you are familiar with, and put them aside. It’s time to reinvent the desktop OS and Microsoft is leading the charge.

Source

Why? I like my notions better than a corporate product.

Agree. :Thmbsup:  Once again somebody is presenting their conclusion as a premise.

<Buzzer sounds!> Faulty logic. :-\
4802
Living Room / Re: DOTCOM saga - updates
« Last post by 40hz on October 24, 2012, 08:39 AM »
But is there nothing we can do to alter our fates?

I think there most certainly is. (Like any true cynic, my cynicism extends to my own cynical outlook BTW.  :mrgreen:)

For example, there's this interesting bit of news (link here) which flies in the face of my earlier comment that the last thing legislators want is a fully engaged electorate:

Icelanders Give Crowdsourced Constitution Warm Reception
By David Vranicar
TechNewsWorld
10/23/12 9:36 AM PT


Today in international tech news: Iceland's crowdsourced constitution gets the green light from voters. Also: A group seeks payback for U.S. transgressions by hacking the National Weather Service, the UK adds to its file-sharing blockade, and ZTE's bad month gets worse.

Voters in Iceland have responded favorably to the government's offer to let them participate in drafting the nation's new constitution.

According to GigaOm, the idea to let citizens chime in online, namely via Facebook and Twitter, was hatched by 25 people on the Constitutional Council, which was tasked with devising a new constitution. The council utilized ideas it found online and wove them into a draft constitution that was delivered in July.

The next step toward implementing these Web-based suggestions was a national referendum. Indeed, citizens approved, by a two-to-one margin, that the new constitution be based on the crowdsourced draft.

The parliament will now decide if that draft will be officially adopted as the national constitution.

GigaOm attributes this extreme brand of participatory democracy to the lingering effects of the financial crisis, which ravaged Iceland's banks and government. Thus did new lawmakers opt to go the open route -- first with the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative, which is fiercely protective of free speech and whistleblowers, and then with constitutional crowdsourcing.

Finland, one of Iceland's Nordic brethren, has used crowdsourcing to draft laws. As with Iceland, elected lawmakers ultimately make decisions about online proposals.

I could possibly argue that countries with small populations and negligible ethnic and cultural diversity have a much easier row to hoe; and therefor, can do things that are impractical (or impossible) for sprawling and multicultural political entities such as the US or EU. (Or China or Russia or India for that matter.)

But that would be cheating on my part. And besides, that old dragon Thomas Hobbs already beat me to the punch and offered an insight into this problem. From Hobbs' perspective, it comes down to a matter of practicality.

55hobbesleviathansmall.jpg

Democracy was possible and preferable in small unified communities. But as the countries became geographically larger and more numerous in population (and diverse in attitudes and opinions) simple practicality made the shift from democracy, to aristocracy, to absolute monarchy (or tyranny) an inevitable necessity.

With millions of voices all shouting to be heard - and hundreds of factions competing for ever decreasing shares of resources and wealth - something must act as the arbiter if anything is ever to get done. Enter first the: senate/parliament/congress/central committee - later the: monarch/tyrant/dictator/"strongman."

In a way it's kind of funny. In a world composed of small nation states, nations compete with each other. In a world consisting of large multicultural nations (i.e. super-states), factions within those super-states compete with each other.

Hardly any real difference when you think about it. Only the labels have changed...

Bloody old Thomas Hobbs! ;D
4803
Living Room / Re: DRONE - web video series
« Last post by 40hz on October 24, 2012, 03:01 AM »
Just saw 4 of 4. Agree.

cat-watching-tv-2-225x170.jpg

Can haz moar DRONE?
4804
Living Room / Re: DOTCOM saga - updates
« Last post by 40hz on October 24, 2012, 02:44 AM »
Nice words of hope 40hz.

However, this whole broad movement is one of the biggest attacks on civil liberties ever. As only a grade C prophet, I can't yet see the signature event that changes things back to the sides of decency.

We need the People's version of 9-11 that we can chant as a meme.

I don't know where that is yet.

Dunno...

They said that about:

The Assyrians
  The Egyptians
    The Romans
      The Mongols
        The Muslims
          The Crusaders
            The Ottomans
              The Church (various)
                The Anarchists
                  The Fascists
                    The Communists
                      The Tonton Macoute
                        The Terrorists

                             - and-

  Sundry sovereign national governments (at different times)...


We've been there. Done that. Wash. Rinse. Spin dry. Repeat as needed.

It's not hope on my part.  (I'm one of this planet's most died-in-the-wool cynics! :Thmbsup:)

Vespero mundi expectando* after all.

We don't have to like it. It's just the way it works. ;D

--------------------------
*In case you're not classically inclined: The evening of the world is to be expected.

4805
Living Room / Re: DOTCOM saga - updates
« Last post by 40hz on October 24, 2012, 01:56 AM »
I'm fearful that the police state will lock down communications (the Internet) and control the propaganda machine (the mainstream media) with such incredible technological skill and so well that it will plunge humanity into darkness forever.

Don't be.

Nothing taken by force is ever kept.

And the more advanced the technology, the more brittle the system that controls it.

Superior firepower didn't defeat the Viet Cong.

Superior firepower, satellite surveillance/communications networks, and advanced military intelligence didn't defeat the Taliban or al Quaeda to date.

A full fledged police state that was also one of the greatest military powers the world had ever seen didn't keep the Eastern Bloc or the Soviet Union intact. Or defeat the Afghans.

In the immortal words of Hassan-i Sabbāh (roughly translated from 11th century Persian): Ain't nothing so heavy it can't be knocked on its ass - and everything is cool, Baby!

It's all a matter how you look at things. That and taking the time to actually look.

A little test

What do you see?

ILOVENY.JPG

     a) A real threat to your privacy and freedom

     b) Some pawns of The Powers That Be who are sitting ducks in that little box they're in if it ever gets really ugly.



FNORD!

 ;) 8)
4806
Living Room / Re: DOTCOM saga - updates
« Last post by 40hz on October 23, 2012, 09:34 PM »
I'm cleaning out my bookshelves. So should I throw out the tome on "American Law"? :P



Nope. You'll need it to refer to during the trials when we finally throw the current batch of hooligans out, restore a genuinely representational government, and go back to being The United States of America once again.

Figure it will take another 20-25 years before it really hits the fan and the change takes place. Too bad we'll have to wade through the darkness of an actual police state for a decade or so before we get there.

So be it. It's all to the good. Vespero mundi expectando. Fiat lux! :Thmbsup:
 
8)
4807
Living Room / Re: Don't You Want to be "Safe"?
« Last post by 40hz on October 23, 2012, 06:27 PM »
No. I don't.  8)
4808
Living Room / Re: JustCloud.com: It's All Lies
« Last post by 40hz on October 23, 2012, 05:51 PM »
Really though, free space-only is not sustainable. It still costs the provider a given amount of money each month to maintain servers housing the drives with your stuff on it.

Exactly right! :Thmbsup:

That's why I thought Backblaze's online backup service made so much sense. They combined unlimited storage with a unique hardware design (i.e Backblaze Storage Pod) that gave them a workable price/profit point. Plus they kept it simple by selling a "backup only" service without any of the file sharing and other "features" many of their competitors are also offering. They're one of the few backup storage providers out there that ever presented a realistic and sustainable (to me at least) business plan.

One of the reasons I like them so much is that they have a "pure play" business model that makes financial and technical sense. That's more than can be said for half the"cloud solutions" out there...
 8)
4809
General Software Discussion / Re: Where can I download BitLocker to Go?
« Last post by 40hz on October 23, 2012, 10:26 AM »
IIRC you need the Enterprise or Ultimate editions of Win7 to get Bitlocker.

It will be included with Pro and up starting with Win8
4810
Living Room / Re: DOTCOM saga - updates
« Last post by 40hz on October 23, 2012, 09:27 AM »
I think the best way to make sense out of this is to view the whole Dotcom debacle as nothing more than the United States teaching a lesson in realpolitik and raw governmental power to those who either still believe in constitutional limitations, or feel they can use legal strategies to advance their own ends against the wishes of those in power.

There's nothing mysterious about this case. Any more than there's a mystery behind Camp X-Ray in Guantanamo Bay, or places like Manzanar, or the new and unlimited (in fact) powers granted by the US government to itself under the rubric of "homeland security."

Some years before  the mixed blessings of post-apartheid government came to South Africa, then president Pik Botha was famously quoted as saying "Do not push us too far" in response to the World's condemnation of his government. There were UN resolutions, boycotts, and widespread condemnation in all quarters against South Africa's government. And all to no avail. Nor did any nation seriously suggest the world take military action and remove SA's government from power. Because deep down inside, every government depends on a high level of unquestioned obedience and indifference from its citizens. A fully engaged general public is the last thing a career politico or apparatchik ever wants to see. What comes around goes around. So to question any one government's actions is to call into question virtually every other government's behaviors. And the sad truth is, there's very little difference between them these days.

The Dotcom saga isn't really a saga. It's a waiting game with a healthy dose of 'puppet theater' thrown in for "good press."

The US will continue to be defiant and stonewall. The NZ judiciary will make their statements to mollify their citizens. And issue their rulings. All with the full knowledge it will have no real effect.

Eventually the brouhaha will die down. And it will be back to business as usual.

But that's because the real goal and message wasn't about file sharing to begin with. It was about an outspoken individual publicly and repeatedly thumbing his nose at a powerful government - and then openly defying it to do anything about it.

It's a dangerous game that all too frequently provokes a similar response. Because no government can afford to allow such a challenge to go unanswered. And, as was noted in the movie V for Vendetta, when pushed to the brink, governments invariably respond in the only way they know how: with men and guns.

4811
Living Room / Re: People Turning on Trolls?
« Last post by 40hz on October 22, 2012, 07:08 PM »
^Which is why it's wise to either pick your venues or develop a thicker skin.

I prefer to pick the venue - which is why you'll find me mostly here at DoCo.  :)
4812
Living Room / Re: People Turning on Trolls?
« Last post by 40hz on October 22, 2012, 09:29 AM »
Still confused. Who are "the innocents" you're talking about? The people getting dumped on who are complaining; people (in general) who will fall under new regulations; or people who were victimized (trolled?) by someone maliciously publishing their personal information. Much like was done to Amanda Todd. And apparently you.

That is what I'm confused over.

The innocents are those that will get caught in the crossfire if this mob mentality takes off, and people start outing people as a form of retaliation.  In any situation where the mob starts taking things in their own hands, innocents are caught in the crossfire, both with and without malicious intent (see the French Revolution).

FWIW they already do. Government and big businesses have already proven themselves very adept at ferreting out identities and personal information for questionable uses for several years now.

As one FBI person I know put it: For us it's seldom a question of who/what/when/where/why or how. For us, the really big question is: can we prove it.
4813
Living Room / Re: People Turning on Trolls?
« Last post by 40hz on October 22, 2012, 09:15 AM »
Note: liberties will be lost. But I don't blame the people screaming for redress. There will always be opportunists that seize on the what asking for additional regulations will present. I blame the people who knew better and could have kept the situation under control - but decided not to.

But those people aren't the victimized ones.  Because the elected representatives couldn't/wouldn't get it under control, it's ok to the people victimized?

Added emphasis. 

Government officials/others could have done something but didn't.  Innocent people get caught in crossfire.  Because government officials didn't address it, the innocents are just collateral damage?

I dunno, they are starting to "address it" but when they do they're leaving truck sized holes for abuse. "Let's require all the names of every handle ever" etc. That's not how I want to see it "Addressed".



Me neither.

But it might be a little too late for that now that the genie is starting to get out of the bottle.

So it goes....
:(
4814
Living Room / Re: People Turning on Trolls?
« Last post by 40hz on October 22, 2012, 09:12 AM »
Note: liberties will be lost. But I don't blame the people screaming for redress. There will always be opportunists that seize on the what asking for additional regulations will present. I blame the people who knew better and could have kept the situation under control - but decided not to.

But those people aren't the victimized ones.  Because the elected representatives couldn't/wouldn't get it under control, it's ok to the people victimized?

Added emphasis.  

Government officials/others could have done something but didn't.  Innocent people get caught in crossfire.  Because government officials didn't address it, the innocents are just collateral damage?

Still confused. Who are "the innocents" you're talking about? The people getting dumped on who are complaining; people (in general) who will fall under new regulations; or people who were victimized (trolled?) by someone maliciously publishing their personal information. Much like was done to Amanda Todd. And apparently you.

That is what I'm confused over.
4815
Living Room / Re: People Turning on Trolls?
« Last post by 40hz on October 22, 2012, 09:07 AM »

The Web IS different. It really is.

Dunno. It's a public place like any other AFAICT.

Why do people go into public spaces? To flirt a little. To do some business. To entertain or be entertained. To get the news. To preach 'the word,' be it religious or political. To find somebody interesting to talk to.

Maybe the web gives you newer and more efficient ways to do all of that. But I don't really see anything on a fundamental level that's any different than what has come before. It's one more "tool for conviviality" as I forgot who put it.

Most of the people arguing for the Internet's "newness" and how it represented a "break with everything that came before" were people in their 20-s and 30s. Most were what would generally be considered geek types. Not exactly the best 'read' people when it came to understanding history, anthropology, philosophy, or psychology.

Interesting to note how so little of the "real promise" the web advocates claimed it represented ever came to pass. The web gave us more of "more," but not really much that was "different."

The web? Sure. Maybe it''s faster. Or cheaper. Or (so far) more consequence and responsibility free than much of what came before it. But viewed as what it is, and what it's used for, it's the 'same old same old.' The only real difference is found in it's efficiency AFAIC.

There are those who see it differently.

YMMV. ;)
4816
Living Room / Re: People Turning on Trolls?
« Last post by 40hz on October 22, 2012, 08:52 AM »
But those people aren't the victimized ones.  Because the elected representatives couldn't/wouldn't get it under control, it's ok to the people victimized?


Sorry. Confused. I don't think I get what you're saying here. Could you maybe rephrase it? Thx. :)
4817
Living Room / Re: People Turning on Trolls?
« Last post by 40hz on October 22, 2012, 08:42 AM »
So it goes.

People do what people do.

Why is there this odd belief (bordering on religious conviction in some quarters) that somehow the web (which is just another human creation) can possibly be any different?
4818
Living Room / Re: People Turning on Trolls?
« Last post by 40hz on October 22, 2012, 08:07 AM »
Funny how there's always so much resentment, and bitterness, and paranoia whenever victims and ordinary people act up - but so little when the antisocial and the crazies do.

Guess it's always a little scary for some when the people commonly dismissed as "the safe ones" or "sheeple" show some fang towards their tormentors.

Oh well. Those in positions of responsibility and power onthe web have had their opportunities to be proactive and introduce some measured responses to some of the truly poisonous behaviors some people are indulging in. But far from doing so,they were so concerned with their own agendas and vision that they stood by and did little if anything.

The usual response to a serious troll complaint is the suggestion that "everybody play nice," or to to pat the dummy on the head and say "Uh-huh. Whatever."

Those hosting sites and providing internet services have spent years attempting to "educate" the public that there is little or nothing they can do about certain types of nasty people you encounter on the web.

Well guess what? It looks like the message "can do nothing" has been received loud and clear.

And the response now seems to be: Ok fine! We'll take care of it ourselves.

Don't want mob rule? Then stop being so lazy and make an effort to genuinely deal with the legitimate and unaddressed grievances which cause mobs to form in the first place.

Many in the web community - who could - chose not to. Their ongoing message has been, "We know better than you. So please, just go away and leave us alone."

Be careful what you wish for.


---------------------------

Note: liberties will be lost. But I don't blame the people screaming for redress. There will always be opportunists that seize on the what asking for additional regulations will present. I blame the people who knew better and could have kept the situation under control - but decided not to.



4819
Living Room / Re: People Turning on Trolls?
« Last post by 40hz on October 22, 2012, 02:56 AM »
If you make a habit of hurting and annoying people, it's only a matter of time before they start hitting back. That should come as no surprise to anyone.

As far as all this being a sea change? Maybe nothing quite that dramatic. But I think it's certainly an indication that people have become familiar enough with the web, and the technology behind it, that they now realize they're not as helpless as they once thought.

These particular stories will soon be old news.

But far from it being over, I think this is just the tip of the iceberg.



4820
Living Room / Re: What books are you reading?
« Last post by 40hz on October 21, 2012, 01:33 PM »
@mahesh2k - Not so much illustration or vintage, but some really good fall season choices:

Dragonfly by Frederick S. Durbin. A Halloween themed coming of age story that is one of the best things I've read in a long time.

Then there's Ray Bradbury's classic Something Wicked this Way Comes and The October Country

Also, for some reason I really can't say why, fall seems (to me) to be the ideal time to read (or reread) The Hobbit. I guess it's because Middle-earth always exists in a strange "forever autumn" whenever I visualize it in my mind.

And let's not forget Washington Irving's The Legend of Sleepy Hollow. Few ever captured the essence of a northeastern autumn better than that story did. Even without the ghostly elements, the descriptions and imagery are spot on.

Ah...New England and the Hudson River Valley! Autumn is what makes it all worthwhile. Here's an iPhone shot taken from in front of my GF's house yesterday. It's not too spectacular a fall from a New Englander's perspective this year - but it's still quite lovely.

10202012_0161.JPG

 :-*
4821
General Software Discussion / Getting rid of the home screen and ads in Skype
« Last post by 40hz on October 20, 2012, 12:06 PM »
Here's a useful how-to article recently posted over on Dedoimedo:

How to remove Skype Home screen, ads
Updated: October 19, 2012


Before we begin - this article does not promise a 100% solution, only a handful of workarounds that will help you enjoy Skype without having to uninstall it. I wanted to make this clear upfront to avoid minutes of frustrating and misleading reading. Now, that we know we are going to be enjoying a less-than-perfect solution to Skype's most annoying features, let's move on.

From the technological perspective, Skype is a decent program. From the user experience perspective, it is a bothersome, lowly product that is designed to cram advertisements down your throat. It started as a decent IM client with encryption, good audio and, later on, video collaboration. Then, it turned into a social network crapfest. And it started serving ads to you, day and night, inside your very call windows. So the question is, how do you restore Skype to some basic sanity without having to purge it away from your box?
.
.
.

Read the full article here.
 :Thmbsup:
4822
Living Room / Re: Outing the Internet's worst troll.
« Last post by 40hz on October 18, 2012, 09:45 PM »
work for true change that won't just apply in this one situation. And one that won't put the needs of those that are in similar but different situations at risk.

I sure we're all waiting to hear exactly what that might be. Because from what I've been given to understand, the human race has been working on that very question for its entire history. And AFAIK, nobody's come up with the answer yet.

So...care to share your specific proposal for true change as it might relate to this particular case? Because we can toss generalities and "bright promise for the future" speeches back and forth forever. And who knows? Maybe you - or somebody else here - does have the answer? Seriously. Somebody will eventually come up with it. Why not somebody here today?

here's my take:

Insisting on arriving at a 'perfect solution for all eternity' before allowing any action be taken is, to me, the ultimate cop out. And a complete evasion of personal responsibility. Most solutions I've seen range from 'marginal' to 'better than the alternatives.' I've never once seen an 'ideal' solution that satisfies everybody. And any attempt to completely eliminate all risk and anticipate all future contingencies is a sure guarantee that nothing will ever get done by anyone. Ever.

Because we're not gods.

Even under the most ideal circumstances, we can't do any more than the best we can with what information we have - and what we have to work with. I've never seen it happen any other way. And I've been involved in more 'causes' and 'social actions' and 'protests' than I care to remember some days.

So while I don't react on a knee-jerk basis to every problem I encounter, by the same token, I also don't sit by and twiddle my philosophical thumbs if there's something I can help with that needs getting done.

For example: It's one thing to contemplate all the factors that went into influencing the development of someone's personality and temperament. And if that development took an antisocial form, to work towards broadly eliminating its root causes, with the goal of removing such things from the human experience.

But in the meantime, if I hear a commotion next door, or see signs of physical abuse on someone who lives there, I'm not going to sit idly by and ponder how we can "raise awareness" and "best address" the "problem of domestic abuse." I'm going to call the police and go over and bang on the door.

Maybe such direct action on my part won't change the world. Or solve the "real underlying problem." But it very likely will bring (or force) some very real attention and official recognition to the hypothetical problem next door - and very possibly prevent an innocent person from otherwise getting seriously injured.

And you know what? That's enough for me. :)

4823
Living Room / Re: What books are you reading?
« Last post by 40hz on October 18, 2012, 05:55 PM »
Guitar Tone: Pursuing the Ultimate Guitar Sound by Mitch Gallagher of Sweetwater Sound.

GTBook.jpg

This is a big book (362 pages) loaded with solid information, analysis, and advice. If you're a guitarist or bass player, you'll want to read this book. If you're a performing guitarist or bass player, you need to read it.

So why this particular book? Simple answer: Mitch Gallagher.

If anybody is qualified to write a treatise on the elements (there are many) influencing the production of a unique guitar tone, it's Mitch Gallagher. He's with Sweetwater Sound - so his experience isn't limited to manufacturer demos and data sheets, or his own personal collection of products. Sweetwater sells this stuff. They're one of the world's premier distributors of professional musical instruments and equipment. And Mitch, as their editorial director, gets to see and seriously play with all these neat tools and toys. (Boy do I ever want his job!) Many musicians will be familiar with Mitch from YouTube where he is the host of the Sweetwater Minute instrument and equipment review videos. Great guy. And very knowledgeable. Here's his CV:

About the Author
Mitch Gallagher has been chasing guitar tone for more than 30 years. He toured as a lead guitarist/vocalist in rock and country bands and has played with big bands, with fusion and experimental music groups, and as a classical and steel-string guitar soloist. As a music technology specialist, he has taught college courses, lectured, given clinics, consulted with manufacturers, and spoken at festivals, conventions, and conferences around the world. His musical compositions cover genres from classical to experimental to heavy metal. His work Prophecy #1: At First Glance, an experimental percussion ensemble/synthesizer work based on the Fibonacci number series, received a 1991 NARAS (Grammy) award in the Best New Music/New Classical category. The former senior technical editor of Keyboard magazine and former editor-in-chief of EQ magazine, Mitch has published well over 1,000 articles in music, guitar, and recording publications. His monthly column, "Guitar Tracks," currently appears in Premier Guitar magazine. He appears in well over 100 YouTube videos. In addition to freelance writing and editing, he is an adjunct faculty member at Indiana University/Purdue University Fort Wayne; he operates The Sound Sauna/MAG Media Productions, a recording and mastering studio; and he is the editorial director for Sweetwater Sound in Fort Wayne, Indiana.


I can't really say I've read this book. More like I'm studying it. Much that's in it I'm already familiar with. (A few decades of experience in music will do that to you. :mrgreen:) But there's still a good deal of coverage on things I've only heard about - or have barely digested on my own. This book puts it all together in one well organized place.

Highly recommended! :Thmbsup: :Thmbsup:
4824
^Umm...paranoid. (Not a bad thing either considering the way this world is going lately.) ;D

@C - I have nothing but the deepest respect for you even if we haven't always agreed on some political topics in the past. :)

That's part of what makes this a very cool place to discuss things. Different opinions and non-US perspectives... 8)

Gimme more! :Thmbsup:
4825
^Understood. I only mentioned it in order to preempt a certain someone else from pointing it out. And probably less politely, if past experience is anything to go by. ;) 8) ;D
Pages: prev1 ... 188 189 190 191 192 [193] 194 195 196 197 198 ... 470next