topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Sunday December 21, 2025, 5:57 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 186 187 188 189 190 [191] 192 193 194 195 196 ... 404next
4751
Interesting analysis of Tesla's move on Harvard Business Review.

The first thing to note is that Tesla is not truly giving away its secret sauce, the source of its competitive advantage. “There’s a lot of thinking in the research these days on the gap between the codified knowledge that is patentable and gets disclosed versus tacit knowledge that really exists in how you actually produce,” says Orly Lobel, a law professor at the University of San Diego specializing in intellectual property. “That gap is probably relevant in this market.”

A Tesla vehicle is quite literally more valuable than the sum of the parts, even when the value of the patented technology is included. “They have this sexy car that people are increasingly liking,” says Lobel. “It’s something different from just the aggregation of the knowledge in the patents.”

That thinking is echoed by Alberto Galasso, another IP expert at the University of Toronto, who put it this way: “A patent on a great technology is worth nothing if there is no threat of imitation.” Access to the patents doesn’t ensure that a competitor can execute on an equally innovative product.

Tesla is trying to thread the needle of expanding the industry without giving up its competitive position. By giving away access to its patents it is offering competitors a leg up, but not fully ceding its lead in innovation.

“Tesla is very much the dominant innovator in the industry, so it can afford making that move,” Lobel told me, adding that the company may hope that it will trigger reciprocal action by others equally committed to furthering the industry.

More at link.

4752
Nice to know there *is* actually a word for my usual stance...

apocaloptimist.jpg
4753
General Software Discussion / Re: TrueCrypt alternative
« Last post by wraith808 on June 12, 2014, 03:42 PM »
I guess I take issue that the article portrays this as an 'open source' problem. It's not. The problem of determining whether or not you can trust the team behind a software project/product is largely independent of whether the software is open source or not.

I think that implying that this is a problem particular to open source software or even just that it's more of a problem for open source software is wrong.


The problem that is endemic to OSS in this regard (and I know I'm guilty of it) is the transparency of whom is behind the project.  I didn't even know, nor take the time to find out who was behind TrueCrypt.  Nor many of the other OSS that I use.  And I'm pretty on top of things... but having the source available makes a lot of that... just seem not to matter.

But it does.
4754
Tesla Just Gave All Its Patents Away to Competitors

While not as sensational as the title implies, he did just give the right to use patents used in building the Tesla to anyone who wants to use them.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced today that his company will not “initiate patent lawsuits against anyone who, in good faith, wants to use our technology.” In plain English, that means that if other car companies want to produce electric cars, they can use Tesla’s technology to do it, and, in turn, advance Musk’s sustainability vision.

“The mission of the company is to accelerate the widespread adoption of electric cars,” explained Tesla spokesperson Simon Sproule in an interview before the patent announcement was made. “If Tesla acts as the catalyst for other manufacturers … that will have been achieved.”

More at link... and announcement here.

Now that's some forward thinking for you.
4755
General Software Discussion / Re: TrueCrypt alternative
« Last post by wraith808 on June 12, 2014, 02:28 PM »
If you have the name of Microsoft, or Google, or whomever behind a project, then you at least have knowledge of the history of whom is making it and some knowledge of what they have done/are doing- for good or ill.  On many OSS projects, there isn't this level of transparency.  It's not about abandoning or choosing to discontinue a project.  It's about knowing who is behind the project.  If you buy from someone, there is some level of transparency on this.  On quite a few OSS projects, there isn't.  It is the same concern to a smaller degree on smaller freeware projects... but those don't give the artificial level of reassurance that knowing a project is OSS tends to.
4756
General Software Discussion / Re: TrueCrypt alternative
« Last post by wraith808 on June 12, 2014, 01:24 PM »
I disagree with the tone of the article about the trustworthiness of free software. At least a couple times, the article says things such as:

I think we’ve all received a wakeup call. We might need to step back and question the source of our open-source software — and in the future, review its pedigree before installing it.

I don't think open source or free software should be called out for this, but not closed source software. This "wakeup call" applies to any software you depend on - whether it's free or paid, open or closed source. Paid-for, closed source software often gets abandoned or has support dropped suddenly - that's not a problem unique to free software.

At least with open source software, the possibility exists of someone/anyone forking the project and continuing to support it if there's a need or demand (keep in mind that as discussions have mentioned before, it's not entirely clear whether the TrueCrypt software is truly open source and possible to legally fork). That possibility doesn't exist for closed source software that gets abandoned.

I think what was meant is that if you buy software from X, then you know that you've bought in from X, and that X is supporting it.  On many open source projects, this isn't the case.  The authors don't have to be known, and there is zero in the way of accountability.  So it wasn't so much that we don't need to assess with closed source projects- people already do that.  It's just leaning towards people *don't* do that with OSS in a lot of cases... after all, we can see the source, so it's not important.

But it is.
4757
Living Room / Re: WinXP is officially dead!
« Last post by wraith808 on June 11, 2014, 06:53 PM »
Nobody ever said to ignore the newer OSs in favor of the old, and not develop for them. That would be nuts! But if someone like mouser can develop software that works on old unsupported versions of Windows, as well as the latest, why can't others do the same?

Mouser does it for the love of it.  And he develops in C (++?).  Those two things get rid of many obstacles.  My software?  As long as I can develop one time with no problems... sure, I'll release it.  And also say that compatibility isn't guaranteed.  Too many headaches otherwise.
4758
Living Room / Re: WinXP is officially dead!
« Last post by wraith808 on June 11, 2014, 01:13 PM »
^ As usual, you said it much more elegantly than I.  ;D  :Thmbsup: +1
4759
Living Room / Re: WinXP is officially dead!
« Last post by wraith808 on June 11, 2014, 12:15 PM »
What I don't understand is 3rd party developers that make their money off supporting their apps running on whatever platforms their customers are using. If there are still a large chunk of people running XP, why turn them away from buying and using your software, by not supporting XP? Flushing all that cash down the toilet is kind of self-defeating, don't you think?

There are a lot of decisions that go into supporting platforms.  And apparently there is some data point (presumably based on money) that causes this kind of decision making.  Happens all the time in business.
4760
Finished Programs / Re: [SOLVED] Ctrl+Alt+Del
« Last post by wraith808 on June 10, 2014, 02:57 PM »
A couple of articles on this:

https://stackoverflo...laltdel-on-windows-7

https://stackoverflo...d-shutdown-for-kiosk

Don't know if any of those approaches work.. .it appears this isn't something to be approached lightly.
4761
She said, "What a small organ."

He said, "I didn't realize I had to play in such a large cathedral."
4762
Living Room / Re: Stuff We Feel Like Bitching About
« Last post by wraith808 on June 09, 2014, 07:29 PM »
I'm on the verge...

Of switching hosts?

A wise decision. I would. 8) :)

Unfortunately, it's not my site.  *sigh*

I even offered to host them for free on my server if they'd just move... but when dealing with people that don't know about technology, they hate change, understandably.

"So here is us.  On the raggedy edge."
4763
^ Umm... that article is from 2011?
What? You mean....this isn't 2011 anymore?!

Good comeback.  Really good comeback!
4764
Living Room / Re: Stuff We Feel Like Bitching About
« Last post by wraith808 on June 09, 2014, 07:00 PM »
Most of my life's experience seems to tell me you can: get whatever you want - or - say whatever you want.

But not both.

At least not when dealing with the most people.

But when the better option isn't available, you can at least get it out of your system.

Godaddy is still telling the client that they don't support wordpress.  When I gave her clear instructions on what to say and she quoted verbatim that it had nothing to do with wordpress... it has to do with php.  

I'm on the verge...
4765
DC Gamer Club / Re: GOG announces DRM-Free game client: GOG Galaxy
« Last post by wraith808 on June 09, 2014, 06:58 PM »
Yes. They have clearly stated that the download via your web account will remain.

They clearly stated a lot of other things... and they were true until they weren't.  :-\

It sounds to me as though Galaxy will work a lot like the GOG Downloader but with social things optionally included.

See, that's where it gets sticky.  The downloader was useful and straight to the point.  I could go to my account and download a lot of things without actually having to do anything or be on the computer, and it would resume, and it *just* downloaded the files.

I need nor want anything else, including a portal for launch or anything like that.  And that's what *everyone* is trying to give me.
4766
DC Gamer Club / Re: GOG announces DRM-Free game client: GOG Galaxy
« Last post by wraith808 on June 09, 2014, 04:23 PM »
... another one?  This is past ridiculous.
The nice thing about GOG's client is that if you don't want to mess with it you don't have to.

Unlike most other gaming clients, you'll still be able to play the games you bought on GOG.


Are we sure about that?  If that becomes their preferred way of downloading then will you have another choice?  And yes, I do understand that from the DRM standpoint- but that's the purpose of going there to begin with.

I'm just tired of all of the clients.  ARC.  Ubi.  Origin.  Gamestop (whatever that one is now). Direct2Drive/Gamefly (which also has DRM free stuff).  Green Man Gaming.  GamersGate.  Trion is making their own.  Raptr. etc, etc, etc.

I understand the concept behind wanting to make your own platform and make all of your products accessible from it.  I understand not having to use things.  But at what point is enough, enough?
4767
^ Umm... that article is from 2011?

Hey! That's my line! :P

You snooze, you lose! ;D
4768
^ Umm... that article is from 2011?
4769
Living Room / Re: Stuff We Feel Like Bitching About
« Last post by wraith808 on June 09, 2014, 10:41 AM »
I dont know about you all, but if someone approaches me an angry/aggressive/abusive manner, I'm naturally going to take that as an attack, and get defensive or attack back. That's human nature (I think). Their job only allows one option there. I can completely relate to their position.

I think the truth (as with most things) lies somewhere in the middle.  I'm totally fine usually when I call.  I relate my position and problem in rational terms- it's just better for communication.  But when someone tries to jerk me around with a script, or not wanting to escalate if they can't take care of it, and not even wanting to admit the problem... well, sometimes a less reasoned approach is called for.

I'm close to that with GoDaddy right now, for an example.  On a client's wordpress (they chose to host with GoDaddy... sigh), the contact form doesn't work.  So I did some troubleshooting, and found out that mail() wasn't working.  I did some further troubleshooting to make it obvious that it wasn't anything with wordpress or anything- just their service.  Then I gave the client the information to relay (since they won't talk to me without the client giving me a lot more information than I'd even *want* them to give me).

Their response?  We don't offer support on Wordpress.

You really expect me to to stay calm with that kind of response?  When it's the fact that I can't access the mail() function because of your configuration?  And I see *several* posts on stackexchange about the same thing and the fact that GoDaddy in a lot of cases doesn't enable it unless you ask?
4770
DC Gamer Club / Re: GOG announces DRM-Free game client: GOG Galaxy
« Last post by wraith808 on June 09, 2014, 09:12 AM »
... another one?  This is past ridiculous.
4771
Living Room / Re: Stuff We Feel Like Bitching About
« Last post by wraith808 on June 09, 2014, 09:11 AM »
^ This.
4772
Living Room / Re: Stuff We Feel Like Bitching About
« Last post by wraith808 on June 08, 2014, 01:30 PM »
Now however we have the hyper reactive shrinking violet movement's new-think assertion that [affect theatrical crying jag] Words Hurt! [/end theatrical crying jag] ...Which is just flat out retarded on so many levels I can't even begin to try counting them. The whole thing is just devolving into an idiotic witch hunt spearheaded by a bunch of smug completely out of touch with reality assholes that think that they are morally superior simply because they haven't been caught up in their own machine yet.


The reason we're back around to the words hurt mentality?

Technology.  It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.

People don't have that level of personal connection they had before technology made them 'social'.  And so in the mistaken view that 'we're more social than ever', we equate words with the same sort of level that 'actions' used to be associated with.  While it is true that you can turn harass/stalk people online, I don't see why we don't focus on the actions rather than the words.

Oh, right.  Because words can't hurt you.
4773
Living Room / Re: Stuff We Feel Like Bitching About
« Last post by wraith808 on June 07, 2014, 05:39 PM »
@wraith808 your post makes me think about censorship.  There used to be George Carlin's 7 dirty words. But the situation has deteriorated to the point where radio call-in shows are censoring euphemisms for the forbidden words.  Imagine if Clark Gable didn't give us the ability to say "damn" then all euphemisms for it would now also be banned.  So on the sports talk show when the radio personality asks "why the heck did the coach call such a stupid darned play?" they would have to bleep the word "darned" and after a year or so they would ban "hell" so the word "heck" would have to be bleeped.  And of course forget about a word starting with 'p' that sometimes refers to felines but often not.  :)

At some point the talk shows will sound like midi sampling with some dialog mixed in.

But on your apology point, what I don't quite get is the double think that allows celebrity "scum" who had their names dragged through the scandal press(probably a redundancy these days I admit) to go about their jobs as if someone lifted the film on the magic slate.  If none of the stuff was true how is it that guys like Marv Albert weren't awarded millions for defamation?  Something is really strange.

But it does look like the Clippers owner messed up his chance to cry for Barbara Walters.  But his "punishment" may be selling his team for the most money for an NBA team ever.  Maybe that made it tough for him to shed a tear if he knew that deal was in the offing.  Makes me wonder how I can screw up royally so I can set myself up for a lavish retirement.  :)


I remember an interview with Alec Baldwin.  OK... so he's crazy at times.  But in this interview, he recounted something that happened after one of his supposed rampages against Anderson Cooper (or someone... I forget.  Like I said, he's crazy at times).

But on this particular one, they called him out for calling someone... well a *sucker, which is apparently an anti-gay slur (who knew?  I didn't).  So he walks into a GLAAD office and has a sit down with someone there, and they start in on him doing more for GLAAD and getting his PR fixed... and he basically said, I don't want any of that.  That he wasn't going to represent them in exchange for washing his image.  He wanted to be truly educated on what they wanted (from the perspective of making sure that he wasn't portraying himself as anti-gay), and then armed with true knowledge, he'd then divorce himself from their causes period.

Now see, that's a form of truth.  Educate... don't hold hostage.  Especially not in exchange for washing their sins away.  No tit for tat, no money for keeping your mailing lists from boycotting me.  Anything else other than education is blackmail of another stripe.
4774
Living Room / Re: Stuff We Feel Like Bitching About
« Last post by wraith808 on June 07, 2014, 05:26 PM »
@Renegade the gun that shocked me most was maybe 7 or 8 years ago.  I picked someone up at the airport.  Not only was the arriving passengers area separated from those waiting by a storm fence from floor to ceiling, but a 200 LB female security guard paced up and down with a Thompson submachine gun.  I hope they didn't give her live ammo.  Perhaps it was a bluff deterrent but it sure felt like America was spelled with a 'k' all of a sudden.  Cheap air fares came at a really high price.  :(


The gun that shocked me the most was the one that was pointed at me with a shaking hand behind it from a security guard.  See, I went to an all male college.  And I had friends at the all women's college next door.  I was walking a friend back to campus after studying at the library.  She got back before curfew, and we stood on opposite sides of the fence, still talking about our work.  The security guard said that I'd have to step away from the fence.  So I did.  'Far enough' in that 18 year old kid mentality... but not so far that we couldn't talk.  So then he said that's not far enough, and I needed to leave.  I told him that I went to the college right across the street (which was pretty obvious) and we were talking about our project and needed to get the final touches and she was in on time for curfew... and all we were doing was talking...

...and all while I was saying that, he was unfastening his holster, pulled out the biggest gun I'd ever seen (I hadn't seen any other than on tv, so take that for what it is- but it looked dirty harry size), pulled back the hammer with shaking hands, and said I needed to go.

... so I did what any sensible person would do when faced with senselessness.  I backed away.  I didn't turn my back on him, but I backed away slowly.  And only after I was gone, did I start to breathe again.

I have nothing against guns.  It's just certain people should not be allowed to (mis)handle them.

Oh, and I found out later that the security guard was on trial for shooting a student in the bathroom in a sketchy situation, and had been fired.  I dodged a not-just-metaphorical bullet with that one.
4775
Living Room / Re: Stuff We Feel Like Bitching About
« Last post by wraith808 on June 07, 2014, 02:24 PM »
Mine is actually posted in the silly humor thread.

What's the big deal with the world and celebrity apologies?  You know in most cases they're insincere... so what?  Is the rant for an apology just to drag them through the dirt and debase them?

You make a bad joke or have an unfortunate choice of words.  So what... everyone does.  And if you believe that everyone doesn't... well, I have a bridge to sell you.  All we're doing with our 'righteous outrage' is guaranteeing that the MSM will keep reporting on them as much as possible.  Because money.

And in the meantime, you're not changing minds, you're just forcing them to be more surreptitious in their thinking and doing.

In all reality, if you think bad things because of me for any characteristic, or truly think these bad things- I want to know, so I can stay the HELL away from you if I choose.
Pages: prev1 ... 186 187 188 189 190 [191] 192 193 194 195 196 ... 404next