topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Sunday November 16, 2025, 12:37 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 184 185 186 187 188 [189] 190 191 192 193 194 ... 310next
4701
This has been reported to Google and they have sent me an email (from an actual person) that states they will be looking into it but will not be able to let me know the outcome.  Hopefully, shortly, their ads will no longer appear on Google.

Still think we need to increase the exposure by Digging it.

Ditto - I got a reply saying pretty much the same. Basically privacy doesn't allow Google to disclose anything about their investigation ... makes you laugh though why should scum get privacy when they are ripping off gullible people ... personally I think Google should provide an equal amount of publicity for the outcome of the investigation with names, photos and credit card details!
4702
General Software Discussion / Re: A Warning about Thinkall.com
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 29, 2007, 11:08 AM »
Reading this thread has brought back some bad memories with a silver lining - a lesson learned. I got burned in a similar manner - for a lot more money - by HighBeam research.

Actually they seem to have changed - they always used to be upfront about trials and costs but I see there is no mention of the subscription price on the page where you sign up (by the way they are now charging $199 a year - which seems rather excessive!).

One way round these "free trial but you must tell us your credit card number" schemes is to cancel the trial immediately - most of them still allow the trial period to run - and in the case of Highbeam they have a free basic membership. Another way is to get your credit card details wrong! If you don't want to be too obvious get the expiry date wrong or 'accidentally' transpose two numbers in the card number. That way when they charge you they have to contact you to correct the details!
4703
General Software Discussion / Re: A Warning about Thinkall.com
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 29, 2007, 07:49 AM »
Looks like your are right.  The US Federal Trade Commission has loned them up.

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2007/01/manay.htm

Not before time IMHO. 

The next internet rogues the FTC should get are Registerfly.

Jeff

Hey - result ....
4704
General Software Discussion / Re: Autoplay Repair
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 29, 2007, 07:46 AM »
Sorry - being stupid I didn't notice that. The other links might still be useful though if the system is screwed up in any way!
4705
Living Room / My Generation ...
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 28, 2007, 06:32 PM »
Program tonight on BBC Two (UK channel) about the appalling treatment older people suffer in 'residential care'.

As part of the program a group of 40 'oldies with attitude' made a single to try and get into the pop charts.

z.gif

Here is the video: http://www.youtube.c.../watch?v=zqfFrCUrEbY

and if you want to see them interviewed live the Graham Norton Show at: http://www.youtube.c...6vIqR4WunFU&NR=1

Their efforts have been widely publicised worldwide by the media and press (mostly following the release of the video on YouTube).

All proceeds from the CD single go to charity so if you can stump up the cash why not buy a copy and support a worthwhile cause. You can find the CD at Amazon.co.uk.

Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be on the US Amazon website.
4706
What makes it so special is that it doesn't come with a root-kit.  ;D

As far as we know - maybe one will emerge in the fullness of time!
4707
ROFL ...
4708
General Software Discussion / Re: Autoplay Repair
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 27, 2007, 11:10 AM »
Could someone tell me if this would solve a problem with my computer no longer auto starting game CD/DVDs anymore?

All the categories shown on the screen shots seem to be for audio or movie CD/DVDs.

I don't think so - if you look at the image at the top of the thread it is useful for adding and removing handlers when you insert a disc - not repairing autoplay settings. The handlers are the list of programs that usually pop up to allow you to run an application when a disc is inserted.


MS have a utility to fix AutoPlay problems see here to download it.

If you are still stuck there are a whole pile of AutoPlay related articles here you may want to browse through.

Also here is an article from PCToday I found to fix common Autoplay issues.

Click for full article
July 2005 • Vol.3 Issue 7
Page(s) 20-21
When AutoPlay Won’t Play
Roadside Assistance -Commentary by Dave Methvin

AutoPlay is one of those features that people either love or hate. When you insert some type of removable media into your PC, such as a CD-ROM, flash drive, or removable disk drive, Windows make some guesses about what to do, depending on the contents of the drive. In some cases it will give you a list and let you choose. For example, if you insert a CD full of MP3 music files, Windows will offer to play them with Windows Media Player.

Often, Windows also lets you choose a default action that should always be taken when that kind of media is inserted. That way it’s not always asking you each time and just does what you want. One of the choices is “take no action” in case you prefer to have AutoPlay leave you alone. But what if you want the choice to come back after you’ve chosen Take No Action, or AutoPlay just mysteriously stops working? I recently had to diagnose a mystery like this.

There are actually two types of AutoPlay. The original AutoPlay (called V1) has been around since Windows 95 and is very basic. If you insert some media that has a file named Autorun.inf in its root directory, Windows will read that file and use it to run an associated file such as Setup.exe. This is most often used with product CDs so that they automatically install when you put the CD into the drive. An advanced form of AutoPlay (V2) was introduced in Windows XP. It lets you determine the action to be taken based on the type of device being plugged in or the type of files on the media.

AutoPlay Is Great--In Theory

The idea of AutoPlay sounds great, and there are certainly situations where you might want to use it. For example, maybe you play audio CDs in your PC. With AutoPlay enabled Windows Media Player can automatically start playing an audio CD whenever you insert it. Or when you insert a blank CD-ROM, Windows can open a folder window for burning files to that CD. If you plug in your digital camera, Windows can show you thumbnail previews of the pictures in the camera.

What if you have AutoPlay set to play your CDs but later decide to rip your CDs to the hard disk and play them that way? When you insert your audio CD to rip it, Windows Media Player will start playing it instead, and you’ll have to cancel it so that you can run the ripping software. Technically, the way it’s supposed to work is that any application that might want to avoid the default AutoPlay action (CD ripping or burning software, for example) should do some extra programming to cancel the AutoPlay actions if they occur. That assumes, of course, that the user starts the ripping software before inserting the audio CD. In practice, these restrictions surprise the user, and you end up with the unfriendly AutoPlay scenario described above.

AutoPlay can also take a while to look at the media you’ve inserted before it decides what options to offer you. For example, I have a 120GB external hard drive that plugs into the system via USB. When I plugged it into the system for the first time, Windows AutoPlay wanted to spring into action and impress me with its ability to determine what I might want to do with this drive. So it started scanning this 120GB drive to see what file types are there. But all I really want to do is back up some files to the drive, so I don’t want Windows to take the time to scan the drive at all.

AutoPlay Your Way

Fortunately, there are some ways you can fine-tune the AutoPlay process. To perform the tweaks, open My Computer, right-click the drive, and select Properties. (If it’s a removable drive, plug in the drive first so that you can right-click it.) The first thing you can do is choose a default action based on the kind of files on the drive. For example, you can have Windows play a CD full of MP3 files, but just have it open a folder window for a CD full of pictures. The default is to always prompt you each time the CD is inserted.

The rules about AutoPlay don’t always make sense, at least to me. For example, there is a choice called Mixed Content on the AutoPlay list. To me, that would mean any situation where the files on the drive weren’t exclusively music, images, or one of the other recognized types. Instead, it seems to kick in only when the files on the drive are a combination of two or more of the recognized types. If you have a drive full of only unrecognized file types, AutoPlay won’t play at all because it doesn’t consider that to be Mixed Content. Go figure.

Come Back, AutoPlay

After going through the work to get rid of AutoPlay, there may come a day when you decide you’d like to have it again. Theoretically, all you should need to do is go back to the drive’s AutoPlay tab and click Restore Defaults. Guess what? Sometimes that’s not enough. I found this out first-hand when I gave one of my old WinXP systems to a family member a few months ago. They were accustomed to using AutoPlay with some of their media, so I had to turn it back on. No matter how many Restore Defaults I tried, though, it just wasn’t cutting the mustard. Getting rid of AutoPlay was a breeze compared to getting it back.

The first thing I did was to try and figure out what settings could possibly be out of whack. That led me to two very interesting articles about AutoPlay. The first article (http://msdn.microsof...utoplay/default.aspx) provides quite a bit of background about how AutoPlay works in WinXP. Although it’s pretty technical, the thing that struck me was the complexity of AutoPlay rules. If you can’t clearly explain the feature to a user in a few sentences, it’s a sign of trouble in my book. The second article (http://msdn.microsof...oplay2k_cookbook.asp) offers a lot of gory detail about implementation but really didn’t help me resurrect AutoPlay.

After another hour of debugging the problem and searching the Internet, I came across a free Microsoft tool called the AutoPlay Repair Wizard. This tool basically takes the information from the two articles above and turns it into a program that mere mortals can use to bring AutoPlay back to life. When I ran it on my system, it found several Registry settings that were out of whack and made the necessary changes to fix them. If you’re having problems getting AutoPlay to play, this tool is a must-have.

As you might be able to tell, I’m not a big fan of AutoPlay. I tend to avoid the fancy wizards and special apps for removable media. Instead, I just open folder or Explorer windows and use drag and drop to move files. I like it that way because I don’t need to learn several different user interfaces that basically do the same thing. No matter where the files are located, I always try to use the same consistent way of doing things. AutoPlay encourages inconsistency, and that tends to slow me down.

by Dave Methvin

4709
General Software Discussion / Re: DVD playback software
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 27, 2007, 10:16 AM »
i too don't much about KMPlayer's internal workings but so far, it has played everything that i throw at it.. :) Korean video technology must be way up.. :Thmbsup:

Whether it is a codec conflict I don't know but I can't get KMPlayer to do much without crackling sound - on on video files the sound drifts out of sync as well as distortion.
4710
Living Room / Re: Why don't you pay for software?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 26, 2007, 06:57 PM »
I'm not saying there should be no reward for the effort, i'm saying giving the reward shouldn't be ENFORCED upon the user.
Yes,- this sounds naive and counts on the goodwill of people, but if you want people to be nicer in the world, you might as wel BE THE CHANGE YOU WANT TO SEE.

I am not sure whether Gothi[c] is serious or just trolling for response.

If you are serious does this philosophy apply to all intellectual pursuits? If not then why not? If it does then how does any business model work when nobody can earn a living at anything?

Example: A designer designs a car, another designer designs a production line to produce it, engineers design the machine to run the production line and the processing plant to produce the raw materials, a mining engineer designs a method for extracting ore to supply the production process. All of these people are producing intellectual ideas just a programmers do - should none of these people get paid for their work - or is it all done for love and they work in MacDonalds to support their 'hobby'?

Just because software is an intangible product that you can't hold in your hand doesn't mean it requires any less work than the factory worker who bolts the parts together to build a car. Would you suggest that a factory worker should work for love of it? Why should people who work in MacDonalds be paid? They don't produce anything tangible either!
4711
What's the Best? / Re: cd burning
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 26, 2007, 10:28 AM »
The links are still working for the discounts but they have changed the price to $19.99 (USD) / £14.99 (UKP)
4712
Ironic twist - have a look at this image:

SC.gif

The joke is that DVDShrink is ILLEGAL to download in the UK (you can be prosecuted just for having a copy even if you don't use it) and ceased development and distribution in 2004 !!!
4713
Here is a related article (not to these sites but to google's attitude):

http://news.com.com/...-7349_3-6180022.html

and here is Googles page on Google Security and Product Safety

with a page of contact links for Security Issues

4714
Is this the place to try?

https://www.google.c...swer.py?answer=18386

Here is the report I sent if others want to use it:

I used
http://www.irfanview-stop.com
as an example of a bad url and then entered the following description:

Not sure if this is the place to report this scamming abuse but this URL (along with many others by the same people) are using sponsored links in google searches to get the gullible to pay a subscription to download free software in direct contradiction of licensing of the software vendors.

There is an excellent article which details the scam and lists a lot of sites being used in this way.

To read the full details of how the scam is using Google to promote itself see the article at: http://tinyurl.com/36c9bp

If I have reported this to the wrong department could you please tell me who I should report this to.

Thanks

The TinyUrl link pointed to Veign's Blog.
4715
Dugg (is that a real term or should it be Digged?) and commented ...

Everyone should report this scam to Irfanview, Adobe etc. and Google !!

(or alternatively install AdMuncher !! The sponsored ads don't appear then ;))
4716
General Software Discussion / Re: I Need Help w/ ConvertXtoDVD program
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 25, 2007, 05:23 PM »
Must ... resist ... urge ... to ... post ... email ... address ... onto ... spam-magnet ... newsgroup  :mad:

Whilst I sympathise with what you say I have removed the email address from the thread.  ;)

HottMama may be an idiot but we need to educate people where possible and I don't wish a spamfest (even on idiots)!
4717
Living Room / Re: 'Big Brother' Google ?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 25, 2007, 11:15 AM »
Apparently if people ask MPs for information under the 'Freedom of Information Act' they can decline !!
4718
What's the Best? / Re: cd burning
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 25, 2007, 09:09 AM »
That's the main reason I have Ashampoo too.
4719
Living Room / Re: How do you auto-forward all IMAP mail?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 25, 2007, 08:29 AM »
Trouble with FreePOPs is that it doesn't appear to support the IMAP protocol - only HTTP based mail.

There are loads of tools that work for HTTP type email but very little for IMAP
4720
Living Room / Re: How do you auto-forward all IMAP mail?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 25, 2007, 04:51 AM »
Sounds like what you need is some sort of server side script scheduled to run every few minutes with CRON that will monitor your IMAP accounts and forward any mail to your GMail account and delete the original!!

Don't know if such a thing exists though. How about a PHP coding snack?

I trawled through loads of email freeware/shareware dross looking for something suitable and the only IMAP forwarding software I could find would only forward to MS Exchange servers - which is not a lot of use unless you are secretly a corporation running Exchange!

It may be simpler to systematically change your email accounts (I know it is a PITA). Use your own domain name and then you will never need to change email address again!
4721
Living Room / Re: How do you auto-forward all IMAP mail?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 25, 2007, 04:04 AM »
How does your mail get to the IMAP accounts (are they fixed email addresses that you must use or are they associated with you web hosting account?). If they are related to your webhosting account you could perhaps redirect the mail by changing the mail server you use.
-Carol Haynes (May 24, 2007, 07:30 PM)

Fixed email addresses. I can't change the mail server I use.

Are the email addresses based on your domain name or totally separate?

My domain name management company has the option of web forwarding so that I can redirect my emails anywhere I want.

If they are totally tied to a domain that you have no control over then I am not sure there is any easy way to do it if the company doesn't support forwarding.

There are a number of companies that will collect email from your email accounts and forward them to another account. I looked at this a while ago (before I had a domain name) but can't remember the company names I considered. They weren't free though.

One last thought is can you access this mail via a POP server as well as IMAP - in which case you can set up you gmail account to collect the email from your other accounts automatically. Just go to Settings link and the Accounts tab. You can then set up POP collection addresses. See http://mail.google.c..._GB&answer=21288 for details.

4722
Living Room / Re: How do you auto-forward all IMAP mail?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 24, 2007, 07:30 PM »
How does your mail get to the IMAP accounts (are they fixed email addresses that you must use or are they associated with you web hosting account?). If they are related to your webhosting account you could perhaps redirect the mail by changing the mail server you use.

Another method would be to use Yahoo mail which includes email forwarding. You could use the web based email as your IMAP style access from anywhere and have all your mail forwarded to one central mailbox which you can collect in your mail app via POP mail.

Works well for me - I have 4 Yahoo email address - 3 feed into the fourth - so I never have to look at those 3 at all - just the fourth which has all my mail. I then use POP to grab that mail into my mail client (you can choose to leave a copy of the mail on the Yahoo server when you download via POP if you want to keep you mail in both places).

Yahoo mail also has the advantage of providing "Address Guard" disposable addresses the hide your proper email address when you want to register somewhere but either don't want to receive emails from them (in which case you can delete the email address when you no longer want to receive mail on it) or monitor the source to see if they send out spam - works great and means you can limit access to your main account for websites that behave badly without screwing up all your other contacts.
4723
Living Room / Re: 'Big Brother' Google ?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 24, 2007, 07:19 AM »
Nevermind their intentions, governements can FORCE information out of them. Which would be fine if all governements in the world were perfect, but they aren't, and even if they were there's no guarantee that they forever will be. If the information is there, it's only waiting to be abused.

Name one government that comes even close to perfection - currently the US and UK both rank very high under any abuse of privacy criteria.

Political aside
Made me laugh the other day - the UK government introduced "freedom of information" with a giant fanfare. Now they have two exceptions:

  • Members of Parliament are exempt from the provision (in other words freedom of information is guaranteed except if you want to know what you elected representatives are under question)
  • There will be a cost limit of £600 on information availability. That is if the organisation thinks it will cost more than £600 to provide the information they will not be required to do so! Start queueing now for the jobs - highly paid 'information officers' (more than £600 per hour) so that companies can justifiably say we can't provide information!

So much for the democratic process

4724
Living Room / 100 days of Vista: Is it Windows ME all over again?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 24, 2007, 04:13 AM »
On TechRepublic today ... interesting article on the truth behind MS Vista sales figures ...

See http://blogs.techrep...om/networking/?p=254 for the full article (only the intro is below)

sc.gif
4725
Living Room / 'Big Brother' Google ?
« Last post by Carol Haynes on May 24, 2007, 02:53 AM »
Interesting article in the Independent Newspaper today (see http://news.independ...y/article2578479.ece) or I have quoted it below:

Google is watching you
'Big Brother' row over plans for personal database
By Robert Verkaik, Law Editor
Published: 24 May 2007

Google, the world's biggest search engine, is setting out to create the most comprehensive database of personal information ever assembled, one with the ability to tell people how to run their lives.

In a mission statement that raises the spectre of an internet Big Brother to rival Orwellian visions of the state, Google has revealed details of how it intends to organise and control the world's information.

The company's chief executive, Eric Schmidt, said during a visit to Britain this week: "The goal is to enable Google users to be able to ask the question such as 'What shall I do tomorrow?' and 'What job shall I take?'."

Speaking at a conference organised by Google, he said : "We are very early in the total information we have within Google. The algorithms [software] will get better and we will get better at personalisation."

Google's declaration of intent was publicised at the same time it emerged that the company had also invested £2m in a human genetics firm called 23andMe. The combination of genetic and internet profiling could prove a powerful tool in the battle for the greater understanding of the behaviour of an online service user.

Earlier this year Google's competitor Yahoo unveiled its own search technology, known as Project Panama, which monitors internet visitors to its site to build a profile of their interests.

Privacy protection campaigners are concerned that the trend towards sophisticated internet tracking and the collating of a giant database represents a real threat, by stealth, to civil liberties.

That concern has been reinforced by Google's $3.1bn bid for DoubleClick, a company that helps build a detailed picture of someone's behaviour by combining its records of web searches with the information from DoubleClick's "cookies", the software it places on users' machines to track which sites they visit.

The Independent has now learnt that the body representing Europe's data protection watchdogs has written to Google requesting more information about its information retention policy.

The multibillion-pound search engine has already said it plans to impose a limit on the period it keeps personal information.

A spokesman for the Information Commissioner's Office, the UK agency responsible for monitoring data legislation confirmed it had been part of the group of organisations, known as the Article 29 Working Group, which had written to Google.

It is understood the letter asked for more detail about Google's policy on the retention of data. Google says it will respond to the Article 29 request next month when it publishes a full response on its website.

The Information Commissioner's spokeswoman added: "I can't say what was in it only that it was written in response to Google's announcement that will hold information for no more than two years."

Ross Anderson, professor of Security Engineering at Cambridge University and chairman of the Foundation for Information Policy Research, said there was a real issue with "lock in" where Google customers find it hard to extricate themselves from the search engine because of the interdependent linkage with other Google services, such as iGoogle, Gmail and YouTube. He also said internet users could no longer effectively protect their anonymity as the data left a key signature.

"A lot of people are upset by some of this. Why should an angst-ridden teenager who subscribes to MySpace have their information dragged up 30 years later when they go for a job as say editor of the Financial Times? But there are serious privacy issues as well. Under data protection laws, you can't take information, that may have been given incidentally, and use it for another purpose. The precise type and size of this problem is yet to be determined and will change as Google's business changes."

A spokeswoman for the Information Commissioner said that because of the voluntary nature of the information being targeted, the Information Commission had no plans to take any action against the databases.

Peter Fleischer, Google's global privacy Ccunsel, said the company intended only doing w hat its customers wanted it to do. He said Mr Schmidt was talking about products such as iGoogle, where users volunteer to let Google use their web histories. "This is about personalised searches, where our goal is to use information to provide the best possible search for the user. If the user doesn't want information held by us, then that's fine. We are not trying to build a giant library of personalised information. All we are doing is trying to make the best computer guess of what it is you are searching for."

Privacy protection experts have argued that law enforcement agents - in certain circumstances - can compel search engines and internet service providers to surrender information. One said: "The danger here is that it doesn't matter what search engines say their policy is because it can be overridden by national laws."

How Google grew to dominate the internet

It's all about the algorithms. When Google first started up, in summer 1998, it quickly made its mark by being the internet's best, most efficient search engine. Now Google wants to know everything - all the knowledge contained on the world wide web, and everything about you as a computer user, too.

The key, at every step of the way, has been the methodology the company has used to catalogue and present information. The first stroke of genius that the company's founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, had while they were still in graduate school was to measure responses to an internet search not only by the frequency of the search word but by the number of times a given web page was accessed via other web pages. It was a revolutionary idea at the time, now copied by every one of their rivals.

A decade later, their technical brilliance is operating on an altogether more ambitious scale. Google is now a $150bn (£77bn) company and a seemingly unstoppable corporate, as well as technical juggernaut.

The big question, of course, is whether the idealism that first fired up Page and Brin can survive in a dirty corporate world where information is not just an intellectual ideal, but also a legal and political hot potato involving profound issues of privacy, intellectual property rights and freedom of speech. "You can make money without doing evil," runs one of their most celebrated mantras. Does that extend to signing a deal with China whereby its search functions will be subject to state censorship? The furore over that particular decision, made at the beginning of last year, still rages.

Google's activities thus touch on some of the key philosophical questions of our digital age. Because of its power and prominence, it will also be the benchmark by which we come to measure many of the answers.

Andrew Gumbel
Pages: prev1 ... 184 185 186 187 188 [189] 190 191 192 193 194 ... 310next