topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday December 22, 2025, 7:52 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 182 183 184 185 186 [187] 188 189 190 191 192 ... 364next
4651
MerleOne: how does it do it's job? Filter Driver, or filesystem notifications?
4652
Living Room / Re: which operating system you like most....
« Last post by f0dder on October 02, 2008, 02:26 AM »
Play during class? Kiddo, take your education seriously - trust me, you'll regret it if you don't.

My (first ever!) laptop should arrive today, btw. 2GHz Core2 P7350, 2gig ram, intel GMA X4500HD. Heck, the X4500 should even be powerful enough to play a few games... but not during class :)
4653
Living Room / Re: which operating system you like most....
« Last post by f0dder on October 02, 2008, 01:06 AM »
Hey, I'm a gamer, what can you say? :D
Buy a desktop computer that's actually suitable for games, and a lot cheaper? Wouldn't be surprised if you can get a decently powered desktop and a school/work laptop for the price of one of those "gaming laptops"... which tend to run like 30min max on battery :)
4654
Living Room / Re: which operating system you like most....
« Last post by f0dder on October 01, 2008, 05:32 AM »
Hm, Alienware laptop?

If somebody gave me one, I'd try to trade it in for cash. For laptops, I want lightweight, portable and long battery time... trying to cram in RAID and high-end GPUs in laptops just doesn't make sense :)
4655
Living Room / Re: which operating system you like most....
« Last post by f0dder on October 01, 2008, 01:02 AM »
That leads me to RAM. Why the **** would someone pay that much for "Apple Certified RAM"?? It's insane! Like $80 for a GB! And Microsoft even went and took this point and accelerated it with Vista's ReadyBoost - so you don't even need to "upgrade" anymore if you run Vista, just pop in a flash drive - $20 for the Apple cost of $160+.
-wreckedcarzz
I'm pretty sure you can install non-certified RAM in MAC, but you're obviously going to void your warranty if you open the box. And you can't compare ReadyBoost to adding more RAM, really. Seems to give mediocre results at < 2GB RAM, and more or less no advantage with >= 2GB. To be expected, though... RAM has several GB/s throughput, the fastest USB flashdrives are still, what, ~50MB/s or less?

You can't even change the time zone WITHOUT AN ADMINISTRATOR!!!
-wreckedcarzz
Can you do that on Windows? Even if you can, I'm pretty sure there's system policies that can be enabled that'll disable the feature - useful for public accessible machines, people always try to tamper with those.

The freaking Apple Menu! So you have to drag the (slow, one button) mouse all the way across that amazing 21" screen (at the speed of 600DPI) to get from your Macintosh HD icon, to your Apple Menu.
-wreckedcarzz
Can't the icon be moved? Can't you enable mouse acceleration? And can't you buy a n-button USB mouse and plug in? *rolleyes*

And the system crashes. Mac's are supposed to be this whole crash proof system - the hardware works oh-so elegantly with the hardware, and it is a seamless environment where the loly-flowers fly in the wind and peace comes to the world. Then you get this little caution alert saying "Interrupting this program may lock up the system." You can't do anything because IT IS ALREADY LOCKED UP!
-wreckedcarzz
Pre-OSX sucked because there was no real protection in the system... but does this also happen with OSX? I've only used Macs for very short periods of time at friends places etc., and I haven't had any crash experience (but oh, pre-OSX public machines... *b00m*, those were fragile).

I'm not an Apple fan, I think their design sucks and their hardware is overpriced. I also feel that OSX is somewhat dumbed-down, and the Mac attitude of "users are idiots" displease me. On top of that things obviously work differently than on Windows, but so does Linux and basically all other OSes. All in all, OSX does seem like a half decent OS, though - and definitely more polished than your usual lunix distros.
4656
4wd: I was thinking specifically about the mirror-driver automatic syncing mode, I can see a lot of potential for that behaving... interestingly... on bi-directional sync :)
4657
Not sure if it does - and I don't think it's the point of the application anyway (I can see how it would fit with the name, though :-\ ).The filter-driver mirroring method is darn useful though, and I haven't seen it in other apps...
4658
Living Room / Re: which operating system you like most....
« Last post by f0dder on September 30, 2008, 01:36 PM »
Or perhaps a limited-time MS offer?

I never looked too closely into the details, since I was already running XP64 at the time :/
4659
Living Room / Re: which operating system you like most....
« Last post by f0dder on September 30, 2008, 12:49 PM »
TucknDar: you might want to go for XUbuntu which uses the XFCE system - I've been told it's lighter than GNOME and KDE.
4660
Living Room / Re: 32-bit Windows and the dreaded (and misunderstood) 4GB RAM limit
« Last post by f0dder on September 30, 2008, 12:47 PM »
Hmm, address up to 16GB of RAM for a 32bit windows application?

That would require...
1) server edition of Windows, in order to use the physical RAM
2) the program utilizing the Address-Windowing Extensions API.

Funny enough the MSDN pages say the AWE API is available for client versions of Windows, which doesn't really make sense - unless they mean 64bit client versions. And it's a mess to use anyway, compared to pure clean 64bit goodness (people who coded in the 16bit DOS days and used XMS or EMS will likely agree :)).
4661
Living Room / Re: which operating system you like most....
« Last post by f0dder on September 30, 2008, 12:32 PM »
I thought it was free to move from 32bit to 64bit Vista? That you just had to contact MS and get your license key 'converted' or something along those lines?

(Probably can't upgrade the OS without a reinstall, though).
4662
General Software Discussion / Re: Insecure Blogging
« Last post by f0dder on September 30, 2008, 12:27 PM »
So, really not Microsoft's fault... except that they should warn when not connecting through HTTPS://...

Oh, and somebody beat up the guy who writes that blog until he makes links stand out from the rest of the text.

4663
BSD license is much less confusing than GPL, and is true freedom, not the twisted definition the GNU people have. GPL isn't free at all - sure, it keeps projects open and available, but not free...

Oh, and OSX isn't just based on BSD, but also on the Mach microkernel (which really has nothing to do with mac/apple), and stuff from Steve Jobs' failed NeXT project... just to set the record straight :)
4664
Living Room / Re: 32-bit Windows and the dreaded (and misunderstood) 4GB RAM limit
« Last post by f0dder on September 30, 2008, 10:53 AM »
For #3, I thought maybe the larger issue was making more memory available to ravenous apps. ('Sides, the topic's been sitting idle for a couple weeks and this is at least related.)[/url]
And it indeed does that, for applications that have been linked so that they are flagged as "aware" of large memory - and that could be useful for particular memory slugs - but it still doesn't fix the "more than 3GB blue on 32bit client Windows versions". (32bit server versions can utilize PAE to use more than 4gig physical, but still of course only 32bit address space per app).

Point taken about GPUs and the rest, but with a 256M graphics card it still leaves the other 3/4 gig for files & devices. (I'll have to do some more digging to see what a typical load would/should be.)
Keep in mind that the kernel address space is also used for various kernel-mode structures (there's a lot of those), drivers, et cetera. 512meg video cards are becoming common now, there's even 1-gig cards, and some people are running 512meg (or even 1gig >_<) cards in SLI. Quickly adds up. I dunno if cards reserve their full memory capacity of address space, but I wouldn't be surprised if they do!

I'm thinking about a somewhat specific use in making mem available for Adobe (audio/video) & other multimedia apps.
Could be useful. Iirc SQL server even uses the "address-windowing extensions" on 32bit server Windows, in order to be able to use more than 4GB physical memory (although in "chunks" or "windows").

Much smarter moving to 64bit though, it simplifies things a lot. I recall Adobe claiming they haven't ported stuff like Photoshop over to 64bit yet "because it doesn't bring significant improvements", but if that is an official Adobe statement, it's crap. I can certainly see their memory-hungry products benefit from being able to address more than 2GB (I wonder if their apps are large-address-space-aware?), and some of the compute-intensive plugins and filters for photoshop could probably benefit from the more & larger CPU registers x64 brings.

I install XP 32-bit on the machine and fired up and I now have 3Gb (less 256Mb) Graphics memory pretty much spot on. I could add a graphics card and disable onboard graphics and gain the extra 256Mb but it seems to work pretty well. This is the first time I have jumped above 2Gb and I was quite surprised to see Windows announce that PAE had been automatically enabled.
Windows should automatically turn on PAE if your CPU supports it, since PAE is required in order to use the CPU per-page no-execute bit... known as DEP under windows (yeah, there's some limited DEP for CPUs without NX-bit support). So it's not enabled PAE in order to utilize the memory, Microsoft intentionally crippled 32bit client versions of windows not to :)
4665
Living Room / Re: The Weeklies: 40
« Last post by f0dder on September 30, 2008, 05:48 AM »
Bigger headlines for each item, please, otherwise it looks pretty nice imho.
4666
Living Room / Re: which operating system you like most....
« Last post by f0dder on September 30, 2008, 01:14 AM »
Can you really think that $3K for a high quality tower is insane?
Yeah. That kind of cash should get you at least a quadcore with 8gigs of ram, GPU in the GeForce 8800 or better class, fast harddrives, high-quailty tower and powerful PSU.

When mentioning OS X, hardware and cash does come into the picture, since you're really limited to what Apple offers... unless you're building frankenmacs. Which Apple really really really doesn't want you to.
4667
Living Room / Re: 32-bit Windows and the dreaded (and misunderstood) 4GB RAM limit
« Last post by f0dder on September 30, 2008, 01:10 AM »
Drawbacks?

1) less address space for the kernel (including filesystem cache and mapped devices... considering how much memory modern GPUs map, this could become a problem).

2) only applications specifically linked with "large address-space aware" can take advantage of the larger address space, otherwise they get the normal 2:2 split. Not many applications benefit, anyway, obviously only those needing a lot of RAM.

3) it doesn't solve the problem at all, as it has absolutely nothing to do with the problem this thread is about :)
4668
General Software Discussion / Re: Conflicting results from Chkdsk -- Why?
« Last post by f0dder on September 28, 2008, 11:52 AM »
<pedantic>Command Prompt, not DOS window :P</pedantic>

for non-system volumes, you can do a "force dismount" (might mess up some running apps, so be careful!) - then you shouldn't get those discrepancies. But since you can't do that for the system volume, you do need the "run on next reboot".
4669
General Software Discussion / Re: Conflicting results from Chkdsk -- Why?
« Last post by f0dder on September 28, 2008, 10:48 AM »
Remember that your boot volume has changes all the time - think of how often the registry is modified.

It's quite possible that there's a filesystem change between the time CHKDSK reads some of the disk structures, and before it progresses to some of the deeper checks. So don't be too worried about the discrepancy when checking a volume that can't be locked exclusively.
4670
General Software Discussion / Re: How do incremental backup programs work?
« Last post by f0dder on September 28, 2008, 09:46 AM »
F0dder: thanks for the pointer to filter driver! I think that's pretty much what I'm looking for to monitor the changes to files, right?
Yup.

You could use a usermode filesystem change notification instead, but that only tells you "there's been changes in this folder" (or subfolder tree), then you need to scan the folder (or entire subfolder tree) for changes - and then you'd have to scan those files for updates.

So filter driver is definitely the way to go, since you get notified of each individual write.
4671
General Software Discussion / Re: How do incremental backup programs work?
« Last post by f0dder on September 28, 2008, 09:31 AM »
Block-level backups... that would have to either be closely integrated with the filesystem (could be done as a filter driver in Windows - see MirrorFolder, their (badly named) "RAID-1 mirroring" option does this (oh, and crosslink to this thread seems appropriate)). If you don't go for this kind of integration, you'd have to compare source/dest files to only backup changes, this could be very costly.

On linux I use rsnapshot, which is pretty nice - it has "last X {hours, days, weeks, months, years}" like the Apple TimeMachine, implemented through use of hardlinks (ie., minimal disk usage - doesn't have changed-blocks though, so a bit change in an 8gig file will still mean a new 8gig file). It's not super suited for backing up my workstation, though, since the backup machine "pulls from the client", instead of the "client pushing to the server".
4672
General Software Discussion / Re: Linux question - mount fs in Windows?
« Last post by f0dder on September 28, 2008, 09:17 AM »
Is the .3fs file a raw disk/partition image, or does QEMU itself add some structure information? That's pretty important... if it's raw, then you could use /dev/loop on linux to mount it, and theoretically the same could be done under windows (although the windows port of ext3fs probably only supports mounting partitions, not files).

Perhaps a usermode application like explore2fs supports opening files rather than partitions? (Haven't tried it, first google hit I found for "ext3 explorer").
4673
Developer's Corner / Re: Freelance coder wanted - I pay good.
« Last post by f0dder on September 28, 2008, 09:12 AM »
Hmm, "bots"?

You might want to elaborate a bit more on that. If it has anything to do with flooding, spamming or cheating in games, I'd feel pretty bad about DonationCoder having been "involved" in the recruitment.

Of course there's a lot of other things that "bots" can do, but "networked app" + "bot" without any further explanation triggers a lot of warning sirens in my head.
4674
General Software Discussion / Re: What are your opinions on fan-editing?
« Last post by f0dder on September 28, 2008, 08:40 AM »
The Dune movie is worth watching, and the atmosphere is pretty good. The aforementioned  changes still sadden/sicken me, though, as they're completely unnecessary, and ruin some of the really cool parts of Dune.

IMHO the later mini-series felt a lot truer to the universe, and I can live with minor slip-ups like forgetting to color people's eyes blue-in-blue in some scenes here and there. It also does show that the budget could have been bigger, and not all the actors are supergood++. But all in all it left me with a much better feeling than Lynch's Dune did :)
4675
General Software Discussion / Re: 'Everything' is one FAST file search engine
« Last post by f0dder on September 28, 2008, 08:34 AM »
If an application is initially written without unicode support, it can be a very nasty task supporting it later on... A fair amount of ansi<>unicode problems can be caught pretty easily (but requires boring manual fixes), but a lot of stuff requires manual walking through the codebase...
Pages: prev1 ... 182 183 184 185 186 [187] 188 189 190 191 192 ... 364next