topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday December 22, 2025, 9:40 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189 190 191 ... 364next
4626
General Software Discussion / Re: Monster Cables- The World should know!
« Last post by f0dder on October 08, 2008, 05:50 PM »
If I was stinking filthy rich, maybe I'd buy a B&O cd player and designer speakers because they look cool, but I'd still never buy audiophile interconnects or any of the other crap they peddle in Sterephile mag etc.
B&O look cool? :huh:

I'm Danish, so theoretically I should take pride in B&O, but I think it looks crappy. I always have, and probably always will, unless they change style radically. And like most designer stuff, it's overpriced and doesn't sound very nice. No, give me NAD simplistic to-the-point design and B&W speakers - cost effective, looks good, sounds good.
4627
Site/Forum Features / Re: Using Anchors Within Posts
« Last post by f0dder on October 08, 2008, 10:09 AM »
Nice, I had been wondering whether there was bbcode for this :)
4628
Living Room / Re: Tech News Weekly: 41
« Last post by f0dder on October 08, 2008, 10:07 AM »
Aaaaaaaaaaaw, that's got to be the cutest depiction of Cthulhu I've ever seen :-*
4629
General Software Discussion / Re: skype... how secure is it?
« Last post by f0dder on October 08, 2008, 04:57 AM »
Curt: are the conversations kept on skype's servers? O_o

I thought the actual voice communication was done peer-to-peer. If the conversations are logged, well... hm. Not my cup of tea.
4630
General Software Discussion / Re: skype... how secure is it?
« Last post by f0dder on October 08, 2008, 12:50 AM »
I wonder if the flaws mentioned here were ever fixed? I've always been wary of Skype. But if you stop it from running when not using it, and (if possible) run it with DropMyRights or similar, I don't think there's that much to worry about. I probably wouldn't talk about blowing up things through it, though :P
* f0dder polishes tinfoil hat
4631
Living Room / Re: How to enter code???? :)
« Last post by f0dder on October 07, 2008, 07:38 PM »
I think the far end of the keyboard we use at work is raised almost... 5cm, or so. But it's also arched up towards the middle, as well as being split. Trust me, It's Good For YouTM. Not the same keyboard as the one in 40Hz's post, but more or less same principle (although ours are more flexible).

You do need proper chair and table adjustments and sitting position before it's comfortable to use, though. But you need that anyway, unless you want to trash your body sitting 8+ hours in front of a computer every day. oh, and you need proper arm rest. If you don't have your entire lower arm supported on your desk, then that's not exactly good ergonomics either. You might not feel the effects now, but wouldn't it suck suffering from carpal tunnel and/or discus prolapse (dunno if that's the right English term) when you're 30?
4632
Living Room / Re: How to enter code???? :)
« Last post by f0dder on October 07, 2008, 07:19 PM »
wreckedcarzz: if you need to do a lot of typing, not just gaming, you'll eventually find that the ergonomic keyboard are much better for you. Does take a bit getting used to, but it pays off in reduced wrist strain and neck/shoulder pains...
4633
Living Room / Re: Tech News Weekly: 41
« Last post by f0dder on October 07, 2008, 06:14 PM »
Again, nice work - I already get a whole bunch of these news from various RSS feeds, but occasionally I miss a few. Besides, your posts can serve as a historical resource in the future :)

A small request: when an item has to do with an exploit, it would be nice if the particular exploit could be mentioned in your summary. For instance, the summary for #1 is veeeery vague and sensationalist-sounding, would've been nice if it included "defeats syncookie protection" (that way I would know, rather than guess, it was a new items I had already read :)).
4634
General Software Discussion / Re: Easy remote access to my home pc?
« Last post by f0dder on October 07, 2008, 05:50 PM »
You need to make sure the port isn't blocked by a firewall, you need to make sure the service is started (and iirc, you can only RDP to XP Pro setups, not home), and somewhere in System Properties you also need to tick a checkbox allowing remote desktop sessions.
4635
Living Room / Re: One answered question before you died
« Last post by f0dder on October 07, 2008, 11:13 AM »
If it really was any question that could be answered, imho that would require an all-knowing being, and thus asking questions like "does god exist" would be pretty much irrelevant. My own question would then be simply WHY?, and would cover all the whys. This probably isn't fair, though, since it is kind of more than a single question.

My question would then probably be along the lines of "Why do we have to go through all this pain and suffering?", again keeping the "all-powerful being" theory in mind, and thus deducing that there must be some reason behind it all.

If we step down from the metaphysical/close-to-religious stuff and have to phrase some much more concrete questions, I don't really know. I guess I'll have to ask whether we're considering that there's an afterlife, and the question is something you can have answered on your death-bed and will then reflect on in the afterlife... or if it's basically any question answered now, knowledge which can then be used until this meat-vessel can no longer sustain me?
4636
General Software Discussion / Re: The Vista Immersion Experiment
« Last post by f0dder on October 07, 2008, 10:20 AM »
Oh, forgot to mention: the laptop is made in a "soft touch" material - reminds me a bit of the rubbery wet-suit stuff. Pretty nice and comfortable to the touch. And the keyboard feels just right, I'm inclined to go hunting for a desktop keyboard with the same button resistance (though I'm afraid that means I'll have to shell out for one of those insanely expensive DiNovos).
4637
Living Room / Re: which operating system you like most....
« Last post by f0dder on October 07, 2008, 10:15 AM »
So... f0dder, has your new notebook arrived? What do you think of Vista? Inquiring minds want to know...  :)
I decided to make a new thread about it since the post got rather long, and I suspect I'll have more to say about Vista in the weeks to follow :)
4638
General Software Discussion / The Vista Immersion Experiment
« Last post by f0dder on October 07, 2008, 10:14 AM »
In response to Darwin in another thread, I decided to make this spinoff since the post got too long and off-topic-ish to put there.

So, up until now, my experience with Vista has been relatively limited. I've set up a couple of laptops for the museum, dealt with some minor and major frustrations, and that's basically it. So since I finally got a laptop (mark ye the historical date of October 2nd, 2008!) and needed to put an OS there, I decided to give Vista a proper spin. I've vowed to keep it on the laptop for at least the entire of October. Figured it'd only be fair to finally immerse myself in it, if I want to keep bitching at it.

So, laptop specs: Zepto Orion A15, 2048meg DDR2-800 RAM, 120gig 7200RPM harddrive, Intel GMA X4500HD graphics, 2.0GHz core2 duo P7350 CPU, Sata DVD-RW drive, Intel 5330AN Shirley Peak WiFi. All in all, a pretty sweet machine. Bluetooth makes it easy to sync my phone with MyPhoneExplorer, and it's nice having an SD card reader for grabbing photos from my camera and transferring MP3s to my Sandisk Sansa E280 (finally got an 8gig SD Micro card for it :D). I'm already finding myself using the laptop more than my workstation - gogogo reduced power consumption!

lap01.jpglap02.jpg

Yeah, the Zepto logo on the lid is lit. It's very discreet though, you only really notice it in a dark room... not like those obnoxious Mac apple logos :)

It has frozen a few times though, which I find a bit unsettling. Usually been related to things like using the card reader - I don't know if this is a Vista problem or it's a hardware issue. But there definitely was software Vista issues when the filesystem on the SD card from my camera... I'll eventually have to test with another OS, would suck if the hardware is flaky.

So... f0dder, has your new notebook arrived? What do you think of Vista? Inquiring minds want to know...  :)
Yeah, it arrived thursday (talk about waiting a looong time!). Didn't take long grabbing Vista64-business-SP1 from MSDNAA with 20mbit, and heck it almost took as long installing it (yeah, an exaggeration, but I had expected more of the new image-based install system).

I was shocked to see that the base install took up ~12 gigabytes :o. So I ran the ISO through vLite, and installed again, this time with a 32gig rather than 16gig system partition. Thankfully, the vLited install was down to 6gig, I can live with that I guess.

So... I've used Vista before, but this is the first time I "immense myself in it". My first impression is that "I can probably live with this", and it's less sluggish than I expected. Even though there's "only" 2 gigs of RAM in it, it's comfortable to use, and stuff in general doesn't feel bad. Visual Studio 2008 and Eclipse run fine. The Intel GMA X4500HD seems pretty capable as well, it can run HL2 in 1280x800 with full details pretty smoothly, Aero runs smoothly... mostly.

I don't understand why things like scrolling contact list in MSN and resizing columns feels so damn sluggish. The column-resize thing might be restricted to things like stuff from the control panel, though, and those are generally extremely sluggish to resize. So perhaps those things are written using WPF, and it's WPF that's a sloppy pig? Just guessing, but anything control-panel seems sluggish beyond belief.

The new explorer doesn't really get my fancy. I would probably be pretty darn frustrated if I had to use it, thankfully xplorer2 works fine under Vista. And wtf does a thing like the "Views" in explorer have a vertical slider next to it? O_o - it feels so dumb. Why can't I turn off the bar that has "Organize", "Views" (etc), and the big bar in the bottom that has selection details? At least I can't find any obvious ways to turn those off. So long live x^2!

It also sucks that it's "Aero or nothing" - you can't get a classic look but keep the Aero acceleration. I know there's hacks to use custom themes (WHY can't Microsoft just let third parties do custom themes without the hacky hoops?), and I'll look into that later, but it sucks sucks SUCKS that you're stuck with the pretty much sucky-looking and not very customizable Aero look if you want acceleration (and I do). Why can I no longer "Always show underline for hotkeys" as I could in XP? Why can't you tweak the color of the "selected item bar"? (I already bitched about this). Fortunately, x^2 can be customized, so I can actually see which files I have selected.

I do like the black taskbar though, and the new start menu layout is also pretty great. Still doesn't beat FARR, though!

When resuming from hibernate/standby/locked session, why doesn't the password editbox have keyboard focus?

Do standard fonts like Courier New look differently in Vista, or is it just me?

Consistent with the other Vista machines I've used, the graphics driver seems to crash fairly often, especially during an UAC screen-dimming thing. Sure, it's nice that the graphics driver now runs usermode and can auto-recover, but I get a feeling that the new graphics system by itself is less stable than XP was. Hopefully this matures with SP2 or Windows 7 ::)

I don't find UAC all that annoying, btw. Sure, I disabled it temporarily while setting up the machine, but once that's done, it's not that bad. I probably do mess around with system settings a bit more than the usual Vista user though, so the popups do annoy me a bit every now and then - IMHO it should be possible to elevate yourself for a time period like a couple of minutes, so you could do whatever administrative tasks with only one UAC popup.

More to follow.
4639
Living Room / Re: Help with vista business remote desktop
« Last post by f0dder on October 07, 2008, 03:19 AM »
40hz: telnet can be used to connect to ports other than 23, which is a quick-and-dirty way to test if you can connect to a given machine/service - more useful than taking down a firewall and pinging, since a firewall could easily block either ping or a specific service, but allow the other :)

Revalidating windows sounds like something worth trying.
4640
Living Room / Re: which operating system you like most....
« Last post by f0dder on October 07, 2008, 03:10 AM »
Why on earth would you want a Vista transformation pack for XP? Getting the useless glitz without the worthwhile kernel improvements? O_o

From what I heard, the MSI Wind computers pack a little more punch than the ASUS EEEs. Guy from school has an EEE, and it's pretty cute... but you don't want to use it for anything heavier than web browsing and some light office tasks. JAVA development, even the simple stuff at school, is a bit of a challenge.

PS: check out if your school is part of the MSDNAA program - that would be a pretty cheap :) way for you to get a legit Windows license.
4641
General Software Discussion / Re: Can You Run OS X on a Virtual Machine?
« Last post by f0dder on October 06, 2008, 08:22 PM »
No, the issue is that Apple uses the more modern EFI instead of a BIOS, once that is emulated then OS X boots as long as the hardware is supported.
If (U)EFI itself was enough, all you'd need would be a motherboard with (U)EFI support - there's already a few of those out there. The hacky USB device apparently does more than just provide (U)EFI support.

well, physical bloat in the sense of distributions needing many more kernel extensions, much more hardware enumeration and so on. i don't understand the low-down kernel secrets of how OS X enumerates hardware to know if it would be affected much, but I don't want to take risks! :-) My macbook always reliably boots in under 30 seconds and I want it to stay that way.
Shouldn't really be necessary - you only need slow enumeration for really old legacy devices. Other than that, you probe the PCI bus for vendor IDs - then you use those to load appropriate drivers. So it's not like you need to "test for a zillion devices that might not be present", you more or less simply use PCI vendors IDs to index a "database" of drivers.

You can run vanilla *or* custom kernels fine on any hardware IIUC (at least I ran both custom and vanilla kernels fine on my Dellintosh once EFI was emulated). I'm not sure which bits are AES encrypted, but the kernel itself is open-source and thus easly modified (which is what the hackintosh hackers do, download source from Apple and compile). Apple could be much more obstructive than they are, and if anything largely ignore the hackintosh community IMO. The Psystar case may change all that sadly.
Hm, you say "Dellintosh" - that would imply either using one of those pira... gray-zone torrents or manually modified installs, wouldn't it? I should go link-hunting for the info on the AES encryption and other weirdness being done in OS X. But from my memory of it, it seems like Apple has released only the bare minimum they need to in order to comply with the licenses from the projects they're using source from, not because they want to be open.

EDIT: I found the stuff I was thinking of - unfortunately, it's part of a book, so only part of it is online (hm, I think I read a longer part of it - either I remember wrong, or it was turned to book and snipped down later on). Anyway, it implies that certain apple applications are encrypted, and protected by kernel-mode code that does decryption. And from what I remember, the decryption key isn't located in the public available source code, and apple are jumping through hoops to try to make you unable to dump the decryption keys from memory... thus the little poem you get when you try to:
Your karma check for today: There once was was a user that whined his existing OS was so blind, he'd do better to pirate an OS that ran great but found his hardware declined. Please don't steal Mac OS! Really, that's way uncool. (C) Apple Computer, Inc.U??VWS?5P
.

Yeah, apple is open alright  :-\ :-\ :-\
4642
DC Gamer Club / Re: TIGSource Demake Competition Results
« Last post by f0dder on October 06, 2008, 07:02 PM »
What a cute idea! :D
4643
General Software Discussion / Re: Can You Run OS X on a Virtual Machine?
« Last post by f0dder on October 06, 2008, 05:42 PM »
Cult indeed.

A little anecdote: one of my friends was sitting at a uni lecture, wondering why the guy next to her was writing pen-and-paper notes when he had a bright and sparkly macbook pro next to him. When asked, he replied pretty much "Oh, I don't really like computers, and I don't know how to take notes on them". In other words, a richkid fanboy who only had the laptop as a status symbol.
* f0dder sighs.
4644
Post New Requests Here / Re: IDEA: Testing tool that fills up memory
« Last post by f0dder on October 06, 2008, 03:31 PM »
I'm thinking it might also be nice if it could fill up memory with a lot of smaller (empty?) files instead of one big one so that it would (theoretically) fill up the page file as well.
Huh? :huh:

Pagefile is utilized when you try to use more memory than is physically available in your system - it doesn't really have to do with "using files".

So it looks like this pretty much just eats virtual memory. Is there something that will eat up "physical" memory?
Nope, not really doable without writing a driver.

But iirc there's a boot.ini switch for limiting the amount of physical memory Windows will use - that's probably close enough to what you want. Yeah, obviously does require a reboot.
4645
General Software Discussion / Re: Can You Run OS X on a Virtual Machine?
« Last post by f0dder on October 06, 2008, 01:39 PM »
I thought OS X had artificial constricting to the hardware it will run on - which is why you have to either grab a pirate pre-patched torrent, do manual modification of OS files, or buy one of those new USB devices that do a lot of system hacking magic?

Apple would sink if it had to support the hardware diversity Windows does, and it would add a whole lot of bloat to the OS supporting such a convoluted mass of devices. So, in a selfish sense, I don't want OS X to end up being tied to endless legacy spaces for years as Windows is.
Why would it add bloat? Afaik OS X is pretty modular, so it would just be the addition of a few modules. On windows (and linux?) both ATI and NVidia support pretty much all their cards (except really old ones) via unified drivers...

As for other types of devices, you already have the need for the supporting "framework" (printer management, wlan management, sound management etc.) so all you need are relatively small individual driver modules - not entire "bloated" subsystems.

Apple isn't interested in making their system open - and it certainly isn't right now. AES-encrypting of modules, hiding the encryption keys, etc... that's in a sense even worse than Win64's patchguard. At least patchguard's justification (apart from protection DRM subsystems) is making exploits harder. Apple's system? To prevent people from running custom kernels.
4646
Coding Snacks / Re: Managing tasks / windows like real time strategy games
« Last post by f0dder on October 06, 2008, 08:59 AM »
Sounds like it could actually be pretty useful - I, too, find that multiple virtual desktops never really worked very well for me. But something along your ideas might, and it could probably be implemented just fine as a third-party utility :)
4647
General Software Discussion / Re: Can You Run OS X on a Virtual Machine?
« Last post by f0dder on October 05, 2008, 08:40 AM »
OS X can be run in a virtual machine, but it's unsupported and you probably need to hack around in the same way as if you were running a frankenmac. Too bad that Apple actively tries to constrict OS X to only run on their "official hardware".
4648
Living Room / Re: Virus/Worm attacks - are they getting worse?
« Last post by f0dder on October 02, 2008, 07:20 PM »
I find no script to be perhaps the single most annoying piece of software ever to be on my computer, I was forever trying to configure the thing to let me see sites I wanted to see, I gave up, life's too short.
Annoying? Indeed. And if you're impatient, you might end up whitelisting everything, removing the benefit of NoScript. Also, you could end up on a legitimate and whitelisted site... which has been hacked. But imho the added security is worth the hassle.

EDIT: personally I prefer ABP to AM - dunno why exactly, but I prefer not dealing with winsock hooking and only having my web browser filtered. Dunno which one is most likely to have "slips", but I haven't been hit with malware for several years. I guess running x64 also helps reduce some attack vectors - the browser + flash is still 32bit, and that probably is the main attack vector.
4649
Living Room / Re: Virus/Worm attacks - are they getting worse?
« Last post by f0dder on October 02, 2008, 06:31 PM »
Are you behind a NATing router? (without DMZ and with sensible forwarding rules!)
Do you have XP's firewall enabled?
Do you use firefox+adblockplus+noscript?

If you answer yes to all the above, you shouldn't get malware... unless something's really really wrong.
4650
Stoic Joker, I agree fully with you - and hopefully that's going to be the direction the museum works now. I couldn't have talked them into it if it wasn't for the museum fusion/merger thingy, thuogh, hence why the original post (before that fusion was planned).
Pages: prev1 ... 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189 190 191 ... 364next