topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Tuesday November 11, 2025, 11:03 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 ... 114next
451
Living Room / Re: A change I've seen in the forum
« Last post by J-Mac on March 16, 2012, 04:45 AM »
I personally prefer 20 lashes.

 :)  ;D  Yeah - but some might actually like this more!  LOL!  (This one should be worth a good pic! Or is that too OT?!)

Jim
452
Living Room / Re: A change I've seen in the forum
« Last post by J-Mac on March 16, 2012, 04:43 AM »
Well I have ready solution for controlling the 'off topic' messages.

Give a link 'Off topic' at bottom of each message, beside 'Report to moderator', which will notify the moderator, who will check and make the message 'yellowish' or something, so that everyone knows it from the rest. Just like inserted ads in search results.

Then ones who do not like it will skip it or give it a glance. It will also make the poster of the message to be more on the topic next time.

Regards,

Anand


And who will make such a determination? Sounds like this would make it very subjective as well as exclusionary.

I vote   :down:  on this one!

Thanks!

Jim
453
Living Room / Re: A change I've seen in the forum
« Last post by J-Mac on March 15, 2012, 12:04 PM »
I think that this has always been the case in Living Room, though perhaps I am wrong. I don't believe I have seen this in the other sub-forums. However if it is bothering other members - as it certainly seem
s to be - then maybe I'm just not seeing it.

Thanks!

Jim

(Posting from an Android again, but this time using the Dolphin browser! )
454
Living Room / Re: Why I Pirate - An Open Letter to Content Creators
« Last post by J-Mac on March 14, 2012, 11:59 AM »
Nope, it was your comment in the post just above mine, quoted here:

Perhaps people ignore the morality of the situation because they don't realize there is a moral issue at all.

@J-Mac - umm...Jim? You might want to check again. That was Deozaan's comment. Not mine. ;) 8) His post is what's directly above yours. :P ;D

What 40hz really wanted to say! :-))



-Ed

-----------------

.
.
.
Perhaps people ignore the morality of the situation because they don't realize there is a moral issue at all.


Onward! :Thmbsup:

Ouch! So sorry 40hz!  (That's what I get for posting from that damn Android browser! Site don’t look the same, formatted for the mobile browser; I miss on most of the tiny buttons and links with large finger aiming for miniscule buttons; etc.)

Heck, the reason I took so long to post back was because I decided to wait till I got back to a real computer! (Wanted to make sure you posted this one!!)

Thanks!

Jim
455
Living Room / Re: Why I Pirate - An Open Letter to Content Creators
« Last post by J-Mac on March 13, 2012, 10:34 AM »
I can't accept that 40hz. "Normal" humans still have that thing we call a conscience, and it still tends to give a twinge when you ignore it. I still see that in young people whom you would think don’t have one. Of course it has been posited by more than one psychologist and psychiatrist that corporate CEOs have a higher incidence of psychopathy than the general population, so that may account for a lack of moral consideration when making such decisions as described above.

Jim

@J-Mac - I'm sorry, but you lost me there. What is it I said that you're responding to?  :huh:

My entire point is that there is no such law that requires a corporation, by law, to put making a profit above all other considerations in its day to day operations. And furthermore, in actual practice (since reality so often diverges from what the law says) acting in a manner that goes against the public good is generally frowned upon by the judicial system and the public at large. And arguing for doing wrong in the name of profit is not accepted as an absolute defense in any legal context I'm aware of. Which indicates (to me at least) that individuals and society do have a conscience and underlying moral framework that goes beyond the letter of the law.

Was it possibly somebody else's comments you were responding to? :)

Nope, it was your comment in the post just above mine, quoted here:

Perhaps people ignore the morality of the situation because they don't realize there is a moral issue at all.

Sorry for not quoting you in the previous post but I was on either my iPad or new and weird Android "Thinks it's smart" phone, so I was trying not to confuse the darned device! I just don’t think that there are many persons at all who truly don’t feel that twinge when they are ignoring the morality of an issue. And the ones who do are usually damaged in another way - emotionally, mentally, or maybe they are just new on this planet.   ;)  :)

Jim
456
Living Room / Re: Why I Pirate - An Open Letter to Content Creators
« Last post by J-Mac on March 12, 2012, 09:13 PM »
I can't accept that 40hz. "Normal" humans still have that thing we call a conscience, and it still tends to give a twinge when you ignore it. I still see that in young people whom you would think don’t have one. Of course it has been posited by more than one psychologist and psychiatrist that corporate CEOs have a higher incidence of psychopathy than the general population, so that may account for a lack of moral consideration when making such decisions as described above.

Jim
457
Living Room / Re: Why I Pirate - An Open Letter to Content Creators
« Last post by J-Mac on March 10, 2012, 12:32 PM »
db90h, you talk as if software pirates invented the rootkit! Please try to remember exactly WHO first introduced most of the public to the "joys" of rootkits!

(Hint: Not to mention Sony BMG by name... -Oops! - but could it have been an overbearing corporation claiming to protect their copyrighted material?? So much for blaming pirates, db90h!)

Jim

In all fairness, I don't think it's all that relevant who may or may not have invented the rootkit. Or who first attempted to deploy one. It's still unacceptable no matter who did it, when they did it, or for what purpose. Rootkitting someone is wrong.

So let's not get too bogged down in finger pointing or arguing 'tit for tat' and "You're another!" This is too important an issue to allow ourselves go off on tangents.
 :)

Sorry 40hz, but with comments like the following dl90h is briefly explaining what rootkits are and then intimating that software pirates are the main cause of it - with all CAPS even! Just thought I would educate back a bit.

Jim

Yes, some of this malware is extremely sneaky. Ever heard of a rootkit? These guys controlling massive botnets have hundreds of thousands of PCs under their control, and the PC owners have no idea they are infected. Rootkits make it near impossible to remove or detect the malware. I am sure there are safe pirated software out there, and I'm not trying to scare people, this is just the truth. Your machine could be infected for years and you never have any idea that it's used in DDoS attacks, or whatever other nefarious purpose the botnet owner desires.

I am not MAKING UP the fact that I have SEEN and ANALYZED with my OWN EYES pirated software that installs fine, seems to work fine, but comes with an extra surprise -- a permanent rootkit infection (or other type of malware). The user never has any idea. Not ALL pirated software is infected, but this is one of the largest vectors of spreading malware. That is fact, not a scare tactic.

458
I even set the Public Network settings to the same as Private - I know; just testing it - and it still will not allow file access to/from in either direction. These two are both wired to the router. Good thing I still have a damn healthy head of hair so I can afford all this pulling out of my hair!

Jim
459
Well, it still isn't working here. And forget the talk about Homegroup - I am completely spent on that and will not use it. There always seems to be something I can't access with it. Look, disability often constrains me to one spot in the house for periods of time, yet I am who has to manage all aspects of all computers at any given time. (Depends on how many of the kids are visiting and connected.) We have four boxes ourselves. I CAN get to them all but it really ain't easy! And it never fails with Homegroup that even though I supposedly have complete access when I need to do something it refuses me access to that directory/file/ or whatever. Don’t want NO HomeGroup 'round here!!

And now this damn network is asking me for User and password info - even though "Password protected sharing" is set to "Off" on all computers! This is straining my brain ....  :'(

Jim
460
Living Room / Re: Why I Pirate - An Open Letter to Content Creators
« Last post by J-Mac on March 10, 2012, 11:35 AM »
db90h, you talk as if software pirates invented the rootkit! Please try to remember exactly WHO first introduced most of the public to the "joys" of rootkits!

(Hint: Not to mention Sony BMG by name... -Oops! - but could it have been an overbearing corporation claiming to protect their copyrighted material?? So much for blaming pirates, db90h!)

Jim
461
No, I need access to all Carol, and HomeGroup can't do that.

Jim
462
Are you using the same account names and passwords on every computer? If not that might solve the problem or in Windows 7 turn off password protected sharing.
-Carol Haynes (March 09, 2012, 11:48 AM)

Carol, I currently have password protected sharing turned off, though I did try it with that on and created identical user accounts on each box, but to no avail - still wouldn’t allow access.

I think 40hz is correct in that I need to scrap it and start over... again.  (Fifth or sixth time now).

40hz, all in that Microsoft article has been gone through with a fine tooth comb; my settings are correct. BTW, this is not with mixed versions. The two main machines are Windows 7, one Professional and one Home Premium, and they cannot access each other's files. Oh, and naturally Microsoft's only advice for Windows 7 to Windows 7 isw top use the HomeGroup, which I can't do, mainly because it sucks but also because I need to access more than the pittance you can dump into the HomeGroup's "public" share folders.

Why Microsoft must make networking such a monster is beyond me - other than the fact that they are just being dicks like always. All the permissions, LSA, and other shit they force on us is of no use whatsoever if you are networking your own damn computers! What, I'm protecting me from me? Why not have a setting where if you are using only your own computers in your own network in your own damn home, that setting up the network and sharing is simple like it was five years ago on XP and prior versions. I don’t need all the access control crap for myself. Ahh, why do I bother to complain?

Thanks!

Jim
463
Living Room / Re: Apple & book publishers may be sued for price fixing
« Last post by J-Mac on March 09, 2012, 12:21 PM »
^LOL!! Great pic 40hz!!

Thanks!

Jim
464
Living Room / Re: Why I Pirate - An Open Letter to Content Creators
« Last post by J-Mac on March 09, 2012, 12:14 PM »
There was a time when I would have condemned that article. That time is long past. Personally I have never used any pirated software except one - and I still use that one today. (More on that later...) Also I haven't downloaded music or movies illegally. But... I no longer feel as strongly against such things as I did before. The entertainment industries have become so nasty, so overbearing, that I actually enjoy articles like the one linked above. I root for the pirates - they are now my "home team". I am disgusted by the graft paid to pass laws like SOPA, ProtectIP, and so-called treaties like ACTA. I am even more disgusted by the thousands of lawsuits by RIAA and MPAA. Not sure why but I seem to take all of that personally. At some point I imagine that I too will finally feel that last straw as my back breaks and start downloading anything and everything I possibly can!

I said earlier that I have never used pirated software with one exception. That exception is a piece of medical software for CPAP machines that was once available to consumers from Respironics. However they never allowed updates and eventually stopped making it available to non-medical professionals. So that software has become a standard download for almost anyone using a CPAP machine. I still must download pirated updates every time one is released. I don’t feel the least bit guilty about this as the software is not available otherwise. All other software that has ever been on a computer of mine has been purchased, is donationware, or is freeware (in which case I always donate if I find it useful and continue using it). Regarding music and movies, I did download roughly 60 or 70 tracks from Napster before the lawsuit. All were either TV show themes or similar cuts that weren't available any other way. Movies? Every movie I have at home is from a DVD I purchased, though I do rip each and every DVD to a hard drive and strip out the warnings and previews. No way I intend to keep that crap on any DVD I rip! I also subscribe to Netflix (streaming only now) and I have Amazon Prime for more movies.

Has DRM ever bitten me? Of course - I don’t know if anyone can honestly say it hasn’t gotten them at some point. A two-hour video I downloaded - an instructional video - had DRM and required a password to be entered every time it was started. I watched about 45 minutes and then when I tried to continue later it would not take the password. No help at all from the vendor. I finally was sent an email from another person who had purchased it and experienced the same problem. It said that I had to use the original WMP 9.0 - no updates at all and no newer versions. It instructed users to uninstall WMP and find somewhere to download the original, virgin WMP 9.0. They had stopped sending out that solution by the time I had contacted them. (2 years later I was speaking with a new owner of that company and he sent me that video in DVD format along with several others. But two years?) I also lost the use of about 2,000 music tracks I had ripped from my own CDs. I subscribed to Rhapsody for about a year, the service where you can't download any tracks but just listen to them. It was cheap - through Comcast - and once I had become disabled my computer was the only place I ever listened to my music. So that was OK until Rhapsody apparently ran into some pirating problems, real or perceived, I don’t know, but I had to install several updates because the previous one was screwing up my machine. (A problem for everyone, not just me). The anti-pirating software baked into their player was messing all manner of computers up. So I dropped the subscription. My problems arose with WMP 11 or 12 - not sure which. Rhapsody allowed you to build a database of your preferred music from which you could make playlists, etc. All the tracks stayed on their server; users could just listen to them with this subscription. Also, Rhapsody scanned your computer and listed all tracks found in the database so you could listen :-\ to them on their player too. About a year or so after I uninstalled Rhapsody, WMP (11 or 12) refused to play any of the songs that were ripped from MY DVDs but were listed in the Rhapsody database, saying that I must have the Rhapsody player installed so that WMP could check to see if I needed a license for those tracks or not. Bullshit! Rhapsody had apparently tagged my tracks in a way that Microsoft wasn’t sure if they were mine or not. I have all the CDs but I really didn't feel like re-ripping them all. But that's what I had to do, because I could not find a way to "clean" the Rhapsody info from the tracks, and so many damn players use the WMP engine and thus also refused to play the tracks.

As someone who always purchased my music, movies, and software this stuff has been niggling at me over the last five or six years....

Too tired to continue bitching - I'll bitch more later.   :Thmbsup:

Thanks!

Jim
465
Computers show up fine. The directories that are shared with "Advanced Sharing" show up on each computer. But apparently the permissions don’t allow any computer to access any shared folders on any other computer. Settings are fine - I have gone over them with every and anybody who has taken a look at them. I have looked at the same settings on other home networks where all is working well. Settings are the same yet access is not there.

As for why? How the hell do I know!!? First time I have ever had a problem with networks! Don’t get me wrong - I have had problems in the past where I had to use all the old tricks like NetBEUI over TCP, etc. but that was in past versions. No one seems to have to do that with Windows 7. I have read a few articles about how the "permissions" in Advanced Sharing - which grants them to "Everyone" - don’t affect the true permissions way down deep in the OS, but I didn't want to start banging around in areas with which I was not that familiar.

Thanks!

Jim
466
40hz, thank you for all that info!! Sounds like a very good starting point for me to get moving and learn this stuff.   :)

I need to do something because although I used the very first generation Mac (it was Macintosh back then!), as well as its short-lived predecessor, LISA, I hadn't used any Apple equipment since then - unless you want to count the Apple Newton handheld against me! Until I was given an iPad 2 for my birthday two months ago by my dear wife. And though that device truly excels as far as the form of the hardware goes, the OS is extremely frustrating. I haven't jail-broken it yet because as of last month no one had released a method to do that for the iPad 2; only a bastardized 1st gen iPad jailbreaking program that was being reported as really buggy. But based on how iOS handles file organization, keeping it all hidden from the user, I don’t want to think about moving to Apple hardware full-time.

And while Windows 7 has plenty of good features going for it, Microsoft still gives me fits whenever it wants to! (I STILL cannot get a standard, old-fashioned home network to allow file sharing between the damn computers in my house!! Not that PITA HomeGroup crap, but a regular Workgroup-based network.) Don’t know if Linux will get along with me any better but I need to learn it and try it.

Thanks again!

Jim
467
Well, time to read up on Linux, though I have to say that all the talk of about 800 gazillion "distro's" along with which does what well but not this or that - has been what has kept me away for the most part.

Or... damn - never though I would ever type something like this - if it comes down to a choice between Microsoft and Apple, I can tell you now that Apple wins in that race. Microsoft would be the traitor AND newcomer to this business while Apple has been doing it all along.

Jim
468
General Software Discussion / Re: Program Files or Program Files (x86)?
« Last post by J-Mac on March 08, 2012, 11:41 AM »
I have been using a new 'puter running Windows 7 64-bit since January and I notice that the majority of the programs I have installed are in the (86) folder. Doesn’t much matter to me as long as they all work fine.

Jim
469
I had the Standard version from GAOTD a few years ago and subsequently upgraded to Pro. But when v.6 was released I declined to purchase it. I really didn't like the "improvements" and I also wasn’t thrilled with the development at that time. I haven't kept up with it so I can't really say where it is now, but since they have decided to include crapware hidden in their "Full" installation package, I wouldn’t recommend this to anyone.

(According to raymond.cc, it apparently doesn’t just try to install "Reg Organizer" but it also throws in something called "The Babylon Toolbar" just for shits and giggles. Nice...)

Jim
470
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: DrawPlusX5 50% on BDJ
« Last post by J-Mac on March 08, 2012, 11:08 AM »
Hey 40hz, this appears to be more like Xara and other pure graphics programs, correct? Not one for creating flowcharts, floor plans, etc. I could use something to replace eDraw Max and have been keeping an eye out for something, but this is not in the same ballpark methinks.

Thanks!

Jim
471
Living Room / Re: The conflict of interest that is Google
« Last post by J-Mac on March 05, 2012, 09:09 PM »
Two somewhat non-relevant points:

First...
Keep in mind it is only the ability of a deceiver in using the lie to keep the deceived believing the deceiver is to be trusted which allows the deceiver to deceive the deceived with the lie.  Once the truth is known by the deceived the power of the deceiver and the lie is nullified and the deceiver loses any credibility.  In other words, a lie only has power while the deceiver can keep the deceived believing the deceiver is to be trusted.  Google succeeds in continuing to keep the "searcher"  believing "Google is your friend."

Huh? I tried reading through that series of sentences a second time but then decided I'd rather play on Braingle and work on their brain-teasers there; those are more fun!

Second, I looked at your "Google Knol" article Iain and I did try to read it, honest! But I kept drifting off every time I got past Lord Krishna chatting with Arjun... especially when I got to the part where we are losing our Ahamkara - I think?! I suppose I might just be losing my attention span rapidly as I grow older - apparently at or near the speed of light.

Basically, I think I am just too darned tired to understand any of what the heck you guys are talking about.   :huh:   :-\

Oh, and BTW - looks like Google is ending the whole "Knol" thing, unfortunately. You probably know that but I just found out.   :(

Thanks!

Jim
472
LOL!  It is really tough to eliminate them all!   :P

Jim
473
Oohhh, be prepared for a LOT of clicking!

Jim
474
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Photo watermark software giveaway
« Last post by J-Mac on February 27, 2012, 11:49 AM »
Don’t know how well this one works, but I have found that many leave a pretty ugly area in place of the watermark. I understand there are some really good ones that extrapolate what data would/should fill in the area where the watermark was removed but many of these just fill the area with a lot of similarly colored pixelation.

Jim
475
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: RightNote PRO 50% off
« Last post by J-Mac on February 22, 2012, 09:43 PM »
Decisions, decisions....

I want to get it but at $30 is it worth it to me? With all the Notes apps I have? After all, I bought ZuluPad Pro and, well, it's somewhere around here I think. After buying and working with it, I realized that I have no use for it. Then there is TreeDBNotes Pro - bought that too, and though I go back to it more often than ZuluPad (which is easy because I NEVER use ZuluPad!), I can't really find any use for it in what I do. I still mostly use Evernote and OneNote 2010 (Though they just HAD to add the damn ribbon crap to it. Sorry but OneNote has never had enough menu selections to warrant using a ribbon instead. Now I am on the Insert tab because that's where you must add a table from, and... damn! Can't change the font size from here.. let me go to that other tab... eenie, meenie, minee, mo...  Grrr!

AllMyNotes looks like it has a lot of potential, but I was looking for something that might become mature BEFORE my lifespan is over.

If RightNotes was a nice simple <$20 it would be done and I wouldn’t even be posting this. But for some reason once a software title hits that $30 mark - or essentially $30 - the brakes in the software-purchasing module of my brain get slammed on. Gotta figure out what nerve-ending is doing that!

Oh hell, just buy it!  (No, don’t you dare!),   Bull - buy the damn thing!!  (No, no... pleaseeeee!) ....

Tune in tomorrow to see where this ends up...

Jim
--
"I am getting so tired of slitting the throats of people who say that I am a violent psychopath."
Pages: prev1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 ... 114next