topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday November 10, 2025, 3:55 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23next
451
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Release: JottiQ
« Last post by worstje on December 31, 2010, 02:57 PM »
Well, that's when I'll be asleep, so this will have to do.  :-\
452
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / NANY 2011 Release: JottiQ v1.0.0
« Last post by worstje on December 31, 2010, 02:12 PM »
With 2 hours and 50 minutes left according to the clock on my corner of this giant egg, I present the official v1.0.0 release of JottiQ.


Readme.txt and all the other good stuff can be found in the topic start.

The best wishes for 2011 everyone, and have a Happy New Year DonationCoder! :)
453
Living Room / Re: Happy New Year & NANY Deadline Day!
« Last post by worstje on December 31, 2010, 01:22 PM »
You too!
454
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Release: Cautomaton
« Last post by worstje on December 31, 2010, 12:49 PM »
Sadly, I need to announce I won't be getting around to making a new release anymore, at least not for as far NANY 2011 deadlines are concerned. I intend to work on it in 2011 though, and take care of the outstanding issues when time becomes available, but between this and JottiQ, the latter just took way more time. Hell, it needs way more polish by nature.

I don't think the lack of a newer release from v0.8.3 will be a problem though, as the one feature that was missing is something mouser already has a solution for. (He was the one to request the app as a coding snack in the first place after all!) So hereby please consider v0.8.3 the official entry for NANY 2011.

.. And yes, JottiQ v1.0.0 will be arriving soon. :)
455
Official Announcements / Re: DonationCoder.com NEW SERVER ACTIVATED Dec 17, 2010
« Last post by worstje on December 31, 2010, 11:10 AM »
I just ran across this link elsewhere on the forums, and since I see some sort of placeholder page, I assume the server migration might not have transfered that one properly. It might be nice to fix it. (it is the NANY page for 2007, the inaugural year.)
456
Developer's Corner / Re: Any EASY Windows Forms Skin Kits for C#?
« Last post by worstje on December 31, 2010, 05:47 AM »
Just my two cents: skin kits are overrated and the bane of the normal user.

It means you have to relearn an interface. That it looks different from the rest of your OS. That it acts different. If you are colorblind, maybe the new colours make the interface unusable. If you're fully blind, there's a good chance your screenreader ceases working. And if you are a poweruser, there's a good chance you'll get really piffed with all the extra memory and sluggishness the skin brings along, as it is never going to be as good as what the OS offers by default.

I think that as long you make sure to use the Visual Themes support Windows offers (as opposed to the old Windows Classic look) you have made it look more than pretty enough.
457
There's tons of those comparing tools. You'll probably have more luck finding freeware tools if you look for the word diff.
458
Drats, that topic title got my hopes up good just now. I never saw this topic 6 months ago. Ah well! :)
459
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Pledge: "VeggieWorld" - Children's Game
« Last post by worstje on December 29, 2010, 11:52 AM »
I am afraid I know of nobody like that. :) On my pc, I get results going back upto a few weeks though, so let's be hopeful. Keep us informed, okay? :)
460
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Pledge: "VeggieWorld" - Children's Game
« Last post by worstje on December 29, 2010, 12:05 AM »
CodeTrucker, it might not be too late yet! :tellme:

On recent Windows versions when you are using a disk with NTFS, Windows has built in 'past versions' support. Rightclick the file in Explorer, and choose Restore previous versions, or alternatively go to Properties and look at the Previous versions tab.

If might not have your newest changes, but it should have some version of your code at least.
461
Living Room / Re: Cute jokes' thread
« Last post by worstje on December 28, 2010, 12:50 PM »
kinda NSFW typography joke
Yo momma's kerning is so fucked up all her hyperlinks say "dick here".

462
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by worstje on December 28, 2010, 09:32 AM »
Just tested a few more platforms (though not requested, but I have them hanging around in VMWare)
Windows Server 2003 R2 32 bit: After installing all prerequisites it all works fine, but there is no Icon displayed in the context menu. But that's a W2K3 setting, AFAIK.
Windows Server 2008 R2 64 bit: Same prerequisited, and the Icon is shown as expected.

Awesome, thank you for the tests. I didn't expect to have someone test it at so many OSes. :)
As you already know (but I think it is nice to share with the rest of DC) I have fixed the issue regarding the icon on the post-XP, pre-Vista Windows varieties.
463
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by worstje on December 28, 2010, 08:14 AM »
Ath, if you come to IRC, we can talk there. I think it'll talk a bit more easily in regards to the setup stuff and such. :)
464
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by worstje on December 28, 2010, 06:07 AM »
That's awesome, thank you for the assist. :Thmbsup:
465
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by worstje on December 28, 2010, 05:02 AM »
Ah yeah, that must be it. It needs the VC runtime and .NET framework v4. I am pretty sure I compiled for the Client Profile, although I might be wrong, and will check it at some point later. I don't compile my things statically out of performance considerations. Just to have the links here:

466
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by worstje on December 27, 2010, 11:23 PM »
worstje, to fix number 2 on your Known Issues list, have a look at AppMutex in the fine Inno Setup helpfile. There's also the CheckForMutexes support function, might you want to check it from some Code.
And here is a way to create it in C# (for if you didn't know).

Yeah I know of it. I already use OpenThreadWaitHandle or something along that name (Winapi: CreateEvent) for my single-instance functionality, but it doesn't appear as if Inno supports checking for such a thing... which is a rather annoying thing, I might say. I might have to add a mutex too, but then I'll have '3' things meant for single instance stuff: Mutex, CreateEvent and the COM IDropTarget local-server I use to handle the shell extension.

Just tested JottiQ 0.9.5 on Vista 32 bit.
Guess Vista doesn't like the shell extension, because it's not showing in the context menu of Explorer, or at least not for the files I tried it with. I'll do an uninstall/reinstall to see if I accidentally unchecked that option. [...] And that didn't help a bit, neither when checking the 'Explorer Integration affects All Users' option, so that might need a fix. Vista's UAC is turned off, btw.
This worked fine on 2 of my Win7 x64 setups, one with UAC in it's default setting and one with UAC turned off.

Finally, a Vista user! I've been trying like crazy to have someone test on Vista. :) I am surprised it does not work on Vista - it works on XP, it works on 7, you'd expect it to deal fine with the halfway point. Is it the 32-bit or 64-bit variety, or had you got the ability to try on both OSes?

If you run JottiQ and use the Settings window to enable/disable the shell extension, does it add a shield to the OK button? (Or when clicking OK ask for elevation for that matter.) If it does, you are using it for the entire machine. For now though, let's avoid any and all UAC issues and focus on the 'explorer integration affects all users' setting being turned OFF as it is by default. (If you simply extract the .7z archive, that is the 'mode' you end up using.)

Assuming you can't get the shell extension to activate through the Settings screen either, open up a dosbox, browse to the JottiQ directory, and type:

regsvr32.exe JQcm32.dll

(If you've got 64-bit, you'll want to do the same for the other dll file as well.) It will pop up that it succeeded, or it will throw an error in your face. If it does the latter, I'd be very interested in the error in question.

Also tested JottiQ 0.9.5 on WinXP 32 bit, but it has the same issue with the context menu as Vista 32 bit has, so it's most likely that that little bugger (the shellextension that is) doesn't behave as it should.
The advantage is that it doesn't want to reboot after a successful uninstall :D

The shell extension _should_ work on XP. :( I've tested it to death myself. Can you explain what you did exactly? Maybe something else went wrong somehow.

I can't remember the exact namespace now, but I've easily implemented detection of all running processes in past projects - just a few lines of code.  Must be easily found on search engines, or I wouldn't have been able to do it ;)

I'll look into it then; if it is as simple as you say it is worth digging into. Some things I expected to be simple as pie ended up taking full days though, so you can see why I am hesitant in committing to the idea.
467
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by worstje on December 27, 2010, 01:42 PM »
Nice idea. Not sure how to implement it though, as .NET gives such relatively low-tech things little importance, and as might be imagined, I don't have 24/4 to work on it the coming few days. I gotta scramble as-is to get JottiQ ready for its final NANY v1.0.0 release.
468
Developer's Corner / Re: Need help from Inno Setup gurus
« Last post by worstje on December 27, 2010, 01:17 PM »
Shouldn't you have said desktop icon listed in the [Icons] section?

You can simply use:

IconFilename: "{app}\myicon.ico"

to change the icon used for such an icon.
469
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by worstje on December 27, 2010, 12:59 PM »
i still dont like the fact that the menu is not going to be fully visible for people without big screens.
changing some of the menu icons+labels to just small icons would fix.
or as i suggested earlier moving the per-item ones to bottom.

After christmas, I intend to focus on the UI and texts and such that I asked peoples opinions on before. I just haven't gotten around to incorporating those details yet. :)

also, i think a right-click for an item and choosing "perform a google search for this filename" would also be nice.

I'll give it a long hard thought. I like the idea - just not sure I like the implied consequences. Why google, why not bing? Make it configurable? Why not add multiple search engines? Why not directly index into some virus/security related sites?

Maybe I am overthinking it, but as you write above: the UI isn't fully visible atm, and I need to remove some labels and re-organize as it is. If I add features, I have to wonder about more things. And drastic UI changes aren't up for grabs simply due to the deadline at this point, so I am focusing on small and really managable and low-impact stuff right now. The sort of feature that has a cascade of other feature requests following almost as a direct consequence... it's the kind of slippery slope that are all over the streets outside my house already. :D
470
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by worstje on December 27, 2010, 12:55 PM »
Would be nice to have an "Uninstall" entry in the start menu group.

I gave this a long hard thought actually. Most applications nowadays do not do that anymore. It seems kinda pointless - if you want to 'start' an app, you likely don't want to remove it. I know that back in the day, I personally got annoyed as hell when I misclicked and it went 'want to go uninstall?'

Were I to compare an uninstall to a stupid Readme, I think the latter would get more (intentional) attention than the uninstaller ever would. But maybe I'm just an oddball in that regard.
* worstje is still annoyed by the by about the fact that shell extensions can't be properly told to be unloaded to explorer.exe. :-(
471
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Pledge: cursor mover (hider)
« Last post by worstje on December 27, 2010, 12:24 PM »
I think Ath's point is that there might be applications you don't want to use "Park Cursor Aside" on. Maybe an app will bug out since it wants to do its own thing with the mouse cursor, maybe the mouse cursor serves a purpose while typing, etc - an easy opt-in or the opposite, an opt-out principle on a per-application basis would be very useful I imagine. Manually turning PCA on and off each time I switch to an app I use often would piss me off really quickly and make me just leave PCA off all the time.
472
Official Announcements / Re: DonationCoder.com NEW SERVER ACTIVATED Dec 17, 2010
« Last post by worstje on December 27, 2010, 10:59 AM »
I am letting you know... that the problem seems fixed.
473
Living Room / Re: Naming and Shaming Bad Forums with Bad Ethics
« Last post by worstje on December 27, 2010, 01:38 AM »
Well, part of me can kind of understand the angle. But there's a huge difference on how to go about it.

Personally, I am one of those people who only resorts to forums and other forms of communication to get a solution to an issue I am facing after I have researched it myself. If that is in your nature, it is _bloody_ annoying to have people ask the same simpleton 'how do I do X' or 'why does Y not work' question if the same question, when asked to almost unchangedly, throws up results on the first page. (Personally I tend to go 3-5 pages deep, and try different ways to summarize my issue as well.)

Is it so much to ask of people that they do a bit of research before they ask a question? News flash: you are usually not the first to run into a particular issue. News flash: nobody got hurt by doing a tiny bit of self-study as opposed to just angling for an answer.

If it was me, I would not have said RTFM. I would not have said 'google it'. I would have given a link to google search results (maybe use letmegooglethatforyou or wth it is named), and added the links of the results I found. I would have written that they could have done the same thing, had results faster, and not wasted my time: I love answering questions but it is a far more enjoyable matter for both sides if you have a discussion worth noting. "Yes, I looked around, but all of them seem to imply knowledge Y or ignore limitation Z."

So, please, I implore everyone: teach people who ask a question that studying for themselves doesn't hurt them. It makes for a far more pleasant forum that is far-less one-way.
474
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Teaser: JottiQ
« Last post by worstje on December 25, 2010, 02:30 AM »
It is long overdue to another release. Thus, I offer you v.0.9.5 as a token of my merry christmas spirit. (And I hate Christmas; go figure. :))

Download JottiQ v0.9.5 (7z archive) (304 kB)
Download JottiQ v0.9.5 (Setup) (1039 kB)

Test away. The installer is a bit of an experiment, and I don't think I whipped it completely into listening to me just yet, but it should get the job done. It's a bit of a fat-arse too, so I apologize for that. I am not sure what I can do to change that though.

After christmas, I intend to focus on the UI and texts and such that I asked peoples opinions on before. I just haven't gotten around to incorporating those details yet. :)

The ReadMe says stuff about right-clicking and elevating and stuff.. but I forgot to adjust the ReadMe after I had to take that stuff out for now because it had some flaws I noticed at the last minute. The current version seems to always want to elevate because I have an admin account, but maybe someone has a really limited user account they can test with for me.)

Readme.txt (excerpts once more)
JottiQ
v0.9.5 (2010-12-25)

REQUEST TO TESTERS:
    Please test _everything_!  Things I need tested in order of priority:
    
    - THE INSTALLER, on all of the below OSes.
    - XP 64-bit
    - Vista 32-bit
    - Vista 64-bit
    - Seven 32-bit


For more information, see the official JottiQ (NANY 2011) topic:

    https://www.donationcoder.com/forum/index.php?topic=24663.0


VERSION HISTORY
---------------

v0.9.5 (2010-12-25)

    It's a special christmas beta-release! Ho ho ho! Merry christmas to all!
    
      Added: Support for Current-User and All-Users installations for the
          shell context menu. In essence, this means UAC will no longer be
          needed if you install it for your user only. This determination is
          made based on the existence of a 'MachineInstallation' file in the
          directory the executable is located.
      Added: An actual installer! When double-clicked, it performs an
          installation that affects your user only. However, if you take the
          opportunity to right-click and select 'Run as Administrator', it
          will do an installation where it affects all users on your machine.
          (And when I write 'it affects', I refer to the shell extension, as
          all other application settings are per-user.) A plain .7z archive
          will continue to exist for those who like it, however.
      Fixed: Shell extension failed to register if it was in a path with
          spaces inside of it. Now it works.
      Fixed: Windows XP no longer has a butt-ugly clipped shield image when
          it needs to elevate to install.
      Fixed: Various texts and the likes should no longer be cut off when
          running at more interesting configurations involving bigger fonts.
      Added: Mnemonics were added to the Settings screen to improve keyboard
          accessibility.
      Fixed: Changing the shell extensions installed state no longer rushes
          through the affair; it now waits for actions to complete so the
          Installer doesn't vomit during the Uninstall.
      Semi-Fixed: At one point during my own testing on my XP machine, JottiQ
          crashed after I clicked a link in the Privacy Agreement screen. I
          suspect it involves Firefox demanding an upgrade before continuing;
          but I have not been able to reproduce it. So from now on, it should
          fail gracefully and spit out an error. If anyone sees this error,
          I would be very interested in finding out what it is and whether it
          is a common error that needs further looking-into.

v0.9.4 (2010-12-21)

    Secret internal beta release.
    
      Fixed: Big booboo involving cached files always returning the same
          (very likely unrelated) file results.
      Fixed: Windows XP now properly shows the fancy lady bug icon in the
          file context menu.

...


KNOWN ISSUES
------------
1) The installer can only delete settings for the current user. This is not
     something that I have any feasible way of changing, although I do welcome
     any and all suggestions on the topic. This includes the shell context
     menu option.

2) The (un)installer does not detect if JottiQ is currently running and offer
     offer to close it first. Hopefully will fix at some point in the future.

3) The installer component 'Explorer Integration affects All Users' determines
     the creation of the 'MachineInstallation' file. By default it is off,
     allowing every user to determine the presence of a file context menu for
     themselves (and also avoiding nasty UAC dialogs in the process.) Once
     this file is present, one needs Administrator rights in order to turn the
     file context menu on or off.
    
     Given point 1), if you install to make JottiQ available to multiple users,
     it is recommended to install with this setting turned on so that any
     registry pollution stays at a minimum. (Unless of course you are willing
     to manually turn off the file context menu for every single user
     beforehand.)

4) The uninstaller may tell you to reboot. This is because explorer probably
     still has the shell extension in use, and killing explorer and restarting
     it is a very user-unfriendly task. As such, postponing the deletion till
     reboot time is the user-friendliest alternative.
475
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Release: NANY Excuse Manager (v0.96 as of 12/30/10)
« Last post by worstje on December 24, 2010, 10:45 PM »
Go do it the fancy way and use layered windows instead. UpdateLayeredWindow is the epic function you want. It's a pain to use, but you can get really pretty results with it. :)
Pages: prev1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23next