topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday May 31, 2025, 8:45 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 169 170 171 172 173 [174] 175 176 177 178 179 ... 438next
4326
58% of Americans didn't even vote.  If any of their names are on the petitions...  >:(

Fraud
Well, given that they are determined by fraud, can you blame them? And then it wouldn't matter anyways. Goldman Sachs always wins. Vote for GS red or vote for GS blue? Not much of a choice.

The new hilarity is that there is a petition to strip people of their citizenship! Well, duh! That's what they're asking for - their own country~! :D :P

You just can't make this stuff up... One laugh after the next! :D

4327
General Software Discussion / Re: Aviary advanced suite now officially offline
« Last post by Renegade on November 13, 2012, 10:26 AM »
Don't worry, I didn't take it badly, just pointing out the difference.

What I mean about caveats, however, is just what was pointed out in the other thread.  An Open Source project may never be gone, but dropped projects are embarassingly common.  Much of Sourceforge.net could rightly be called an elephant's graveyard for abandoned code...  :-\

I totally hear you there.

I am planning on dropping some projects, but not willing to go back through them and clean up comments and code so that I would be comfortable releasing it into the public domain or GPL or whatever. They will simply die. And entirely because I just do not have the time for them.

I will make them available to people by email through request. But only to people that I know and actually care about, e.g. DC members, etc. For the rest, well, yeah... It sucks. :( And I hate to do it. But I've carried some projects for long enough. I can't continue with them.

I perfectly well understand both sides there. Effort is work. And you only have so much time.

What pisses me off are the users that complain to people that give them things for free. It's rude and ignorant. Nobody has a "right" to your labour or efforts. Assuming that you do is perverse. A bit more thankfulness would be in order. The commercial side... well.. that's a different matter...
4328
General Software Discussion / Re: Best USB Encryption Software.
« Last post by Renegade on November 13, 2012, 10:20 AM »
I won't recommend any specific software or algorithm, but I will say that multiple iterations with encryption, even with the same algorithm, are stronger. So, if you picked ACME Encryptor, then used it 3x on the same file, you would have increased the protection level all that much more. (I don't want to say 3x or something else as I forget the exact math for it, but that should be a good enough comment to help a bit.)
4329
I can come up with so many ways to deal with problems, that the only real one is if someone else can decode the message. e.g. Take some open source program, change an image in it, then compile and upload it somewhere as an "alternative". Mission accomplished, provided that you can get the message to the intended recipient. That's another issue though, and beyond the scope of steganography.

BTW - Thanks for bringing up this topic. I know someone who needs this in life and death situations and have already sent him a quick message on the topic. You very well could have saved someone's life by creating this thread. That's not an exaggeration. Thank you.
4330
The infinity of hilarity is spiraling out of control~! ;D :P

Wannabe Quebecers and more!

Deport them!

https://petitions.wh...tes-america/dmQl1bXL

And, the number of states is up to 31!

Alabama
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Indiana
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Michigan
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
West Virginia
Wyoming

And there are 38 petitions! Some states have more than 1.

;D


Reality is so much funnier than fiction! :D
4331
I wasn't too sure. I don't know enough about the underlying guts of steganography. Thanks for the info.

I suppose for individual use, and not sharing, it'd be ok. For sharing though, an open source program would most likely be more appropriate. Some are listed here: http://en.wikipedia..../Steganography_tools
4332
Do you know if it is compatible with other steganography programs?
4333
Living Room / Re: Recommend some music videos to me!
« Last post by Renegade on November 13, 2012, 06:55 AM »
Just saw this:



If nothing else, it shows Dotcom has personality~! :D
4334
General Software Discussion / Re: Aviary advanced suite now officially offline
« Last post by Renegade on November 12, 2012, 11:34 PM »
This reminds me about this thread. Same basic deal, just about open source and not commercial/proprietary.

The difference, and I mean THE difference is that if Aviary were open source, it would never go away.  It may languish and stagnate without a dedicated team of maintainers, and users would complain ad nauseum, but it would never be simply and suddenly GONE.  Plenty of caveats either way. 

Sorry - I didn't mean to imply anything there. Just that the "closing up shop" case was similar.

You have an excellent point about open source still being available after the doors are shuttered.
4335
Living Room / Re: Remember Buckyballs? They Are Now Gone
« Last post by Renegade on November 12, 2012, 10:27 PM »
Well, I checked the Zen Magnet site, thinking that they were safe so far. WRONG!

http://www.zenmagnets.com/

Screenshot - 2012-11-13 , 3_20_23 PM.png

The press release:

http://zenmagnets.co...8_CPSC_Press_Release

About Bucky Balls:

http://www.zenmagnet...1_20_November_Update

A news article on it:

http://blogs.westwor...y_targets_denver.php

Zen Magnets, a company based in Denver, is now facing an administrative complaint from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, a federal agency that claims the small magnets Zen sells are a serious safety hazard. The CPSC is pushing the business to notify consumers and recall its products.

ZERO incidents from Zen Magnets, and they're "dangerous"?

This is not about safety - this is about control.

I have some suspicions about why this is being done, but I'll keep them (mostly) to myself. For those that are interested in guessing, search for "Fred Bell". (If you need help there, add "dead" or "murdered" or something like that to the search. e.g. What was he doing just the day before he "died"?) I think this is the same issue and just the prelude.
4336
Living Room / Re: Remember Buckyballs? They Are Now Gone
« Last post by Renegade on November 12, 2012, 10:11 PM »
Billions of magnets sold, and 12 incidents reported.

Let's see...

How about 33,808 deaths in 2009? List_of_motor_vehicle_deaths_in_U.S._by_yearw That's a kill ratio of 0.01%.

If you don't like that figure, then how about something that kills MORE people than cars?

http://naturalsociet...ic-fatalities-in-us/

37,485 deaths from those in 2009. Confirmed that is. More recent figures say around about 100,000 people per year die as a direct result of using prescription medication as prescribed by their doctors.

Come to think of it, we should outlaw gravity. Hell, gravity is a killer! Just ask Wile E. Coyote. Don't believe me?

List_of_causes_of_death_by_ratew

Falls are responsible for 0.69% of all deaths in the US.

BAN GRAVITY NOW! Support the "Ban Gravity Bill"!

Also ban fire. It kills 0.55%.

1.24% of people would still be alive if we had the courage to make gravity and fire illegal!



This is a very disturbing trend - the quest to make it illegal to make a living. Fascist petty tyrants.
4337
Neat!  But for the 5-spot, it looks like they pictured "(sqrt(9!))" when it ought to be "(sqrt(9))!".

Yeah, I noticed that before. Still, a little forgiveness and it's still pretty darn cool~! :D

  Funny that you posted this because I was reading sometime last year that the state of Texas was the only state in the union that has a clause that allows them to secede from the union.  The reasoning was because Texas was a republic before entering the union.
I don't know if it would required a vote of the Texas people or not.  It was a big issue a year or so back when Gov. Perry jokingly said we should secede from the union, the news networks were having a field day with that....

Now that you mention Texas, it gets even funnier!

Infinite hilarity~! =D Political in nature, but still hilarious!
Texas is way over the 25,000 signature requirement.

https://petitions.wh...-government/BmdWCP8B

Louisiana is almost there. They're all gaining momentum!

It's almost as if the USA has been infected by Quebec~! ;D :P

4338
The continuum scenario makes more sense though. e.g. You defame someone, get punished for it, but keep the defamatory materials up online. You've already been punished for it (as an event), so you can't be tried twice for it. This seems absurd.

Sounds like you've just made the case for the web equivalent of book burning.

A successfully prosecuted libelous statement made in a book doesn't result in every copy of that book being rounded up and burned. Once the suit is settled that's the end of it. True existing unsold copies are usually recalled. And likely the new editions of the book need to add or remove some language. But the book itself, in its original form, still lives on and is available to anybody who takes the trouble to hunt down a copy. You can't be prosecuted again just because copies of your original book are still floating around.

But with no statute of limitations on web publishing, you can basically prosecute and prosecute and prosecute until all copies of the file are taken down. That will have a chilling effect on free speech, investigative reporting, and news writing. And a complete takedown is something that is becoming increasingly possible despite the assurances of the hacker/pirate/darknet crowd that the web can't be controlled. (Trust me, major governments haven't even begun to regulate the web. Within 25 years the Internet will be more restricted and monitored than the isolation cellblock in a 'supermax' prison. The dream of Jeremy Bentham's panopticon lives on in virtual space.) In such an environment, self-censorship becomes the only workable strategy for self-preservation. Especially in the face of no statutory limitations on anything that appears there.

Brave new world indeed!

Good point. That makes it much more sensible to use the actual date that someone clicked "Post". You have me sold there. :D
4339
The most awesomest clock face ever.
 (see attachment in previous post)

Nice find.  BTW, I don't understand the computation for "7" : 9-sqrt(9)+ ? = 7, what is actually the ?

Reading that would be "point nine bar". Some mathematical notations are used differently in different situations. I believe that they mean "ad infinitum" there. So:

nine minus root nine plus point nine bar = 9 - 3 + 0.999999999999999999999... = 7

Math is just wonky sometimes with odd symbol usage. I generally think of "bar" as meaning absolute value or ad infinitum for several digits, with dot being used for 1.
4340
And you'd feel comfortable trying to explain that to a jury of average people and feel confident that they would understand what you are saying?

It's the same basic logic as those addition problems where you start factoring, then divide by zero in a hidden step, and magically end up with an absurd answer. Zeno's paradoxes are all well known illustrations of the problems you get when you juxtapose discrete and indiscrete systems. For explaining why... well, might take a bit longer.


The law only extends as far as we're willing to take it. It's not a mathematical proof where if A=B and B=C then A must = C. It's subject to interpretation, discretion, and human judgment. Pull that out of the loop and we're doomed.

But picking a date *IS* as simple as a mathematical proof. It's either Monday or it's not Monday, but it isn't both Monday and not Monday. Humanity has little to do with it. It's kind of like all these quack scientists and doctors out there that talk about "consensus", as if they can change the laws of physics by all agreeing on something. It's utter insanity. But, that's a total tangent. :D

Do  your part not to let that happen. Call a crock a crock whenever you hear one being pushed your way. I stops these people in their tracks when you don't concede their right to frame the debate and define the terms being used. Just say ""You know as well as I do that's complete bullshit." When they reply they don't see it as that at all, simply smile your most pitying smile and then say "Really? You don't?" Act flabbergasted and listen with amusement as the room chuckles while the idiot slinks away to look for somebody else to annoy.
 8)


I think I'm right about "publishing" online being a "state of being" rather than an "event" as it is in traditional print. (In the case of where one has control - otherwise, it is an event.)

I have no real opinion on how to choose the date there for the statute of limitations.

It's either the date that someone clicked "Submit/Post", or it's what I described above as a continuum.

The event scenario is much easier to deal with. The continuum scenario makes more sense though. e.g. You defame someone, get punished for it, but keep the defamatory materials up online. You've already been punished for it (as an event), so you can't be tried twice for it. This seems absurd.

Dunno. Just seemed like an interesting issue about having things online.
4341
No good deed goes unpunished.
4342
Ok... I'm going to put this in a spoiler because it is of a political nature... But man... This has GOT to be one of the FUNNIEST things I've ever seen in my life~! Really. Be forewarned... This is fall-off-your-chair-pissing-your-pants hilarious~! ;D

Seriously... I'll be pissing myself laughing over this for YEARS!


Ok - followup on that joke... the laugh is now 20x larger~! ;D :P

20x larger laugh!




4343
So, if you are going to count each day that a defamatory statement appears on a blog as "republishing it" each and every day that it remains on the site, for the purposes of nullifying the idea of a SOL then you will also have to count each day as a separate incident, so that if a defamatory statement remains on a blog for a year, you have 365 individual counts of defamation, as if it were 365 different statements, one published each day?

You're committing the exact same fallacy that I outlined above - confusing discrete and indiscrete systems.

No. They are not separate incidents - it is a continuum and not an isolated event.

To twist it another way (RAA - Reductio Ad Absurdum) - Choosing any unit of time can just as easily be chosen as half whatever you've chosen. So, why not half a day... and so on... and then why not by the yottasecond? (1 * 10^-24) Or, why not double the day to 2 days... and so on... oops - we've not completed an eternity, so the defamation cannot have happened as 1 unit of time hasn't even been accomplished. Either way - infinite charges, or never charged. (This is again the same fallacy I mentioned above.)

If you asked someone to turn a light on, and they rubbed their feet across the carpet, then touched you, there would be light. Would you call that having the lights on? Again - same relative issue about an event as a temporal continuum as opposed to an event as being temporally discrete.
4344
General Software Discussion / Re: Synergy Virtual KVM
« Last post by Renegade on November 12, 2012, 03:06 AM »
Most mouse and keyboard sharing solutions, we are aware of, use the TCP network data protocol to transmit mouse cursor and keyboard input updates:

TCP is packet-based. TCP packets have a pre-defined static size. TCP transmits packets only if they are fully packed (in the particular application, data updates have to match the defined TCP packet size in order to be dispatched immediately) or after a time-out. If your mouse/keyboard data update packet doesn't fill up a complete packet, TCP waits for the next packet to finish the pending packet or waits for the time-out to dispatch the data -> Laggy cursor.

Possible solutions:

1. Reduce the TCP time-out parameter which will slow down your whole TCP transfer as small unfinished packets with a lot of packet overhead will entertain your wires. Too small values may stall your switch/router/network adapter.

2. Use a dedicated network connection between your computers to isolate mouse and keyboard data from other TCP traffic and experiment hours by tweaking the TCP packet size to matches the mouse/keyboard data update size. I actually don't know but hope for you, that Synergy uses data updates with static size to allow you matching with the TCP packet size. Otherwise you have to deal with a target that moves faster than a bullet.

Good luck.

For people, who have things to get done, other makers invested man-years to develop a custom protocol that is optimized to meet special requirements of mouse and keyboard sharing. Sometimes, pearls do not shine on the surface but under the hood. :Thmbsup:

That makes sense.

I was actually surprised to hear that TCP is used.

My Mac isn't my money machine -- that's Windows -- and really, given how slow Macs are to use compared to Windows (well, for me anyways), the minor annoyance is fine for now. If I really need better performance, I'll look elsewhere.

But it's good to know that you have a custom protocol for that. Didn't know that before. It would certainly make a difference for me if I were to try out a few and evaluate some - at least for understanding what's going on.
4345
I *should* be washing dishes, but a bit clearer picture popped into my noggin... Imagine these:

Joe writes a scathing attack on Fred. It's defamatory and simply untrue. Joe publishes it on his blog, but sets the permissions on it so that it is not visible to the public at large. Joe then waits 2 years plus a day, and changes the permissions to make it publicly visible.

Is Joe immune to prosecution because the SOL has expired?

Now, let's do another...

Andrew is pissed at Joe, and wants to retaliate. (Andrew is a friend of Joe.) Andrew writes a scathing attack on Joe that is similarly defamatory and untrue. He goes into the database, and alters the data so that it appears that it was written 2 years ago plus a day. (Let's forget the technical issues about logs, etc. and just say that he does it perfectly so that forensically, it appears to have truly been written 2 years ago plus a day.) He publishes the article attacking Joe.

There is no evidence to prove that Andrew wrote the article today, and it appears to be beyond the SOL. i.e. It appears to be the exact same case as Joe's above.

Now. In light of that... are either Joe or Andrew beyond the SOL? Are they immune?

I don't think the online case is quite the same as the offline case. There seem to be fundamental differences at work.

Or, am I just a nutbar? :P
4346
There's a fundamental difference between a print book/newspaper/whatever, and a web site. And *THIS* is where the nuance is...

Publishing a physical book is pretty much a single event. You print it - it exists.

Publishing a web site is NOT a single event. It is a continuum of events that continues until you turn the site off, after which it is no longer in the state of "being published".

i.e.:

Physical books are discrete events.
Web sites are indiscrete events.


Treating them the same without a good reason is exactly the same fallacy that leads to Zeno's paradoxes. i.e. The imposition of discrete/indiscrete systems of logic in the wrong context.

So far, I haven't heard a reason why they should be treated the same.

Not saying I have any answers... But... the difference is there. Anyone have a reason to treat them the same other than "just because"?
4347
I'm not so sure.

There is a twist here.

On a web site, you continually publish whatever is on it until you pull it down. So, the site was still publishing the material until it closed.

So, is the publish date the first day it was published? Or is the publish date renewed every day you continue to publish it?

That seems reasonable. I'd say every day you continue to publish on your own site is a renewal of the last date for the purposes of a statute of limitations.

Now, for other sites continuing to publish it, I don't think that holds water. You can control other sites, and shouldn't be responsible for what they do.
4348
General Software Discussion / Re: Synergy Virtual KVM
« Last post by Renegade on November 11, 2012, 08:10 PM »
Just as a mini-update, Synergy seems to be smoother on my Mac now. Might be because the mouse battery was low before? That doesn't seem quite right, but I don't really have a very good explanation why it seems smoother now. Maybe I just got used to it?
4349
General Software Discussion / Re: Synergy Virtual KVM
« Last post by Renegade on November 11, 2012, 10:14 AM »
Had a huge post written... Decided to not post it. Read the above.
4350
General Software Discussion / Re: Sign of the times for OpenSource software?
« Last post by Renegade on November 11, 2012, 10:04 AM »
Just for reference, there's another post over here (DC) about the same basic deal in the commercial/proprietary world.

The significant difference being that since Aviary is a closed proprietary product, once the developers elected to kick it to the curb, that was the end of it. If it were F/OSS there would have at least been the hope other interested developers might have adopted it so it could live on. Or that somebody else could have hosted it and kept the current functionality and community intact.

Ahem...

Yes. That is EXACTY why I posted the cross-post. ;)

It was to make a point there.

;)

Boom! Nailed it! OpenSSH is THE go-to for that. Any time you look into the topic... you ALWAYS end up with OpenSSH pretty much no matter what. Pretty much every time I ever need to do some kind of encryption, even if I'm using a third party component, I end up using OpenSSH.
Do you mean OpenSSH or OpenSSL, renny?

Yeah, yeah.... Let's just go make fun of Renegade because he posts drunk all the time and makes stupid mistakes/typos~! :P ;D

This time around, I'm blaming some pretty damn good Australian wine! :D
Pages: prev1 ... 169 170 171 172 173 [174] 175 176 177 178 179 ... 438next