417
« Last post by Tinman57 on May 04, 2013, 04:54 PM »
I've looked at the footage many times over. From a pilots view of things and past experiences with aircraft accident investigations teams, I can tell that the aircraft did in fact stall. It's not hard to tell from not only it's forward speed, that appeared to "hang" in the air for a few seconds, but also it's steep nose up attitude. It is hammered into every pilot trained, when your nose is too high and your stalling, push forward on the stick to get your airspeed back up, even if your going to hit mother earth. More forward motion reduces impact damage, and it hit the ground nose first with little forward airspeed. But what I thought was strange is that it appeared that he was turning left initially and then turned right and got almost inverted but with the right wing down. All visual indications looked like an aft heavy balance* which would make the aircraft nose high from too much weight in the aft section. At that low of altitude and hardly any forward airspeed, it's mostly impossible to get your nose down without enough air flowing over the horizontal stabilizers, so how would they get the nose down right at impact? It should have hit tail-feathers first.
* If it wasn't a load balance problem, then the pilot was just climbing too steep or the controls weren't functioning correctly, which is why I thought it strange with an aft-heavy aircraft flying that low and slow would hit nose first.
Perhaps they have other footage from another angle that shows what happened during the time the aircraft was out of camera range above the cars windshield. It only takes one second for an aircraft to go from flyable to unflyable.