3826
Living Room / Re: Why do we always wait for apple's stuff before making a i[blank]-killer??
« Last post by superboyac on June 06, 2010, 03:33 AM »Nice, Renegade. I have to agree with probably everything you say.
The only thing I will add and question is, if sexy sells and is so successful, why won't the other companies give that strategy a shot? is it because they don't have the cult following and they know without it they can't succeed? That's one answer. But I don't even see them trying until after Apple sucks in the market.
I mean, for example, take the ipod. Fine, the ipod came in a and surprised everyone. But then you'd think companies would catch on: "Oh, we have a great technology here. Why don't we concentrate on a nice, sexy, simple user interface." I remember for years hearing about people complain about how the early mp3 players were somewhat klunky to use. Then apple showed up with the wheel. people complained for years about all sorts of things about minidisc players...bigger screen, more info, why is it so difficult to use? Sony never seriously addressed those issues.
And with tablets, I heard the same thing. People didn't want to use it because it was klunky. And if you ask me, the designers were lazy. All they really did was package a laptop running regular Windows into a touchscreen monitor. To me it seems like they didn't think about how the experience of regular windows might be different on a touchscreen. but whatever...it was touch screen, it ran windows...what more could you possibly want? And for years, nothing happened, until the ipad. Now, a bunch of companies are planning on releasing comparable tablets and I'm sure we'll find one that is much better than the ipad and runs windows or linux, and we powerusers can configure just the way we want. but why wait until now? They could have done this easily in 2005.
The only thing I will add and question is, if sexy sells and is so successful, why won't the other companies give that strategy a shot? is it because they don't have the cult following and they know without it they can't succeed? That's one answer. But I don't even see them trying until after Apple sucks in the market.
I mean, for example, take the ipod. Fine, the ipod came in a and surprised everyone. But then you'd think companies would catch on: "Oh, we have a great technology here. Why don't we concentrate on a nice, sexy, simple user interface." I remember for years hearing about people complain about how the early mp3 players were somewhat klunky to use. Then apple showed up with the wheel. people complained for years about all sorts of things about minidisc players...bigger screen, more info, why is it so difficult to use? Sony never seriously addressed those issues.
And with tablets, I heard the same thing. People didn't want to use it because it was klunky. And if you ask me, the designers were lazy. All they really did was package a laptop running regular Windows into a touchscreen monitor. To me it seems like they didn't think about how the experience of regular windows might be different on a touchscreen. but whatever...it was touch screen, it ran windows...what more could you possibly want? And for years, nothing happened, until the ipad. Now, a bunch of companies are planning on releasing comparable tablets and I'm sure we'll find one that is much better than the ipad and runs windows or linux, and we powerusers can configure just the way we want. but why wait until now? They could have done this easily in 2005.

Recent Posts




