topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 13, 2025, 12:29 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 136 137 138 139 140 [141] 142 143 144 145 146 ... 252next
3501
Living Room / Re: What's Your Internet Speed/Reliability SATISFACTION?
« Last post by superboyac on September 06, 2010, 11:18 PM »
Anyone with At&T's U-verse?  Thoughts?
3502
Living Room / Re: What's Your Internet Speed/Reliability SATISFACTION?
« Last post by superboyac on September 06, 2010, 11:16 PM »
(see attachment in previous post)
This is the connection you get here in Paraguay for about 100 USD/month.
Oh Shnikey!  OK, Shades wins...I won't complain anymore.  That's a raw deal, man.

By the way, my parents have Cox...Cox is awesome.  From what I've seen, Cox has the fastest "normal" ISP service I've seen.  FIOS is faster, but it has fiber coming to the house.
3503
Living Room / Re: What's Your Internet Speed/Reliability SATISFACTION?
« Last post by superboyac on September 06, 2010, 04:05 PM »
My connection is overpriced for what it provides.  Unfortunately, it's the best available in my area.  I'm so jealous of FIOS users (like my sister) or any other fiber service.  I don't know what my rated specs are, but that doesn't really matter.  All that matters is what I actually have seen, and what I pay:
$45 a month
DL Max speed I've been able to see consistently = 700 KB/s
UL Max speed I've seen = 60 KB/s

Also, what's up with bits?  Isn't it more convenient to use "bytes" in conversation?  I don't know about you guys, but everytime someone says bits, I have to divide by 8 in my head before I have a feel for what it really means.  I don't know why everyone does that.  All our files on our computers are shown in bytes.  This whole bits thing is weird.  if you ask me, the only reason the companies advertise in bits is because the number is bigger, so it's more impressive.  My two cents as usual.
3504
Just to clarify -- from my reading you don't need to renew the license to use the program.. it's just a question of whether you get free UPGRADES after a year.  Regardless, you can always keep using your last version.  That's pretty standard and seems not a big deal to me.  That's how i read it.

(i agree with you about avoiding programs where you actually need to renew your license every year in order to keep using it)
I think developers don't need to actually mention or brag that you can use the version you bought for life.  I've seen companies do this many times and the end result is that the consumer is always confused and there's a lot of miscommunications and back-and-forths because of the whole thing.  First of all, there is no program that I know of where you CAN'T use the version you originally bought forever.  So it's nothing to emphasize or brag about because all programs work that way.  So just the fact that it is mentioned is confusing.  Why is it being mentioned?  What's the point?  So what?  That's why people get confused.  It sounds like a great thing is being offered, but it's really the standard practice for just about all software.  When people say the word "lifetime" in any software licensing situation, the user will assume they mean lifetime upgrades/updates/everything.  That's why we get excited when we hear that.  So the fact that the word "lifetime" is used when it's describing the standard situation is misleading.  I have to think it's done intentionally.  Now, I like Crystal Rich so I won't criticize them too much for this.  The bottom line is that they have decided to use a different licensing for Zentimo than they were doing for USB SR.  And as a developer, you have to mention this, but you have to do it in a nice way.  Maybe that's why they say "You can still use the program for lifetime and on each of your computers", even though that was never in question.  What software do you know of where you can't do this?  That would be the equivalent of software rental, which just doesn't happen (maybe in some big corporate software it does).

Like I said, I've seen this happen many times and in all cases, I've seen the developers throw in that statement, "You can still use the program for lifetime and on each of your computers."  You shouldn't say this.  It causes confusion, it's misleading, and as soon as you say this, you have to:
1) Explain to MANY people the difference between lifetime upgrades/updates vs. using an old version forever.  This is always difficult for developers because they have a hard time saying "you can still use your old version forever."  That sounds depressing and negative.  So they go for the more positive/happy sentence "You can still use the program for lifetime and on each of your computers", which just doesn't get the same point across.

2) Makes people resent the developers for seemingly trying to do a switch-and-bait or other trickery.  This does happen, but I don't think Crystal Rich is one of those.  I think they just realized the lifetime thing is an impossible business model.  It really is.  It's great for us as consumers.  I jump on lifetime licenses all the time because I know they're going to have to change it sometime in the future.  But it's bad for the developers.  I think Crystal Rich, from all the companies I've seen that had to go through this change, were the most honest in dealing with this.  They explained on the website how with lifetime licenses, the user base keeps growing and growing, and no more money is coming in other than that initial purchase.  It really doesn't work.
3505
Living Room / Re: Should I buy a tablet pc, ipad, netbook, or other?
« Last post by superboyac on September 05, 2010, 02:37 PM »
I think with a true tablet pc, some of the software that you mentioned becomes obsolete.  That's the reason that I'm trying to develop something that will let me launch items in a pen environment.  There are some, but they go further, using gestures and such.  I want to be able to navigate and click with a pen, visually, rather than mnemonically.  FARR, LBC, and DOpus just don't really work for me in a pen environment- they're built around a different paradigm IME.  I've also tried circle dock, radius, object dock...  the closest I've come so far is Beryoko and/or Fences.
Yes, yes.  You have a very good point.  I imagine it comes down to the question: "what do we do with what we normally accomplish with keyboards"?  The mouse/stylus switch is very logical.  But how do we replace our keyboard functionality with a stylus?  The simple answer is the onscreen virtual keyboard.  But there must be something more elegant.  Like you say, gestures is one thing, but not exactly perfect.  I think handwriting recognition, if done smoothly, can be the way.  Like using the Ritepen program.

I'm so curious....maybe I'll just go and get the cheaper HP tablet to play around. Ay yay yay...how many times can one person change his mind?
3506
Living Room / Re: How do you add a post in a Google Groups thread???
« Last post by superboyac on September 03, 2010, 04:51 PM »
Google's answer doesn't help:
http://groups.google...=en&answer=46247
To reply to an existing topic, view the topic, and click the "Reply" link near the bottom of the posting to which you want to reply. You don't have to join a Usenet newsgroup to post to it, but you will need to have a Google Account to post through our webpage.

You can also reply to an existing post in Google Groups via email. If you've chosen to receive emails from a particular group, log into your email account and find the topic you'd like to reply to. Click on the "Reply" button in your email program and type your message into the body of the email. Make sure to keep the subject line intact so your reply is sent to the correct thread. Please note that it's not possible to respond via email to threads from Usenet groups.
You know what Google?  Don't tell me, show me.  Show me the freaking button or whatever.  All those words above did not help me at all.
3507
Living Room / How do you add a post in a Google Groups thread???
« Last post by superboyac on September 03, 2010, 04:49 PM »
Man, am I a complete idiot??  I cannot figure out how to add a post to a google groups thread.  Specifically, I'm in the MLO forum.  I was able to create a thread, someone else replied to it, but I can't reply back.  There's a "reply to author" link at the bottom of each post, but that only lets you send a private mail to that individual.  I'm posting a screenshot of the entire page in case I'm not seeing something.  Once again, simple things made to appear difficult or impossible.  Even if I'm not allowed to reply (which I don't see why since I'm allowed to create a thread), but let's say I'm restricted from replying, somewhere obvious on the page should say I can't reply or post...or have some button greyed out...something!

Of course, I have to say it, this is where Apple shines and other companies falter, including Google, who is normally relatively good with this stuff.
screenshot_20100903144437.png
3508
Post New Requests Here / Re: File Finding Utility
« Last post by superboyac on September 03, 2010, 04:09 PM »
This is a great idea.  I'm all for it.

First, see if the program Everything can do this.  It's not exactly what you described, but it may be useable.  If you haven't tried it, you'll be blown away by its speed.

But, yeah, I'd also want a two part utility where one deals with building the index and the other (the client) is the interface for the search.  great idea.
3509
That sounds like SparkleShare's goal, but it's still in its early stages.
That looks like an amazing thing and I'm really itching to try it.  Thanks!
3510
Living Room / Re: Should I buy a tablet pc, ipad, netbook, or other?
« Last post by superboyac on September 03, 2010, 03:14 PM »
I've been following that Samsung one on engadget for a while.  Looks interesting.  I'm really waiting for the whole tablet market to mature a little more.  I think it's going to be very interesting.

I've been thinking about what kind of tablet I really want.  Knowing myself, and this is probably true for many here, I want a fully functioning Windows 7 tablet.  I don't want an android thing.  I don't do "apps".  I use real man software, not kiddie stuff.  I want to use FARR, LBC, DOpus, stuff like that.  I've gone to great lengths to find the software that does things just the way I like.

I feel it's right around the corner.  Actually, the business models are already there.  If you're willing to spend $2000+ you can get a real nice tablet pc that runs Windows 7, with fast hardware, long battery life, and all that.  If I was just slightly more wealthy, I'd get one right now.

By next year, i want to have a whole nice portable setup.  I want a fully functioning computer that I can write on with a stylus, has all the necessary connections and speedy hardware.  I want all the cables and accesories necessary to connect to most TV's or monitors easily, including audio cables.  I want an extra battery and charger.  Maybe some blank dvd's, a couple of spare usb sticks.  Also, if projectors come down in size enough, I'll stick one of those in there.  Nice microphone and pro audio card also to make sure I can use it to play my piano and/or record a concert.  And all of this in a nice case that's as compact as possible.  That would be a great thing to take around with me.
3511
Living Room / Re: Should I buy a tablet pc, ipad, netbook, or other?
« Last post by superboyac on September 03, 2010, 12:45 PM »
I love this phrase below:
Don't get me wrong: Microsoft needs a tablet. Apple sold 3 million iPads in two months, and that was amid howls that it was overpriced and underfunctioning. The market for a thin but large, touch-screened thing-that-isn't-a-phone is clear, as an e-book reader, as a movie player, as a game pad, as a casual e-mail-and-Web device. Why rest a hot PC on your lap when you can balance a slender slab on your thigh? So what if that slab only does 85 percent of what the PC can do?
It's from here:
http://www.msnbc.msn...nce-tech_and_gadgets

I like the description.  Keep in mind my post from above about all the terms being used.
3512
Living Room / Re: tc1100 tablet pc dies before i've even set it up
« Last post by superboyac on September 03, 2010, 12:39 PM »
nudone...if i could find a motion tablet like you did for half-price, I'd strongly consider it.
3513
Living Room / Re: tc1100 tablet pc dies before i've even set it up
« Last post by superboyac on September 03, 2010, 12:34 PM »
^ That one is a bit on the large side to me.  That let's them stuff a *lot* into it in addition to the ruggedness, but it seems like it would quickly become annoying.
Yeah, but sometimes I don't mind the extra size if it means i get more flexibility.  For example, I LOVE how you can easily slide in an extra battery to get 8-hours on it.
3514
Living Room / Re: tc1100 tablet pc dies before i've even set it up
« Last post by superboyac on September 03, 2010, 09:07 AM »
Okay, well, fingers crossed then. i'll let everyone know what it's like when it arrives. it could be the device i'd always dreamed of (i've wanted a tablet for years).
I'm very interested to hear your thoughts!  The motion tablets look pretty awesome to me.  Another one I like is the Panasonic toughbook C1, which is a rugged tablet.  It's built very well.
3515
Krishean, I've often thought of doing it your way: no antivirus.  But I'm afraid to.  I'm very comfortable with computers myself and can probably do anything with a Windows computer that doesn't involve actual programming.  However, I also like having the peace of mind of just being able to turn my brain off and just do stuff without worrying about it.  That's why I have an AV installed.  However, I am sort of questioning if I really need it.  I absolutely don't like the performance hit that AV's cause on the machine.  I love how freaking fast my computer is without Kaspersky running.  It's blazing.

I've always though of doing it, but I'm too scared.  I'm actually going through a phase where I don't want to be such a computer supergeek anymore.  I don't want to constantly be fiddling around with my computer.  Even though I like it and I'm good at it...there are other things I'm trying to do now as an adult and I'm just a little burnt out with all the computer stuff.

I forgot who, but someone here did a Kaspersky mini-review, and he turned off a lot of the components he thought were unnecessary.  I wonder if I would be any worse off if I turned off my AV entirely and just ran a scan at night after I sleep or go to work.  Would that be any worse than constantly monitoring all the time?  I don't know.  Thoughts?
3516
LaunchBar Commander / Re: My experience with LBC
« Last post by superboyac on September 02, 2010, 04:41 PM »
Thanks for bringing this up.  Auto-hiding is a subject that has been on my mind for years, but I've never really talked about it much.  I have never seen an auto-hide implementation that I have been completely satisfied with.  I probably mentioned something here about LBC years ago.

For me, I'm not talking about bugs or anything like that.  There's nothing that's actually broken or buggy.  What I'm going to talk about is what is the best way to do an auto-hide thing from an end-user standpoint.  So here goes:

Delay control for the user:
I feel this is a MUST before I'll even consider using any auto-hide feature.  The user needs to be able to set the delays for the thing to pop-out AND to pop back in.  There needs to be two fields somewhere in the options where the user can set these values in milliseconds or something.  Personally, I like zippy action: I don't want to wait at all.  I would set it to zero.  As soon as my mouse touches the hotspot, I want the thing to pop out instantly, no delays, no jerkiness, ideally no animations (for me, it adds delay).  And same goes for it popping back in.  As soon as my mouse leaves the area, I want it to disappear immediately.  No delay or anything.

Most of the time, when developers do an auto-hide thing, there are no additional tweakable elements to that.  The typical options provided are things like always on top, position, and dockable or no.  But to be able to fine-tune the actual popping in/out behavior is the key.  Everyone is going to like different speeds.  People like me want it fast.  Others like it to linger around a little bit to prevent accidental pop outs.  But the option needs to be there so the user isn't always frustrated.  It's one of those things where you may really love the software, but the popout is just annoying enough to not make you want to use it so much.  I know I've run into that.

In LBC's defense, mouser implemented the independant feature of having the menu activated by a hotkey and it appears right under the mouse cursor.  I love that so much, i've totally forgotten about the auto-hide.  In fact, when that feature was implemented, my use of LBC increased quite a bit.
3517
http://dhanti.com/ad...toughbook-c1-review/
What a typically shitty review.  It's titled "Advantages and Disadvantages of Panasonic Toughbook C1 (Review)" yet there is nothing in the article that talks about advantages or disadvantages.  NOTHING!!  What is happening?!  The internet is going to turn into 4chan.

Here's my analysis of this particular site.  This can be applied to just about 90% of the sites out there today:
screenshot_20100902141531.png
3518
Living Room / Re: Should I buy a tablet pc, ipad, netbook, or other?
« Last post by superboyac on September 02, 2010, 01:49 PM »
You know what's confusing about trying to keep up with all these gadgets?  The categories.  I feel we've gotten a little out of control with all these.  In my mind, it's helpful to think about it as two broad categories: desktop computing, and portable computing.  Everyone talks about the pros/cons of these devices, and they they start getting into little debates about how a netbook does this but a laptop does that, I think that can be confusing if you don't quite understand the technical differences.

Anyway, here's my master list of the categories I've seen mentioned:
laptop
netbook
desktop replacement (annoying term)
ultra-mobile-pc (UMPC)
tablet
tablet pc (different!)
tablet netvertible
tablet convertible notebook (bigger version of netvertible?)
notebook (?)

And each of those can probably have a regular consumer version and an "enterprise" version.  The difference?  Not much.  Maybe a few bits of hardware that are more powerful.  Superficially, the enterprise stuff will have better cases and just be built more solid generally.  Why that has to be such a big deal, I don't know.  I don't mind that, but I do get frustrated when some things on the consumer model are better than the enterprise model (see my previous comments).  That's totally a Sony type of thing.

Of course it doesn't help when people start talking about intel's different chips: low voltage, ultra low voltage, regular, i5, i7, core, etc.  Sheesh.  Once again, apple doesn't really get caught up in this.  They keep it simple.  Fortunately, I'm starting to see manufacturer websites being slightly more helpful in helping you figure out the differences, but many are still very confusing.  It's really a culture that's been developed.  it's not any one company's fault, but they do encourage it because it helps them financially.  See, the reason why apple can keep it simple and get away with it is because they know their product is very good and there really is no competition.  So they can just come out and say: we're selling a ipad, it's $49, and that's it.  But other companies have to deal with so much competition and so many models of different laptops, chips, etc., that they have to emphasize all the little technical differences.  The problem is that it makes it hard for a user (supergeek or not) to really figure out why i need this device and not that one, and so forth.
3519
i've seen lots of good info on about.com pages; in fact i'd go so far as to say it's one of the rare cases where i get the feeling that the people maintaining the pages actually care about providing good and useful information.
Ok, yes, mouser is right.  I have come across some good info there.  I guess my complaint is more with the presentation...it's borderline annoying to me.  Ok ok...I think i was a little hard on about.com.  My main complaint is that, yes, there's pretty decent information there, but not the definitive kind of information that a real expert would give.  It's more like an overview.  Also, another thing that bothers me is that their links are always very prominent in google searches, and other more helpful articles will not be so easy to find.  It's not about's fault, so I shouldn't say they are shitty.  I'll revise that.  My bad.  Overreaction.
3520
Here's a typical shitty description for (surprise!) a corporate type of software:
Wave Systems' EMBASSY Trust Suite (ETS) delivers advanced levels of security to the client PC using the TPM security chip found on most enterprise PCs today. ETS 7 features a variety of secure business productivity capabilities with an easy-to-use security center and is compatible with all TCG-Compliant secure hardware platforms.

ETS 7 includes multifactor strong authentication support for hardware-secured Windows login using fingerprints, smart cards, TPMs and passwords. ETS 7 also provides data protection, password management, TPM management, and TPM key backup/recovery. ETS 7 integrates with Wave's enterprise servers for domain-based strong authentication, for enterprise level key management, and for remote administration of Trusted Drives and TPM systems.

For systems containing self-encrypting hard drives, the EMBASSY Security Center includes the Trusted Drive Manager to activate and manage the drive’s hardware-based full disk encryption. (For more information on EMBASSY Trusted Drive Manager, please contact Wave Sales at [email protected].)
So what does it do?  Why do I want it?  How much?  See there at the end?  They just want you to call them.  All that nonsense description stuff is just fluff.  They really just want you to call them so they can send a rep down to you to try to make you buy some overpriced software that can probably be done better by some little freeware utility out there.
3521
Living Room / Re: Should I buy a tablet pc, ipad, netbook, or other?
« Last post by superboyac on September 02, 2010, 09:01 AM »
I had one of the first generation tablet PC. In fact, it was a convertible. Compaq Concerto back in 1990, running Win3.1 and a pen. Beautiful machine:
http://mvardon.com/2...apples-tablet-specs/

At the time, I was working for a large engineering company. The best thing (at the time anyway) of having a tablet PC was not to be able to enter stuff on the go (while standing up, chatting with co-workers), but accessing your information.

n.b. If (one day) voice recognition (multi-lingual, in my case) gets to be good enough, perhaps, one could consider entering significant info on a tablet
n.b. #2: Of course, now, you can achieve the access part, really easily and cheaply, using DropBox and an Ipod Touch
That's fascinating.  How cool that you had one way back then.  You've been on the notetaking frontier for a long time, Pierre! 
3522
Living Room / Re: Double-sided tape with one side to be removed later?
« Last post by superboyac on September 02, 2010, 08:37 AM »
J-mac, app...I think both of those suggestions fit the bill.  Thanks!
3523
Living Room / Re: Should I buy a tablet pc, ipad, netbook, or other?
« Last post by superboyac on September 01, 2010, 10:36 PM »
You know what?  I just don't need it.  That's all there is to it.  There's nothing like a notepad and a pencil for me.  I do everything in my notepad and at the end of the day/week enter the important stuff on my REAL computer, which is more than a desktop--it's a console station.  So, no new gadget for me.  I'm done.

Maybe...
3524
Living Room / Re: Should I buy a tablet pc, ipad, netbook, or other?
« Last post by superboyac on September 01, 2010, 10:12 PM »
Ok, ok...bear with me here...

I have now begun my "seriously shopping" phase.  I've been reading about tablet pc's for the last 3 hours now.  And, surprise, a new contestant has emerged: the HP 2740p.  The reason why I'm now considering this one is because it's more professionally built than the cheaper tm2t.  But it's not so simple.  The tm2t does SOME things better than the 2740p such as the wacom pen input, which sounds like a slightly more advanced technology than whatever is on the 2740p.  However, it doesn't sound like it's a big deal.

Now comes the price issue.  The 2740p is going to run me probably $2000 or a little more.  So it's more than twice the cost of the tm2t.  But I'm a professional, I'm not a student or a gamer.  I can afford it, but do I want to afford it.  I'm really a desktop user: I'm not much of a portable computing person.  I like big towers, lots of big monitors, big chairs, big speakers, etc.  When I'm out and about, you won't even recognize me as the geek that you all know and love here.  But the tablet thing is very intriguing to me.  You will often see me walking around with a notepad and a pencil.  i write a bunch down then go to my computer and put it in Infoqube or Evernote, etc.  I would love to transfer that to the tablet pc.  I'd like to get familiar with that whole process.  I know the technology isn't perfect right now, but maybe I'll experiment for a year or two, and then get a really nice, mature one.  back to the price, I think it may be worth it.  I'm at an age and salary level where I'll easily pay twice as much to not have stupid little annoyances like the battery bump and poor screen quality of the cheaper tablet.

On to the issues with the 2740p.  Firstly, the touch interface will never be as good as the ipad, I have to accept that.  Apple has the whole multi-touch thing practically perfected.  I'm so jealous of that.  Still, the touch interface appears to be good enough and that's fine.  There is one thing that not many people talk about around the net: third-party software!  The BEST thing about being a pc user!  There are plenty (I'm assuming) third party tools out there to make the touch experience on Windows 7 much much better.  One of them is RitePen, which I'll be excited to try out.  But let me explain what is happening.  A lot of the complaints people have about these tablets are really complaints about the touch features that are BUILT-IN Windows 7.  But nobody said you had to stick with that!  So not many people are talking about the 3rd-party tools, which I find a little surprising.  They bitch about Windows 7 touch features, the popup keyboard, etc...but all that can probably be drastically improved by some great third party utility.  I'm all about that.

So, I may actually splurge and get this thing.  But first I'm going to look at a couple of the other higher end tablet convertibles like Lenovo, Fujitsu, heck, even Panasonic (doubt it).

Here are the good links I've come across:
http://www.youtube.c.../watch?v=YSutEkZFrU0
http://www.youtube.c.../watch?v=dCjovy6aDhM
http://forum.tabletp...w.com/hp-elitebooks/

Finally, a short little quote from a helpful user that demonstrates why I keep changing my mind:
Finally, if you don't truly need a tablet (I have no professional or even hobby need, just kind of "fell in love" with the tablet/touch/pen format and its benefits when I first took the plunge in long-bagged TM2-land. Unless you already know you must have a tablet, ask yourself: how much am I using the tablet functions/how important are they to me? The reason: there are now more than half a dozen truly superb ultraportables available with the 2740 features and more, for everywhere from much less $ to similar money but far more features and performance - except tablet - eg, Toshiba Portege M700 (various configs and features), HP 2540 (as good or better than 2740 in all respects, hundreds cheaper, more options), Lenovo X201 non-tablet (same comments as HP 2540, with usual Lenovo pros/cons) - just to name a few. The Sony Z series is, for many, the "gold standard" in ultraportables, and it doesn't cost any more than a well equipped 2740p.
3525
Thanks superboyac,

Just an additional note. RecentX does 2 things. It tracks the files & folders that you access so that you can find and search your favorite items quicker then digging in to the whole list of 'never accessed' files. Plus it also allows you to search in 'All files', 'All Folders' with a single key so that you will always find a file where you accessed that file/folder or not.

So basically, irrespective of which programs you are using to access files or folders, you will always find your file/folder in RecentX.

Of course, I do see a point that you are already using many other tools for same purpose.

Regards,
Gautam Jain
I see, that's really great.  It's a nice program, really.  I'm a fan.  Thanks for participating here!
Pages: prev1 ... 136 137 138 139 140 [141] 142 143 144 145 146 ... 252next