topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Monday November 10, 2025, 6:29 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 26next
351
LaunchBar Commander / Re: Width, spacing and padding (Oh my!)
« Last post by Vurbal on January 31, 2014, 12:07 PM »
Notice how I also use a left handed mouse pointer. That's another visibility issue. I like a big mouse pointer but the bigger it is, the more it gets in your way. Click on a text box and by default the pointer is directly over where you're typing.

That's actually a really elegant solution to that problem.

Thank you. I consider that the ultimate compliment.
352
LaunchBar Commander / Re: Width, spacing and padding (Oh my!)
« Last post by Vurbal on January 28, 2014, 08:35 PM »
While I'm at it here's one more thing - not display related - I keep forgetting to ask. Why is it a few thing in text file menus require the /params argument to work, some only work if you enter the arguments normally (like on a command line) and most work either way?

Right off the top of my head the only thing I can think of that hasn't worked without it are the nircmd power/logoff features - but not the other nircmd options I've used. From memory it seems like what hasn't worked has been low level MS stuff like invoking functions using rundll32 or DirectShow filters like FFDshow configuration.
353
LaunchBar Commander / Re: Width, spacing and padding (Oh my!)
« Last post by Vurbal on January 28, 2014, 08:10 PM »
Notice how I also use a left handed mouse pointer. That's another visibility issue. I like a big mouse pointer but the bigger it is, the more it gets in your way. Click on a text box and by default the pointer is directly over where you're typing.
354
LaunchBar Commander / Width, spacing and padding (Oh my!)
« Last post by Vurbal on January 28, 2014, 07:42 PM »
Even though I'm sure Mouser will know what I'm posting about I'll spell it out for anyone else who wants to throw in their 2 cents worth. One of the side effects of LBC's functionality vs aesthetics bent is a relative lack of styling-type options. I think that's fine. It doesn't stop me from making a nice looking toolbar. If I wanted 3D animation I'd watch a cartoon.

Just for the sake of reference I'm including some screengrabs from my launchbar so it's clear what I'm talking about. I intentionally didn't resize it so it would be easier to see things at roughly the same scale I am. There are also smaller ones below to illustrate particular points. I made sure to include the mouse pointer in the images.

LBC_001.png

LBC could use at least a basic option for padding the edges of nodes for a number of reasons. The first is admittedly just because it looks nice. I'm not saying everybody cares about it but honestly most people do even if they don't understand why. Preferring symmetry is an evolutionary advantage because if one half of a person's body is very different from the other they're likely to make a poor mate. I don't really want to mate with my launchbar but having buttons of wildly different sizes kind of bugs me.

My current solution: LBC_002.png

My proposal is an option to add X pixels of padding to the edges - ideally with the option to pad the left and right sides differently than the top and bottom. It could even be per side but even I think that's excessive. The mouseover highlights could then start at the padding rather than the icon which also has a visual advantage. It's a lot easier to make out the icon or text if it's not covered with your pointer.

Currently I simply put extra spaces before and after the caption text to stretch the node boundaries. Of course it's difficult to get them close to the same size without a lot of trial and error.

LBC_011.png

It also doesn't work when the caption isn't being displayed. Besides the issue of the mouse pointer, this results in very small spaces in between. Once again not always a problem but it can be. Particularly when you're using small icons but also if 2 adjacent icons are similar or even if you're just not overly familiar with the shape. I've been using separators but that's not really ideal either since a) it means a lot of separators and b)they seem to have a minimum size of 10 pixels when used that way.

LBC_004.png LBC_008.png

LBC_006.png LBC_005.png

Padding the top and bottom isn't all that important but if it's no extra work it would look a little nicer IMO. For example it would move the icons on mine further down from the top edge. This really is just looks though and not something I would even ask for by itself.

The other problems I hinted at on IRC actually turned out to be almost entirely side effects of the kludges I recently did away with. However as I was doing a little more kludge removal today I ran across another one I'd forgotten.

Because of the different visual styles my bar uses for different sections I thought it would be nice to have finer control over the caption font. I was hoping I might be able to do that using Link nodes but that turned out not to be the case. I still like the concept though and I thought I would go ahead and move my main menu set and help file menus to their own docks anyway.

Unfortunately it didn't work for the help menus because I couldn't get them to use small icons any more. The parent menu is set to small icons for child nodes, the link nodes were set to small captions, and I even set the original menus which were now in a separate dock to small icons. No matter what it doesn't work. It's not a big deal since I can just leave them where they started. Don't spend a bunch of time troubleshooting it or anything.
355
General Software Discussion / Re: Automate options in windows 7
« Last post by Vurbal on January 26, 2014, 02:42 PM »
I love scripting :) I had a menu back in my XP days that had a listing of all of the rundll32 commands I frequently used and let me press 1-40 to launch them :)

rundll32 can do some really cool things if you have the patience to find the right arguments - or at least the forethought to keep notes when you find them.
356
General Software Discussion / Re: Automate options in windows 7
« Last post by Vurbal on January 25, 2014, 10:50 PM »
Alternatively of you want to access it quickly from within Windows Explorer you could drag it to the Favorites list at the top of the tree pane.

Running to try. I am using FileBox eXtender for favorite folders.
 :P

sorry : I don't see the favorites list at the top of the tree pane. Where is it ?
Best Regards
 :-[

Should be right at the top.
WindowsExploderFavorites.png

And I use FileBox Extender for that too - plus I get a lot of mileage from pinning and rolling up windows. I've thought about getting a commercial program for it (don't remember the name) but the minor glitches aren't quite annoying enough for that.
357
General Software Discussion / Re: Automate options in windows 7
« Last post by Vurbal on January 25, 2014, 09:57 PM »
Alternatively of you want to access it quickly from within Windows Explorer you could drag it to the Favorites list at the top of the tree pane.
358
Living Room / Re: Hard Drive Brand Reliability Data
« Last post by Vurbal on January 22, 2014, 01:23 PM »
FWIW, the two drive brands I've seen fail more than any other make were Seagate and Maxtor - which is now owned by Seagate. Seagates usually had catastrophic 'head seek' failures whereas the Maxtor's controller boards tended to smoke with no warning.

This is all from several years past but that's basically my experience as well.

Going back to the days when Maxtor was a low performance off-brand I found them to be incredibly reliable. After they grew into a major player I remember going through 5 or 6 cases (48 drives per case) of 5400 RPM PATA drives with early (within a few weeks) failure rates ranging between 20% and 40% for each and every case. Actually I'm not sure any were as low as 20%. In every case it was the electronics that failed.

For certain periods I got similar results from WD's OEM units (but never their retail models) although the sample size was much smaller - only about 30 drives.
359
Living Room / Re: No More Candy
« Last post by Vurbal on January 22, 2014, 12:58 PM »
Is the system broken? Nope. It's fixed. :P

Not for all values of "fixed."

FTFY
360
Living Room / Re: What are your favorite movies?
« Last post by Vurbal on January 14, 2014, 10:18 AM »
a recent rerun made me remember yet another favourite of mine:
Robert Altman's Gosford Park ♥ In my mind it is within Top 50.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0280707/
http://en.wikipedia....rg/wiki/Gosford_Park

You may need to love the classic British understatement culture, to fully appreciate this genre. Some people have said the film isn't funny. However, when I re-saw it last week I was literally ROTFL, when the policeman (played by Stephen Fry) again and again tried to introduce himself; it was just so hilarious! I am big fan of British humour on film and tv, and Gosford Park is not at all boring - even though Robert Altman is an American....

Stephen Fry is definitely hilarious in Gosford Park but the movie is so much more than humor. Altman has a gift for building little worlds out of characters which are so engrossing the plot is almost irrelevant. Much like my other favorite Altman movie, MASH, it's almost disappointing because I could watch another hour of those people doing whatever in that little world.
361
General Software Discussion / Re: Laptop Battery.
« Last post by Vurbal on January 04, 2014, 03:15 PM »
Isn't there usually an icon down in the system tray that shows whether you are on AC or battery?

It doesnt notify of the change though (power => battery).

The icon always changed on my old WinXP laptops.
362
General Software Discussion / Re: Mind mapping software
« Last post by Vurbal on December 29, 2013, 02:34 PM »
I ran across another interesting option today called VUE. It's Java-based, open source, and developed by Tufts University. It's mostly education oriented so that's apparently what the default setup is geared toward.

What makes it really intriguing for me, though, is a focus on interacting with web-based repositories.
363
General Software Discussion / Re: Mind mapping software
« Last post by Vurbal on December 29, 2013, 01:17 PM »
@TaoPhoenix

That's a good point WRT traditional databases vs mind maps. For your typical non-technical person a mind mapping interface would probably be more useful for the types of datasets you're talking about. The alternative would probably be something like an unwieldy spreadsheet. OTOH it's certainly not an optimal solution.

Where mind mapping really shines IMO is more freeform data organization and analysis. I'll have to throw together some examples to explain what I mean by that. I can say that a lot of the power is in navigating data directly (in the mapping software) rather than through a report. Even if you could represent more than 3 dimensions in physical space you would lose the nuances of the complex relationships.

The one use I would have wanted a map program (but couldn't find one ultra simple enough - coding snack!?) was just to capture all the web pages I visit and auto produce a tree with some nodes being annotations in between. It's fun to see the linkages when you go web surfing.

Thinking back to the website mapping feature I played with in the last pre-Microsoft version of Visio makes me think Dia could do that pretty easily by processing your browser history with a Python script. That's just a barely educated guess since I've only tried out Dia in passing and it was several years ago.
364
General Software Discussion / Re: Mind mapping software
« Last post by Vurbal on December 29, 2013, 12:25 PM »
Last time I tried to map my mind every program I tried hung with a "Re-calculating route..." message.  ;D

I can't even get that far. The origin point keeps moving and eventually the software runs out of memory updating it.  :o
365
General Software Discussion / Re: Mind mapping software
« Last post by Vurbal on December 29, 2013, 02:24 AM »
So I just looked at The Brain's webpage and it looks interesting at first glance but then I ran into one of the Pro version's features which happens to be one of my pet peeves. For collaboration (TeamBrain) you have to go through their server for no real reason other than probably making sure they control it. That's the sort of thing that usually guarantees I won't be giving the company any money. OTOH the free version seems worth consideration.

MindVisualizer looks similar to XMind at first glance - once again based on their website - although most of its features are in the free version of XMind. Actually after playing around with Freeplane some more today I'm considering switching back to XMind because it just seems like a much nicer experience. Also I seem to recall XMind doing better with many to many relationships. It might just be a lack of skill with Freeplane but that sort of embodies what I don't like about it.

Which reminds me of one other thing that some (maybe most) of the mind mapping software I've read about seems to get horribly wrong. Aside from a handful of superior offerings it seems like there's a tendency to focus on the visual layout as the structure of the data rather than just a representation of it. Doing it that way you're back to the old flat sheet of paper constraints and the result isn't a lot better than a list or outline.
366
General Software Discussion / Re: Mind mapping software
« Last post by Vurbal on December 29, 2013, 01:52 AM »
Also Compendium which is IBIS based.

I use The Brain extensively at work: found nothing better for project / information management (not a great mind mapper, as in brain-stormer, as such)

I installed CompendiumNG a few months back and honestly couldn't figure out how to do anything useful - possibly needed to follow some instructions or something. It was such a non-experience I forgot until I read your post.
367
General Software Discussion / Mind mapping software
« Last post by Vurbal on December 28, 2013, 02:39 PM »
For the last several months I've been experimenting with mind mapping software to organize my thoughts. If you're not familiar with mind mapping, it's essentially a philosophy of organizing ideas in a (theoretically) more organic way. Where traditional ways of organizing information are essentially still based on a flat file (technically flat piece of paper) model, mind mapping is a lot like a relational database approach. You have individual ideas, simple or complex (1 to 1, 1 to many, many to many) relationships between them, and the maps themselves which are visual representations of both ideas and relationships - like a report generated from a database.

Until now I've focused entirely on organizing the tangled mass of information my autistic brain spews out endlessly. It makes my internal problem solving process almost a collaboration in and of itself. Additionally the data/report paradigm saves me a lot of time I used to spend endlessly reorganizing information as my understanding of it develops.

Now that I almost sorta know what I'm doing, and what I'd like to do, it seems like a good time to start a discussion here to share thoughts about the available software and mind mapping in general. There is quite a bit of commercial software which I haven't even looked at and probably never will. Since I do intend to experiment with using it collaboratively, any software potential collaborators might need to buy seems counterproductive.

In the free (and open source) world the primary programs are Freemind and a fork (which I use) called Freeplane. I don't actually remember why I picked Freeplane over Freemind so maybe somebody else has some insight into the differences. Originally I used XMind, the free version of a commercial, closed source competitor. It's more polished, and perhaps a better starting point to get started because you don't have to invest much effort. OTOH the $79 price tag for XMind Plus and $99 (or $79 annually) for XMind Pro are too steep for my purposes.

Freeplane is nice on its own, and it also has a number of add-ons, some of which are designed to customize it for particular workflow concepts like IBIS and GTD. I'm just now getting around to looking at add-ons so I'll try to post more when I have. I should probably post a mini-review of Freeplane at some point. Given how easily my train of thought is derailed, don't hold your breath on that.

What I dislike about both Freeplane and XMind is they're Java-based. It's not a deal breaker or anything. I would have to have Java installed for another program anyway so it's not like I wouldn't already have it installed. However, unlike that other program, I'm pretty sure Freemind development began recently enough that there were lots of other (IMO better) choices for cross platform compatibility - which admittedly may not have anything to do with the choice of Java.

Anyway I'm interested in seeing what mind mapping software other people use or have tried. What I'd really like to find is something good that's not Java-based. Now that I want to use it collaboratively I suspect the Java requirement probably limits the potential. A lot of people really dislike Java and a not insignificant number flat out refuse to install it on their computers.
368
Living Room / Re: silly humor - post 'em here! [warning some NSFW and adult content]
« Last post by Vurbal on December 21, 2013, 05:22 PM »
A true Christmas classic:


369
Living Room / Re: Security in TV Shows
« Last post by Vurbal on December 21, 2013, 02:01 PM »
What's especially amusing to me watching Star Trek these days is a storyline would talk about this computer or that automated satellite installation being compromised by the enemy and not once was computer security was discussed in regards to how it happened (I guess everyone knew that the Bad Guy(tm) just needed jimmy a door open and start typing at the relevant computer console) or how to prevent the breach from happening again. Oh, sure...every week they'd re-program the sensor array to do this or that...something it wasn't designed for or re-program things in engineering to get more speed out of the engines, but when it came to protecting the navigation systems from being taken over and the Enterprise being sent off across the galaxy, it seemed like the only ones who knew how to lock people out were the Bad Guys(tm).

You are talking about the same shows where people flying around in a giant battleship routinely claim "Starfleet is not a military organization."
370
Living Room / Re: PROJECT: Children's home store server
« Last post by Vurbal on December 21, 2013, 01:03 PM »
<explanation>

Tao, let me preface this explanation below with the fact that our daughter is autistic. We use fake money because this started as a physical catalog-based store that we created in publisher and printed out as it was modified. The original intent was to teach monetary concepts and help her learn to save while also helping to enforce desirable and positive behaviors in place of certain non-desirable behaviors or actions. We are simply trying to move this one step further. Store credit would not give her the physical representation of money that she requires to fully understand these concepts. Think of the physical money as an immediate reward for her when she engages in a desirable behavior.

As a person living in the digital age, I can already tell you that I've watched many people (including myself as a teenager) get into trouble with things like non-physical money (debit cards, digital currency accounts, etc.). The reason for this is the idea that you are spending money diminishes as you use just swipe a card or login to an account. This is what we eventually want to lead up to with our daughter, but the physical money helps to enforce these concepts, and gives her something to represent how much she actually has. A big issue we have encountered is her lack of impulse control. Teaching her to save her money for the larger items in the store (A game she really wants, something of choice at the local stores, etc.) has proven difficult.

We will eventually move to all digital when we feel she has a grasp of money concepts (which isn't that far off as she is only very recently beginning to understand "a lot" VS "a little"). Additionally, we don't want to jump ship too quickly to all digital until she is able to better exhibit impulse control.

So, needless to say, she earns money in a lot of different ways throughout the day. At night, once per day, she is allowed to buy something out of the store. We include lots of little things for her as well, not just big ticket items. However, we do include things she wants that are higher priced in hopes that she will save, or learn to buy something little every now and then vice HAVING TO buy something every night.

</explanation>

Does this help?

As someone with lots of experience with my own autism and my daughter's it makes perfect sense.

The only thing I would add is to make sure and include however much of a cognitive behavior element as possible - however much that may be based on your daughter's functional level. With autism it's important to get an intellectual handle on the why of things, especially knowing at some point in the future you will probably have to adapt your behavior as your circumstances and the world around you changes.
371
Living Room / Re: Migrating from Google Gmail.com to Microsoft Outlook.com
« Last post by Vurbal on December 16, 2013, 04:26 PM »
Afraid I filter everything through Google - I get a lot of mail (most of which I don't get round to reading) and GMail's spam filter is one of the best. (Athough recently I have noticed an increase in false positives). I filter out adverts so I am not bothered by the nonsense served up - but I don't really care if an automated system wants to scan my email to target me for specific ads - at the end of the day those ads are filtered out anyway. By definition any service reads your email in one way or another - even if they don't make use of the info - if only to provide spam filtering, so nothing is really private.

Don't really care that much about privacy too much - most email is not that private anyway - but at least Google are up front. I don't trust MS or Yahoo to tell you the truth until they are likely to get caught. And Yahoo just sucks as a service - ironic since it is now MS too! I have been waiting from Yahoo to disappear into Bing and Outlook.com ... seems MS want to give the illusion of choice.

Ironically most of my email is actually filtered through my own server but I find GMail a handy place to do it all. I do daily backups offline.

That's pretty much my take on it as well. My primary email account is through Gmail for more or less the same reasons you mention plus the use of 2 factor authentication.

Re. SSL/TLS - isn't it all an illusion anyway - it is secure to and from the provider (and only possibly at the other person's end) but in the middle there isn't any secure layer? Or am I missing something?

I wouldn't say it's an illusion but it's definitely an incomplete solution. There's no way to guarantee intermediate security between email servers or between the recipient's server and client. At best you may be able to count on some measure of security between servers on your provider's internal network. As I mentioned previously it's public knowledge that Google (finally) uses encryption for those connections and Microsoft did their usual song and dance about it before eventually announcing they will be implementing something in the future.

And of course none of that prevents a government from ordering an email provider from simply handing over whatever information they want.
372
Living Room / Re: Migrating from Google Gmail.com to Microsoft Outlook.com
« Last post by Vurbal on December 14, 2013, 08:30 PM »
Just a couple points...

1. It's true SMTP's messaging is insecure but that's why it's now standard to use TSL/SSL to secure the communication. You should avoid any email provider which doesn't have strict (required) TSL/SSL implemented. I know Gmail does and AFAIK so do Outlook.com and Yahoo Mail.

2. SMTP represents a relatively small attack surface. Intercepting outgoing messages during transmission is the least efficient way to read your email unless you are being targeted specifically and individually. Actually even if you are personally targeted it's far more likely the attack will be in the form of malware which intercepts the message at the application layer or some other strategy which operates on the psychological (ie user) layer.

3. You should assume all your incoming email, and potentially also outgoing, is scanned by any and all public email services. How they scan it and what they scan for will vary but at the very least there will be a virus scan so you can guarantee they're accessing every message and every attachment individually.

4. If you're in the US you should assume any email stored for more than 6 months is available to any and all government agencies without a warrant. That is the standard interpretation of the ECPA (Electronic Communications Privacy Act) based on judicial precedents established when public email servers were pretty much useless for long term storage. One appeals court (don't remember which district) has a slightly different precedent. They ruled that if those emails (older than 6 months) were copies of messages you also downloaded and stored on your computer they were considered backups and subject to standard Fourth Amendment protection.

5. Anything sensitive you store on a third party server should not be considered secure unless you have taken measures to independently encrypt it. In other words don't rely on the same third party (including software they've provided) to both store and encrypt your data. That represents a single point of failure and avoiding those is a basic tenet of good security.

This last point is the most important IMO - although probably the least relevant to the original discussion. But since it's probably one of the most common mistakes people make I'm going to climb on my soapbox anyway. When in doubt the question should never be whether you're paranoid. It should be whether you're paranoid enough.
373
General Software Discussion / Re: New to Forum
« Last post by Vurbal on December 13, 2013, 01:49 PM »

Hmmm, I don't suppose anyone on DC wants to throw their hat into the ring?   :P

Don't look at me. I'm just here for the electroshock.



No seriously, stop looking at me...    :huh:
374
Living Room / Re: Migrating from Google Gmail.com to Microsoft Outlook.com
« Last post by Vurbal on December 12, 2013, 04:01 PM »
Regardless of any ad network issues it's a known fact that Microsoft's datacenter links aren't encrypted which means the NSA has full access to them. We know that because just a month or 2 ago they announced they would be looking into encrypting them. Google OTOH encrypted their connections earlier this year when they discovered governments were accessing those pipes via arrangements with infrastructure providers.

Then again since Google doesn't provide anyone, including themselves a record of keywords used for ad matching I don't find the whole issue particularly troubling. There are lots of things that concern me about Google but that isn't one of them.

Given Microsoft's long and incredibly consistent history of making excuses about blatant security holes for years before finally fixing them they certainly wouldn't be a company I'd turn to if I wanted more privacy.
375
General Software Discussion / Re: New to Forum
« Last post by Vurbal on December 12, 2013, 02:01 PM »
Welcome to the forum.

The third padded cell on the left is mine. If you hear howling in the middle of the night just keep walking and you'll be fine.  :o
Pages: prev1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 26next