topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday September 19, 2026, 2:57 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 [1387] 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 ... 1515next
34651
Site/Forum Features / Discussion - should we use drupal?
« Last post by mouser on October 30, 2005, 02:38 PM »
If you read my previous post on the my initial feelings about wiki you know i was not happy with it.

I've recently installed Drupal, and even without any fancy configuration I am loving it:

https://www.donationcoder.com/drupal/

I think it's likely we will remove the wiki and do all collaborative work through the Drupal pages.

I will try to set up an automatic registration for forum members so users don't have to sign up twice.

I'm also looking into the possibility of using a drupal-based feature request/bug report system, instead of the mantis standalone system we are using.




EDIT:
As you will read in this thread we have since decided not to go with drupal, and have actually settled on using MediaWiki, despite all of it's flaws.
34652
Mini-Reviews by Members / Re: Confessions from a Wiki Hater ??!?
« Last post by mouser on October 30, 2005, 01:05 PM »
i'm going to try drupal, that might match better my expectations.

[edit] drupal is suiting my tastes a lot better - i think we may use this for collaborative writing instead of wiki.
34653
Mini-Reviews by Members / Confessions from a Wiki Hater ??!?
« Last post by mouser on October 30, 2005, 12:24 PM »
i've been reading more and more about configuring mediawiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki)

one of the most well respected wiki software.

and i'm having one overriding general impression: i'm really not feeling love for it at all.  in fact i'm feeling what could probably be termed strong dislike and disrespect.

the central concept of a wiki, that you have content that people can collaboratively easily edit, is one i whole heartedly endorse.  but looking at the pathetic level of user control and organization of mediawiki, which people seem to think is the bees knees has left me nonplussed.

just two example from the disorganized wikimedia "manual" pages:

Revoking user's privileges
In its current development stage, MediaWiki has a web-based interface to create users and make sysops and bureaucrats, but it has no interface for revoking privileges.
Currently, the only way to downgrade user's privileges is through SQL:
update user set user_rights='' where user_name='yourusername';
Version 1.4 Mediawiki:
UPDATE user_rights SET ur_rights="" WHERE ur_user=1;
or using Program phpMyAdmin read a textfile into the "TINYBLOB" ur_rights of table user_rights that contains the proper user-entries "sysop,bureaucrat,developer"
permissions are actually a hell of a lot worse than that, but that's just a flavor of how nonexistent any facilities for managing users are.

heres another nice example, the comparison page on the official mediawiki page:
http://en.wikipedia....t_management_systems

oops - no values for mediawiki itself... wtf?

and this is the official software for wikipedia?!? holy christ that's not good.

i spent many hours customizing the mediawiki "skin" to fit into donationcoder (www.donationcoder.com/wiki) but don't get too used to it, i think there's a very good change i may uninstall mediawiki.

it's just a total mess as far as i can see.

let me recap - i love the idea of collaborative editing of content, but for the love of god it's not that hard to imagine that you are going to need to be able to do some minimal amount of permission management, even if its just to restrict the editing of certain areas to certain groups.  apparently wikis are suffering from huge amounts of spam lately and part of the problem is no one anticipated this or decided that it might be useful to have some moderation over content..  who are these people coding this stuff?

am i a wiki hater?
34654
Screenshot Captor / Re: "Made with Screenshot Captor" object
« Last post by mouser on October 30, 2005, 11:21 AM »
agree about spelling:
the official spelling of the name is "Screenshot Captor"
and this is the one i used.  quickstart icon i better check into - i generall avoid spaces in install directories but the quickstart icon doesn't qualify for this.  only problem is once i make a mistake naming something in installer its hard to change without people getting duplicate entries.
34655
Site/Forum Features / Re: NEW SITE FEATURE: Bug Tracker + Feature Request System
« Last post by mouser on October 30, 2005, 10:49 AM »
Any way to combine the username/password from DonationCoder and the username/password required to access mantis?


we've been discussing this - i definitely agree it would be a nice thing to do.
34656
UrlSnooper / Re: EAccessViolation
« Last post by mouser on October 30, 2005, 05:37 AM »
try searching for winpcap and "administrator rights"
url snooper uses the winpcap engine and i'm sure there are some posts about this issue at winpcap support site or web.
34657
Site/Forum Features / NEW SITE FEATURE: Wiki
« Last post by mouser on October 30, 2005, 02:45 AM »
https://www.donationcoder.com/wiki

I still don't know exactly how we're going to use this, but feel free to play around with it in the meantime.

We discussed the possibility of doing group collaboration on reviews using the wiki.

Maybe there's someone with some wiki experience who can clue us in to some of the stuff we might consider?

Software is the Open Source Media Wiki.
34658
Site/Forum Features / NEW SITE FEATURE: Bug Tracker + Feature Request System
« Last post by mouser on October 30, 2005, 02:42 AM »
https://www.donation...m/Software/Tracking/

This will soon become the official way of submitting bug reports and feature requests for all software on DonationCoder.com.

Such a system should make it much easier to keep track of requests and bugs and insure that none are overlooked.

We will probably be doing some tweaking of that section in the upcoming weeks; software is the Open Source Mantis system.
34659
ProcessTamer / Re: any plans to "force" stubborn programs?
« Last post by mouser on October 30, 2005, 01:09 AM »
thank you very much for your report bigbadbuu - your comments make a lot of sense.
a new version of process tamer will be out this month and i hope to investigate this more before then.

if someone could find a program or two for me that pt can't tame that i could run during testing, that would help a lot.
34660
Screenshot Captor / Re: 4U: keyboard key clips
« Last post by mouser on October 29, 2005, 06:39 PM »
those could really come in handy! thanks,
34661
Living Room / Flowchart and Diagramming Review
« Last post by mouser on October 29, 2005, 06:37 PM »
wow!

i've been configuring a new wiki on this site because i thought we would see if a wiki might be a better way to prep for a review.. as soon as i get it finished (tonight) we can see if its easier from your standpoint to use that or an html outline template.
34662
i think we need a review of bittorrent clients..  :Thmbsup:
34663
Living Room / Flowchart and Diagramming Review
« Last post by mouser on October 29, 2005, 10:04 AM »
i've used a couple of these tools - most are a bit overly complicated for my use.
i bought a license for edge diagrammer (which is already in your list) many years ago - it seemed to me much faster to start and use and was much more intuitive, made it easier for me to get ideas onto paper.  it may not be able to compete with some of the really complicated featuresets, but i've found it consistently more intuitive to use for limited stuff.
(www.pacestar.com)
34664
Screenshot Captor / Re: 4U: Bigger Cursor Clips
« Last post by mouser on October 29, 2005, 10:00 AM »
great! i'll add them for the next download  :Thmbsup:
34665
it has the advantage that I can make the bold and italic versions the same width as the regular font


excellent - looks great.  :up:
34666
something like vmware would really make this easy to experiment with
because you could build a setup in your vmware and also test it without risking any damage.
34667
Living Room / Re: SMF forum problem/query
« Last post by mouser on October 28, 2005, 07:22 PM »
are you using a non-standard theme?
if so try going back to default theme during testing.
34668
Living Room / Re: SMF forum problem/query
« Last post by mouser on October 28, 2005, 06:29 PM »
looks like from the image that it isnt finding its copyright text in the template, and freaking out and locking you out of it.
34669
Living Room / Flowchart and Diagramming Review
« Last post by mouser on October 28, 2005, 03:12 PM »
sword - that would be great to start off a review on diagrammers!

and wow!!! that's some list!  :up:
personally i'm very interested in this category and would be thrilled to see a comprehensive review of this category.


let me put up a template for the part1 section of reviews on the website you can download.
basically its just like an outline with a table for putting info about programs.

at least 50-60% of the work of these reviews is collecting a list of the various applications and making this part1 overview of the category and the screenshots and program info, so it would be a HUGE great start to start to make progress on that.

let me know any other way i can help.

once the part1 "catalog" of programs is written, the rest of us can help narrow down the field and identify the top tier of programs that are worthy of more detailed investigation..

i'm really looking forward to this review..
34670
ProcessTamer / Re: any plans to "force" stubborn programs?
« Last post by mouser on October 28, 2005, 01:56 PM »
yes to both.

the answer to first might be to run PT as a service; there was some discussion of looking into this earlier but i haven't yet.  if you can find any discussion of these issues and why some apps "resist" i'd love to see.

the answer to second is that i will probably implement this as an option, though there seems to be a debate about whether one would expect to get a benefit from this, since windows 2k/xp is supposed to do this semi-automatically behind the scenes, as i understand it.
34671
General Software Discussion / Re: TrustPort - Phoenix Rebel
« Last post by mouser on October 28, 2005, 12:30 PM »
very cool -
the idea of having multiple engines is really nice.
34672
General Software Discussion / Re: TrustPort - Phoenix Rebel
« Last post by mouser on October 28, 2005, 12:19 PM »
looks beautiful.

what i don't quite understand is, it seems to suppoer norman + bitdefener antivirus engines...
can you explain how that works, do they license those, or you have to have those installed separately on your own?
34673
if i went into a bread store, and spent an hour looking for bread, and couldn't find it.
i would probably yell at everyone and write up a very mean blog about that bread store  :D
34674
Living Room / Re: WEBSERVER HAS BEEN RESTARTED - 10/28/05
« Last post by mouser on October 28, 2005, 08:30 AM »
server is back up.

again, i appreciate the patience - i'm trying to get everything set up properly now rather than have troubles later.
34675
Living Room / Re: WEBSERVER WILL BE RESTARTED SOON.. BE PATIENT PLEASE 10/28/05
« Last post by mouser on October 28, 2005, 07:29 AM »
we're recompiling the web server with some additional features; the site will be down for (hopefully) only 10 minutes or so,
Pages: prev1 ... 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 [1387] 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 ... 1515next