topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Sunday December 21, 2025, 6:18 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 129 130 131 132 133 [134] 135 136 137 138 139 ... 470next
3326
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Kingsoft Office 2013 PRO giveaway
« Last post by 40hz on June 18, 2013, 12:51 PM »
^You're right. I did miss the fact they went to a subscription model.  :-[

And for which I wish them good luck because I don't see where the value added is for an office *desktop* app being by subscription only. Seriously, What needs ongoing annual updates? The dictionaries?



3327
DC Gamer Club / Re: Incredipede for free! (Linux only)
« Last post by 40hz on June 18, 2013, 12:44 PM »
The developers said the browser requirement was due to Adobe abandoning support for Linux .
3328
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Kingsoft Office 2013 PRO giveaway
« Last post by 40hz on June 18, 2013, 10:53 AM »
extended trial

------------

edit2:
Looking at their history, the program will be offered for free again within a year. So, theoretically, very theoretically, you could end up upgrading to version 2014 for free


 ;D Awesome!

@Curt - Thx for the find either way. It's really a shame they feel the need (or possibly even do need) to play these games. I bought a copy of KO some years back. It's a very capable office suite. I recall I liked it even better than Softmaker Office at that point in time. Which was why I bought it.
 8)
3329
Living Room / Re: Recommend some music videos to me!
« Last post by 40hz on June 18, 2013, 10:37 AM »
Not so much a music video as a full music documentary plus a long interview!

The complete 2003 documentary Joni Mitchell - Woman of Heart and Mind is currently available on Vimeo. Link here.

joni.png

And if that whets your curiosity, there's also this recent long interview courtesy of CBC Music currently up on YouTube:



Any woman who appears on a television interview - and who sits there unapologetically smoking throughout - is ok by me. :Thmbsup: And I don't even smoke any more!  ;D

FWIW, I liked the documentary better - not so much because the interview was lacking as I really didn't care for the way Jian Ghomeshi conducted it. YMMV.
 :Thmbsup:
3330
DC Gamer Club / Re: Incredipede for free! (Linux only)
« Last post by 40hz on June 18, 2013, 09:38 AM »
I actually downloaded it. It looks to be worth it just for the graphics alone. It's an amazing look.

incredipede_lakes_bg.jpg
3331
Found Deals and Discounts / Re: Kingsoft Office 2013 PRO giveaway
« Last post by 40hz on June 18, 2013, 09:01 AM »
Q: When is "a giveaway" not a giveaway?

A: When it's a one year loan.

 :P

Maybe it's time to create a new term for something like this?

   Boomerang-ware?

   Loaner-ware?

   Beware-ware?

   "Free" as in not-ware?

 :-\
3332
Living Room / Re: What annoys you to no end?
« Last post by 40hz on June 17, 2013, 10:43 PM »
Today it's videos demoing guitars where there's so much distortion/overdrive added - or so many effects plugged in between the instrument and the amp - that you have absolutely no idea what the instrument itself sounds like. :-\

That and "Emo" anything. :down:
3333
“Thanks,” said Sethra. “That will be all for now”.

becomes

“Thanks,” said Sethra. “That will be all for now.”

Maybe just bold the word now but not the following period?

as in: "That will be all for now." instead of "That will be all for now."

 :)
3334
It's all crafted very meticulously, carefully, control-freaky, secretly.  So what kind of positive conclusion are you supposed to draw from that, especially when *that* is what the actual facts are?

The conclusion I've drawn is:

   a) That we are being systematically lied to by those who are supposed to providing us with accurate information.

   b) I'm getting awfully tired of being lied to.

Don't know if that qualifies as "positive", however. ;D

 8) :)
3335
Well, it depends... was the article annotated that it was changed?  Or just changed?  It's the latter that is the problem.

Just changed, according to Forbes.

Hmm...on second thought...why am I now trusting what Forbes said happened?

(Kidding! But that's where actions like this can lead us if they aren't at least questioned. ;) )
3336
Honestly, I'm not particularly concerned about this. I see post-hoc editing of news stories all the time, as the need for corrections comes to light. I'm a little put out that there's no notation on the page saying that a change occurred -- I see such notes frequently. But I don't get the idea that there's anything unusual going on due to what the article reveals.

I'm concerned in that some of the so-called "newspapers of record" (NYT, WSJ, and WP) do this routinely with no notification of post-facto editing. AFAIK, the only major paper that still refuses to indulge in this practice is the Christian Science Monitor.

I think we're entitled to something a little better than having to resort to the wayback machine to pin down something that was originally said. Otherwise we're walking down the same path as The Congressional Record where a rep can say one thing on the House floor - but then "amend," "revise," "correct" or completely rewrite the official transcript after the fact.

Sorry. I have to call BS on that practice. When major papers begin changing their wording for any reason other than an incorrectly reported fact or flat out error in attribution - and do it in such a way as to change the original intent or conclusion of the article without putting the reader on notice first - smacks a little too much of the "ignorance is strength" and "it's for your own good" ruling class mindset.



It's hard enough pinning some of these rascals down in real time without allowing them to go in and change what was said after the fact. That's more than a slippery slope we're heading down if we accept that. That's eliminating history and "the record" from consideration and attempting to put the equivalent of a videogame's "revert to last save" or "do over" into real life. That's what the practice of acknowledged corrections and retractions was created for to avoid.

Life doesn't have a reset or "new game" feature. Time is not a two way street in our world. We deal with nothing but actual events and their consequences plus the fallout from the decisions that were made in response to them. To get away from that is pure "magical thinking."

Let's not let the fourth estate encourage that by playing fast and loose with what was actually said when it actually was said.
 :)

3337
Living Room / Re: Bitmessage - a protocol for secure decentralized e-mail
« Last post by 40hz on June 17, 2013, 10:05 AM »
(had to look up browncoats...ah, firefly, why is joss wheden so prolific?!)

More like... why is he not more prolific?

He is. He just can't get anybody behind him. ;D

Joke:

Q: What's are two the best ways to guarantee a good TV show will be canceled early?

A: 1) Have Joss Wheden write it. 2) Give Summer Glau a role in it.

wh.jpg

It's a fiendish plot. They'll never convince me otherwise. :-\

Sorry that this didn't pan out.  Seems a good idea with a bad implementation.

So it goes. Onward!... :) :Thmbsup:
3338
Living Room / Re: Bitmessage - a protocol for secure decentralized e-mail
« Last post by 40hz on June 17, 2013, 09:20 AM »
Ouch, that does not look good. My impression of what the analyst is carefully not saying is not good. Especially if one assumes who is the most likely choice for a local external "attacker", hm...

Yup. Problematic. At least in its current implementation - which is why it's so important to have people who really understand signal and data security take a very hard look at these things.

Although it is very nice that people are working on creating secure and anonymous messaging systems, I am afraid that BitMessage is weak to a variety of attacks. I fear that the people working on it do not have sufficient expertise, in the fields of security and anonymity, to design and implement a proper cryptographic communications system + anonymity network. After reading the two design .pdf documents, I have identified a variety of weaknesses and overall poor design choices in the BitMessage protocol.

And therein lies the problem with so much of this - and also shows the value of building such protocols in an open fashion - many eyes (often with greater expertise) can chime in with corrections and suggestions. Something which is absolutely critical here. Because the only thing more dangerous than lacking security is the false belief you have some.

watch.png

At any rate, the discussion on their forum is most instructive. I've learned more than a few of things I didn't know after reading through it slowly - then giving it some serious thought a few hours later while gazing at the stars with a nice glass of ale by my side.

Be interesting to see if this is an issue of detail and implementation - or - if the fundamental design itself is flawed and needs to be scrapped. But at the very least, people are thinking, talking and working on this idea. And that can only lead to good things down the road.

@ 40hz - What is second choice?

Nothing else like it so far. At east from what I've seen. Right now encryption+proxy is the only other viable alternative AFAICT.

Onward! :Thmbsup:
3339
On a very related note, here's a prime example of the problem with extensive 'databasing' done in the name of security and law enforcement. This is a classic case of "Who guards the guards?" And yet another example of how the NYPD has become somewhat notorious for circling the wagons whenever called to task for violating the very laws they are sworn to uphold. (They are not the only police agency that has done so either.)

This article from the Village Voice:

NYPD Sergeant Convicted of Misusing Terror Database Now "Integrity" Officer in Brooklyn Precinct
By Graham Rayman Fri., Jun. 14 2013 at 11:56 AM


Five years ago, NYPD Sergeant Haytham Khalil was indicted for illegally accessing the FBI criminal records and terrorism database on behalf of a friend in a child custody dispute. He pleaded guilty in 2009.

Today, Khalil not only is still with the police department, despite his conviction, but he is an integrity control officer in a Brooklyn precinct.

In sum, an officer convicted of abusing his position to access confidential information for a private purpose is now monitoring whether other officers are following the rules.

We asked the NYPD's public information office for comment, but received no response.

The National Crime Information Center maintains a database filled with sensitive information used by law enforcement agencies across the country in investigations.

Khalil, 37, of Brooklyn was convicted of using another sergeant's password to access the NCIC database and retrieved an entry which identified an individual as being on the terrorist watch list. He then sent that document to a female friend in a child custody dispute in Canada. That dispute was with a man who was being monitored by the feds. The friend then filed the document in court records in Canada.

Khalil pleaded to accessing a computer beyond his authority, a misdemeanor. He faced a maximum of one year in jail and a $100,000 fine. He was sentenced in 2009 to one year probation and a $500 fine.

Under state law, if he had pleaded guilty to a felony, he would have been fired. But since he pleaded to a misdemeanor, the NYPD could decide to keep him on the job.
:-\

3340
Living Room / Re: Bitmessage - a protocol for secure decentralized e-mail
« Last post by 40hz on June 16, 2013, 07:25 PM »
Shiny. Browncoats Unite!

Don't really have anything to add... just had to give a shout out as a Browncoat.  Now let's go be bad guys.

Let's!  ;D "Because we are so... very... pretty. We are just too pretty for God to let us die." :Thmbsup:
3341
Ok...it's starting to look more Orwellian than we imagined.

This article over at Forbes shows how The Washington Post has been changing it's news archives.

...One of the most remarkable changes is the subtle retraction that companies were knowingly complicit. The Post changed the text to say that “participation is essential” to the program and bears on citing the source document.

The original:

    The technology companies, which participate knowingly in PRISM operations, include most of the dominant global players of Silicon Valley.

The updated:

    The technology companies, whose cooperation is essential to PRISM operations, include most of the dominant global players of Silicon Valley, according to the document.

While I think it's right and proper for a news organization to publicly clarify or correct erroneous information or conclusions in one of its reports, I find it somewhat worrisome when the official new archive is quietly 'corrected' after the fact - and with no mention made. That just smacks of 1984 and the ongoing historic revisionism that Winston Smith's department was charged with.

So it goes.  :-\ Full article can be found at the Forbes website here.
3342
@k - looks like you're running your very own private NaNoWriMo with this one. ;D

Keep going! Don't break the rhythm since you're apparently in the zone right now. We're all behind you 100%. :Thmbsup:
3343
Living Room / Re: Bitmessage - a protocol for secure decentralized e-mail
« Last post by 40hz on June 16, 2013, 07:08 AM »
Downloaded and installed it under Linux Mint. Very easy process.

Seems to be working correctly. Got this after it was up for around 10 seconds. It appears to be pretty active:  

bmsg.png

Heh! What a perfect application for a RaspberryPi or similar inexpensive SBC.

Next step will be to get it to work with DD-WRT so that it can be embedded in an open router. Or better yet - a PirateBox! 8)

However, to emphasize ewemoa's earlier point, the people behind Bitmessage are still waiting for the independent security audit they themselves requested be done. So don't just assume this thing is as as secure as is hoped until that happens.

And (if you're ultra-paranoid) also don't rule out the possibility that this could eventually become a very sneaky and sophisticated honeypot if the wrong people can figure out a way to somehow co-opt it. There's just no rest for the wicked.

But who should know that better than us, right? ;)



Shiny. Browncoats Unite! :Thmbsup: ;D

3344
^We can probably thank Tor for that. They've been very proactive when it comes to e-publishing.
3345
^Well...I'd have to stop procrastinating and working on music long enough to finish it first, but I don't think I'd care either way. SF fans don't seem to have a problem with e-books so that wouldn't be an issue. I think I'd be open to either format although my inclination might be to e-pub first to see what kind of reaction I got. Ultimately I'd want to see it done up as a graphic novel more than anything else.
 8)
3346
^Currently some quasi military-themed sci-fi. :)
3347
Living Room / Re: Bitmessage - a protocol for secure decentralized e-mail
« Last post by 40hz on June 15, 2013, 01:10 PM »
Sounds interesting, but as a proxy (if I understand what they're saying on their websites) it's only as trustworthy as you're willing to trust them.

Bitmessage is a little more promising to me (assuming it gets popular enough) since nobody has direct control over it due to it's decentralized and anonymized (is that a word?) design.

In some respects it hearkens back to FidoMail and FidoNet in that regard.

Time will tell if it actually flies. :)
3348
The only cure I can see is to neuter the beast: take away its strength. And the way to do that is to shrink it, so it's no longer the 800-lb gorilla that can push everyone around.

Sounds good - but like putting the proverbial bell on the cat - exactly how do you accomplish that?

You have a government that has gradually centralized all real power in the Executive Branch. And this Executive Branch has become increasingly uncontrollable due to it's assumption of unprecedented privileges and its deliberate defiance of any attempts to enforce a workable system of checks and balances over it.

You also have a "representative" Legislative Branch that no longer even feels the need to do more than pay lip service to the notion of acting on behalf of its electorate, let alone represent it.

You have a feckless and divided federal judiciary, burdened by age and a love of definition that borders on the pathological, that freely admits (often with a note of pride) how very little it understands about the many of the crucial things (education reform, software, patents, the Internet, modern communications, women, children, families, etc.) it so glibly rules on. And so often with such disastrous consequences.

Then you have an ever increasingly powerful, arrogant and secretive government bureaucracy - consisting of many obscurely named agencies - which also have their own enforcers in the form of duly sworn "agents"  (or independent security "consultants" and "contractors") who do what they're paid to do - with no questions asked. And this bureaucracy (which is not accountable to the electorate and is now becoming increasingly difficult to rein in because of it) has more and more come to believe that IT rather than the PEOPLE is what constitutes The United States of America.

dont.jpg

So maybe I sound cynical, but what exactly can you do to shrink a monster that is incapable of internal reform - and is actively hostile towards any outside attempts reform it? Especially when it has access to guns, drones, wiretaps, secure communications, is willing to defy the elected branches of government when push comes to shove, and has a documented history of lying whenever asked an inconvenient question?

Walt Kelly absolutely nailed it back in 1971:

pogo.jpg

"It's a big problem." as my 5-year old niece likes to say.

So...anybody have any good workable ideas about how to fix this mess that wouldn't be interpreted as "seditious speech" under The Patriot Act? :huh:
3349
^Same here! Thx for serving as a little kick in the butt K-Man! :Thmbsup: ;D
3350
Living Room / Re: What are your favorite movies?
« Last post by 40hz on June 15, 2013, 10:21 AM »
Not out yet, but this one looks promising. Due for release in August 2013 and also available for IMAX viewing if you're into seeing things on the really big screen. Could be good. It's called Elysium. Class warfare in a not-too-distant dystopian future:





Pages: prev1 ... 129 130 131 132 133 [134] 135 136 137 138 139 ... 470next