So I don't see a return to patronage as necessarily desireable or without danger to artistic integrity.
-40hz
I do agree there are dangers- but there's danger in everything. The trick is to be aware of them, and work to avoid them. You really think that the current system we have is any better? And that those same pressures don't exist? The current system is closer to classical patronage- the few hold the money, and they support who they will on a whim. When I say patronage, I don't think towards that system- but more towards those that want support directly. That is what I like about patronage. I give $1 and it's not much. 10000 give $1 and it's a clear sign that you're doing something that people like. 100,000 give $1... and you're well on your way. So I mean everyone being a patron of what they like. Rather than the artist getting only a fraction of what I pay, and being in control of a lesser fraction. And where you have to basically sign away your work in order to get published.
I had a friend... a moderately successful writer. He wrote a pretty niche set of novels, and still writes them. It was originally his story... and one that the publisher just publishes, right? He tried to go into different media. Things that the publisher wasn't even into. Used Kickstarter for it, and was very successful. Too successful one might say- there was nothing from the publisher's side, until the Kickstarter did so well. You can imagine the rest. It ended *reasonably* well, but still, it shows that people above will grasp onto anything they can keep ahold of, and squeeze until there's nothing left.