topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Saturday September 19, 2026, 11:51 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 127 128 129 130 131 [132] 133 134 135 136 137 ... 404next
3276
Living Room / CISA almost guaranteed to become law
« Last post by wraith808 on December 17, 2015, 10:10 AM »
Lawmakers Have Snuck CISA Into a Bill That Is Guaranteed to Become a Law

At 2 AM Wednesday morning, Speaker of the House Paul Ryan unveiled a 2000-page budget bill that will fund the federal government well into next year. The omnibus spending bill, as it's usually referred to, is the result of countless hours of backroom dealings and negotiations between Republicans and Democrats.

Without the budget bill (or a short-term emergency measure), the government shuts down, as it did in 2013 for 16 days when lawmakers couldn’t reach a budget deal. It contains dozens of measures that make the country run, and once it's released and agreed to, it's basically a guarantee to pass. Voting against it or vetoing it is politically costly, which is kind of the point: Republicans get some things they want, Democrats get some things they want, no one is totally happy but they live with it anyway. This is how countless pieces of bad legislation get passed in America—as riders on extremely important pieces of legislation that are politically difficult to vote against.

As Politico notes:

"In a closed-door meeting with fellow Republicans, Ryan touted a pause in Obamacare's 'Cadillac tax,' the lifting of a longstanding oil-export ban and preservation of several other policy preferences in the year-end deal, which include $1.149 trillion in spending and several hundred billion in tax breaks.
After the deal was announced, many members of both parties said Democrats won this round on federal spending. They agreed to lift the prohibition on exporting US oil, but turned back other so-called GOP policy riders, including efforts to tighten restrictions on Syrian and Iraqi refugees. The GOP also did not mount a serious effort to strip funding from Planned Parenthood, although many hardline conservatives had demanded such a move."

You see how it is. This is some House of Cards-type shit, and anyone who values their privacy is screwed, because, let's face it—CISA is small potatoes politically speaking compared to the other stuff in here. Every major political media outlet is already talking about how the deal avoids a government shutdown and is talking as though it has already been passed. And that’s because, for all intents and purposes, the agreement on the text of the bill itself was the politically difficult hurdle to clear—the actual passage of it is a foregone conclusion.

More on what exactly got sandwiched in there at the link

Brought to you courtesy of Ghacks.  Support GHacks at their patreon- these articles are a sampling of the links he aggregates.
3277
Living Room / This is Great! An analysis of the Emperor's 'Poison Pill'
« Last post by wraith808 on December 17, 2015, 10:04 AM »
It's a Trap: Emperor Palpatine's Poison Pill

In this paper we study the financial repercussions of the destruction of two fully armed and operational moon-sized battle stations ("Death Stars") in a 4-year period and the dissolution of the galactic government in Star Wars. The emphasis of this work is to calibrate and simulate a model of the banking and financial systems within the galaxy. Along these lines, we measure the level of systemic risk that may have been generated by the death of Emperor Palpatine and the destruction of the second Death Star. We conclude by finding the economic resources the Rebel Alliance would need to have in reserve in order to prevent a financial crisis from gripping the galaxy through an optimally allocated banking bailout.

Brought to you courtesy of Ghacks.  Support GHacks at their patreon- these articles are a sampling of the links he aggregates.
3278
Living Room / Re: 14 year-old boy arrested for creating a digital clock
« Last post by wraith808 on December 17, 2015, 09:39 AM »
From the comments on the video:

This hits home for me. I had a situation 6 years ago (15yo)when I was in computer class and I was making a blueprint for a portable solar speaker after I finished my assignments. The teacher in his infinite wisdom takes a screenshot as "evidence" and reports it to the principal, and they both think it is a bomb. They call the police to escort me to the county jail for my dad to pick me up. I was expelled and 'sentenced' to alternative school. I took my GED test after a year of waiting to turn 16 to qualify for one. I'm now an associate in mechatronics and I want to continue working with electronics and robotics.
3279
Found Deals and Discounts / GP Software (Directory Opus) 2015 Holiday Sale
« Last post by wraith808 on December 16, 2015, 11:55 PM »
Received this via e-mail, and thought that there might be interest:

It's the GP Software 2015 Holiday Sale!

To celebrate the end of another fine year of Directory Opus development, GP Software is pleased to announce the 2015 Holiday sale is now on!

Until December 26th, everything Directory Opus-related is 50% off! That means:

Directory Opus Light is 50% off
Directory Opus Pro is 50% off
Upgrades from Opus 10 or earlier to Opus 11 are 50% off
Extra licences are 50% off
Optional features like Advanced FTP and USB export are 50% off
It's all 50% off! :)

To take advantage of this sale, use the coupon code HALFPRICE2015 before December 27th.

To upgrade or buy new copies of Opus 11, visit the Directory Opus online purchase page.
To add licences and optional features to your existing licence, login to the My Account page.
We hope you've had a great 2015. Enjoy the holiday season and we wish you a fantastic year in 2016!

All the best,
Greg & Jon
GP Software, Brisbane, Australia
3280
Living Room / Re: Kickstarter has a problem... the Solution
« Last post by wraith808 on December 16, 2015, 07:04 PM »
Meanwhile you back 350 projects!? Any quick notes about averages and some special case backing higher amounts?

I am at 376 Backed, with 7 currently active.  The most I've spent is 120 Pounds, followed by 120 USD, followed by 114 USD, and 2 100 USD.  The first is consistently putting out stuff- the next two just closed, but I anticipate no problems.  The third was a failure, with complete recompense and a product.  I was doing it more to get the collateral stuff (editing from gaming professionals, and opinions on work) and they didn't respond in time for my deadline, so that was more of a hit than the actual product.  The other 100 was ahead of schedule for the main product, and the stretch goals followed closely.

There's no way to export your data that I know of, so I haven't really done any analysis.  But I do have rules for backing, no matter how much I want to get stuff, that I've detailed before.  It's become more and more refined as I go along.  I've passed on some things that I've thought were good ideas and/or I wanted because of them- I'm pretty strict in that regard.

Most of the things that I've gotten have been in the gaming category- mostly role-playing games and board games, and accessories for both.  There are a few computer games in there (both of my other failures are computer games), and I really seem to like wallets from what one of my friends commented.

My first backed project was in Dec 18, 2009, and there were no thoughts of failure back then- I was only backing people I knew that wanted to do things.

And on that note, Kickstarter's interface for projects that you have backed sucks when you've backed as much as I have.

My oldest non-fulfilled Kickstarter that I still consider viable was funded on Jul 17, 2011.  My first failure was funded Apr 6 2012, and looking back at it, I wouldn't have backed if I were using my current rules.  But it was only $5.  And looking through, I have another failure- it was for $1.  It actually delivered, but an iOS update broke it, and the developer refunded everyone rather than deal with Apple again, and released the source.

Another interesting tidbit- I have backed only 5 unsuccessful projects (in terms of funding).  I have pulled out of quite a few... subsequent research or a re-think of whether I wanted to be involved were the causes.

Used correctly, it's a great platform.  But a lot of the crowdfunders don't know what the platform is for, and of course are understandably annoyed and verbal when their project fails.  Creating an image that I don't think is accurate, and am sure that Kickstarter doesn't want.

3281
Living Room / Re: help with data matching
« Last post by wraith808 on December 16, 2015, 04:40 PM »
I can pull the postcodes easily, and likewise derive corresponding suburbs.  Trouble is their data doesn't necessarily match my data (and in many cases is just plain wrong)

which brings me back to the street address.  I'd be interested in how I might go about building some sort of regex tool, but given the variables I'm not sure how I would even go about it

Well, I don't know much about AU street addresses.  Which is one of the reasons I quieted down once you clarified.  Can you expound?

Until then, some general resources:

As you said this was for a company, there are several services if you have a budget for this that would probably cost less than paying you to reinvent the wheel.

A good example: https://smartystreets.com/features

I use RegExBuddy to help me build.  There's also a good library: http://www.regxlib.c...etectCookieSupport=1

A good start (but this is US Based)

Code: Text [Select]
  1. \d{1,5}\s\w.\s(\b\w*\b\s){1,2}\w*\.

(need to get mouser to add regex to the code highlighting)

This bit of RegEx allows 1-5 digits for the house number, a space, a character followed by a period (for N. or S.), 1-2 words for the street name, finished with an abbreviation (like st. or rd.).  This by no means solves your problem... it's just meant as a start.

You can also use text matching to brute force the text matches... and use the DICE coefficient to set a threshold for human intervention.  For more on that, visit: https://en.wikibooks...Dice%27s_coefficient.  There are implementation examples in several languages.

A better and more practical explanation: http://www.tsjensen....In+C+Extensions.aspx
3282
Living Room / Kickstarter has a problem... the Solution
« Last post by wraith808 on December 16, 2015, 04:32 PM »
Kickstarter has a problem.  Even with all of the successful projects, it's becoming known more for its outlying failures (which of course, can happen to anyone) rather than its outlying successes.  What can you do about it, without putting undue strictures on the creators or turning Kickstarter into something it's not?  An independent analysis of the numbers seems a good way to start.

The Kickstarter Fulfillment Report - An independent analysis by the University of Pennsylvania.

In March 2015, we invited a scholar from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania to help answer this question. Professor Ethan Mollick is an expert in entrepreneurship and innovation who developed an independent study surveying nearly 500,000 backers about project outcomes and backer sentiment.

Note, that they don't say anything about the funding of the project.  That would be more transparent- whether invited meant solicited and funded.  Not that I think it's a salient point, but it will be to some people.  All sorts of groups give grants to study particular things that might be of use to the funding group. 

There is, however this tidbit, that might stave off the naysayers:

“Kickstarter collaborated on data gathering, but these results are independent and solely my own work. I was not paid by Kickstarter, and all analyses were conducted independently of Kickstarter. Kickstarter was offered the chance to comment on, but not change, this paper before it was made public. For the backer data, Kickstarter conducted the survey using questions jointly developed with me, but shared all relevant non- private data. For the survey of project creators, the survey was conducted by me alone, and responses were not shared with Kickstarter. All errors and omissions are mine.”

Emphasis mine.  But the next question is- how were you funded?  Which is not answered.

What is important is the next paragraph:

This is the largest study to ever examine the Kickstarter community. We had no influence over its findings. Before research began, Wharton and Kickstarter agreed that we would co-publish the results, whatever was found.

But for some, that will get lost in the question of who funded it, which is a shame.

I'll summarize the points for those who don't want to read.

  • 9% of Kickstarter projects fail to deliver rewards
  • Failure rates are consistent across categories
  • Projects that raise less than $1,000 fail the most often
  • There are good failures and bad failures

That last point refers to project satisfaction.

In the end, he says that each backer should allow for a 1-in-10 failure rate of projects backed.  I guess I'm just lucky- I consider only 3 of my 350+ projects to have failed.  Those have gone silent without delivering.  Many are late- very late in one case- but they're still communicating and progressing.  And one of those refunded 100% of my pledge, and gave a complimentary product. 

I'm in it more for the process, though I only back things that are interesting to me.  I have a worse rate on IndieGoGo, which is the reason that I don't use it anymore.  It seems more wild west than Kickstarter.

But back to the report - it's an interesting read, with interesting methodology- especially for the last point.  I do like that they include it, however.
3283
Living Room / Re: Kickstarter Highlight: Onion Omega
« Last post by wraith808 on December 16, 2015, 07:31 AM »
I'm still at a standstill.  Got a needle, but I can't get the power on.  Might order a dock... but they're backordered.

I guess I should be glad I forgot to order the dock then, given the problems that have been had with the power switch.

Less than impressed with their response to the power switch fiasco.  They did accept responsibility, which is good.  But they're trying their damnedest not to take responsibility for a solution to their existing base.  Some people can get them on... and that's fine.  But there's literally nothing left in the slot for me to move with a needle.  Their last response was send us a close-up picture and we'll try to see what you're working with and how to use the needle.
3284
Living Room / Re: help with data matching
« Last post by wraith808 on December 16, 2015, 07:28 AM »
so basically I'm just going to have to slog my way through it - luckily it's only small (4.5K records)


RegEx could really help with this- other than the street address.  Also, remember it doesn't have to be either/or.  You can use a programmatic method to narrow it down to possible matches that you have to look at, and do that part manually.

And I think that's exactly what 4wd said above, but I'm going to post this anyway because maybe I'm wrong.  :-[
3285
Living Room / Re: Kickstarter Highlight: Onion Omega
« Last post by wraith808 on December 15, 2015, 11:09 PM »
I'm still at a standstill.  Got a needle, but I can't get the power on.  Might order a dock... but they're backordered.
3286
Living Room / Re: help with data matching
« Last post by wraith808 on December 15, 2015, 09:01 PM »
there are different considerations when you have a localized area for the addresses vs. international and local, so I was clarifying if the information was international or not.
3287
Living Room / Re: Kickstarter Highlight: Onion Omega
« Last post by wraith808 on December 15, 2015, 09:00 PM »
Nice!  I didn't realize the screen was going to be so small!
3288
Living Room / Re: help with data matching
« Last post by wraith808 on December 15, 2015, 06:27 PM »
US only?
3289
Developer's Corner / Re: Mixing Code Licences - AKA let's bake a program
« Last post by wraith808 on December 15, 2015, 01:56 PM »
Don't know myself.  The easiest thing to do would be to take your primary license, see where the inherent incompatibilities lie, then research the others.  For example, if you using MS-Pl it's a copyleft license, so you look for licenses that are not compatible with copyleft.  That is still not comprehensive, but it's a sanity preserving approach.

http://www.gnu.org/l...license-list.en.html

https://en.wikipedia...icense_compatibility

https://en.wikipedia...ce_software_licenses

http://www.dwheeler....s-license-slide.html

floss-license-slide-image.png
3290
Living Room / Re: good Videos [short films] here :)
« Last post by wraith808 on December 14, 2015, 08:39 PM »
If you haven't heard of the Nicolas Brothers, you're in for a treat!  With none other than Gregory Hines and Maurice Hines narrating- and saying how much above them the Nicolas Brothers' skill was- and that's saying something!  A dance number that Fred Astaire himself once said was the best ever put in a movie- and this was after Singing in the Rain.  It's AMAZING!



The number only, in better quality.



3291
Living Room / Re: good Videos [short films] here :)
« Last post by wraith808 on December 14, 2015, 06:38 PM »


Pretty interesting video about a Superhero coming out in a real world.
3292
Living Room / Re: good Videos [short films] here :)
« Last post by wraith808 on December 14, 2015, 06:35 PM »


Impressive and Cute
3293
That bias in this case can be summed up very well:

“Hi, I’m from the games industry. Governments, please regulate my more successful competitors.”

Always remember:

“The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.”

both of these are valid viewpoints

with respect to the first, successful doesn't mean better (or even good), which is what I think was the nub of his complaint (I know nothing about star citizen, but the voice in my head was screaming duke nukem!!)

and with respect to the latter there's another quote about if you tell a lie for long enough it becomes the truth.  Seems to me that we could well be filling the world with fools, simply because all we're giving them is lies advertising



Just to add (didn't want to rant anymore than I already was), that the whole thing rang as disingenuous, when Star Citizen and f2p browser games are apples and oranges, and applying the same broad stroke to both is a recipe for the same type of regulation that we have today.
3294
The tl;dr is that gamers are massively outgunned by marketing departments with bots and Big Data.


I might go for that, other than this line:

people need to be saved from themselves.

Bullshit.  Just because one side is bad, doesn't mean the other side is worse.

An article that might seem to lean towards the way of the writer:

http://toucharcade.c...ee-to-play-producer/

It is bad.  In fact, it's arguably worse than what he says in the article.  But adults don't need to be saved from themselves.  No matter the reasoning.  It's not a slippery slope.  It's an express elevator funded by your tax dollars.

"Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?"

I follow Cliffski, and have bought his games, and do enjoy his articles.  But he's a bit vitriolic at times, and definitely has his own agenda.  And even worse, he subscribes to his agenda with one hand, while bashing the system with the other.

http://positech.co.u...ove-on-or-they-fail/

http://positech.co.u...-ethical-capitalism/

http://positech.co.u...ie-apocalypse-maybe/

He's a good writer, and very well-spoken.  I like his game.  But I also realize he has biases, and they show... but he doesn't really acknowledge it.  So I take the good, and bin the bad in his conversation, passing them through the lens of known bias.

But really, if I didn't hammer it home enough: Don't ask the government for anything for me, or for the "greater good".  You'll get a new form of evil in response.

That bias in this case can be summed up very well:

“Hi, I’m from the games industry. Governments, please regulate my more successful competitors.”

Always remember:

“The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.”
3295
If 4.5.2 is getting security updates, then since 4.0 "support" is included with it...I'd have to think it would also get updated in the process. Okay sure, Microsoft can tend to be a big bag of dicks...but do you really think they'd push it to only updating half of an existing package?


That's just it.  If 4.0 support was just included and it just worked out of the box, I'd agree with you.  But it is only pre-supposed to be working.  They haven't tested everything- that's pretty evident from the post, and pretty self-evident as they can't test every bit of code out there.

Are there any breaking changes in .NET 4.5.2? Why do you include these changes?

There are a very small number of changes in .NET 4.5.2 that are not fully compatible with earlier .NET versions. We include these changes only when absolutely necessary in the interests of security, in order to comply with industry wide standards, or in order to correct a previous incompatibility within .NET. Additionally, there are a small number of changes included in .NET 4.5.2 that will only be enabled if you choose to recompile your application against .NET 4.5.2.

They're trying best-effort, and they're trying to minimize the perceived impact...

... but tell that to the boss when you're in the whatever percentage.

Check these two links:

https://msdn.microso...58358(v=vs.110).aspx

https://msdn.microso...61502(v=vs.110).aspx

Now, admittedly, most of this you can get around.  But you have to get around it.  Just letting MS autotarget?  That's a recipe for failure for someone.  And that someone may be you.

3296
"As previously announced, starting January 12, 2016 Microsoft will no longer provide security updates, technical support or hotfixes for .NET 4, 4.5, and 4.5.1 frameworks. All other framework versions, including 3.5, 4.5.2, 4.6 and 4.6.1, will be supported for the duration of their established lifecycle. The decision to end support for these versions will allow us to invest more resources towards improvements of the .NET Framework."

All of this wraps into some weirdness with my AdiIRC client new version, so I gotta keep my eye on this thread!

I expect I'll have to ask for tips in a lil' bit, I just don't have my grasp together on this yet what to ask.

There is nothing you can do.  Side-by-Side configuration just lets you run different versions.  In our case at work, we have a legacy platform that we couldn't upgrade at the time, but a new platform that had to use assemblies for the older update.  The Side-by-Side that Stoic linked to does exactly what it says.  Allows you to run versions side-by-side, or in parallel.  Even when configured, if your app targets the older version- it will use the older version.  Things that target the newer version, use the newer.  It does, however, let you specify versions of the framework that your application is compatible with.  But, back to the article that Stoic linked- there's a minor blurb there, that shows what I am concerned about:

In practice, this compatibility can be broken by seemingly inconsequential changes in the .NET Framework and changes in programming techniques.

The only thing you can do is request that the makers of AdiIRC recompile it for 4.5.2 or 4.6.

And to further cloud the issue, I want to point out the verbiage they use and what it implies to me.

"All other framework versions, including 3.5, 4.5.2, 4.6 and 4.6.1, will be supported for the duration of their established lifecycle."

Why those versions?  And how much savings in resources will that mean?  It just doesn't add up.  Why break the lifecycle rules now?  But in any case, this was just a PSA, as I'd not seen talk about it anywhere, and missed the original announcement, and thought others might have also.
3297
You can implement side by side compatibility- and we've had to do that.  But it's something you have to do.  And it doesn't work for C++ libraries that you might be linking to that do not link to the correct .NET framework version.  And there are changes between .NET versions.  I know because I've had to go through this before, and the behaviour of initialization of certain complex types changed between major versions.  And then there's the idea of third-party libraries you can't just recompile.  I've had that problem too.  And you can tell what .net framework things are compiled for, so even if you were to have your theoretical call, and they started to help you... once you got down to it and they say what it was compiled for, you'd be out of luck.   But what I'm really talking about is security problems that they will now now release patches for.

It's not a simple issue, and it's not necessarily a simple fix either.
3298
Why would they need to support 4.0 directly? 4.5.1 gets upgraded to 4.5.2, and 4.5.2 includes 4.0 just like 3.5 includes 3.0 and 2.0. So they're not really orphaning it, their just bundling it in with the latest version to limit the number of updates that need to be futzed with.

[ Invalid Attachment ]

Because of software and development.  If you target 4.0 in your applications, then you are using an unsupported version.  Much of our infrastructure in the company I work for is using 4.0.  Most of the software I have linked from the site also uses 4.0.  Unless I recompile it for 4.5 and re-release, it's unsupported.  Even if the assemblies for the versions are in the same place, they are not the same version, as you can see by the linked assemblies a build is targeting.
3299
You can actually disable it if you don't use the windows store with no adverse effects.  What you should really do if you're interested is use ProcessMonitor to see what is actually causing it.  It's a broker as it implies, so it's doing this on behalf of another process.
3300
http://blogs.msdn.co...4-4-5-and-4-5-1.aspx

I don't know how I missed this!

As previously announced, starting January 12, 2016 Microsoft will no longer provide security updates, technical support or hotfixes for .NET 4, 4.5, and 4.5.1 frameworks. All other framework versions, including 3.5, 4.5.2, 4.6 and 4.6.1, will be supported for the duration of their established lifecycle. The decision to end support for these versions will allow us to invest more resources towards improvements of the .NET Framework.

More at link.  I thought the versions that were affected... and unaffected... were interesting, and confusing!
Pages: prev1 ... 127 128 129 130 131 [132] 133 134 135 136 137 ... 404next