topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 13, 2025, 4:31 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 117 118 119 120 121 [122] 123 124 125 126 127 ... 252next
3026
Living Room / Re: Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by superboyac on January 10, 2011, 05:51 PM »
The diagonal measurement isn't helpful at all, as far as I'm concerned.  The ONLY thing it does is offer a single number with which to compare other similar numbers to.  It's like if someone were working with height (in the US) and giving the millimeter measurement.  So, instead of saying I'm 6' tall, I'd say I'm 1829 mm tall.  So I'm going to do that now...it's such an asshole thing to do.  Because now it's up to the other person to figure out what that exactly means.  Nobody knows what 1829 mm looks like, unless they are weird.  Nobody has any idea what shape a 48" TV is unless they just rock at doing Pythagorean in their head.
3027
Living Room / Re: What happened to the free WSJ articles through Google News?
« Last post by superboyac on January 10, 2011, 05:10 PM »
No problem, man!  I wasn't flaming you or anything.  Maybe I do that so much everyone is just used to it.  Yikes!  Really, I'm a pretty nice person....sometimes.  At least my mom thinks so...sometimes.
3028
Living Room / Re: What happened to the free WSJ articles through Google News?
« Last post by superboyac on January 10, 2011, 05:05 PM »
I don't mind and all, it's just I can't find any information about it.  I don't think it could just be an accidental thing.  It's not like it's no big thing to all of a sudden say that we're not allowing free articles on Google anymore.  I just expected more news about it.  But, as usual, it seems like nobody cares...I didn't find anything in my search.
3029
zero
3030
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: NANY 2011 Release: Ethervane Radio
« Last post by superboyac on January 10, 2011, 04:34 PM »
Ah!  Always great to see tranglos developing new software. One of the best!
3031
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on January 10, 2011, 03:03 PM »
I was just eyeing the PowerVault MD1000 as my storage box.

Sorry if I sound like a broken record... I'm all for the off-lease commercial stuff. The company I mentioned in the other thread Stallard Technologies, Inc. handles those and they are indeed $3,000+ (refurbished). However...

I spoke to my contact there the last week (While ordering a PowerEdge 2800), and told him about DC. If you call the number on their site, ask for Geoff (pronounced Jeff), and tell him you're from here he'll work with you. No discounts were discussed, but if you need a configuration not listed in their site (small number of large drives with room to grow), he's the man to see; knowledgeable, honest, & fun to chat with.

Note: I also found out (last week) that they have a referral program, but that has no bearing on my decision to endorse them. I like the company because they have excellent service & quality product.
Thanks Stoic!  that's the kind of help I truly value.  I will definitely give him a call.
3032
Living Room / Re: Why I love product reviews....written by NON-TECHS
« Last post by superboyac on January 10, 2011, 02:26 PM »
Warning!

@Bamse - love your new avatar.  :Thmbsup: Almost as evil as Josh's creepy little gnat thing. 
 (see attachment in previous post)
Have you seen this yet?  8)
I hope that's as good as the previews look.
3033
Living Room / Re: Why I love product reviews....written by NON-TECHS
« Last post by superboyac on January 10, 2011, 01:26 PM »
Renegade, with non-techies I was referring to pro and amateurs who don't know what they talk about or worse have agenda guiding them. Could be getting clicks to their site so Google money or affiliate deals kicks in. Attempts to seek "Always flame" label could be part of that of course. Techies don't necessarily have credentials other than they don't blabber too much. Years of experience don't mean crap if you are stupid and not able to consume new knowledge. Did certainly not hint you should look for credentials  :o or if none available what X person say is useless. Closer to the opposite in tech area I think.

That's true also.  The majority of "reviews" out there are just plain spam.  I mean, the web is inundated with this stuff.  Finding anything is like a needle in a haystack situation.  The only time I actually find stuff is when people refer me to specific links.  Googling hardly gets you anything these days.
3034
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on January 10, 2011, 01:20 PM »
I was only asking.  I don't have a problem spending it if there's a reason for it.  That's what I wanted to know.  I don't shy away from spending a little extra if the equipment is all rugged, well made, metal, etc.  vs. something cheap and plasticky.  But then we're talking 10x the price, so that might be a little too much to justify.

But I may very well go for that $300 Norco unit.  People seem to be pretty happy with that.  I also don't really want to do this with a normal tower case.  i want to build a mid-size rack.  Not one of those 7-footer ones, but like a mid-height thing around 4' or so.    I want to be semi-enterprise quality with this stuff, even though it's for home use.  I'm like that.
3035
Living Room / Re: Building a home server. Please help, DC!
« Last post by superboyac on January 10, 2011, 12:46 PM »
I totally forgot about this thread.

What do you guys think about Dell's Powervault line?  I was just eyeing the PowerVault MD1000 as my storage box.  I spoke to someone this weekend that highly recommended it, saying they are very well built and so forth.  I mean, The Norco unit that most consumers like me buy costs about $300, and this thing would cost like $3000.  So what is it that justifies a 10x price difference?
3036
Living Room / What happened to the free WSJ articles through Google News?
« Last post by superboyac on January 10, 2011, 11:44 AM »
I was under the impression that if you accessed Wall Street Journal articles through Google News, then you could read the full article for free.  But now it seems like that isn't the case anymore.  Does anybody know what happened here?
3037
Living Room / Re: Why I love product reviews....written by NON-TECHS
« Last post by superboyac on January 10, 2011, 10:43 AM »
The techies tend to obsess over minor things that hardly anybody cares about.  While they may have valuable things to say about that minor point, they end up writing a lot that ultimately ends up being useless to most people who come across the article.  It's the quantity over quality thing.  It's hard to be consice and to also be able to be sensitive to what most people would care about.  It's the difference in reading a pop magazine (like Time) and an academic journal.  The scientists scoff at Time because they don't get into the hardcore details, and claim it's pop rubbish.  The pop culture crowd picks up an academic journal and thinks, "What the fuck is this, and who gives a shit.  Oh, and it's super boring."

Which is why the most valuable people as far this stuff goes, are those who have a clear grasp on the technical stuff, but also can break down the important points to the non-techies, non-geeks, whatever you want to call them.  Guys like Stephen Fry are very gifted at this.
3038
Living Room / Re: Is there a better site than AllMusic.com?
« Last post by superboyac on January 10, 2011, 08:53 AM »
Yeah, I have to give it to Deo on that one.  I was like, "wha...where....OH!  haha"  Whenever you say hitler, the mustache is the first thing that comes to mind...people forget about the floppy hairdo.
3039
Living Room / Re: Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by superboyac on January 09, 2011, 11:51 PM »
1080p is a *ton* more pixels than 720p, and it's hard to push 30 frames per second with the additional resource demand. Truth be told 720p actually looks very good at most normal screen sizes, almost indistinguishable in motion from 1080p at average viewing distances. The biggest issue with 720p in 3d rendered images like console games is antialiasing. If you have 720p imagery with good antialiasing, it really won't matter. Problem is *good* antialiasing is often about as demanding as simply pushing more pixels, so you can get 720p with good AA, or 1080p with no AA. Usually 720p with good AA is actually better.

- Oshyan
Are you saying that even modern computer equipment still has trouble with 1080p?  After all this time?  I mean, I don't really doubt it...with my own 1080p video files, I can sense my computer (which has great specs) working pretty hard to do it.  Still, I find it hard to believe that even basic equipment can't handle 1080p.  I don't get that.
3040
Living Room / Re: Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by superboyac on January 09, 2011, 11:29 PM »
Really?  The PS3 games are NOT 1080p HD?  Why not?  i thought that was the whole point of the kickass PS3 system, the amazing graphics.
3041
Living Room / Re: Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by superboyac on January 08, 2011, 11:54 PM »
Bravo!  Freaking 40hz!  Thanks man.

OK, so as is usually the case with life's truth, it's not black or white, but a gray area.  So the diagonal thing is definitely not a conspiracy as I laid out above.  However, now that it has been a fair amount of years or decades since the tube limitations were an issue, why haven't the companies started using the WxH measurement?  I still insist that the reason is because the number won't be as big and they will lose ground to other competitors that keep using the diagonal.  So it's not a conspiracy, but there is a deliberate attempt to NOT show that information.

If I were them, I'd at least put the WxH on the smaller print of the display units in the stores or online, whatever.  They can still rely on the diagonal as their MAIN sticker or standout number, but somewhere tell us what the width and length are.  I mean, as someone stated, they give us all the other seemingly unimportant numbers, why not that one?

Actually, if it were really up to me, I'd make a standard sticker that showed the diagonal, length AND width all in a standard way.  I've already seen somewhat standard badge-like stickers that they put on tv's in the stores, and it's basically a big black sticker with a yellow diagonal going across with the number 54" shown on it.  Well, just add a vertical and horizontal arrow in a different color and smaller scale with those other numbers, and everyone's happy.  Right?  Nobody can say anything to that one.
3042
Man, Oshyan is really doing us a big service here.  This is a lot of legwork and analysis.  Thanks dude.
3043
Living Room / Re: Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by superboyac on January 08, 2011, 03:09 PM »
And I find that to be a pretty fine indication of physical size, really, moreso today where ratio has been pretty much stabilized on 16:9/16:10 (there's not a lot of 4:3 monitors around anymore).

Still, it would be nice if they just gave you the WxH measurement instead of making you resort to plugging the screen ratio numbers along with the diagonal measurement into the Pythagorean theorem just to get an answer.  :-\

Ever look at all the specs they print on those boxes? They'll tell you everything you could possibly want to know about the product - including several things any sane person could care less about. In short, they tell you everything BUT the freekin' width and height measurements of the screen.

What's up with that?  Is there some gentleman's agreement in the industry that you don't talk about WxH? :huh:
That's my point, exactly!  They deliberately withhold that information, because if they did list it, even in the smaller print, customers would get used to seeing it there.  Soon, customers would get used to it and start talking about their tv's using those numbers instead of the diagonal number, because it just makes more sense.  So, in the office, when someone asks how big your tv is, right now we say 50" or whatever....but eventually, if that information was readily available, people would start saying 40x30" even if not all the time...but that would destroy the power of that big >>54"<< sticker that is so prominent on the tv's in the store now.  Anyway...
3044
Living Room / Re: Fast/Responsive programs: An official SuperboyAC list
« Last post by superboyac on January 08, 2011, 03:05 PM »
40's on a roll!!

Bamse's right, I don't like Irfanview as a program, but it sure is fast.
3045
Bravo!!  BraVO!!

Man, I was TOTALLY going to be going through this during my planned 2011 home theater makeover edition project.  I am so glad you have detailed everything out, because it saves me a LOT of legwork.  Whew!  I was all set on starting with XBMC, I even was testing it on a virtual machine.  I had played with MeediOS, but like you, I felt it was way too complicated, and I didn't even really continue.  I tried J River, and you are exactly right...what's the big deal?  It is like a Cadillac....think about it...Cadillacs today are not really "hip" cars, just a good name.  Nobody cares about Cadillacs anymore...it's so old school.  Just like J River.  haha

Good stuff, man.
3046
Living Room / Re: My 'LOL' alternative
« Last post by superboyac on January 07, 2011, 09:28 PM »
I've only had one friend in life who could make me laugh that much.. I miss hanging out with him.
I know.  Isn't it a shame?  I'm trying to recapture that ability to legitimately laugh out loud.  Not fake it, which is what I normally do if I don't catch myself.  I probably laugh like that at most once every 6 months.  Crazy to say.  I've gotten so cynical.  I don't know.  Actually, I was in tears just the other day...Toy Story 3, when Buzz Lightyear went into Spanish mode.  But I was also crying because the movie was so freaking good.  So it was both...but Buzz really pushed me over the limit.
3047
Living Room / My 'LOL' alternative
« Last post by superboyac on January 07, 2011, 09:20 PM »
I've never liked typing 'lol'.  It doesn't ever reflect the accuracy of the emotion.  It's too smug and quiet for what it stands for.  Whenever I see it, I picture someone just kind of smirking.  That's partly due to it's abuse.  I mean, actually "laughing out loud" as the phrase suggests is something that is rare, and it's rarity is to be appreciated as such.  So, I made these 3 video clips from the once popular Everybody Loves Raymond show.  It's not my favorite show, but this particular laughing scene by Robert (Brad Garrett) is probably my favorite TV laugh of all time.  Yes, I categorize a lot of things.  So here they are below for everyone's use.  I even posted the bbcode so you can paste it in the forums if you wish (along with the thumbnail).  Cool, yeah?

LOL (level 1)
i.e. should make you chuckle out loud at your monitor


[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsSth9szPxQ][img]http://aram.dcmembers.com/wp-content/uploads/images/lol-level1r.jpg[/img][/url]


LOL (level 2)
i.e. prolonged laughter compared to the above


[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISASED7nrGE][img]http://aram.dcmembers.com/wp-content/uploads/images/lol-level2r.jpg[/img][/url]


LOL (level 3)
i.e. you are laughing loud enough to make your coworkers wonder


[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Uky1SUtoh4][img]http://aram.dcmembers.com/wp-content/uploads/images/lol-level3r.jpg[/img][/url]
3048
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: That NANY badge
« Last post by superboyac on January 07, 2011, 08:54 PM »
OK, I'm making a closet apple fan badge.  Sorry, didn't mean to hijack...I just remembered.

If you could make it an apple peeking out of a closet that would be hilarious...
I know, wouldn't it?!  I can't find any images in my clipart at the moment.  I don't want to make a big project out of it, but knowing myself I will.  It will happen...
3049
N.A.N.Y. 2011 / Re: That NANY badge
« Last post by superboyac on January 07, 2011, 08:35 PM »
OK, I'm making a closet apple fan badge.  Sorry, didn't mean to hijack...I just remembered.
3050
Living Room / Can we stop with the diagonal screen length thing?
« Last post by superboyac on January 07, 2011, 06:27 PM »
Ok, one more rant for the week.

I am SOO tired of this diagonal screen length that has now become the standard dimension to advertise for all screens.  It's not the dimension itself that irritates me, since it is partly helpful.  It's more of the reason WHY it has become the standard number to give for screen sizes.  It's the exact same manipulation that is used for prices...the whole $3.99 thing (the .99 part).

It's so freaking annoying.  Why?  Because every time I see a screen size with the diagonal, which is all of them now, I have to go through a whole mental exercise to figure out what that actually means to me as far as width x height.  I don't know about you guys, but when I see rectangular objects, I do not intuitively think about the diagonal length, nor do I really give a shit.  Length and width makes sense to me.  You tell me length and width, and I know exactly what you are talking.  I can picture the shape, I can figure out very quickly and intuitively if it fits somewhere, etc.  All good stuff.

You tell me the diagonal length, and I'm like "cmon, asshole", now I have to do all this math to really understand how big it is.  Furthermore, to really tell, you need the ratio also.  "Oh, but they give you the screen resolution in the spec also.  So you can just figure it out.  It's all there!"  Shut up!!  As if i don't have enough work to do!  So now, I'm supposed to take the freaking 12" diagonal number, and then take the 1024x768 number and do all the math to figure out the length and width??  Are you kidding me?  Look at those numbers...12, 1024, 768!  Cmon people!

But that's how they get you.  I have no idea what a 54" TV means to me.  But it allows them to use the bigger number.  of course the diagonal is going to be a bigger number than the length or the width.  So given the three numbers that describe screen size, of course they are going to use the biggest one.  That's good marketing.  Useless, but good marketing.

What happened is that one company started doing this.  I remember when monitor sizes were given as LxW.  The diagonal was also given as a convenience, but not the main feature.  Now, it's the one sticker that is prominently featured on the product.  Anyway, back in those days, what happened was one company started doing it.  They were able to advertise a "bigger" number for the same size screen as their competitor.  The competitors must have lost a little bit of the market because of the people who got duped by it.  So they all started doing it.  Now it's the thing to do.
Pages: prev1 ... 117 118 119 120 121 [122] 123 124 125 126 127 ... 252next