topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Sunday December 21, 2025, 4:12 am
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 115 116 117 118 119 [120] 121 122 123 124 125 ... 470next
2976
What's in the folder you're interested in. Docs? Or things like settings and executables?
2977
Living Room / Re: Please help superboyac build a server (2013 edition).
« Last post by 40hz on August 07, 2013, 04:05 PM »
^ Welcome to the world of system administration!

It's not just a job...it's a...well...it's...ah screw it! It's a job. ;D
2978
Living Room / Re: Anti-Tracking Smartphone Pouch
« Last post by 40hz on August 07, 2013, 03:26 PM »
Wonder if it actually does work as well as claimed? I don't think they've had any independent confirmation of their claims - but I could be wrong.

Of course since the NSA can easily monitor who supported the kickstarter and got one - plus who buys one once they become commercially available (ain't debit and credit cards a grand thing?), it's kinda moot. Besides, any phone that regularly drops off the grid and can't be reached by a backchannel ping - and then pops back for no apparent reason - becomes a dead giveaway that the owner is employing some shielding mechanism.

That should be enough to get you on a list of phone owners targeted for 'heightened' scrutiny...

That's the insidious part what's going on. It's not a technical fix we need. We need to address and deal with the people and power issue here. And get it resolved definitively. Otherwise it becomes a game of "whack-a-mole" as somebody characterized it. It'll never end if we only try to deal with the technology and not the attitudes and motivations behind this government's blanket and effectively unsupervised surveillance agenda.

2979
Living Room / Re: Please help superboyac build a server (2013 edition).
« Last post by 40hz on August 07, 2013, 03:14 PM »
I haven't been able to find much information about FreeNAS 9 or 9.1, especially regarding the drive pooling features.  Got anything to read or watch for that?

Sorry I missed your question earlier.

Downloadable docs for all current versions of FreeNAS can be found on this page. Manual in PDF format for 9.1.0 can be directly downloaded here. The ZFS pooling info starts on page 111.

Can't comment at this point because it's a brand new version of FreeNAS and I haven't got any hands-on with this version. And I'm not sure I really would be able to say much since this 20 drive Leviathan server you're building will have more drives under unified management than anything I've ever worked with. Biggest I've ever done is 4 drives with ZFS. It's worked really well for me so far.

But remember, with servers - especially storage servers - you're in it for the long game. So it isn't until you hit the 5-year mark and successfully recover from your first few hardware crises that you can realistically say: "This is good. It works."

Look at what happened with Backblaze once a few of their mondo storage servers started experiencing real loads and time frames. Intermittent 'bad surprises' cropped up with some people's data even though Backblaze's techs do know what they're doing.

Like the man says, "It ain't over till it's over."

And with this stuff, it's never really over. 8)

2980
Living Room / Re: P3005 HP LaserJet printer questions
« Last post by 40hz on August 07, 2013, 01:07 PM »
They're great printers, but a bit much for Techidaves print volume as if the cartridge gets too old (recommended shelf life is 1 year) the seals will go and dump all the toner into the printer in one shot. And it's not the kind of mess you can scrape off the Teflon roller in the fuser...so plan on kissing that goodbye too.

Yep. Just had that happen recently with my beloved personal 4150N. I've been trying to see if I can get it cleaned out as kind of a hobby project when I'm feeling mechanical. Doesn't look too promising.

2981
Living Room / Re: New bill upgrades unauthorized streaming to a felony
« Last post by 40hz on August 07, 2013, 01:02 PM »
Any questions about how fascism works?

Just two:

1. How late are they open?
2. How far away are they from midtown

(with apologies to Woody Allen)

 :P
2982
Please put me down for a copy if it's not to late. :Thmbsup:
2983
Living Room / Re: save and upload
« Last post by 40hz on August 07, 2013, 07:21 AM »
oh, I want it for personal use!

From their site's copyright notice, they seem to draw a distinction between documents which they do allow to be copied for personal use, and everything else they have up on their site which may not be copied without their express permission. See below:

Permission to use documents such as white papers, press releases, data sheets, etc. from this Web site is granted, provided that (i) the copyright notice below and this permission notice appear on each use of such documents; (ii) such use is for informational and non-commercial or personal purposes only; and (iii) documents are not copied or posted on any network computer or broadcast in any media. No modifications of any Information is permitted. Use for any other purpose is expressly prohibited by law. Documents specified above do not include the design or layout of the www.quintiles.com Web site or any other Quintiles owned, operated, licensed or controlled site. Elements of Quintiles Web sites are protected by trade dress and other laws and may not be copied or imitated in whole or in part. No logo, graphic, sound or image from any Quintiles Web site may be copied or retransmitted unless expressly permitted by Quintiles.

Also, the fact they don't have an obvious way to download the presentations your link points to seems to be a pretty strong indication they don't want people downloading them. Or so it seems to me.
 :)
2984
Living Room / Re: save and upload
« Last post by 40hz on August 07, 2013, 06:29 AM »
Elements of Quintiles Web sites are protected by trade dress and other laws and may not be copied or imitated in whole or in part. No logo, graphic, sound or image from any Quintiles Web site may be copied or retransmitted unless expressly permitted by Quintiles.

2985
Living Room / Re: PLease help superboyac build a server (2013 edition).
« Last post by 40hz on August 06, 2013, 03:45 PM »
@SB - that second quote sounds like either somebody shilling for Microsoft, or somebody who doesn't know much about Linux other than what they've seen in non-specialist web articles.

The mount point argument being made is incorrect, misinformed, and outdated. Red herring. It can be ignored.

ZFS is very "production ready" although there are poor implementations of it out there. Best to find a distro that officially supports it as one of their filesystems if you want to use it. Btrfs is still in heavy enough development that I wouldn't consider it for anything really big and/or critical at this point...

Regarding Darkleech - I suppose that could be a danger in some areas. But if you're not running an Apache server on the box in question it can't affect you. Smart money also seems to indicate the attack vector is through outdated or insecure copies of Plesk or cPanel since the exploit needs to gain root access to the server in order to do it's dirty deed. Unless you're planning to run a public facing webserver, I wouldn't worry about Darkleech too much. It's more a hosting service provider problem revolving around sloppy configurations plus them not keeping up with security patches since that's mostly who has been targeted.
 8)
2986
Living Room / Re: PLease help superboyac build a server (2013 edition).
« Last post by 40hz on August 06, 2013, 03:21 PM »
There's a variant of disk pooling available with Server 2012.

Yes indeed. But that puppy is an entirely different breed of tech from what they had in WHS.

I've never done anything with pooling in a Windows server production environment. But I did get some (brief) hands-on with it in a lab setting. Looked impressive. But that's one of those things you need to have up long-term before  you can say for real how well it works in contrast to something like tossing VMs back and forth. With that, you have immediate feedback if something isn't what they say it is.

Indeed, time will tell as they say. But with SB's desire for flexible access to...stuff. It sounds right down his alley ... Assuming he doesn't decide to go the Linux route. I just thought it best to clarify before preclusively eliminating an option.

Actually, if you're most comfortable with Windows and don't really feel like putting the time into getting over the learning curve on an entirely new OS environment, there's no intrinsic need to look at Linux except maybe to save some significant money and more fully own your server.

I'd definitely be inclined to download a trial copy of a Windows server and give it a try with a project like this one.

One catch would be the hardware compatibility issue. It's important to remember that if your chosen devices aren't on Microsoft's list, they'll make no representations about them working correctly (or remaining stable) when used with their server software.

I've never encountered any real systemic faults with MS Server. Truth is, with Windows Server, most problems I've run into were caused by either a bad initial setup, or by somebody messing with things they were warned were best left alone.

But, I love stupid people ... They pay for my house! ;)

Don't know about love - but yeah...I'm somewhat dependent on their mistakes and lack of knowledge for my own income too. ;D
2987
Living Room / Re: HTTPS Hackable In 30 Seconds: DHS Alert
« Last post by 40hz on August 06, 2013, 01:09 PM »
DHS issued an alert?

All of a sudden these guys are working for us again? What's up with that? :huh:

2988
Living Room / Re: PLease help superboyac build a server (2013 edition).
« Last post by 40hz on August 06, 2013, 12:59 PM »
There's a variant of disk pooling available with Server 2012.

Yes indeed. But that puppy is an entirely different breed of tech from what they had in WHS.

I've never done anything with pooling in a Windows server production environment. But I did get some (brief) hands-on with it in a lab setting. Looked impressive. But that's one of those things you need to have up long-term before  you can say for real how well it works in contrast to something like tossing VMs back and forth. With that, you have immediate feedback if something isn't what they say it is.

I'd have no problem implementing Microsoft's pooling capabilities however, if I were anyplace that would benefit from it. Microsoft's mainline server technology is rock solid. As good - or better - than anything else that's out there in the situations it's intended for.

I've never encountered any real systemic faults with MS Server. Truth is, with Windows Server, most problems I've run into were caused by either a bad initial setup, or by somebody messing with things they were warned were best left alone.

If you follow the directions (RTFM is particularly appropriate advice when doing up a server)  and observe what Microsoft considers to be 'best practices' whenever deploying one of their server products, they really are extremely capable and (mostly) worry free. Windows servers that are correctly provisioned (hardware-wise) and which get set up "by the book," offer years of virtually flawless performance. And with minimal management or maintenance.

One of the reasons I tend to be so hard on Microsoft is because I know what levels of technical excellence they're capable of achieving. So if I'm more critical of what they do than some other companies, it's because I do respect them. And I also expect more of them because of it.
2989
Living Room / Re: PLease help superboyac build a server (2013 edition).
« Last post by 40hz on August 06, 2013, 08:26 AM »
Is that for the WHS version, the new version, or both? I've never had occasion to play with it ... But I've got all my VMs on an 8 disk hardware RAID5 array.



It was for the WHS version.

Ah! Okay. I remember that debacle. But supposedly they got that all fixed...supposedly... They were pitching it as the best thing since sliced bread at the last MS show I went to. Guess we'll have to wait for 40 to chime in on the clarification then. Thanks.

The first iterations worked ok as long as you didn't push it too much. Then something went terribly wrong a few updates later. Microsoft 'fixed' it by the simple expedient of removing the drive pooling feature from WHS.


But it's kinda moot now. Unless I missed something WHS has been officially discontinued. Microsoft is suggesting its very stripped down "Windows Server Essentials" server as the replacement.

However, with the advent of its cloud services iniative, I don't expect Microsoft to do anything to bring back WHS. Their attitude seems to be that most file and streaming media servers really belong up in the cloud. Ideally the Microsoft cloud, where Ballmer will be be happy to rent you as much storage space as you'll ever need. All major credit cards accepted!

2990
Living Room / Re: PLease help superboyac build a server (2013 edition).
« Last post by 40hz on August 06, 2013, 06:38 AM »

Don't like the sound of that last bit.  I guess it is saying, when you run out of space, it's best NOT to try to replace the existing drives with bigger ones, but rather, just add storage.  That is certainly possible with my setup.

That's going to be  the case with pretty much anything you choose. Since the drives are pooled (in whatever fashion) pulling out any existing element in the pool which is already holding data will result in similar degradation until the data either gets reconstructed and redistributed to the remaining elements or a new drive gets incorporated into the pool. That's because your system is aware of what drives it has in its pool. If anything happens to them (or you decide to pull and replace one) certain niceties need to be preserved while housekeeping gets performed. So until the system finishes cleaning up, the system will be 'degraded.' And any additional 'surprises' it encounters while doing so could result in data loss. But the same is true of RAID or pooling or any other storage virtualization scheme. The important thing is how many simultaneous surprises the scheme can deal with at a time - and how quickly it can recover and resume full normal operations following them.

If you're really feeling ambitious about all this, take a look at Gluster-FS when you get a chance. There's also a bunch of videos on it up on Youtube.
 8)
2991
Living Room / Re: BREAKING: Half of TOR sites compromised, including TORMail.
« Last post by 40hz on August 05, 2013, 06:57 PM »
So where is the Mule to blow this all to hell and free us?
Doesn't matter, a few hundred years and we'll be back on track... :D

Yup. When the stars are right and the Great Old Ones return.  ;D :Thmbsup:
2992
Living Room / Re: BREAKING: Half of TOR sites compromised, including TORMail.
« Last post by 40hz on August 05, 2013, 06:55 PM »
I guess I'm cynical.

I don't see the revelation as an oversight or screw up.

I think a very pointed message is being sent to the cyber-counterculture and digital separatists.

The message is: We own your ass, kiddies. And we can collect on it any time we feel like.

2993
Living Room / Re: PLease help superboyac build a server (2013 edition).
« Last post by 40hz on August 05, 2013, 06:48 PM »
oh yeah...never used the pool feature in Windows server.

But that's only because the servers I spec are purpose built and configured for specific tasks, so the storage configuration in them remains static for their service life. And to date, none of my clients were looking for anything quite as big as what you're planning.

I also tend to veer towards multiple smaller rather than one large server purely to avoid a single point of failure scenario and also to provide some flexibility down the road.

YMMV.  8)
2994
Living Room / Re: PLease help superboyac build a server (2013 edition).
« Last post by 40hz on August 05, 2013, 06:41 PM »
Before you commit to W2k12 server, be sure to check out the latest version of FreeNAS just out.

2013-08-03   NEW • BSD Release: FreeNAS 9.1.0
   Josh Paetzel has announced the release of FreeNAS 9.1.0, an open-source and BSD-based NAS solution that enables the users to build networked storage devices on a multitude of hardware platforms: "The FreeNAS development team is delighted to announce the general release of FreeNAS 9.1.0. This release offers massive improvements to the usability, extensibility, stability, and performance of FreeNAS. Everything from the web user interface, plugin management system, base operating system, ZFS file system, and even the source control used to manage the project has been substantially improved. With FreeNAS 9.1.0, iXsystems sets a new level of excellence and power in open source storage solutions... The volume creation interface has been completely replaced with a new wizard that assists the user in creating the most ideal storage pool and optimal setup for the number of disks available, also helping those unfamiliar with ZFS to make correct early configuration decisions and avoid painful rebuilds later." Check the full release announcement for more information. The ISO images as well as the PDF documentation are available from the download page (SHA256): FreeNAS-9.1.0-RELEASE-x64.iso (306MB).


This one ain't your granddad's FreeNAS.
2995
Living Room / Re: Apple vs. Samsung Goes NUCLEAR!
« Last post by 40hz on August 05, 2013, 12:10 PM »
Hardly surprising. This won't be the first time a U.S. president has intervened in full executive capacity on something that either went 'against the public interest' - or was simply something the government didn't want to allow to happen.

That is why Apple, Microsoft, the US movie and music industry, and Monsanto's business interests will always be protected by this government, come hell or high water. Just as the US will protect any other key American business if it's in an industry where the US still retains general market dominance.

Such is the way of the world.

Good TechDirt coverage of this one here.
2996
Living Room / Re: BREAKING: Half of TOR sites compromised, including TORMail.
« Last post by 40hz on August 05, 2013, 11:52 AM »
Do you read any alternative media?

Seldom. Or at least not deliberately/

I just read. A lot. Of anything I can get my hands on. I'm sort of with Charles Forte who suggested we need to look at everything - and not just throw out the stuff that doesn't fit in with what we either "know" or believe to be possible. "Catalog everything. Then file it away for future review and correlation." he used to say.

Do that long enough and patterns and connections start emerging. Patterns and connections that often get confirmed as being accurate by the events which follow. In time it becomes crystal clear what forces are at work for what ends. After that, it gets very depressing. ;)

So no, I don't consciously seek out alternative reporting. I just read. And I ignore conspiracy theories and simply wait for the wheels within wheels to reveal themselves.

(Note: I got nothing against conspiracy theories per se. It's just that I can spin far more creative and scarier conspiracy theories than any I've ever be told. So if I feel the need for one, I'll just come up with one on my own. >:D)
2997
Techdirt and Popehat are both on this story too. Talk about getting a double black eye!

Pretty interesting reading.
2998
Living Room / Re: BREAKING: Half of TOR sites compromised, including TORMail.
« Last post by 40hz on August 05, 2013, 07:14 AM »
Damn you prophet boy.  :D

Not a prophet by any means. Just an avid student of history and human psychology who read The Foundation Trilogy when still a young and highly impressionable child. :(

 ;D
2999
Living Room / Re: Where/how do you mostly watch movies/videos?
« Last post by 40hz on August 05, 2013, 06:20 AM »
My order of preference:

On DVD or media server to a TV screen
On Netflix via a Roku box to a TV screen
On a standard PC from a locally hosted file
On a standard PC via stream

Reasons:

1. My eyesight isn't all that great, so the bigger the screen, the better AFAIC.
2. I prefer watching a movie using the same aspect ratio it was filmed in. (see #1 above)

 8)
3000
Living Room / Re: BREAKING: Half of TOR sites compromised, including TORMail.
« Last post by 40hz on August 05, 2013, 05:56 AM »
@Ren - I get that a lot. :)

And just for the record, I REALLY hate it too.

Things like this I want to be completely wrong about. Seriously.

And since I'm in predictive mode, the next steps will be something like this:

After a great deal of fulminating and managed debate, most of the public will knuckle under and accept broad and highly intrusive albeit mostly invisible (by design) regulation and monitoring of any and all web traffic. At which point the Internet will enter it's second incarnation that I think of as The Overnet (i.e. an internet with overlords).

In response, you'll have the usual protocol battles to attempt to wring some level of anonymity and privacy out of government/corporate owned and operated networks. Broad and vaguely worded laws will be eventually passed to make such attempts illegal. And draconian fines and penalties will be handed down on a certain token number of highly publicized cases. Those charged will be thoroughly demonized (i.e. kiddie-porn, terrorism, drug dealing, human trafficking, organized crime) - in some cases with justification - but also at times without. These cases will form the basis for talking points which will be repeated ad nauseum in order to control the scope and terms of any ongoing debate about the subject of web monitoring.

In the meantime, efforts will continue to develop methodologies to evade government monitoring. Most will be unsuccessful and mainly serve as unsuspecting R&D and 'quality control' for government monitoring efforts. Knowing full well that anything which doesn't kill us serves to make us stronger, governments will deliberately act stupider than they are in order to encourage such activities and identify those involved in it.

Some (very few) of the less talented will be periodically arrested and charged. But it will be purely for token effect.

The truly talented will be offered government jobs in exchange for a waiver of prosecution. Those rare individuals who pose a genuine threat however, will simply be apprehended, bled dry of what they know, and either 'rehabilitated' into some government occupation, or quietly disposed of - with no need for a trial or anyone being made the wiser.

Eventually a series of protocols will emerge that do provide genuine anonymity and privacy and the The Undernet will be born. This will be addressed by the creation of new laws (with even harsher penalties) for any caught using these technologies.

Ultimately, advances in computing machinery (i.e. quantum computers etc.) and mathematic theory will lead to the government cracking the Undernet protocols. But rather than shut it down, government will by now realize it provides them with the ultimate sandbox to contain those wishing to operate outside the law. So other than the prosecution of more serious criminals, plus the occasional token victim (just to let everybody know your government still "on it"), the Undernet will continue to be unofficially tolerated. But only under the ever watchful eye of government in order to serve as a technology containment and societal pressure relief mechanism.

At which point human society will enter into a completely new phase of it's existence which might as well be called The Panopticon Age since universal surveillance will be the dominant shaping technology of that era.

***

So there you have it: Internet begets Overnet begets Undernet begets Panopticon. Sounds almost biblical doesn't it? ;D

Figure this will all likely come to pass within the next 25-30 years. But definitely before the end of this century. (And once again, I sincerely hope I'm wrong. :o)
Pages: prev1 ... 115 116 117 118 119 [120] 121 122 123 124 125 ... 470next