topbanner_forum
  *

avatar image

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
  • Thursday November 13, 2025, 4:47 pm
  • Proudly celebrating 15+ years online.
  • Donate now to become a lifetime supporting member of the site and get a non-expiring license key for all of our programs.
  • donate

Recent Posts

Pages: prev1 ... 115 116 117 118 119 [120] 121 122 123 124 125 ... 252next
2976
By the way, I have to say something regarding adult content:
Adult content isn't necessarily malware.  yes, it tends to be found on sites that have bad stuff going on, but just because it's adult content doesn't mean it's harmful to your computer.  For example, a well designed page with some booby pictures around isn't a harmful thing.  I mean, sometimes that's why you (or I) are visiting the site!  My point is that I don't consider parental control issues in the same vein as security issues.  i don't have kids, I'm a grown man, i don't need to filter out any mature content.

I make it a point here because I don't think I intend to include parental control issues in my official list.  That's a separate topic as far as I'm concerned.  now, if it's a popup that has adult content, that's bad.  But that would be true no matter what the popup content was.  It's not the content, it's the popup that's bad.

The same goes with...er..."modified" programs.  Just because a program has been modified doesn't mean it's bad.  Yes, there's a much greater chance of it being bad vs an unmodified program, but that doesn't mean it's bad.  The scanners and security software should be able to tell the difference.

Maybe I'm wrong here, especially morally.  But this isn't about morals.  This is about filtering out harmful content and situations.  It's like saying, "There's the possibility of getting an ankle sprain playing basketball.  Therefore, I'm not going to play basketball."  A lot of you say similar things, "I never visit pron sites, so I never get any viruses.  I have never gotten a virus ever.  i don't even use an antivirus program."  OK...so what are we supposed to do with that information?  All we can do, logically speaking, is congratulate you for your accomplishment.  But it doesn't help anyone figure out how to protect against harmful things.

It reminds me of the popular message when we were in high school, "Abstinence is the best prevention for STD's."  Ok...thanks, sort of.  But you do realize that at some point, I'm going to..well...do it.  Then what?  Oh no...that's not a good message.
2977
Thanks app!  Lots of helpful and valuable information there.  Let me reread it a couple times and I'll add some more things to the list in the first post.  Your method sounds very sensible and flexible, I like it a lot.  One thing I want to try on my computer is running MSE as the live scanner, and relegating Kaspersky (which is already running) to just an on-demand scanner.  I like Kaspersky for it's supposedly powerful detection abilities, but in the past couple of years, I think it's getting too sensitive.  Before, it hardly had any false positives.  Now, it's getting more.  I think Eugene Kaspersky is really getting a little too crazy with it.  He's too suspicious of everything and I think it's reflected in the program.  but that's just my feeling.
2978
General Software Discussion / Re: Can we talk about mkv files here please?
« Last post by superboyac on January 12, 2011, 09:27 PM »
What we need is something like this:
When the player detects an mkv file, it should enable the appearance of a few buttons on the taskbar or wherever the navigation buttons normally are.  Those buttons should be stuff like previous/next chapter, enable/disable subtitles, dropdown for additional audio tracks (commentary, languages).  It wouldn't hurt to have a dropdown also for just a list of chapters to jump to quickly.

Another suggestion would be something like this: if it detects an mkv file, it can have a fake dvd-like menu appear if you press a certain button.  What this will do is bring up a text list of the chapters, audio options, etc. right on the screen, and you can click on your choice with the mouse.

This is the kind of stuff I'm looking for.  Right-clicking and using the menus is ok, but not all that great.  It seems to me that mkv files just aren't all that popular yet.  They should be, they have the advantage in just about every way i can think of.
2979
I think it still exists, at least I'm still showing definition updates for it in my Windows Update History.
Duly noted.  Thanks.
2980
General Software Discussion / Re: Can we talk about mkv files here please?
« Last post by superboyac on January 12, 2011, 07:19 PM »
Thanks 4wd!  That's very helpful.  That's the way i do it also.

So now I'm wondering if anyone has found a good player that can do all this without menus or context menus.  Actual buttons along the bottom.  I can't seem to find any.  Maybe we just have to wait a little longer until mkv files become more popular, and then we'll start seeing buttons and other conveniences develop.
2981
General Software Discussion / Re: Which is the real KMPlayer?
« Last post by superboyac on January 12, 2011, 07:16 PM »
+1 w/JavaJones

Tried Potplayer. Didn't like it. :nono2:

I have a copy of VLC Media Player installed "just in case." But I rarely (if ever) use it.

AFAIC it begins and ends with KMPlayer. Lovely piece of software. :-*

 :)
+2 for me also.  I keep trying to go away from KMP for no real good reason; just to try something new I guess.  But i always go back to it.  It works, it's fast, it can do anything I ask it to.  I play half of my videos with KMP, the other half with Light Alloy.  i have my reasons, they wouldn't necessarily make sense to others.  So if I had to choose, it would be KMP.
2982
Windows Defender is a Anti-Spyware program - not a firewall.
I know.  It was just a placeholder.  I'll clean it all up eventually.  Does Windows Defender even exist anymore?  I was under the impression that MSE superseded it.
2983
FWIW SFFS works well for me. (Or should that have been FWIW SFFS WWFM?)
-cranioscopical (January 12, 2011, 04:40 PM)

LOL!  8)
I think what you really mean is:
2984
FWIW SFFS works well for me. (Or should that have been FWIW SFFS WWFM?)
-cranioscopical (January 12, 2011, 04:40 PM)
I'm still waiting for the thought-to-text software to mature.  Who needs keyboards?
2985
WinPatrol!
I totally forgot about it.  Definitely something to include here.  What category would that fall under?  Startup protection?  Application Nazi?  Watchdog?
2986
Yes JJ.  All true.
that's why i think it would be helpful to establish this list here.  That way, others can have some kind of assurance that the stuff on the list plays nice with each other.  After all, it's donationcoder approved!

I might even add an extra box with some directions below the list specifiying exactly how to set up each software to play nice.  I feel like something like this can be very helpful for people.  It's not the easiest topic to get your head around.
2987
Living Room / Re: Would someone mind recommending a good laser printer?
« Last post by superboyac on January 12, 2011, 04:18 PM »
I never completed this adventure.  By Friday, I believe I am going to go to the store and buy the Brother Brother HL-5370DW printer.  I like to finish what I start.
2988
Haha, good one.  Yeah, i don't really know specifically.  I have not kept up with academia much in the past few years.  I was speaking more practically than anything else.  I'll put it this way, if I were to do it, I'd focus on taking as few formal classes as necessary.  So first I'd check to see what the actuary jobs require as far as degrees and certificates.  I'd get the bare minimum.  Then, to really become an expert, I'd self-study using recommended books, and, ideally, I'd find a good mentor I can talk to regularly.
I know there are several sequential exams or certificates you have to get to become a real actuary, so I would really focus on getting those as soon as possible.  That way, i can get employed as soon as possible, and that's the hardest part.  Once you are employed, the rest of it will develop a little more naturally.
2989
General Software Discussion / Re: SyncBackSE vs. SuperFlexible
« Last post by superboyac on January 12, 2011, 03:33 PM »
I know this is an old thread, but I wanted to address just a few of of tranglos' SFFS comments.

The program has improved over the past 3 years.  The scheduler is much more stable now, and not as confusing as it once was with the promts for ExtremeSync and what not.  Now, the scheduling dialog is pretty straight forward and works better.  I, too, was confused intially by all the startup/stopping background scheduler, extremesynce, etc. issues.  I haven't experienced anything like that in the past year anymore.

The interface is slightly improved, but overall still the same.  It's not good.  I hate to say that because it's such a good program and Tobias is pretty helpful.  But the interface is a little bit wacky.  SFFS would definitely be the hands-down favorite if the interface was fixed.  For example, when you want to just sync certain folders, you are presented with the following radio buttons:
screenshot_20110112132854.png
So you would ask, "How do I select the folders?" Well, when you click the radio button for select folders and files, then the explorer tree hierarchy dialog pops up.  But that REALLY strange because radio buttons shouldn't behave that way.  Radio buttons should only move the dot around to the selected item, not activate additional dialogs or windows.  What it SHOULD be is like that "Browse" button above it.  When a user sees that button, he expects a dialog to pop up.

That's just one example.  The whole interface needs to be revamped.  I was hoping it was going to happen for v5, but it didn't.  All those horizontal tabs, and the tabs within the tabs within the list of tabs needs to just be reorganized and cleaned up.  It's way too much.  But that's the only complaint I have about the software.
2990
@Carol - do you have any strong opinions about the paid versions of SyncBack - performance and stability-wise? I'm due to update some similar software I'm not über happy with, so I'm open for recommendations right now.

Anything you'd care to share would be appreciated. :)
40hz, have you considered Super Flexible?
http://www.superflexible.com/
I use it and am happy with it, but I wouldn't mind exploring the SFFS vs. Syncback discussion.  I like SFFS, except for some complaints about the interface.  It looks like Syncback's interface is better, but I wonder if I would miss any of the features from SFFS.
2991
i don't care what kind of bad stuff.  But if I need multiple programs to deal with the multiple kinds of bad stuff, that's fine.  My goal is simply to cover all bases and I'll use the proper lingo when necessary.
Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware is designed to supplement what an AV program does and to catch the things most AV programs are likely to miss.  It can be used on demand or (in the Pro version) you can schedule it to run scans at a specific time.  Also, its database is updated multiple times a day.  I've been using it for about two years, and I like the feeling of extra security that it gives me.  Since I rarely if ever have any malware on my computer, I can't say it has made a difference except to my peace of mind.
Same here.  i like having it around.  i really like these programs that "play nice" with your other security software.  I know years ago, the rule was to NEVER EVER install multiple security software on the same machine because all sorts of things would go wrong.  Is that still the case?  I hope not, because all these programs do things a little differently, and it would be great to have a large toolbox of effective, overlapping, redundant software that wouldn't screw up your pc.  It's nonsense that you can't have two antivirus programs installed.  I understand not having two AV programs doing real-time scanning, but you should be able to have as many on-demand programs as possible.  The developers should design their stuff in a way to allow for this.
2992
General Software Discussion / Re: Another reason to drop Kaspersky?
« Last post by superboyac on January 12, 2011, 12:02 PM »
My reason is that I just don't like to send information anywhere.  It doesn't matter to me whether I'm helping MS or not.  I'm not saying it's not good to send info back, i just wouldn't do it.  I don't have a technical reason for it other than I just like the idea of never sending anything anywhere unless I'm deliberately trying to.  I'm a control freak, in case you haven't noticed.
2993
Does MSE have good on-demand scanning?  Like, can I right-click a folder/file and scan it real quick?

On a related note, what are some recommended on-demand scanning for antivirus, malware, etc.?

Yes it does have on-demand...
Great.
Next question, is there another on-demand scanner that people prefer?  Or is the MSE one good.  How about on-demand malware scanning, or on-demand scanning programs that might do something better or different than MSE?  I know that sounds vague, but again, I really don't understand the difference between malware, virus, rootkit.  it seems like some products are considered antivirus, others are anti-malware, others are rootkit stuff, etc.  To me, they are all just "bad stuff" that can get on your computer.  That's the only category I care about.  i don't care what kind of bad stuff.  But if I need multiple programs to deal with the multiple kinds of bad stuff, that's fine.  My goal is simply to cover all bases and I'll use the proper lingo when necessary.
2994
> on-demand scanning
this is one part of the picture I don't get.  I assume that my AV program will catch a bad file or email either when it appears on my system or when I go to open it.  I can see wanting to be able to double-check something suspiscious before opening it, but why wouldn't this be pretty much unnecessary, belt & suspenders?
With all due respect, I don't see why anyone would argue against this.  It's not uncommon for something to get past your initial defenses.  So, yes, it would be nice if you could double-check or just check something that you feel is suspicious.  I don't see why someone wouldn't want to have that ability.  Is it the extra software installation that you don't like?  The space it takes up?  The memory it uses?  I don't understand why you wouldn't want this.  it doesn't hurt anything, it only helps.
2995
Does MSE have good on-demand scanning?  Like, can I right-click a folder/file and scan it real quick?

On a related note, what are some recommended on-demand scanning for antivirus, malware, etc.?
2996
That's good information.  Well, maybe we have our answer for the antivirus/firewall categories.  Maybe I should categorize that as the real-time protection.
2997
General Software Discussion / Re: Another reason to drop Kaspersky?
« Last post by superboyac on January 12, 2011, 11:28 AM »
Ah, yes I see. AFAICT, the first option as shown in Timns screenshot should allow you to opt out completely. As noted, I haven't opted out and don't intend to, but I can confirm that the option is present in MSE 2.0.
Nice.  Great to know.  Man, I swear just last month, that first option wasn't there.  Just the other two.  Hmmm, I may be losing it.
2998
General Software Discussion / Re: Another reason to drop Kaspersky?
« Last post by superboyac on January 12, 2011, 11:22 AM »
That's reasonable.  Still, if it's available, I'll opt out.  I'll try it again, but can someone confirm the opt thing?

In version 1.x the choice was between sending a little less information to MS and sending a little more.

In version 2.x, fresh out of beta, there is a "No, thanks" option as well.
Thanks tranglos.  That's exactly what I was looking for.  It sounds like you are using it.  Are you happy with it's performance like Darwin?
2999
General Software Discussion / Re: Another reason to drop Kaspersky?
« Last post by superboyac on January 12, 2011, 11:17 AM »
:huh:  Not to be dense, but what sort of confirmation do you need? Are you seeking someone who HAS opted out to verify that doing so REALLY results in no data being sent back to the MS mother ship?
I just wanted to know if you CAN opt out.  Nobody has said definitely "yes you can".  Only you think you can.  i tried it less than 4 weeks ago and I couldn't find a way to opt out.  That's all.  I mean, once I go home, I'll know for sure.
3000
General Software Discussion / Re: Another reason to drop Kaspersky?
« Last post by superboyac on January 12, 2011, 11:13 AM »
Cut down on the paranoia.

This is Microsoft - if anything dubious was being sent back to them, the whole internet would be in uproar with pitchforks and torches. And the bits and pieces sent back to them helps a lot in discovering new pieces of malware as well as keeping false positives low.

I'm not a fan of sending back data, but this is one of the things I haven't opted out of.
That's reasonable.  Still, if it's available, I'll opt out.  I'll try it again, but can someone confirm the opt thing?
Pages: prev1 ... 115 116 117 118 119 [120] 121 122 123 124 125 ... 252next