Not necessarily. The youtube linking code is an add on to SMF, while the image code is inbuilt. Therefore, there could have been allowances made for images that would not have taken into account the youtube markup.
____________________________
-wraith808
Ah, I see. So, if that is possible, then who would be in a position to determine whether there were "allowances made for images that would not have taken into account the youtube markup."?
@mouser seems to think is is a "bug" of some sort. Presumably he would know?
-IainB
A bug is
a defect or imperfection, as in a mechanical device, computer program, or plan; glitch. However, that does not cover all of what a bug or defect is. A bug is
any an unexpected defect, fault, flaw, or imperfection found in a program. Just because it can be capitalized on, doesn't make it not a "bug". That's what mouser meant. He wouldn't even necessarily know, as it seems that he didn't before I brought it up. But I think this conversation is descending into the highest form of pedantry.
It is an unexpected flaw that mouser sees as a feature, and will not correct, as the general consensus is that it is useful to explain any video post (more than an image) as they, not being hosted on the server, can disappear, leaving a gap in the flow of the thread. In addition, text can be indexed for later retrieval by a simple text search- videos can't.
That seems to be enough to answer the question brought up in this thread, so I will leave it with that.