276
Living Room / Re: How do you resist buying ever more powerful PCs?
« Last post by Edvard on July 15, 2015, 12:53 AM »I just look at my bank account the day after payday... no resistance required.

Welcome to the home of Motion, a software motion detector.
Motion is a program that monitors the video signal from cameras. It is able to detect if a significant part of the picture has changed; in other words, it can detect motion.
News:
webcamXP Free and webcamXP Private now with Motion and Audio Detection. We have decided to extend the features of those 2 versions to allow everybody to put in place home security even with the free version. The only feature which remains specific to webcamXP / webcam 7 PRO is the continuous recording (DVR). A license for webcamXP Private allows supporting up to 4 cameras and removing or changing the webcamXP watermark displayed over the video streams and recordings.

Any person who intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication…intentionally discloses, or endeavors to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subsection; intentionally uses, or endeavors to use, the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subsection…
You probably think that this is a really stupid idea—the concept that you could be violating the law merely by monitoring what a trespasser does on a system you own. But that’s just your common sense speaking, and any lawyer will tell you that the law has little or nothing to do with common sense.

are you sure it's that simple? they work shifts and they even have managers/supervisors and they are whole departments of law companies
I am in UK, maybe things are different here?-kalos (June 23, 2015, 03:13 AM)

WebAssembly, or wasm for short, is intended to be a portable bytecode that will be efficient for browsers to download and load, providing a more efficient target for compilers than plain JavaScript or even asm.js. Like, for example, .NET bytecode, wasm instructions operate on native machine types such as 32-bit integers, enabling efficient compilation. It's also designed to be extensible, to make it easy to add, say, support for SIMD instruction sets like SSE and AVX.
Mozilla, Google, Microsoft and Apple have decided to develop a binary format for the web. Called WebAssembly, this format could be a compilation target for any programming language, enabling applications to run in the browser or other agents.
...
WebAssembly is meant to allow programs written in languages other than JavaScript to run in the browser and other JS agents on the server, mobile or IoT.
What computer is she using?-Arizona Hot (May 20, 2015, 04:11 PM)

I don't even know where to begin... words cannot describe the evil.
It was November of last year when I purchased my first jar of drug butter.
...

both look good there - but #2 is preferable I think - and more foolproof too-tomos (May 05, 2015, 03:41 AM)
I'm still confused by the above:-tomos (May 05, 2015, 04:00 AM)
So, a group of tasks can ultimately be treated as one task,
...
I have no ideas about difficulties of implementation. What do you think?
Maybe this is not yet implemented:
tasks are not saved on closing.

I like version 2 for layout, though I wonder if it was a typo that the task-begin-end-total bar was left out?
It just seems we're so close to everything, because if there is a "stopwatch mode", then it can start with a timer of 0, start-stop works as normal, and "lap" creates its own "pseudo-tasks" aka the laps breaking down the segments of each task, below the main header of it.
It feels to me like this should be easy ... but famous last words?-TaoPhoenix (May 04, 2015, 03:28 AM)

I notice:should it not simply reset to zero? (again, I may be missing an application)
- create, say, three tasks - without using reset (let each run for a time before creating the next)
- then create a fourth task - it will show the endtime of task #3 in the timer
- try Reset on task #4 - it reverts to endtime of task #2
-tomos (May 03, 2015, 04:49 AM)

). I can fix that, just the clock window may have to be a bit larger. On my box, I use the Euromode font as my main font; I love the square-ish look and it's very legible, more so than the fonts it was inspired from (Microgramma and Eurostile) and makes a very nice clock face. I wish I could embed it in my program, but I'm sure there would be licensing issues or something. I didn't set the font, Lazarus just uses whatever the default is if I don't set it explicitly, so looks like it chose something funky 

I was trying to keep the timekeeping as simple as possible because even as it is I had a devil of a time keeping the time set-able but synchronized with real time, and the correct time showing up in the correct places. That's why I made it so when you make a new task, the old task is "closed out"; that is, the time is finalized. That can be changed in the final CSV file, but if I'm interpreting Tomos' comments correctly, maybe I should make it so you can switch between tasks to add time to a previous one.