26901
Living Room / Re: A Very Simple Ethical Principle for Search: Google Fails Miserably
« Last post by mouser on May 05, 2007, 10:28 AM »I think onyx and broken85 make some good points.
I wouldn't want to be taking traffic away from the small little sites who are managing to make some money from ads on their pages. I really want these small sites to survive and do well.
Even if i might be happier with a more community-involved micro-donation funding system for them, i'm not at all opposed in principal to sites making money from ads.
Actually i don't find most google ads on pages particularly annoying.
It's not the ads per se that i'm trying to avoid.
But i am keenly interested in the idea that google has its own little "wink and grin" secret ranking algorithms which they don't want to explain or justify, and entire industries of seo trying to find ways to squeeze their sites to the top of google ranked results to make more money, content be damned.
So the idea of empowering individuals to bypass this ranking system and "re-rank" results based seems intriguing. Now having said that, i agree with broken85 that in fact google does (and has always done) a damn good job of ranking results. That's one of the reason they beat out the competition is that they do such a damn good job of putting relevant finds up top. So i'm not sure if such a tool is needed YET.
On the other hand, the temptation for google to start messing with result rankings to increase the scores of pages containing adsense, etc., and if they ever go in that direction, it would be nice to have a way to counter it.
I wouldn't want to be taking traffic away from the small little sites who are managing to make some money from ads on their pages. I really want these small sites to survive and do well.
Even if i might be happier with a more community-involved micro-donation funding system for them, i'm not at all opposed in principal to sites making money from ads.
Actually i don't find most google ads on pages particularly annoying.
It's not the ads per se that i'm trying to avoid.
But i am keenly interested in the idea that google has its own little "wink and grin" secret ranking algorithms which they don't want to explain or justify, and entire industries of seo trying to find ways to squeeze their sites to the top of google ranked results to make more money, content be damned.
So the idea of empowering individuals to bypass this ranking system and "re-rank" results based seems intriguing. Now having said that, i agree with broken85 that in fact google does (and has always done) a damn good job of ranking results. That's one of the reason they beat out the competition is that they do such a damn good job of putting relevant finds up top. So i'm not sure if such a tool is needed YET.
On the other hand, the temptation for google to start messing with result rankings to increase the scores of pages containing adsense, etc., and if they ever go in that direction, it would be nice to have a way to counter it.

Recent Posts

