2651
As for #1, there are lots of cases where uninstalling leaves behind trivial stuff that is not used for any purpose -- sometimes just because deleting it seems pointless, or because a reinstall should preserve the settings, etc. Sometimes people freak out about such things. I think in order to be upset or care, you'd really want to show that WOT is using this left over undeleted information for nefarious purposes. I'm not saying someone shouldn't document how to clear this information or that i know whether or not it's being used, i'm just saying that just because info is left over after an uninstall is not in itself reason to freak out.-mouser (December 07, 2013, 10:12 PM)

Just curious to know... any developments?-dcwul62 (December 07, 2013, 02:23 AM)

Did you think of a name? Something like the "Ultimate Attribute Changer" (UAC)![]()
Examples
a. a GUI that shows current dates (created/modified/last accessed) and preview of changes before applying
b. an easy way to synchronize dates after created, or modified, or last accessed
c. a randomize dates option: so, you can updated modified dates with randomized dates and times using a certain period
d. add your update folderdates of course
e. add date-time (userdefined format) to filenames (not really a 'attribute changer'-thing, but maybe it can be added)
f. update modified dates after dates or dates/times in filename (a difficult one, I know, am not sure if it is possible, there are a lot of combinations)
Maybe also add
- option to simulate?
and/or
- log changes, so users can easily 'undo' changes

* Donot know if it is possible at all *
It won't allow 'delete' of the entries.
So what is the name of the file with all those entries and where is it located I wonder?-bit (December 06, 2013, 11:49 PM)



gmail is terrible at this. if someone sets my email as *their* recovery address, gmail merrily sends me a congratulatory message (with an advice to disregard if it was not intentional). shouldn't they first send a verification code to the person who keyed-in my email as their recovery email?-lanux128 (December 04, 2013, 10:21 PM)

Just Delete Me-bit (November 22, 2013, 02:30 AM)
It looks as though some have discovered a way to prevent AutoIt from being decompiled. (Although you are not allowed to talk about that on the AutoIt forum.)-vbmark (December 05, 2013, 02:43 PM)
Obfuscation (as practiced by Obfuscator and as demonstrated in the snippets posted above by the OP) has never and will never be a problem. All that is changed is the script itself.
Altering an already compiled exe to prevent decompilation is also not a problem - several threads have been allowed showing how this might be done. However, we are certainly not going to to give official blessing to anything which might act in such a manner - it is for the individual to test them and decide whether they are suitable. And as has been already been pointed out, mentioning decompilation is best avoided here - a good reason for the results of any such tests to remain private.
What is a problem is altering the AutoIt3.exe or Aut2Exe.exe executables - that is against the EULA.

Description
File system/directory monitoring utilities with loggin and task processing support (can execute files or make a WCF service call). Multiple configuration options. Source code libraries can be used to create a custom file system monitor.
]I think I would have phrased the Amazon Delivery by Drone question in the FAQ as "is this for f***ing real?" versus just asking if it was science fiction...
http://www.amazon.com/b?ref_=tsm_1_tw_s_amzn_mx3eqp&node=8037720011-vrgrrl (December 02, 2013, 12:53 PM)
Me too ... But I think they're just trying to get people used to having things buzzing overhead so that the ones with cameras don't stand out so much.-Stoic Joker (December 02, 2013, 03:58 PM)
Just tried it. It's still slow but it's not broken UK newspaper loads much faster.-cranioscopical (November 30, 2013, 10:18 PM)

Also IIRC it reports in UTC so the disparity should match your time zone offset.-Stoic Joker (November 26, 2013, 07:02 AM)

| Event ID | Event Type | Event Source | Event |
| 1 | INFORMATION | Power-Troubleshooter | The system has resumed from Sleep |
| 12 | INFORMATION | Kernel-General | The operating system started at system time |
| 13 | INFORMATION | Kernel-General | The operating system is shutting down at system time |
| 41 | CRITICAL | Kernel-Power | The system has rebooted without cleanly shutting down first. |
| 42 | INFORMATION | Kernel-Power | The system is entering sleep. |
| 109 | INFORMATION | Kernel-Power | The kernel power manager has initiated a shutdown transition. |
| 1073 | WARNING | USER32 | The attempt by user <user> to restart/shutdown computer <computername> failed |
| 1074 | INFORMATION | USER32 | The process <processname> has initiated the power off of computer <computername> on behalf of user <user> for the following reason: ... |
| 6008 | ERROR | EventLog | The previous system shutdown at <time> on <date> was unexpected. |
Has it been replaced by app.update?-Curt (November 28, 2013, 07:57 AM)
But can MS still do the updates while the PC is not actually running?-dr_andus (November 27, 2013, 05:23 AM)
