<rant>
I hate to say, "I told ya so...," but I did and I remember being raked over the coals by some as a conspiracy buffoon because of my warnings. Anyone that knows me knows I have had concerns about Google doing exactly this, i.e, having the power to manipulate knowledge and using it for their benefit, for some years now. I previously pointed out the validity of Lord Acton's profundity. I have no desire to rub anyone's nose in this and all those that were antagonistic will remain anonymous. There is no need to try and search this forum for those threads. Due to Providence (or call it "luck," if you prefer) all of those threads were wiped out a while back by me (the DC staff had
nothing to do with those events), but that's all I need to say about that.
I have no axe to grind, but I hope now I won't be written off as some nut case. The threats that were real years ago are more real today. Frankly, I'm not worried near as much about what Larry and Sergey are doing as I am when (not if) some Administration usurps Google's autonomy for less-than-benevolent purposes. It is only a matter of time and History, itself is my star witness. "Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely." Human nature will allow nothing else unless that "power" is kept under good regulation by love. Ignore these facts and one day you are going to be unpleasantly surprised. Ask the folks in the Warsaw Ghetto among others.
'Nuff said.

</rant>
I really don't worry about Big G that much anymore. I don't use it (directly) except on rare occasions. Have been using the
Scroogle Scraper for years. Every now and then I get a message from them announcing Big G has changed their algorithm. A day or two later, Scroogle is back online. I have also had some pretty good success with the old
Clusty, which is actually
Yippy now.
I wonder if the way
Scroogle, (actually, this is the "Scroogle Scraper" site) works has any bearing on what is returned? I don't think so, but I was wondering if anyone else did? Anyone know?